Uwarunkowania rozwoju terminowego rynku produktow rolnych w Polsce (ograniczenia i szanse)

• Autorzy: Rembeza J
• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

This paper discussed some theoretical problems connected with futures market functioning what is connected with the price risk management and with the conditions of their development. The favourable factors for developing futures market of agricultural commodities in Poland are the high price variability and lack of alternative price risk management instruments. Among the factors limitting thees possibilities the most important seems to be weakly developed cash market, especially not active enough wholesale market, strong regionalization of agricultural markets and the lack of leading cash market.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

kontrakty terminowe; efektywnosc; rozwoj; Polska; rynek terminowy; produkty rolne

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Postępy Nauk Rolniczych
• Rocznik: 2002
• Tom: 49
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: s.101-113,tab.,rys.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Rembeza J

• Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roslin, 76-009 Bonin

Bibliografia

• [1] Black D.G. 1986. Success and failure of futures contracts: theory and empirical evidence. Monograph 1986-1, Salomon Brothers Centr for the Study of Financial Institutions, New York.
• [2] Carlton D.W. 1984. Futures markets: their purpose, their history, their growth, their successes and failures. J. Futures Mkts. 4: 237-271.
• [3] Ederington L.H. 1979. The hedging performance of the new futures markets. J. Finance 34: 157-170.
• [4] Gray R. W. 1978. Why does futures trading succeed or fail: an analysis of selected commodities. W: Reading in Futures Markets, vol. 3, ed. Peck A.E., CBOT, Chicago.
• [5] Rembeza J. 1999. Kontrakty a ryzyko cenowe na rynku zbóż. Zag. Ekon. Rol. 6: 4-12.
• [6] Newberry D.M.G., Stiglitz J.E. 1981. The theory of commodity price stabilization. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
• [7] Pennings J.M.E. 1998. The market for hedging services: a merketing-finance approach. Amsterdam Exchanges.
• [8] Silber W .L. 1981. Innovation, competition and new contract design in futures markets. J. Futures Mkts. 1: 123-155.
• [9] Thompson S.R., Waller M.L., Seibold D. 1993. Comparison liquidity costs between the Kansas City and Chicago wheat futures contracts. J. Agr. and Res. Econ. 18: 185-197.
• [10] Urban R. 1999. Czynniki wzrostu konkurencyjności polskiego przemysłu spożywczego. Zag. Ekon. Ral. 2/3: 20-30.
• [11] Varian H. 1992. Microeconomic analysis. W.W. Norton&Company, New York.
• [12] Working H. 1962. New concepts concerning futures market and prices. Amer. Econ. Rev. 52: 431-459.