Habitat use by coypu Myocastor coypus in agro-systems of the Argentinean pampas

• Autorzy: D'Adamo P. , Guichon M.L. , Bo R.F. , Cassini M.H.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Habitat use by coypu Myocastor coypus (Molina, 1782) was studied in agro-systems oí' the Pampas grasslands, Argentina. We analysed two dimensions of the habitat: perpendicular and parallel to the water source. The perpendicular dimension covered three distinct areas: border of the stream, interface, and crops, while the parallel dimension involved the use of different crop types. We worked at two study sites, Mechongué (winter 1995 - summer 1996) and Lujan (winter 1997). At Mechongué, we conducted Four seasonal samples using an indirect method of counting faeces to estimate abundance of coypu. Along the perpendicular dimension, coypus used the border significantly more than the interface and the crops. The relative use of the border increased over the study period. Parallel to the water source, crops were avoided and pastures were preferred, At the Lujan study site, we observed the behaviour of coypu by recording activity and use of cover types at different distances from the stream. Coypu spent most of their active time foraging (80.5%). Ninety-two percent of the bouts took place less than 4 m from the pond. Coypus did not move more than 10 m away from the pond and did not use the crops. These results disagree with the claim that coypus are a risk to croplands in their native range.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Argentina; behaviour; habitat; crop damage; Myocastor coypus; coypu; pampas

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 2000
• Tom: 45
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.25-33,fig.

Twórcy

autor

D'Adamo P.

• Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, Pab.II, [1423] Buenos Aires, Argentina

autor

Guichon M.L.

autor

Bo R.F.

autor

Cassini M.H.

Bibliografia

• Abbas A. 1988. Impact du ragondin (Myocastor coypus Molina) sur une culture de mais (Zea mays L.) dans le marais Poitevin, Acta Oecologica/Oecologtca Applicata 9: 173-189.
• Bo R., Quintana R., Merler R., Minotti P., Malvarez A. and Villafafie G. 1992. Problems in the conservation of mammals in the lower Delta Region of the Parana River. Evaluation of the current situation using a combined methodology. Noragric Occasional Papers Series C Development and Environment 11: 143-152.
• Colantoni L. O. 1993. Ecologia poblaeional de la nutria (Myocastor coypus) en la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Fauna y Flora Silvestres 1: 1-25.
• Diuk-Wasser M. A. and Cassini M. H. 1998. A study on the diet of minor grisons and a preliminary analysis of their role in the control of rabbits in Patagonia. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 33: 1-4.
• Doncaster C. P. and Micol T. 1989. Annual cycle of a coypu (Myocastor coypus) population: male and female strategies. Journal of Zoology, London 217: 227-240.
• Goldberg S., Cirera I., Parella M., Benitez A., Bulos L. and Troncoso A. 1995. Caracterización climaticaa y agrodimatica de la cuenca del Rio Lujan, Proceedings of Jornadas sobre la Cuenca del Rio Lujan, Lujan, Argentina: 13-19,
• Gosling L. M. 1981. The role of wild plants in the ecology of mammalian crop pests. [In: Pests, pathogens and vegetation, J. M. Thresh, ed]. Pitman Books Ltd., London: 341-364.
• Gosling L. M. 1993. Family Myocastoridae. [In: The Handbook of British Mammals. G. B. Corbet and S. Harris, eds, Third Edition], Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford: 267-275.
• Gosling L. M. and Baker S. J. 1987, Planning an monitoring an attempt to eradicate coypus from Britain. Symposium Zoological Society of London 58: 99-113.
• Jaksic F. M. and Soriguer R. C. 1981. Predation upon the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in Mediterranean habitats of Chile and Spain: a comparative analysis. Journal of Animal Ecology 50: 269-281.
• Jouventin P., Micol T., Verheyden C. and Guedon G. 1997. Le ragondin: biologie et methodes de limitations des populations. Acta, Paris: 1-155.
• Kinler N. W., Linscombe G. and Ramsey P. R. 1987. Nutria. Wild Furbearer Management and Conservation in North America 27: 327-343.
• Marchetti B. and Morello J. 1991. Sustainable development in Argentina. Centro de estudios avanzados de Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires: 1-116.
• Marcum C. L. and Loftsgaarden D. O. 1980. A nonmapping technique for studying habitat preferences. Journal of Wildlife Management 44: 963-968.
• Martin P. and Bateson P. 1993. Measuring behaviour (second edition). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1-222.
• Merler J., Bó R., Quintana R. and Malvarez A. 1994. Habitat studies at different spatial scales for multiple conservation goals in the Parana River Delta (Argentina). International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 20: 149-162.
• Putman R. J. 1984. Facts from faeces. Mammal Review 14: 79-97.
• Quintana R., Bó R., Merler J., Minotti P. and Malvarez A. 1992. Situación y uso de la fauna silvestre en la Region del Bajo Delta del Rio Parana (Argentina). Iheringia, Serie Zoologica 73: 13-33.
• Reggiani G., Boitani L., DAntoni S, and De Stefano R. 1993. Biology and control of the coypu in the Mediterranean area. Supplement Richerche di Biologia delia Selavaggina 21: 67-100.