PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2006 | 09 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

The role of macrophytes in the diurnal distribution of crustacean zooplankton in a littoral of a shallow, macrophyte-dominated lake

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
In a mesotrophic, shallow, macrophyte-dominated lake, stable plant cover can be attractive for zooplankton species being a grazer or a prey; dense submerged vegetation, Chara beds in particular, can offer a day-time refuge for cladocerans and some adult copepods. The former use this shelter also at night; on the contrary, young stages of Copepoda distinctively avoided both types of plant covered areas during the day and migrated towards open water. That might resulted from the increased grazing upon zooplankton. The pressure of predatory fish in open water probably forced young fish to seek for a shelter. As Chara beds are too dense to be penetrated, they preferred emergent plant zone. That might encourage copepods to undertake reversed DHM. The present study suggests a significant role of plant cover on diurnal zooplankton distribution. Dense charophyte patches could offer a daytime refuge for cladocerans, and some adult forms of Copepoda, while both groups of planktonic invertebrates did not take the advantage of emergent macrophytes cover to avoid fish predation.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

09

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume9/issue2/art-18.html

Twórcy

autor
  • University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, M.Oczapowskiego 5, 10-957 Olsztyn, Poland
autor
autor

Bibliografia

  • Barko J. W., James W. F., 1998. Effects of submerged aquatic macrophytes on nutrient dynamics, sedimentation and resuspension. In: Jeppesen E., Sondergaard M., Christoffersen K (Eds). The structuring role of submerged Macrophytes in Lakes. Springer, New York, pp 197-217.
  • Burks R. L., Jeppesen E., Lodge D. M., 2000. Macrophyte and fish chemical suppress. Daphnia growth and alter life-history traits. Oikos 88, 139-148.
  • Cerbin S., Balayla D.J., Van de Bund W.J. 2003. Small-scale distribution and diel vertical migration of zooplankton in a shallow lake (Lake Naardermeer, the Netherlands). Hydrobiologia 491: 111-117.
  • Donk E., Bund W. J., 2002. Impact of submerged macrophytes including charophytes on phyto- and zooplankton communities: allelopathy versus other mechanisms. Aquatic botany 72: 261-274.
  • Gilbert J.J, Hampton S. E. 2001. Diel vertical migrations of zooplankton in a shallow, fisless pond: a possible avoidance-response cascade induced by notonectides. Freshwater Biology 46: 6111-621.
  • Gliwicz Z. M., Rybak J.I., 1976. Zooplankton.[In:] Selected problems of lake littoral ecology. Ed. E. Pieczyńska, Wyd. Uniw. Warszawski, Warszawa: 69-96.
  • Jasser I., 1995. The influence of macrophytes on a phytoplankton community in experimental conditions. Hydrobiologia 306: 21-32.
  • Jepsen E. J. P., Sondergaard M., Lauridsen T., Pedersen L. J., Jensen L., 1997. Top-down control in freshwater lakes, the role of nutrient state, submerged macrophytes and water depth. Hydrobiologia 342/343: 151-164.
  • Karabin A. Ejsmont-Karabin J., Kornatowska R., 1997. Eutrophication procesess in a shallow, macrophyte-dominated lake – factors influencing zooplankton structure and density in Lake Łuknajno (Poland). Hydrobiologia 342/343: 401-409.
  • Krolikowska J., 1997. Eutrophication procesess in a shallow, macrophyte-dominated lake – species distribution of submerged macrophytes in Lake Łuknajno (Poland). Hydrobiologia 342/343: 411-416.
  • Kufel I., Kufel L., 1997. Eutrophication procesess in a shallow, macrophyte-dominated lake – nutrient loading to and flow through Lake Łuknajno (Poland). Hydrobiologia 342/343: 387-394.
  • Lauridsen T., Buenk I., 1996. Diel changes in the horizontal distribution of zooplankton in the litoral zone of two shallow eutrophic lakes. Arch. Hydrobiol. 137, 161-176.
  • Lauridsen T. L., Lodge D. M., 1996. Avoidance by Daphnia magna of fish and macrophytes: chemical cues and predator-mediated use of macrophyte habitat. Limnol. Oceanogr. 22: 805-810.
