The feather mite family Syringobiidae Trouessart, 1896 [Acari, Astigmata, Pterolichoidea]. II. Phylogeny and host-parasite evolutionary relationships

• Autorzy: Dabert J
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

A cladistic reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships between species of the feather mite family Syringobiidae was carried out. The maximum parsimony and neighbor-joining analyses were based on 201 external morphological characters of 65 syringobiid species (two species represented by 2 morphotypes each) and 4 species of pterolichid and ptiloxenid outgroups. The MP analysis produced 2 equally most parsimonious trees that were phylogenetically consistent and topologically very similar to the single tree reconstructed by NJ procedure. The results confirmed the monophyly of the family and monophyly of most syringobiid genera. The generic status of Limosilichus was weakly supported. Intergeneric relationships were most stable and well supported in the basal part of the tree (Plutarchusia-Paidoplutarchusia, Leptosyringobia, Grenieria, Thecarthra) with the exception of the position of the genus Raineria. All remaining species were placed in a large monophyletic clade with weaker statistical support for its internal composition. The present studies revealed the Magimeliinae as a sistergroup of Syringobiidae, a relationship that is discordant with the hitherto prevailing hypothesis. The cospeciation hypothesis was strongly supported statistically as one of the main factors in the current distribution of syringobiid mites on the hosts. However, other evolutionary events including at least four instances of host-switching have also contributed into the contemporary observed host-syringobiid associations. Only among the Laridae have all lineages of Syringobiidae diverged in parallel with host birds and represent members of the original acarofauna. In contrast, most of the syringobiid acarofauna of shore birds (Scolopacida and Charadrioidea) had ancestors on the Laridae and secondarily cospeciated after switching from this host group onto new hosts. The reconciliation results for syringobiid mites were compared with the patterns shown by other commensal mites inhabiting the same hosts - subfamily Avenzoariinae. In Syringobiidae the number of cospeciations was significantly smaller and the contribution of sorting events was significantly greater than in Avenzoariinae. Differences in distribution patterns on hosts (prevalence and density) of these two taxa were probably responsible for the significant differences in importance of particular evolutionary events observed in both taxa. The differences in distribution patterns of Syringobiidae and Avenzoariinae may be related to different degrees of virulence of each taxon. The cospeciation analysis has also allowed reinterpretation of morphological features occurring in many Syringobiidae that are typical of mites inhabiting the vane’s surface. The adaptations are most probably apomorphic reversals due to these syringobiids secondarily reoccupying this microhabitat from the quill environment.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

phylogenesis; Acari; Pterolichoidea; taxonomy; host; feather mite; cladistic analysis; mite conspeciation; phylogenetic relationship; bird; Astigmata; Syringobiidae; host-parasite relationship

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Parasitologica
• Rocznik: 2003
• Tom: 48
• Numer: Suppl.
• Opis fizyczny: p.S185-S233,fig.

Twórcy

autor

Dabert J

• Department of Animal Morphology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, 28 Czerwca 1956 198, 61-485 Poznan, Poland

