A eutherian mammal in the latest Cretaceous of Vitrolles, Southern France

• Autorzy: Tabuce R , Vianey-Liaud M. , Garcia G.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In Europe, the fossil record of the eutherian mammals is very scanty for the Late Cretaceous, as only two genera, documented by isolated teeth, are presently recorded in France and in Spain. Both genera, Labes and Lainodon, are considered to be representatives of the “zhelestids”, a paraphyletic unit regarded as being at the origin of Cenozoic ungulates within the Ungulatomorpha clade. We here describe Valentinella vitrollense gen. et sp. nov. from Vitrolles la Plaine (Maastrichtian, southern France). This species, represented by fragmentary remains of lower and upper dentitions, is tentatively assigned to the “zhelestids” according to the hypoconulid−entoconid twinning and the antero−posteriorly short trigonid on m1–3. The occlusal surfaces are obliterated by dental attrition, but Valentinella could be an evolved “zhelestid”, more derived than Labes and Lainodon by its fully compressed trigonid. Valentinella is similar to Gallolestes by other derived characters such as a crushing specialization of the teeth, associated with a probably molariform p4 (or dp4) and slightly reduced m3. The enamel microstructure, showing a radial prismatic pattern combined with a reduced interprismatic matrix, in which cristallites are oriented at about 45° to the prisms axes, appears compatible with the ancestral morphotype for all ungulates; although no synapomorphy can be proposed for the ungulatomorphs.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

eutherian mammal; Eutheria; mammal; Cretaceous; Mammalia; Vitrolles; France; paleontology

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
• Rocznik: 2004
• Tom: 49
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.347-356,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Tabuce R

• Universite Montpellier II, place Eugene Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier cedex 05, France

autor

Vianey-Liaud M.

autor

Garcia G.