  • Lauridsen T. L., Pedersen L. J., Jeppesen E. Sondergaard M., 1996. The importance of macrophyte bd size for cladoceran composition and horizontal migration in a shallow lake. J. Plankton Res. 18: 2283-2294.
  • Lauridsen T. L., Jeppesen E. Sondergaard M., Lodge D.M., 1998. Horizontal migration of zooplankton: predator-mediated use of macrophyte habitata. In: Jeppesen E., Sondergaard M., Christofferson K. (Eds.), The structuring role of submerged Macrophytes in Lakes. Springer, New York, pp. 233-239.
  • Luning-Krizan J. 1997. Selective feeding of third- and fourth-instar larvae of Chaoborus fluvicans in the firld. Arvhiv fur Hydrobiologie 140: 347-365.
  • Moss B., 1990. Engineering and biological approaches to the restoration from eutrophication in which aquatic plants are important components. Hydrobiologia 275/276: 367-377.
  • Neil W.E. 1990. Induced vertical migration in Copepods as a defense against invertebrate predation. Nature 345.
  • Nurminen L. K. L., Horppila J. A., 2002. A diurnal study on the distrribution of filter feeding zooplankton: Effect of emergent macrophytes, pH and lake trophy. Aquat. Sci. 64: 198-206.
  • Paterson M., 1993. The distribution of microcrustaceans in the littoral zone of a freshwater lake. Hydrobiologia 263: 173-183.
  • Persson L., Eklov P., 1995. Prey refuges affecting interactions between piscivorous perch and juvenile perch and roach. Ecology: 70-81.
  • Pennak R. W.,1973. Some evidence for aquatic macrophytes as reppellants for a limnetic species of Daphnia. Int. Rev. Ges. Hydrobiol. 58: 569-576.
  • Pereyra-Ramos E., 1981. The ecological role of Characeae in the lake littoral. Ekol. Pol. 29:167-209.
  • Perrow M. R., Jowitt A. J. D., Stansfield J. H., Philips G. L., 1999. The practical importance of the interactions between fish, zooplankton and macrophytes in shallow lake restoration. Hydrobiologia 395/396: 199-210.
  • Rybak J.I., Węgleńska T. 2003. Temporal and spatial changes in the horizontal distribution of planktonic Crustacea between vegetated littoral zone and the zone of open water. Pol. J. Ecol. 51: 205-218.
  • Siebeck O.,1980. Optical orientation of pelagic crustaceans and its consequence in the pelagic and littoral zones. [In]: Kerfoot W.C. (Eds.): Evolution and Ecology of zooplankton communities. Hannover, NH. University Press of new England: 28-38.
  • Schriver P., Bogestrand J., Jeppesen E., Sondergaard M., 1995. Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish-zooplankton-phytoplankton interactions: large-scale enclosure experiments in a shallow trophic lake. Freshwater Biol. 33: 255-270.
  • Smiley E. A., Tessier A. J., 1998. Environmental gradients and horizontal distribution of microcrustaceans in lakes. Freshwat. Biol. 39: 397-409.
  • Stansfield J. H., Perrow M. R., Tench L. D., Jowitt A. J. D., Taylor A. L., 1997. Submerged macrophytes as refuges for grazing Cladocera against fish predation: observation on seasonal changes in relation to macrophyte cover and predation preassure. Hydrobiologia 412: 81-94.
  • Steiner C. F., Roy A. H. 2003. Seasonal succession in fishless ponds: effects of enrichment and invertebrate predators on zooplankton community strusture. Hydrobiologia 490: 125-134.
  • Timms R. M., Moss B., 1984. Prevention of growth of potentially dense phytoplankton populations by zooplankton grazing, in presence of zooplanktovorous fish, in a shallow wetland ecosystem. Limnol. Oceanogr.2:472-486.
  • Townsend C.R., Risebrow A.J., 1982. The influence of light level on the functional response of a zooplankton on fish. Oecologia 53: 293-295.
  • Vanni M. J., 1986. Competition in zooplankton communities:suppresion model of small species by Daphnia pulex. Limnol. Oceanogr. 31:1039-1056.
  • Vuille T., 1991. Abundance, standing crop and production of microcrustacean population (Cladocera, Copepoda) in the littoral zone of Lake Biel, Switzerland. Arch. Hydrobiol. 123: 156-185.
  • Walls M., Rajasilta M., Sarvala J., Salo J., 1990. Diel changes in horizontal microdistribution of littoral Cladocera. Limnologica 20: 253-258.
  • Winfield I. J., 1986. The influence of simulated aquatic macrophytes on the zooplankton consumption rate of juvenile roach, rudd and perch. Fish. Biol. 29:37-48.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-a033a081-3685-468d-a1e4-7ff3d14776ea
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.