Overlap of temporal niches among four sympatric species of shrews

• Autorzy: Rychlik L.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Hypotheses about the dependence of circadian activity from metabolic rate and the segregation of temporal niches among competing species were verified by the study of activity patterns in a shrew community of two semiaquatic species,Neomys anomalus Cabrera, 1907 andN. fodiens (Pennant, 1771), and two terrestrial species,Sorex araneus Linnaeus, 1758 andS. minutus Linnaeus, 1766, co-existing in wet habitats of Białowieża Forest (E Poland). In ten trapping sessions, performed in early summer between 1991 and 2000, traps were open 24 hours continuously and patrolled at 1:00, 5:00, 10:00, 15:00, and 20:00. All the shrew species were most active between 20:00 and 1:00, and least active around mid-day (10:00–15:00). However, activity of the twoSorex species was lower than that of the twoNeomys species in the period 20:00–1:00, but higher in the period 15:00–20:00. BothNeomys species displayed clearly nocturnal, unimodal patterns of activity. In contrast, activity of bothSorex species was relatively evenly distributed over 24 hours and they increased their activity earlier (ie after 15:00) than bothNeomys species (after 20:00). These results confirm the idea that small shrew species with higher metabolic rate have more frequent and more equally distributed activity bouts than large species. Overlap of temporal niches was the highest within genera (99.29% between bothNeomys species and 98.36% between bothSorex species), the lowest betweenN. fodiens andS. araneus (88.26%) andS. minutus (89.34%), and intermediate betweenN. anomalus and bothSorex species (91.78 and 93.34%, respectively). Such high interspecific overlaps in activity suggest a joint-action of other mechanisms that separate ecological niches of these species also in other dimensions (eg food, microhabitat).

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Sorex minutus; habitat; Neomys; Neomys fodiens; Bialowieza Forest; circadian activity; metabolic rate; Sorex araneus; niche; Neomys anomalus; temporal niche; Sorex; shrew; niche separation; interspecific competition; shrew community

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 2005
• Tom: 50
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.175-188,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Rychlik L.

