Reforma Wspolnej Polityki Rolnej a wyzwania zwiazane z rozszerzeniem Unii Europejskiej i ze Swiatowa Organizacja Handlu (WTO) - jaki moze byc udzial badan ekonomiczno-rolniczych

• Autorzy: Rabinowicz E
• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Two major events will be shaping discussion on agricultural policy matters during the coming years: the EU enlargement and WTO negotiations. In response to these challenges some underlying theoretical issues have been presented for which agricultural economic research could contribute to the discourse on the design of an efficient and equitable policy. The addressed topics are: -domestic or national policies and distortion of competition, -non-tariff barriers to trade, -status of compensation payments. The basic principles of domestic/national policies and problems of food security. environmental benefits and rural development have been presented. The non-trade concerns, food safety, trade issues and the acquis communautaire have been discussed. The non-trade concerns should be addressed by non-trade measures or these measures should be designed in a non-distorting way. Direct payments will undoubtedly play an important role in the next WTO negotiations. Denying direct payments to the CEECs would eventually undermine the very foundation of the CAP for the incumbents. A common policy of supporting farm incomes cannot be credible if the poorest farmers are excluded.Taking into account the EU enlargement and WTO negotiations the role of agricultural economists will relate to a new orientation of the research agenda and policy advising.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Unia Europejska; doplaty bezposrednie; doplaty kompensacyjne; Swiatowa Organizacja Handlu; Polska; rozszerzenie Unii Europejskiej; Wspolna Polityka Rolna; badania ekonomiczno-rolnicze; polityka rolna

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Postępy Nauk Rolniczych
• Rocznik: 2000
• Tom: 47
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: s.11-32,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Rabinowicz E

• Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 48 230 53 Alnorp Sweden

Bibliografia

• [1] Anderson K. 1998. Domestic agricultural policy objectives and trade liberalisation: synergies and trade-offs. OECD Workshop on Emerging Trade Issues. Paris.
• [2] Antle J.M. 1995. Choice and Efficiency in Food Safety Policy. Washington, DC: AIE Press, American Enterprise Institute.
• [3] Banse M., Munch W., Tangennann S. 1999. Union Accession for Central and Eastern Enropean Agricultural Markets, Trade, The Implications of European Government Budgets and the Macroeconomy. W: Jason G. Hartell i Johan F.M. Swinnen (eds), Agriculture and East-West European Integration. Aldershot: Ashgate (in press).
• [4] Barro R., Sala-i-Martin X. 1992. Convergence. Journal of Political Economy 100: 223-251.
• [5] Blanc M. 1997. Rurality: approaches and concepts, 1997. 48th EAAE Seminar, ENSEAD, Dijon, 21-22 March 1997.
• [6] Brouwer R., Slangen L. 1998. Contingent valuation of the public benefits of agricultural ,vildlife management: the case of Dutch peat meadow land. European Review of Agricultural Economics 25: 53-72.
• [7] Bureau J.-C. 1998. Food Safely and Quality Issues: Trade Considerations. Committee for Agricullure. Paris: OECD.
• [8] Caswell J.A, Mojduszka E.M. 1996. Using information labelling to influence the market for quality in food products. American Journal of Agricultural Economies 78: 1248-1253.
• [9] CEPR 1993. Making Sense of Subsidiarity. MEI 5 (Monitoring European Integration No. 5). London: Centre for European Policy Research.
• [10] Diamond P., Hausmann J. 1994. Contingent valuation: is some numbers better than no numbers? Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4): 45-64.
• [11] Frandsen S.E., Jensen H.G., Vanzetti D.M. 1998. Expanding 'Fortress Europe': Implication of European Enlargement for Non-member Regions. Danish Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Economics Working Paper 12/1998. Copenhagen.
• [12] Gardner M.B., Shogren J. 1998. Economics of endangered species. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12(3): 3-20.
• [13] Henrichsmeyer W., Löhe W. 1998. Impact analyses of the Agenda 2000 proposals for CAP reform. Simulations with the SPEL/EU-MFSS and the RAUMIS model systems. Comments and additional considerations. Bonn: Institute for Agricultural Policy, University of Bonn.
• [14] Henson S. 1998. Regulation of the trade effects of national food safety standards: discussion of some issues. OECD Workshop on Emerging Trade Issues, Paris.
• [15] Henson S., Traill B. 1993. The demand for food safety. Market imperfections and the role of government. Food Policy 18: 152-162.
• [16] Lehmann B. 1998. Domestic objectives in agricultural polices and liberalisation. OECD Workshop on Emerging Trade Issues, Paris.
• [17] Mahé L.P. 1997. Environmental and quality standards in the WTO: new protectionism in agricultural trade? An European perspective. European Review of Agricultural Economics 24(3-4): 480-503.
• [18] Mahé L.P., Ortalo-Magne F. 1998. International co-operation and the regulation of food quality and safety attributes. OECD Workshop on Emerging Trade Issues, Paris.
• [19] Martin P. 1997. Can Regional Policics Affect Growthand Geography in Europe? London: Centre for European Policy Research.
• [20] Metrick A., Weitzman M. 1998. Conflicts and choices in biodiversity preservation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12(3): 21-34.
• [21] Ministry of Agriculture, Sweden 1998. Agenda 2000 and Swedish Agriculture-Some Consequences. Departmental Series 1998: 70.
• [22] Quigley J.M. 1998. Urban diversity and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12: 127-138.
• [23] Rabin M. 1998. Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature 36: 11-46.
• [24] Rabinowicz E. 1999. Next enlargement and the future of the CAP. International Politics 33(3) (in press).
• [25] Sala-i-Martin X. 1996. Regional cohesion: evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence. European Economic Review 40: 1325-1352.
• [26] Saraceno E. 1996. Jobs, equal opportunities and entrepreneurship in rural areas. Cork Conference on Rural Development, November 1996.
• [27] Sen A. 1981. Poverty and Famines: an Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• [28] Slangen L. 1997. How to organise nature production by farmers. European Review of Agricultural Economics 24(3-4): 508-529.
• [29] Smith A., Holmes P., Sedelmeir U., Smith A., Wallace H., Young A. 1996. The European Union and the Central and Eastern Europe: Pre-accession Strategies. Sussex European Institute Paper 15. Brighton: University of Sussex.
• [30] Thompson R. 1998. Public policy for sustainable agriculture and rural equity. Food Policy 23(1): 1-7.
• [31] von Urff W. 1996. Integrated rural development: realizing the concept. Cork Conference on Rural Development, November 1996.
• [32] Winters L.A. 1988. The so-called 'non-economic' objectives of agricultural Support. OECD Economic Studies 13: 237-266.