Bibliografia

• Antunes, M.T., Sigogneau−Russell, D., and Russell, D.E. 1986. Sur quelques dents de mammifères du Crétacé supérieur de Taveiro, Portugal (note préliminaire). Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris 303: 1247–1250.
• Archibald, J.D. 1996. Fossil evidence for a Late Cretaceous origin of “hoofed” mammals. Science 272: 1150–1153.
• Archibald, J.D. 1998. Archaic ungulates (“Condylarthra”). In: C.M. Janis, K.M. Scott, and L.L. Jacobs (eds.), Evolution of Tertiary Mammals of North America, 292–329. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Archibald, J.D. and Averianov, A.O. 2003. The Late Cretaceous placental mammal Kulbeckia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23: 404–419.
• Archibald, J.D., Averianov, A.O., and Ekdale, E.G. 2001. Late Cretaceous relatives of rabbits, rodents, and other extant eutherian mammals. Nature 414: 62–65.
• Averianov, A. O., Archibald, J.D., and Martin, T. 2003. Placental nature of the alleged marsupial from the Cretaceous of Madagascar. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 48: 149–151.
• Butler, P.M. 1977. Evolutionary radiation of the cheek teeth of Cretaceous placentals. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 22: 241–271.
• Butler, P.M. 1990. Early trends in the evolution of tribosphenic molars. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 65: 529–552.
• Carlson, S.J. and Krause, D.W. 1985. Enamel ultrastructure of multituberculate mammals: an investigation of variability. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology. The University of Michigan 27: 1–50.
• Cifelli, R. 1990. Cretaceous mammals of Southern Utah. IV. Eutherian mammals from the Wahweap (Aquilan) and Kaiparowits (Judithian) formations. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 10: 346–360.
• Clemens, W.A. 1997. Characterization of enamel microstructure terminology and application of the origins of prismatic structures in systematic analyses. In: W. von Koenigswald and P.M. Sander (eds.), Tooth Enamel Microstructure, 85–112. Balkema, Rotterdam.
• Codrea, V., Smith, T., Dica, P., Folie, A., Garcia, G., Godefroid, P., and Van Itterbeeck, J. 2002. Dinosaur egg nests, mammals and other vertebrates from a new Maastrichtian site of the Haţeg Basin (Romania). Comptes Rendus Palevol 1: 173–180.
• Dumont, E.R. 1996. Enamel prism morphology in molar teeth of small eutherian mammals. Scanning Microscopy 10: 349–370.
• Fosse, G., Kielan−Jaworowska, Z., and Skaale, S.G. 1985. The microstructure of tooth enamel in multituberculate mammals. Palaeontology 28: 438–449.
• Garcia, G. 1998. Les coquilles d’œufs de dinosaures du Crétacé supérieur du sud de la France: diversité, paléobiologie, biochronologie et paléoenvironnements. 152 pp. (unpublished). Ph.D. Dissertation, University Montpellier 2, Montpellier.
• Garcia, G. and Vianey−Liaud, M. 2001. Dinosaur eggshells as new biochronological markers in Late Cretaceous continental deposits. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 169: 153–164.
• Garcia, G., Duffaud, S., Feist, M., Marandat, B., Tambareau, Y., Villatte, J. and Sigé, B. 2000. La Neuve, gisement à plantes, invertébrés et vertébrés du Bégudien (Sénonien supérieur continental) du Bassin d’Aix−en−Provence. Géodiversitas 22: 325–348.
• Gill, T. 1872. On the characteristics of the primary groups of the class of mammals. Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 284–306.Twentieth Meeting, held at Indianapolis, Indiana, August, 1871.
• Gheerbrant, E. and Astibia, H. 1994. Un nouveau mammifère du Maastrichtien de Laño (Pays Basque espagnol). Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris, Série II, 318: 1125–1131.
• Gheerbrant, E. and Astibia, H. 1999. The Upper Cretaceous mammals from Laño (Spanish Basque Country). Estudios del Museo de Ciencias naturales de Alava 14: 295–323.
• Gheerbrant, E., Abrial, C., and Cappetta, H. 1997. Nouveaux sites à microvertébrés continentaux du Crétacé terminal des petites Pyrénées (Haute−Garonne et Ariège, France). Géobios M.S. 20: 257–269.
• Kielan−Jaworowska, Z. 1969. Preliminary data on the Upper Cretaceous eutherian mammals from Bayn Dzak, Gobi Desert. Palaeontologia Polonica 19: 171–191.
• Kielan−Jaworowska, Z. and Trofimov, B.A. 1980. Cranial morphology of the Cretaceous eutherian mammal Barunlestes. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 25: 167–185.
• Koenigswald, W., von. 1995. Enamel differentiation in myoxid incisors and their systematic significance. Hystrix 6: 99–107.
• Koenigswald, W., von. 1997a. Brief survey of enamel diversity at the schmelzmuster level in Cenozoic placental mammals. In: W. von Koenigswald and P.M. Sander (eds.), Tooth Enamel Microstructure, 137–161. Balkema, Rotterdam.
• Koenigswald, W., von. 1997b. Evolutionary trends in the differentiation of mammalian enamel ultrastructure. In: W. von Koenigswald and P.M. Sander (eds.), Tooth Enamel Microstructure, 203–235. Balkema, Rotterdam.
