Mutual antagonism between fluorescent pseudomonads and soil actinomycetes

• Autorzy: Kaszubiak H.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The inhibition of 23 strains of actinomycetes by 7 strains of fluorescent pseudomonads and vice versa, on 4 different media, was examined. The antagonism of pseudomonads was more frequent and more intense than that of actinomycetes. Inhibition was observed in pseudomonads and actinomycetes of both kinds of strains, antagonistic and non-antagonistic to Fusarium oxysporum. Some media were more favorable to the an-tagonism of pseudomonads and others to that of actinomycetes, hence in identical environmental conditions mutual antagonism between the two counter-partners occurred only rarely.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

fluorescent pseudomonad; siderophore; antagonism; actinomycete; soil; antibiotic; Fusarium

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 1998
• Tom: 07
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.207-211,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Kaszubiak H.

• Academy of Agriculture, Wolynska 35, 60-636 Poznan, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1.BECKER J.O., COOK R.J. Role of siderophores suppresion of increased-growth response of wheat by fluorescent Pseudomo nas. Phytopathol. 78,778, 1988.
• 2.DAVIS K.G., WHITBREAD R. Factors affecting the coloni sation of a root system by fluorescent Pseudomonads: The effects of water, temperature and soil microflora. Plant a. Soil 116, 247, 1989.
• 3.HAMMER P.E., HILL S., LIGON J. Characterization of genes from Pseudomonas fluorescens involved in the synthesis of pyrrolnitrin. Phytopathol. 85, 1162, 1995.
• 4.JAMES D.W.JR., GUTTERSON N.I. Multiple antibiotics pro duced by Pseudomonas fluorescens HV 37a and their differen tial regulation by glucose. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52, 1183, 1986.
• 5.KASZUBIAK H., MUSZYNSKA M. Qualitative changes in the community of copiotrophic bacteria accompanying reduc tion of the fungal community in soil. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 6, 15, 1997.
• 6.KING E.O., WARD W.K., RANEY D.E. Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescein. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 44, 301, 1954.
• 7.KUREK E., JAROSZUK J. Siderofory i ich rola w srodowisku glebowym. Post. Microbiol. 32, 71, 1993.
• 8.KUREK E., KOBUS J. Korzystne i szkodliwe oddziaływanie mikroflory ryzosferowej na wzrost i rozwój roslin. Post. Mik- robiol. 29, 103, 1990.
• 9.NEILANDS J.B., LEONG S.A. Siderophores in relation to plant growth and disease. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 37, 187, 1986.
• 10.PRIDHAM G.T., GOTLLIEB D. [In] KURYLOWICZ W., KORZYBSKI T., NIEDZWIEDZKA-TRZASKOWSKA I., KOWSZYK Z. Metoda otrzymywania aureomycyny. Ed. PZWL, Warszawa, pp. 86, 1954.
• 11.RAIJMAKERS J.M., WELLER D.M., THOMASHOW L.S. Frequency of antibiotic-producing Pseudomonas spp. in natu ral environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 881, 1997.
• 12.ROSALES A.M., THOMASHOW L., COOK R.J., MEW T.W. Isolation and identification of antifungal metabolites produced by rice-associated antagonistic Pseudomonas spp. Phytopath. 85, 1028, 1995.
• 13.WAKSMAN S.A. The actinomycetes, Vol. 1 Nature, occuren­ce and activities. Ed. The Williams a. Wilkins Company, Baltimore pp. 327, 1959.