Antagonistyczne oddzialywanie bakterii fermentacji mlekowej na paleczki Salmonella w warunkach hodowli mieszanej

• Autorzy: Bauza-Kaszewska J , Szala B. , Paluszak Z.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Antagonistic effect of lactic acid bacteria on Salmonella in co-cultures

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The purpose of the research was to estimate the influence of lactic acid bacteria on pathogenic bacteria of Salmonella Senftenberg W775. The method of co-cultures was applied in order to examine the interaction between the investigated microorganisms. The results obtained indicate that 3 LAB strains (numbers 2, 3, 4) isolated from fermented plant material indicated high antibacterial activity against Salmonella rods. The growth of the pathogen in associated cultures was completely inhibited in 48 hours. The theoretical survival of Salmonella incubated in the presence of Lactobacillus plantarum was significantly longer and amounted to 132 hours. None of the LAB strains examined was influenced by Salmonella rods.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

hodowla mikroorganizmow; oddzialywania antagonistyczne; bakterie kwasu mlekowego; hodowla mieszana; mikrobiologia; Salmonella

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medycyna Weterynaryjna
• Rocznik: 2006
• Tom: 62
• Numer: 11
• Opis fizyczny: s.1313-1316,rys.,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Bauza-Kaszewska J

• Akademia Techniczno-Rolnicza, ul.Bernardynska 6, 85-029 Bydgoszcz

autor

Szala B.

autor

Paluszak Z.

Bibliografia

• 1.Bielecka M., Biedrzycka El., Biedrzycka E., Smoragiewicz W., Śmieszek M.: Interaction of Bifidobacterium and Salmonella during associated growth. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998, 45, 151-155.
• 2.Breasher M. M., Durre W. A.: Antagonistic action of Lactobacillus lactis toward Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli O157:H7 during growth and refrigerated storage. J. Food Prot. 1999, 62, 1336-1340.
• 3.Colleran E.: Hygienic and sanitation requirements in biogas plants treating animal manures or mixtures of manures and other organic wastes, [w:] Anaerobic Digestion: Making energy and solving modern waste problems. Wyd. H. Ørtenblad. AD-NETT, Herning Municipal Authorities, Denmark 2000, 77-86.
• 4.Drago L., Gismondo M. R., Lombardi A., de Haën C., Gozzini L.: Inhibition of in vitro growth of enteropathogens by new Lactobacillus isolates of human intestinal origin. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1997, 153, 455-463.
• 5.Draksler D., Gonzáles S., Oliver G.: Preliminary assays for the development of a probiotic for goats. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 2004, 44, 397-405.
• 6.Fernández M. F., Boris S., Barbés C.: Probiotic properties of human lactobacilli strains to be used in gastrointestinal tract. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 94, 449-455.
• 7.Fooks L. J., Gibson G. R.: In vitro investigation of the effect of probiotics and prebiotics on selected human intestinal pathogens. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2002, 39, 67-75.
• 8.Forestier C., De Champs C., Vatoux C., Joly B.: Probiotic activities of Lactobacillus casei rhamnosus: in vitro adherence to intestinal cells and antimicrobial properties. Res. Microbiol. 2001, 152, 167-173.
• 9.Kot B., Jakubczak A., Bukowski K.: Antagonistyczne działanie bakterii fermentacji mlekowej w stosunku do wybranych drobnoustrojów. Medycyna Wet. 2000, 56, 53-57.
• 10.Lauková A.: In vitro treatment of different isolates from cattle dung and pig slurry by nisin. Acta Vet. Brno 2000, 69, 147-151.
• 11.Ligocka A., Paluszak Z.: Capability of lactic acid bacteria to inhibit pathogens in sewage sludge subjected to biotechnological processes. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy 2005, 49, 23-27.
• 12.Ligocka A., Paluszak Z., Hermann J.: Wpływ czynników fizykochemicznych na skuteczność działania bakteriocyn bakterii mlekowych na patogeny osadów poœciekowych. Medycyna Wet. 2005, 61, 1413-1416.
• 13.Oberauskas V., Kantautaite J., Sutkeviciene R., Sederevicius A., Monkeviciene I., Zelvyte R., Ramanauskiene J., Laugalis J., Kabasinskiene A.: Investigations of the properties of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum U-14 and Lactobacillus fermentum U-5 strains and their evaluation during lyophilization. Medycyna Wet. 2004, 60, 1278-1282.
• 14.Obiger G.: Untersuchungen über die Thermostabilität bedeutsamer Infektionserreger unter den Bedingungen der Milchpasteurisation. Arch. Lebensmittelhyg. 1978, 27, 121-160.
• 15.Raibaud P., Caulet M., Galpin J. V., Mocquot G.: Studies on the bacterial flora of the alimentary tract of pigs. II. Streptococci: selective enumeration and differentation of the dominant groups. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1961, 24, 285-291.
• 16.Reid G.: The scientific basis for probiotic strains of Lactobacillus. Minireview. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 3763-3766.
• 17.Santos A., San Mauro M., Sanchez A., Torres J. M., Marquina D.: The antimicrobial properties of different strains of Lactobacillus spp. isolated from kefir. System. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 26, 434-437.
• 18.Saxelin M., Tynkkynen S., Mattila-Sandholm T., de Vos W. M.: Probiotic and functional microbes: from markets to mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2005, 16, 204-211.
• 19.Servin A. L.: Antagonistic activities of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against microbial pathogens. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 28, 405-440.
• 20.Soomro A. H., Masud T., Anwaar K.: Role of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in food preservation and human health a review. Pak. J. Nutr. 2002, 1, 20-24.
• 21.Visser R., Holzapfel W. H., Bezuidenhout J. J., Kotzé J. M.: Antagonism of lactic acid bacteria against phytopathogenic bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1986, 52, 552-555.