• Koenigswald, W., von. and Sander, P.M. 1997. Tooth Enamel Microstructure. 280 pp. Balkema, Rotterdam.
• Krause, D.W. 2001. Fossil molar from a Madagascar marsupial. Nature 412: 497–498.
• Lillegraven, J.A. 1969. Latest Cretaceous mammals of upper part of Edmonton Formation of Alberta, Canada, and review of marsupial−placental dichotomy in mammalian evolution. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions 50: 1–122.
• Lillegraven, J.A. 1976. A new genus of therian mammal from the Late Cretaceous “El Gallo Formation”, Baja California, Mexico. Journal of Paleontology 50: 437–443.
• Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Vol. 1: Regnum animale. Editio decima, reformata. 824 pp. Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm.
• Luo, Z., Kielan−Jaworowska, Z., and Cifelli, R. 2002. In quest for phylogeny of Mesozoic mammals.Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 47: 1–78.
• Martin, T. 1999. Phylogenetic implications of Glires (Eurymylidae, Mimotonidae, Rodentia, Lagomorpha) incisor enamel microstructure. Mitteilungen des Museums für Naturkunde Berlin, Zoologische Reihe 75: 257–273.
• McKenna, M.C. and Bell, S.K. 1997. Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level. 631 pp. Columbia University Press, New York.
• Muizon, C., de and Cifelli, R. 2000. The “condylarths” (archaic Ungulata, Mammalia) from the early Paleocene of Tiupampa (Bolivia): implications on the origin of the South American ungulates. Géodiversitas 22: 47–150.
• Nessov, L.A. 1985. New mammals of the Cretaceous of Kyzylkum [in Russian]. Vestnik Lyeningradskogo Universiteta Seriâ 7: 8–18.
• Nessov, L.A., Archibald, J.D., and Kielan−Jaworowska, Z. 1998. Ungulate−like mammals from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan and a phylogenetic analysis of Ungulatomorpha. Bulletin of Carnegie Museum of Natural History 34: 40–88.
• Pol, C., Buscalioni, A.D., Carballeira, J., Francés, V., Lopez−Martinez, N., Marandat, B., Moratalla, J.J., Sanz, J.L., Sigé, B., and Villatte, J. 1992. Reptiles and mammals from the Late Cretaceous new locality Quintanilla del Coco (Burgos Province, Spain). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie 184: 279–314.
• Rădulescu, C. and Samson, P. 1997. Late Cretaceous Multituberculata from Haţeg Basin (Romania). Sargetia 17: 247–255.
• Rage, J.−C. 2002. The continental Late Cretaceous of Europe: toward a better understanding. Comptes Rendus Palevol 1: 257–258.
• Reif, W.−E. 1974. REM−Beobachtung am Schmelz eines rezenten und eines fossilen Caniden. Biomineralisation 7: 56–68.
• Sahni, A. and Koenigswald, W., von. 1997. The enamel structure of some fossil and recent whales. In: W. von Koenigswald and P. M. Sander (eds.), Tooth Enamel Microstructure, 177–191. Balkema, Rotterdam.
• Sander, P.M. 1997. Non−mammalian synapsid enamel and the origin of mammalian enamel prisms: the bottom−up perspective. In: W. von Koenigswald and P.M. Sander (eds.), Tooth Enamel Microstructure, 41–62. Balkema, Rotterdam.
• Setoguchi, T., Tsubamoto, T., Hanamura, H., and Hachiya, K. 1999. An early Late Cretaceous mammal from Japan, with reconsideration of the evolution of tribosphenic molars. Paleontological Research 3: 18–28.
• Sigé, B., Buscalioni, A.D., Duffaud, S., Gayer, M., Orth, B., Rage, J.−C., and Sanz, J.L. 1997. Etat des données sur le gisement crétacé supérieur continental de Champ−Garimond (Gard, Sud de la France). Münchner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen 34: 111–130.
• Smith, T., Codrea, V., Săsăran, E., Van Itterbeeck, J., Bultynck, P., Csiki, Z., Dica, P., Fărcaş, C., Folie, A., Garcia, G., and Godefroid, P. 2002. A new exceptional vertebrate site from the Late Cretaceous of the Haţeg Basin (Romania). Studia Universitatis Babes−Bolyai, Geologia Special Issue 1: 321–330.
• Stephen, C. 1997. Differenciations of Hunter−Schreger bands of carnivores. In: W. von Koenigswald and P.M. Sander (eds.), Tooth Enamel Microstructure, 123–136. Balkema, Rotterdam.
• Stephen, C. 1999. The enamel of Creodonta, Arctocyonidae, and Mesonychidae (Mammalia), with special reference to the appearance of Hunter−Schreger−Bands. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 71: 291–303.
• Wood, C.B. 2000. Tooth enamel microstructure in Deltatherium (Metatheria, Late Cretaceous of Mongolia), with comparison to some other Mesozoic mammals. Journal of the Paleontological Society of Korea, Special Publication 4: 127–152.
• Wood, C.B. and Stern, D.N. 1997. The earliest prisms in mammalian and reptilian enamel. In: W. von Koenigswald and P.M. Sander (eds.), Tooth Enamel Microstructure, 63–83. Balkema, Rotterdam.
• Wood, C.B., Dumont, E.R., and Crompton, A.W. 1999. New studies of enamel microstructure in Mesozoic mammals: a review of enamel prisms as a mammalian synapomorphy. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 6: 177–213.