Genotypic within-colony interactions and the colony defense in Apis mellifera

• Autorzy: Borsuk G. , Paleolog J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The authors studied how genotypic variability within colonies affects their defensive response. Different genetic types of bees were used in the experiments. The influence of the artificially generated within-colony genotypic diversity on the colony defence was investigated. Common stinging assays were performed. Time to the first sting was (TFS) and the number of stings made to the leather target within 2 minutes (NS) were recorded. The contribution of both defensive and gentle workers in the defensive response of the colonies being a physical mix of two such worker types was also studied (film analysis of the bees attacking the target). It was concluded that the within-colony, inter-worker genotypic interactions influenced the colony defense response due to the fact that the quantified value of the colony was usually not the additive composite of diverse worker groups of which the colony was composed. Moreover, the inter-worker interactions were dependent both on the quantified characteristics, which were different for TFS and NS, and on the types of the combined bees. The film analysis revealed that the contribution of defensive/gentle bees to the colony defense only partly reflect the defensive : gentle worker ratio in the colonies composed of such worker types. The contribution also depended on the types of mixed workers.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

mixed colony; honey bee; genotypic interaction; sociobiology; colony; Apis mellifera; defensive behaviour

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities. Series Biology
• Rocznik: 2005
• Tom: 08
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume8/issue3/art-04.html

Twórcy

autor

Borsuk G.

• Agricultural University in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland

autor

Paleolog J.

Bibliografia

• Brodschneider R., Arnold G., Hrassingg N., Crailsheim K., 2004 - Alien honeybees do their job well: Scouting and recruiting in drifted bees. Proc. of the first European Conf. of Apidology, Udine, Italy. - 57.
• Collins A., Rinderer T., Tucker K., 1988 - Colony defence of two honeybee types and their hybrid. 1. Naturally mated queens, J. apic. Res. 27(3), 141-145.
• DeGrandi-Hofman G., Collins A., Martin H., Schmidt O., Spangler H., 1998 - Nest defense behavior in colonies from crosses between Africanized and European Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Insect Behav. 11(1), 37-45.
• Guzman-Novoa R., Page R. E., 1994 - Genetic dominance and worker interactions affect honeybee colony defense, Behavioral Ecology 5, 91-97.
• Kastberger G., Thenius R., Hepburn R., 2004 - Defense strategies in western honeybees: Docility versus aggressiveness. Proc. of the first European Conf. of Apidology, Udine, Italy. - 60-61.
• Koeniger G., 1986 - Reproduction and mating behaviour, in: Rinderer T. E., Honey Bee Genetics and Breeding, Academic Press, Inc., New York.
• Kolmens S., A., 1989 - Measurments of stinging behaviour in indywidual worker honeybbees (A. mellifera). J. Apic. Res. 28(2), 71-78.
• Page R. E., Robinson G, E,. (1991) - The genetics of division of the labour in honey bee colonies. Adv. Insect Physiol. 23, 117-169.
• Paxton R. J., Sakamoto C. H., Rugiga F. C., 1994 - Modification of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) stinging behaviour by within-colony environment and age. J. apic. Res. 33(2), 75-82.
• Robinson G, E,. Page R. E., 1995 - Genotypic constraints on plasticity for corpse removal in honey bee colonies. Anim. Behav. 49, 867-876.
• Stort A. C., 1974 - Genetic study of aggressiveness of two subspecies of Apis melifera in Brazil. 1. Some tests to measure aggressiveness, J. apic. Res. 13(1), 33-38.
• Taber S., 1988 - Drifting. Gleanings in bee culture. 6, 398-399.
• Woyke J., 1992 - Diurnal and seasonal variation in defensive behaviour of Apis mellifera adansoni in Ghana. Apidologie. 23(4), 311-322.