Bibliografia

• Atyeo W.T., Gaud J. 1971. Feather mites (Analgoidea: Pterolichidae) of the hoatzin (Aves: Galliformes). American Midland Naturalist, 86, 152-159.
• Atyeo W.T., Gaud J. 1979. Feather mites and their hosts. In: Recent Advances in Acarology (Ed. J.G. Rodriguez). Academic Press, New York, 355-361.
• Avise J.C. 1994. Molecular markers, natural history and evolution. Chapman & Hall, New York, London.
• Balance L.T., Pitman R.L. 1999. Foraging ecology of tropical seabirds. In: Proceedings of the 22 International Ornithological Congress, Durban (Eds. N.J. Adams and R.H. Slotow). BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg, 2057-2071.
• Blondel J., Mourer-Chauviré C. 1998. Evolution and history of the western Palaearctic avifauna. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13,488-492.
• Bock W.J. 1958. A generic review of the plovers (Charadriinae) Aves. Bulletin: Museum of Comparative Zoology, 118, 27-97.
• Borowik O.A. 1996. Molecular systematics and the evolution of mating systems in calidridine sandpipers. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto.
• Borowik O.A., McLennan D.A. 1999. Phylogenetic patterns of parental care in calidridine sandpipers. Auk, 116,1107-1117.
• Bremer K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution, 42, 795-803.
• Brooks D.R. 1988. Macroevolutionary comparisons of host and parasite phylogenies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 19, 235-259.
• Bryant H.N. 1997. Hypothetical ancestors and rooting in cladistic analysis. Cladistics, 13, 337-348.
• Carpenter J.M. 1996. Uninformative bootstrapping. Cladistics, 12, 177-181.
• Chandler R. J. 1983. Feeding behaviour of black-headed gull. British Birds, 76, 85-87.
• Charleston M.A. 1998. Jungles: a new solution to the host/parasite phylogeny reconciliation problem. Mathematical Biosciences, 149, 181-223.
• Christian P.D., Christidis L., Schodde R. 1992. Biochemical systematics of the Charadriiformes (shorebirds): relationships between the Charadrii, Scolopaci and Lari. Australian Journal of Zoology, 40, 291-302.
• Chu P. 1994. Historical examination of delayed plumage maturation in the shorebirds (Aves: Charadriiformes). Evolution, 48, 327-350.
• Chu P. 1995. Phylogenetic reanalysis of Strauch’s osteological data set for the Charadriiformes. Condor, 91, 174—196.
• Chu P. 1998. A phylogeny of the gulls (Aves: Larinae) inferred from osteological and integumentary characters. Cladistics, 14, 1-43.
• Cooper A., Penny D. 1997. Mass survival of birds across the cretaceous tertiary boundary: molecular evidence. Science, 275, 1109-1113.
• Cracraft J. 2001. Avian evolution, Gondwana biogeography and the Cretaceous-Tertiary mass extinction event. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B - Biological Sciences, 268,459—469.
• Dabert J. 1987. Morphological analysis of Freyana anatina (Koch, 1844), feather mites (Acari, Freyanoidea). Acta Parasitologica Polonica, 32, 239-262.
• Dabert J. 1992. Feather mites of the Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos (Charadriiformes, Scolopaci) - an attempt at a reconstruction of acarofauna origin (Acari: Astigmata). Genus, 3, 1-11.
• Dabert J. 1994. Kiwilichidae fam. nov. eine neue Federmilbenfamilie (Astigmata, Pterolichoidea). Entomologische Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Hamburg, 11, 101-110.
• Dabert J. 2003. The feather mite family Syringobiidae Trouessart, 1896 (Acari, Astigmata, Pterolichoidea). I. Systematics of the family and description of new taxa. Acta Parasitologica, Suppl., 48, S1-S184.
• Dabert J., Dabert M., Mironov S.V. 2001. Phylogeny of feather mite subfamily Avenzoariinae (Acari: Analgoidea: Avenzoariidae) inferred from combined analyses of molecular and morphological data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 20, 124-135.
• Dabert J., Ehrnsberger R. 1995. Zur Systematik und Phylogenie der Gattung Thecarthra Trouessart, 1896 (Astigmata, Pterolichoidea, Syringobiidae) mit Beschreibung zweier neuer Arten. Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut, 92, 87-116.
• Dabert J., Ehrnsberger R. 1998. Phylogeny of the feather mite family Ptiloxenidae Gaud, 1982 (Acari: Pterolichoidea). In: Arthropod Biology. Contributions to Morphology, Ecology and Systematics (Ed. E. Eberman). Biosystematics and Ecology, Series 14, Vienna.
• Dabert J., Mironov S.V. 1999. Origin and evolution of feather mites (Astigmata). Experimental and Applied Acarology, 23, 437- 454.
• Dabert M. 1997. A fragment of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene as a molecular marker in phylogenetic studies on feather mites. Genus, 8, 743-749.
• Davies M., Bryant D.M. 1983. Lesser black-backed gull completely submerging while plunge-diving. British Birds, 76, 138— 139.
• Dubinin V.B. 1949. Features of the structure and biology of feather mites which inhabit the quills of feathers of terns. Zoologicheskiĭ Zhurnal, 28, 421-430 (In Russian).
• Dubinin V.B. 1951. Feather mites (Analgesoidea). I. Introduction to their study. Fauna SSSR. Paukoobraznye, 6, 1-363 (In Russian).