• Polish Academy of Sciences, Waszkiewicza 1, 17-230 Bialowieza, Poland

Bibliografia

• Barnard C. J., Brown C. A. J. and Gray-Wallis J. 1983. Time and energy budgets and competition in the common shrew (Sorex araneus L.). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 13: 13–18.
• Bäumler W. 1975. Activity of some small mammals in the field. Acta Theriologica 20: 365–377.
• Baxter R. M., Goulden E. A. and Meester J. 1979. The activity patterns of some Southern AfricanCrocidura in captivity. Acta Theriologica 24: 61–68.
• Buchalczyk A. 1972. Seasonal variations in activity of shrews. Acta Theriologica 17: 221–243.
• Buchalczyk T. 1964. Daily activity rhythm in rodents under natural conditions. Acta Theriologica 9: 357–362.
• Buckner C. H. 1964. Metabolism, food capacity and feeding behaviour in four species of shrews. Canadian Journal of Zoology 42: 259–279.
• Cameron G. N., Kincaid W. B. and Carnes B. A. 1979. Experimental species removal: temporal activity patterns ofSigmodon hispidus andReithrodontomys fulvescens. Journal of Mammalogy 60: 195–197.
• Castién E. and Gosálbez J. 1999. Habitat and food preferences in a guild of insectivorous mammals in the Western Pyrenees. Acta Theriologica 44: 1–13. Cawthorn J. M. 1994. Live trapping study of two syntopic species ofSorex, S. cinereus andS. fumeus, in southwestern Pennsylvania. [In: Advances in the biology of shrews. J. F. Merritt, G. L. Kirkland Jr and R. K. Rose, eds]. Special Publication of Carnegie Museum of Natural History No. 18, Pittsburgh: 39-43.
• Churchfield S. 1982. The influence of temperature on the activity and food consumption of the common shrew. Acta Theriologica 27: 295–304.
• Churchfield S. 1984. Dietary separation in three species of shrew inhabiting water-cress beds. Journal of Zoology, London 204: 211–228.
• Churchfield S. 1990. The natural history of shrews. Christopher Helm (Publishers) Ltd., Bromley: 1–178.
• DeCoursey P. J. 1989. Photoentrainment of circadian rhythms: an ecologist's viewpoint. [In: Circadian clocks and ecology. T. Hiroshige and K. Honma, eds]. Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo: 187–206.
• DeCoursey P. J. 1990. Circadian photoentrainment in nocturnal mammals — ecological overtones. Biology of Behaviour 15: 213–238.
• Ellenbroek F. J. M. and Hamburger J. 1991. Interspecific interactions between the shrewsSorex araneus L. andS. minutus L. (Soricidae, Insectivora) and the use of habitat — a laboratory study. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 41: 32–61.
• Faliñski J. B. (ed) 1986. Vegetation dynamics in temperate lowland primeval forests. Ecological studies in Białowieża forest. Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht: 1–537.
• Goulden E. A. and Meester J. 1978. Notes on the behaviour ofCrocidura andMyosorex (Mammalia: Soricidae) in captivity. Mammalia 42: 197–207.
• GraphPAD InStat 1990. GraphPAD InStat version 1.13 software. W. Lampert, Max-Planck-Institut, 911271S.
• Halle S. 2000a. Ecological relevance of daily activity patterns. [In: Activity patterns in small mammals. Ecological Studies, vol. 141. S. Halle and N. C. Stenseth, eds]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg: 67–90.
• Halle S. 2000b. Voles — small graminivores with polyphasic patterns. [In: Activity patterns in small mammals. Ecological Studies, vol. 141. S. Halle and N. C. Stenseth, eds]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg: 191–215.
• Halle S. and Stenseth N. C. (eds) 2000. Activity patterns in small mammals. Ecological Studies, vol. 141. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg: 1–320.
• Hanski I. 1984. Food consumption, assimilation and metabolic rate in six species of shrew (Sorex andNeomys). Annales Zoologici Fennici 21: 157–165.
• Hanski I. 1985. What does a shrew do in an energy crisis? [In: Behavioural ecology. Ecological consequences of adaptive behaviour. The 25th Symposium of the British Ecological Society, Reading 1984. R. M. Sibly and R. H. Smith, eds]. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford: 247–252.
• Hanski I. 1994. Population biological consequences of body size inSorex. [In: Advances in the biology of shrews. J. F. Merritt, G. L. Kirkland Jr and R. K. Rose, eds]. Special Publication of Carnegie Museum of Natural History No. 18, Pittsburgh: 15-26.
• Ivanter E. V. and Makarov A. M. 2002. [Circadian activity and movements of the common shrew (Sorex araneus L.). Ekologiya 4: 298–303. [In Russian]
• Jánský L. and Hanák V. 1960. Aktivität der Spitzmäuse unter natürlichen Bedingungen. Säugetierkundliche Mitteilungen 8: 55–63.
• Karulin B. E., Khylap L. A., Nikitina N. A., Kovalevsky Yu. V., Teslenko K. B. and Albov S. A. 1974. Activity and use of refuges in the common shrew (from observations on animals labelled with radioactive cobalt). Byulleten' Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytatelei Prirody, Otdel biologicheskii 79: 65–72. [In Russian with English summary]
• Kenagy G. J. 1973. Daily and seasonal patterns of activity and energetics in a heteromyid rodent community. Ecology 54: 1201–1219.
• Kotler B. P., Brown J. S. and Subach A. 1993. Mechanisms of species coexitence of optimal foragers — temporal partitioning by two species of sand dune gerbils. Oikos 67: 548–556.
• Kronfeld-Schor N. and Dayan T. 1999. The dietary basis for temporal partitioning: food habits of coexistingAcomys species. Oecologia 121: 123–128.
