PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2006 | 52 | 3 |

Tytuł artykułu

The estimation of different ELISA procedures for serodiagnosis of human trichinellosis

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Introduction. The most important confirmative diagnostic test for trichinellosis is the presence of the muscle larvae in a tissue biopsy but this direct method has a low sensitivity of light and moderate infections. The aim of presented study was to compare the usefulness of the results obtained by three ELISA procedures for Trichinella spp. diagnosis in human outbreaks. Materials and methods. All sera (cases and controls) were tested for anti-Trichinella antibodies (immunoglobulin G) using commercially available Novatec KIT and two other ELISA procedures based on excretory-secretory (ES) antigens on Trichinella spiralis muscle larvae. The main differences in ELISA procedures were: the protein concentration in antigen, dilution of human serum samples, conjugate and the time of conjugate incubation. Additional differences were noticed in ES antigen preparation procedures as well as in T. spiralis isolates used in these procedures. Serum samples were obtained from 22 symptomatical patients from Poznań region (West Poland), geographic area where human outbreak had occurred. Control serum samples were obtained from 20 patients from an open population from a non endemic trichinellosis area. Results. The results were analyzed in terms of both: statistical and epidemiological point of view. Linear regression analysis and correlations coefficient r between OD values of total 22 patients obtained in three ELISA procedures were positive and high statistically significant. Three ELISA procedures revealed different cut-off values and positivity rates for outbreak. However, the majority of positive samples were found as positive in three procedures, but some of them were positive in two or one procedure only. These individual variability in sera reactivity observed in three ELISA procedures could be very important from epidemiological point of view.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

52

Numer

3

Opis fizyczny

p.231-238,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Polish Academy of Sciences, Twarda Street 51/55, 00-818 Warsaw, Poland
autor
autor
autor
autor
autor
autor

Bibliografia

  • [1] Dupoy-Camet J. 2000. Trichinellosis; a worldwide zoonosis. Veterinary Parasitology 93: 191-200.
  • [2] Gajadhar A.A., Gamble H.R. 2000. Historical perspectives and current global challenges of Trichinella and trichinellosis. Veterinary Parasitology 93: 183189.
  • [3] Gołąb E., Sadowska-Todys M. 2003. Współczesne problemy epidemiologii i diagnostyki włośnicy w krajach Unii Europejskiej i w Polsce. Przegląd Epidemiologiczny 57: 561-570.
  • [4] Cabaj W., Moskwa B., Pastusiak K., Bień J. 2006. Włośnica zwierząt wolno żyjących stałym zagrożeniem zdrowia ludzi w Polsce. Kosmos 54: 95-103.
  • [5] Cabaj W., Moskwa B., Pastusiak K., Malczewski A. 2004. Włośnica u zwierząt wolno żyjących i świń w Polsce. Medycyna Weterynaryjna 60: 80-83.
  • [6] Feldmeier H., Fisher G., Blaumeiser G. 1987. Kinetics of humoral response during the acute and the convalescent phase of human trichinosis. Zentrablatt fűr Bakteriologie, Mikrobiologie and Hygiene, Series A, 264: 221-234.
  • [7] Mahannop P., Chaicumpa W., Setasuban P., Morakote N., Tapchaisri P. 1992. Immunodiagnosis of human trichinellosis using excretory-secretory (ES) antigen. Journal of Helminthology 66: 297-304.
  • [8] Kocięcka W. 1996. Włosień kręty i włośnica. Volumed, Wrocław.
  • [9] Dupoy-Camet J. 2006. Trichinellosis; still a concern for Europe. Eurosurveillance 11: 5.
  • [10] Mahannop P., Setasuban P., Morakote N., Tapchaisri P., Chaicumpa W. 1995. Immunodiagnosis of human trichinellosis and identification of specific antigen for Trichinella spiralis. International Journal for Parasitology 25: 87-94.
  • [11] Van Knapen F., Frachimont J., Verdonk A.R., Stumpf K.U. 1982. Detection of specific immunoglobulin (IgG, IgM, IgA, IgE) and total IgE level in human trichinosis by means of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 31: 973-976.
  • [12] Homan W.L., Derksen A.C.G., van Knapen F. 1992. Identification of diagnostic antigens from Trichinella spiralis. Parasitology Research 78: 112-119.
  • [13] Gomez-Priego A., Crecensio-Rosales L., De La Rosa J.L. 2000. Serological evaluation of thin-layer immunoassay-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antibody detection in human trichinellosis. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 7: 810-812.
  • [14] Anvida S., Yera H., Haeghebert S., Tourte-Schaefer C., Magnaval J.F., Dupouy-Camet J. 2002. Comparative evaluation of a latex agglutination test, two ELISA tests and a Western Blot test for serodiagnosis in human trichinellosis. Annales de Biologie Clinique (Paris) 60: 79-83.
  • [15] Yera H., Andiva S., Perret C., Limonne D., Boireau P., Dupouy-Camet J. 2003. Development and evaluation of western blot kit for diagnosis of human trichinellosis. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 10: 793-796.
  • [16] Gamble H.R., Anderson W.R., Graham C.E., Murrell K.D. 1983. Diagnosis of swine trichinellosis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using an excretory-secretory antigen. Veterianary Parasitology 13: 349-361.
  • [17] Zarlenga D.S., Gamble S.R. 1990. Molecular cloning and expression of immunodominant 53-kDa excretory-secretory antigen from Trichinella spiralis muscle larvae. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 42: 165-174.
  • [18] Bradford M.M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of the protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72: 248-254.
  • [19] Chapa-Ruiz M.R., Salinas-Tobon M.R., MartinezMaranon R., Cedillo R., Garcia-Larotte E. 1989. Diagnosis of human trichinellosis by indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Revista Latinoamericana de Microbiologia 31: 136-139.
  • [20] Pozio E., Sofronic-Milosavljevic L., Gomez Morales M.A., Boireau P., Nöckler K. 2002. Evaluation of ELISA and Western blot analysis using three antigens to detect anti-Trichinella IgG in horses. Veterinary Parasitology 108: 163-178.
  • [21] Falconer 1981. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 2nd ed. Longman, New York.
  • [22] Kapel C.M.O., Webster P., Lind P., Pozio E., Henriksen S.A., Murrell K.D.A., Nansen P. 1998. Trichinella spiralis, T. britovi, T. nativa: infectivity, larval distribution in muscle and antibody response after experimental infection of pigs. Parasitology Research 84: 264-271.
  • [23] Borsuk P., Moskwa B., Pastusiak K., Cabaj W. 2003. Molecular identification of Trichinella spiralis and Trichinella britovi by diagnostic multiplier large mitochondrial rDNA amplification. Parasitology Research 91: 374-377.
  • [24] Whittington R.J. 1992. Evaluation of a simple method for improving the precision of an ELISA detecting antibody in serum. Journal of Immunological Methods 148: 57-64.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-7a9e7da2-7a32-4e81-b9ac-6e7c80f5d06f
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.