• Dubinin V.B. 1956. Feather mites (Analgesoidea). III. Family Pterolichidae. Fauna SSSR. Paukoobraznye, 6, 1-814 (In Russian).
• Duffy D.S., Duffy D.C., Wilson R.O. 1984. Kelp gull Larus dominicanus catches fish by plunging. Cormorant, 12, 106.
• Ebach M.C., Ahyong S.T. 2001. Phylogeny of the trilobite subgenus Acanthopyge (Lobopyge). Cladistics, 17, 1-10.
• Ehrnsberger R., Mironov S.V., Dabert J. 2001. A preliminary analysis of phylogenetic relationships of the feather mite family Freyanidae Dubinin, 1953 (Acari: Astigmata). Biological Bulletin Poznan, 38, 181-202.
• Eriksson T. 1998. AutoDecay ver. 4.0. Program distributed by the author, Department of Botany, Stockholm University, Stockholm.
• Evans G.O. 1992. Principles of Acarology. CAB International, Wallingford.
• Favero M. 1995. Antarctic terns Sterna vittata feeding on stranded krill at King George Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Marine Ornithology, 23, 159-160.
• Feduccia A. 1996. The origin and evolution of birds. Yale University Press, New Haven.
• Figuerola J. 1999. A comparative study on the evolution of reversed size dimorphism in monogamous waders. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 67, 1-18.
• Fjeldså J. 1977. Guide to the young of European precocial birds. Skarv.
• Futyuma D.J. 1998. Evolutionary biology. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
• Gaud J. 1982. Acariens sarcoptiformes plumicoles des oiseaux Ciconiiformes d’Afrique II. Parasites des Ciconiidae, Scopidae et Phoenicopteridae. Revue de Zoologie Africaines, 96, 335-357.
• Gaud J., Atyeo W.T. 1979. Co-évolution des acariens sarcoptiformes plumicoles et de leurs hôtes. Acarologia, 21,291-306.
• Gaud J., Atyeo W.T. 1996. Feather mites of the world (Acarina, Astigmata): The supraspecific taxa. Part 1 Text. Musee Royal de l'Afrique - Tervuren, Belgique Annales, Ser. 8, Sciences Zoologiques, 277, 1-193.
• Gaud J., Atyeo W.T., Klompen J.S.H. 1989. Oconnoriidae, a new family of feather mites (Acarina, Pterolichoidea). Journal of Entomological Science, 24, 417-421.
• Griffiths D.A., Atyeo W.T., Norton R.A., Lynch C.A. 1990. The idiosomal chaetotaxy of astigmatid mites. Journal of Zoology, London, 220, 1-32.
• Hackett S.J. 1989. Effects of varied electrophoretic conditions on detection of evolutionary patterns in the Laridae. Condor, 91, 73-90.
• Hafner M.S., Page R.D.M. 1995. Molecular phylogenies and host- parasite cospeciation: gophers and lice as model system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Ser. B, Biological Sciences, 349, 77-83.
• Hayman P., Marchant J., Prater T. 1991. Shorebirds. An identification guide to the waders of the world. Christopher Helm, A & C Black, London.
• Hillis D.M. 1991. Discriminating between phylogenetic signal and random noise in DNA sequences. In: Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences (Eds. M.M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft). Oxford University Press, New York, 278-294.
• Hillis D.M., Huelsenbeck J.P. 1992. Signal, noise and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analysis. Journal of Heredity, 83, 189-195.
• Hudson P.J., Dobson A.P. 1997. Host-parasite processes and demographic consequences. In: Host-parasite evolution. General principles and avian models (Eds. D.H. Clayton and J. Moore). Oxford University Press, New York, 128-154.
• Johnsgard P.A. 1981. The Plovers, Sandpipers and Snipes of the World. Lincoln & London, University of Nebraska Press.
• Johnson K.P., Drown D.M., Clayton D.H. 2001. A data based parsimony method of cophylogenetic analysis. Zoologica Scripta, 30, 79-87.
• Joseph L., Lessa E.P, Christidis L. 1999. Phylogeny and biogeography in the evolution of migration: shorebirds of the Charadrius complex. Journal of Biogeography, 26, 329-342.
• Kethley J.B., Johnston D.E. 1975. Resource tracking patterns in birds and mammal ectoparasites. Miscellaneous Publications of the Entomological Society of America, 9, 231-236.
• Kim J. 1993. Improving the accuracy of phylogenetic estimation by combining different methods. Systematic Biology, 42, 331— 340.
• Kumar S., Gadagkar S.R. 2000. Efficiency of the neighbor-joining method in reconstructing deep and shallow evolutionary relationships in large phylogenies. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 51, 544-553.
• Leung B. 1998. Aggregated parasite distribution on hosts in a homogeneous environment: examining the Poisson null model. International Journal for Parasitology, 28, 1709-1712.
• Maddison D.R., Maddison W.P. 2002. MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 4.05. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
• Mironov S.V. 1987. Morphological adaptations of feather mites to different types of plumage and skin of birds. Parazitologicheskiĭ Sbornik, 34, 114-132 (In Russian).
• Mironov S.V. 1991a. Coevolutionary relationships of the feather mite family Avenzoariidae (Acariformes: Analgoidea) with birds. Parazitologiya, 25, 473-493 (In Russian).
• Mironov S.V. 1991b. Phylogeny of the feather mites family Avenzoariidae (Acariformes: Analgoidea). Parazitologiya, 25, 281— 296 (In Russian).