• Krushinska N. L. and Pucek Z. 1989. Ethological study of sympatric species of European water shrews. Acta Theriologica 34: 269–285.
• Krushinska N. L. and Rychlik L. 1993. Intra- and interspecific antagonistic behaviour in two sympatric species of water shrews:Neomys fodiens andN. anomalus. Journal of Ethology 11: 11–21.
• Lardet J. P. 1988. Spatial behaviour and activity patterns of the water shrew,Neomys fodiens in the field. Acta Theriologica 33: 293–303.
• Malmquist M. G. 1985. Character displacement and biogeography of the pygmy shrew in northern Europe. Ecology 66: 373–377.
• Malmquist M. 1986. Density compensation in allopatric populations of the pygmy shrewSorex minutus on Gotland and the outer Hebrides — evidence for the effect of interspecific competition. Oecologia 68: 344–346.
• Merritt J. F. and Vessey S. H. 2000. Shrews — small insectivores with polyphasic patterns. [In: Activity patterns in small mammals. Ecological Studies, vol. 141. S. Halle and N. C. Stenseth, eds]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg: 235–251.
• O'Farrell M. J. 1974. Seasonal activity patterns of rodents in a segebrush community. Journal of Mammalogy 55: 809–823.
• Ohdachi S. 1994. Total activity rhythms of three soricine species in Hokkaido. Journal of Mammalogical Society of Japan 19: 89–99.
• Ohdachi S. 1997. Laboratory experiments on spatial use and aggression in three sympatric species of shrews in Hokkaido, Japan. Mammal Study 22: 11–26.
• Pernetta J. C. 1977. Population ecology of British shrews in grassland. Acta Theriologica 22: 279–296.
• Pianka E. R. 1973. The structure of lizard communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 53–74.
• Priotto J. and Polop J. 1997. Space and time use in syntopic populations ofAkodon azarae andCalomys venustus (Rodentia, Muridae). Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 62: 30–36.
• Rácz G. and Demeter A. 1998. Character displacement in mandible shape and size in two species of water shrews (Neomys, Mammalia: Insectivora). Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 44: 165–175.
• Rychlik L. 1997. Differences in foraging behaviour between water shrews:Neomys anomalus andNeomys fodiens. Acta Theriologica 42: 351–386.
• Rychlik L. 2000. Habitat preferences of four sympatric species of shrews. Acta Theriologica 45, Suppl. 1: 173–190.
• Rychlik L. 2001. Habitat preferences of water shrews and root vole coexisting along a stream in Białowieża Forest. Säugetierkundliche Informationen, Jena 5: 99–112.
• Rychlik L. and Jancewicz E. 2002. Prey size, prey nutrition, and food handling by shrews of different body sizes. Behavioral Ecology 13: 216–223.
• Rychlik L. and Ramalhinho M. G. 2005. Habitat preferences of the Mediterranean water shrewNeomys anomalus in Portugal. [In: Advances in the biology of the Soricidae II. J. F. Merritt, S. Churchfield, R. Hutterer and B. I. Sheftel, eds]. Special Publication of Carnegie Museum of Natural History, No. 22 Pittsburgh. (in press)
• Rychlik L., Ruczyñski I., Borowski Z. and Friedrich T. 2004. Space use and competitive interactions in shrews (Insectivora: Soricidae) revealed by radio-telemetry. [In: Contributions to the 5th International Symposium on Physiology, Behaviour and Conservation of Wildlife, Berlin, Germany, 26–29 September 2004. C. Voigt and H. Hofer, eds]. Advances in Ethology 38, Suppl. to Ethology: 172.
• Schoener T. W. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185: 27–39.
• Shillito J. F. 1963. Field observations on the growth, reproduction and activity of a woodland population of the common shrew,Sorex araneus L. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 140: 99–114.
• SYSTAT 1992. Systat for Windows, version 5.01 software. SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston, IL.
• Taylor J. R. E. 1998. Evolution of energetic strategies in shrews. [In: Evolution of shrews. J. M. Wójcik and M. Wolsan, eds]. Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża: 309–346.
• Tupikova N. V. 1949. [The diet and nature of circadian activity of shrews from central region of USSR]. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 28: 561–572. [In Russian]
• Voesenek L. A. C. J. and van Bemmel A. C. 1984. Intra and interspecific competition in the water shrew in the Netherlands. Acta Theriologica 29: 297–301.
• Vogel P. 1976. Energy consumption of European and African shrews. Acta Theriologica 21: 195–206.
• Vogel P. 1980. Metabolic levels and biological strategies in shrews. [In: Comparative physiology: primitive mammals. K. Schmidt-Nielsen, L. Bolis and C. R. Taylor, eds]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 170–180.
• Yalden D. W., Morris P. A. and Harper J. 1973. Studies on the comparative ecology of some French small mammals. Mammalia 37: 257–276.
• Yoshino H. and Abe H. 1984. Comparative study on the foraging habits of two species of soricine shrews. Acta Theriologica 29: 35–43.
• Ziv Y. and Smallwood J. A. 2000. Gerbils and heteromyids — interspecific competition and the spatio-temporal niche. [In: Activity patterns in small mammals. Ecological Studies, vol. 141. S. Halle and N. C. Stenseth, eds]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg: 159–176.
• Zwolak R. and Rychlik L. 2004. Does the reduction of locomotor activity serve as an aggression avoidance mechanism in shrews (Soricidae)? Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities, Biology 7(2) http://​www.​ejpau.​media.​pl/​series/​volume7/​issue2/​biology/​art-06.​html.​