Regional genetic variability among South African vervet monkey Chlorocebus aethiops populations

• Autorzy: Grobler P. J. , Matlala J.M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

A South African rehabilitation centre for illegally kept vervet monkeys Chlorocebus aethiops Linnaeus, 1758 required an evaluation of the genetic status of vervet monkeys, to determine whether animals from different geographical areas may be mixed. We studied animals originating from three geographical regions and used biochemical genetic and morphological approaches to address this question. The most prominent trend from allozyme data was derived from the locus Prt-2 (an unspecified serum protein), where each of the three populations could be characterised by the absence or presence of unique alleles. Nevertheless, statistical coefficients indicated little genetic divergence, with genetic distance values of 0.001-0.003 and an overall fixation index value of 0.046. Average heterozygosity did not differ appreciably among populations (2.5-3.3%). The morphological study identified suitable traits, free from the influence of growth allometry, that can be used for inter-population comparisons. No significant morphological differences between con-specific populations were however found. It is concluded that vervet monkeys from the species' wider distribution range is relatively monotypic, but that monkeys from different geographical areas should not be unduly mixed, pending the results of finer grained molecular studies.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

vervet monkey; regional variation; genetic variability; geographic variation; South Africa; Chlorocebus aethiops

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 2002
• Tom: 47
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.113-124,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Grobler P. J.

• University of the North, P/Bag X1106, Sovenga, 0727, Republic of South Africa

autor

Matlala J.M.

Bibliografia

• Allendorf F. W. 1986. Genetic drift and the loss of alleles versus heterozygosity. Zoo Biology 5: 181-190.
• Best T. L., Chesser R. K., McCulloug D. A. and Baumgardner G. D. 1996. Genic and morphometric variation in kangaroo rats, genus Dipodomys, from coastal California. Journal of Mammalogy 77: 785-800.
• Blackstone N. W. 1987. Allometry and relative growth: pattern and process in evolutionary studies. Systematic Zoology 36: 76-78.
• Chesser R. K., Reuterwall C. and Ryman N. 1982. Genetic differentiation of Scandinavian moose Alces alces over short geographical distances. Oikos 39: 125-130.
• DeBlase A. F. and Martin R. E. 1981. A manual of mammalogy, with keys to the families of the world. W.C. Brown Company Publishers, Dubuque, Iowa.
• Dracopoli N. C., Brett F. L., Turner T. R. and Jolly C. J. 1983. Patterns of genetic variability in the serum proteins of the Kenyan vervet monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops). American Journal of Physical Anthropology 61: 39-49.
• Grant W. S., Little R. M., Malan G. and Crowe T. M. 1997. Temporal and geographical genetic variability in Namaqua and Burchell's Sandgrouse. Journal of Arid Environments 35: 123-139.
• Grobler J. P. and Van der Bank F. H. 1993. Genetic variability in South African blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 107(B): 111-116.
• Grobler J. P. and Van der Bank F. H. 1994a. Isozyme variation in South African impala (Aepyceros melampus) populations under different management regimes. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 24B(4): 89-94.
• Grobler J. P and Van der Bank F. H. 1994b. Genetic heterogeneity in sable antelope (Hippotragus niger Harris 1838) from four southern African regions. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 22(B): 781-789.
• Grobler J. P., Taylor P., Pretorius D. M. and Anderson P. C. 1999. Fluctuating asymmetry and allozyme variability in an isolated springbok Antidorcas marsupialis population from the Chelmsford Nature Reserve. Acta Theriologica 44: 183-193.
• Huxley J. S. 1932. Problems of relative growth. MacVeagh, London: 1-276.
• Kawamoto Y., Ischak T. M. and Supriatna J. 1984. Genetic variations within and between troops of the crab-eating macaque (Macca fascicularis) on Sumatra, Java, Bali, Lombok and Sunbawa, Indonesia. Primates 25: 131-159.
• Markert C. L. and Faulhaber I. 1965. Lactate dehydrogenase isozyme patterns of fish. Journal of Experimental Biology 35: 156-191.
• Murphy R. W., Sites J. W., Buth D. G. and Haufler C. H. 1990. Proteins I: isozyme electrophoresis. [In: Molecular systematics. D. M. Hillis and C. Mauritz, eds]. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mas­sachusetts: 45-126.
• Nei M. 1972. Genetic distances between populations. The American Naturalist 106: 283-292.
• Nei M. 1975. Molecular population genetics and evolution. North-Holland, Amsterdam: 1-288.
• Ridgway G. J., Sherbourne S. W. and Lewis R. D. 1970. Polymorphism in the esterase of Atlantic herring. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 99: 147-151.
• Rowell T. E. and Richards S. M. 1979. Reproductive strategies of some African monkeys. Journal of Mammalogy 60: 58-69.
• Schmitt J. and Tomiuk J. 1994. Protein polymorphism in three cercopithecid species and its implications to conservation. Folia Primatolica 63: 123-130.
• Seidel M. E. and Lucchino R. V. 1981. Allozymic and morphological variation among musk turtles Sternotherus carinatus, S. depressus and S. minor. Copeia 1981: 119-128.
• Shimada M. K. and Shotake T. 1997. Genetic variation of blood proteins within and between local populations of grivet monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops aethiops) in central Ethiopia. Primates 38: 399-414.
• Shimada M. K. 1998. Population genetics of wild old world monkeys: the case of the grivet monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops aethiops). [In: Proceedings of the Trinational Workshop on Molecular Evolution. Vancouver, Canada, June 1998. M. K. Uyenoyama and A. Von Haeseter, eds]. Duke University Publications Group, Durham: 139-146.
• Skinner J. D. and Smithers H. N. 1990. The mammals of the southern African subregion. University of Pretoria, Pretoria: 1-771.
• Sugg D. W., Chesser R. K. and Long J. C. 1997. Assessment of genetic information in morphometric traits: geographic and evolutionary interpretation. Journal of Mammalogy 78: 405-416.
• Turner T. R. 1981. Blood protein variation in a population of Ethiopian vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops aethiops). American Journal of Physiological Anthropology 55: 225-231.
• Turner T. R., Mott C. S. and Maiers J. E. 1984. Genetic and morphological studies on two species of Kenyan monkeys, Cercopithecus arthiops and C. mitis. [In: Primate evolution. Vol. 1. J. G. Else and P. C. Lee, eds]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 307-316.
• Turner T. R., Anapoli F. and Jolly C. J. 1994. Body weights of adult vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) at four sites in Kenya. Folia Primatologica 63: 177-179.
• Turner T. R., Anapoli F. and Jolly C. J. 1997. Growth, development, and sexual dimorphism in vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) at four sites in Kenya. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 103: 19-35.
• Whitt G. S. 1970. Developmental genetics of lactate dehydrogenase isozymes of fish. Journal of Experimental Zoology 175: 1-35.
• Wright S. 1965. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19: 395-420.
• Wright S. 1978. Evolution and genetics of populations. Volume 4. Variation within and among natural populations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 1-580.