• Mironov S.V., Dabert J. 1999. phylogeny and co-speciation in feather mites of the subfamily Avenzoariinae (Analgoidea: Avenzoariidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology, 21, 525-549.
• Moynihan M. 1959. A revision of the family Laridae (Aves). American Museum Novitates, 1928, 1-42.
• Nixon K.C., Carpenter J.M. 1993. On outgroups. Cladistics, 9, 413- 426.
• Olsen K.M., Larsson H. 1997. Skuas and Jaegers: A Guide to the Skuas and Jaegers of the World. Pica Press, Sussex.
• Page R.D.M. 1990. Temporal congruence and cladistic analysis of biogeography and cospeciation. Systematic Zoology, 39, 205-226.
• Page R.D.M. 1994. Parallel phylogenies: reconstructing the history of host-parasite assemblages. Cladistics, 10, 155-173.
• Page R.D.M. 1995. TreeMap ver. 1.0. Program distributed by the author. Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
• Page R.D.M. 1996. Tree View: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Applications in the Biosciences, 12,357-358.
• Page R.D.M. 1998. TreeView ver. 1.5.2. Program distributed by the author. Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
• Page R.D.M. 2001. NDE: NEXUS Data Editor 0.5.0. Program distributed by the author. Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
• Page R.D.M., Charleston M.A. 1998. Trees within trees: phylogeny and historical associations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13,356-359.
• Page R.D.M., Lee P.L.M., Becher S.A., Griffiths R., Clayton D.H. 1998. A different tempo of mitochondrial DNA evolution in birds and their parasitic lice. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 9, 276-293.
• Paterson A.M., Banks J. 2001. Analytical approaches to measuring cospeciation of host and parasites: through a glass, darkly. International Journal for Parasitology, 31, 1012-1022.
• Paterson A.M., Palma R.L., Gray R.D. 1999. How frequently do avian lice miss the boat? Implications for coevolutionary studies. Systematic Biology, 48, 214-223.
• Paterson A.M., Palma R.L., Gray R.D. 2003. Drowning on arrival, missing the boat and x-events: How likely are sorting events? In: Tangled trees: phylogeny, cospeciation and coevolution (Ed. R.D.M. Page). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
• Paterson A.M., Wallis G.P., Wallis L. J., Gray R.D. 2000. Seabird and louse coevolution: complex histories revealed by 12S rRNA sequences and reconciliation analyses. Systematic Biology, 49, 383-399.
• Penny D., Hendy M.D. 1985. The use of tree comparison metrics. Systematic Zoology, 34, 75-82.
• Randi E., Spina F. 1987. An electrophoretic approach to the systematics of Italian gulls and terns (Aves, Laridae and Stemidae). Monitore Zoologico Italiano (N.S.), 21,317-344.
• Rhijn J.G. van 1990. Unidirectionality in the phylogeny of social organization, with special reference to birds. Behaviour, 115, 154-174.
• Rhijn J.G. van 1991. Comparison and evolution 5.1. Taxonomic relationships. In: The Ruff. T & AD Poyser, London, 161-170.
• Ronquist F. 1995. Reconstructing the history of host-parasite associations using generalized parsimony. Cladistics, 11, 73-89.
• Sanderson M.J., Donoghue M.J. 1989. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution, 43, 1781-1795.
• Schnell G.D. 1970a. A phenetic study of the suborder Lari (Aves) I. Methods and results of principal components analyses. Systematic Zoology, 19, 35-57.
• Schnell G.D. 1970b. A phenetic study of the suborder Lari (Aves) II. Phenograms, discussion and conclusions. Systematic Zoology, 19, 264-302.
• Sibley C.G., Ahlquist J.E. 1990. Phylogeny and classification of birds. A study in molecular evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven.
• Sites J.W. Jr., Davis S.K., Guerra T., Iverson J.B., Snell H.L. 1996. Character congruence and phylogenetic signal in molecular and morphological data sets: A case study in the living iguanas (Squamata, Iguanidae). Molecular Biology and Evolution, 13, 1087-1105.
• StatSoft Inc. 2000. Statistica for Windows (Computer program manual), Tulsa, Oklahoma.
• Strauch J.G. 1978. The phylogeny of the Charadriiformes (Aves): a new estimate using the method of character compatibility analysis. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London, 34, 263-345.
• Swofford D.L. 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
• Swofford D.L., Maddison W.P. 1987. Reconstructing ancestral character states under Wagner parsimony. Mathematical Biosciences, 87, 199-229.
• Székely T., Reynolds J.D., Figuerola J. 2000. Sexual size dimorphism in shorebirds, gulls and alcids: the influence of sexual and natural selection. Evolution, 54, 1404-1413.
• Thompson G. 1997. Common, black-headed and Mediterranean gulls plunge-diving. British Birds, 90, 360-361.
• Watrous L.E., Wheeler Q.D. 1981. The out-group comparison method of character analysis. Systematic Zoology, 30, 1-11.
• Wiens J.J., Servedio M.R. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis and intraspecific variation: performance of parsimony, likelihood and distance methods. Systematic Biology, 47, 228-253.