Zachowanie sie zwierzat gospodarskich a wyniki chowu i jakosc produktow zwierzecych

• Autorzy: Jezierski T
• Języki publikacji: PL

Słowa kluczowe

PL

zachowanie sie zwierzat; hodowla zwierzat; produkty zwierzece; zwierzeta gospodarskie; jakosc; produkcja zwierzeca

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Postępy Nauk Rolniczych
• Rocznik: 1994
• Tom: 41
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: s.97-110,rys.,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Jezierski T

• Instytut Genetyki i Hodowli Zwierzat PAN, Jastrzebiec

Bibliografia

• [1] Alexander G., Stevens D., Bradley L. R. 1983. Washing lambs and confinement as aids to fostering. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 10: 251-261.
• [2] Appleyard J. O., Cook B. 1976. The detection of oestrus in dairy cattle. Vet. Res. 99: 253-256.
• [3] Arave C. W., Albright J. L. 1976. Social rank and physiological traits of dairy cows as influenced by changing group members. J. Dairy Sci. 59: 974-981.
• [4] Barr H. L. 1974. Influence of oestrus detection on days open in dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 58: 246-247.
• [5] Björk A., Olsson N. G., Christensson E., Martinsson K., Olsson O. 1988. Effects of amperozide on biting behavior and performance in restricted-fed pigs following regrouping. J. Anim. Sci. 66: 669-675.
• [6] Blokhuis H. J., Liekens E., Rommers J. M. 1986. Behavioural observations of hens in a tiered-wire-foor layinghouse. Proc. of the Internat. Symposium on Applied Ethology in Farm Animals. Balatonfûred, Wręgry 95-99.
• [7] Brakel W. J., Leis R. A. 1976. Impact of social disorganisation on behaviour, milk yield and body weight of dairy cows. J. Dary Sci. 59: 716-721.
• [8] Canali E., Ferrante V., Todeschini R., Verga M., Carenzi C. 1991. Rabbit nest construction and its relationship wilh litter development. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 31: 259-266.
• [9] Craig J. V. 1982. Behavioral and genctic adaptation of laying hens to high density environments. Bio. Science 32, 1: 33-37.
• [10] Eldridge G. A., Winfield C. G. 1990. The behaviour and bruising of cattle during transport at different space allowances. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 15: 60-68.
• [11] Franc C., Bartos L., Hanys Z. 1986. The influence of social stability within a group of bulls on the incidence of dark-cutting beef (DFD). Proc. of the Internat. Symp. on Applied Athol. in Farm Animals. Balatonfûred, Węgry, 147-151.
• [12] Fraser D. 1983/4. The rote of behavior in swine production: a review of research. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 11: 317-339.
• [13] Fulkerson W. J., Sawyer G.J., Crothers I. 1983. The accuracy of several aids in detecting oestrus in dairy cattle. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 10: 199-208.
• [14] Gonyou H. W., Hemsworlh P. H., Barnett J. L. 1986. Effects of frequent interactions with humans on growing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 16: 269-278.
• [15] Grandin T. 1978. Design of lairage, yard and race systems for handling cattle in abbatoirs, auctions, ranches, restraining chutes and dipping vats. 1st World Congress on Ethology Applied to Zootechnics. Madrid, Proceedings E-I-2: 37-52.
• [16] Harrison R. O., Young J. W., Freeman A. E., Ford S. P. 1989. Effects of lactational level on reactivation of ovarian function ancl interval from parturition to first visual oestrus ancl conception in high-producing Holstein cows. Anim. Prod. 49: 23-28.
• [17] Hemsworth P. H., Barnett J. L., Coleman G. J., Hansen C. 1989. A study of the relationships between the attitudinal and behavioural profiles of stockpersons and the level of fear of humans and reproductive performance of commercial pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 23: 301-314.
• [18] Hemsworth P. H., Barnelt J. L., Hensen C. 1987. The influence of inconsistent handling by humans on the behaviour, growth and corticosteroids of young pigs. Appl. Anim. Beh. Sci. 17: 245-252.
• [19] Holmes L. N., Price E.O., Dally M. R., Wallach S. J. R. 1989. Fostering lambs by odor transfer: two-lamb substitution. Appl. Anim. Beh. Sci. 24: 247-257.
• [20] Jezierski T. 1987. Zachowanie się bydła o różnej użytkowości zależnie od genotypu i sposobu utrzymania. Ossolineum Wydawnictwo PAN, Prace habilitacyjne.
• [21] Jezierski T., Goszczyński J. 1984. Choice of sexual ancl social partners by young bulls of different genotypes. Proc. of the Internat. Congress on Applied Ethology in Farm Animals, Kiel, RFN, 40-42.
• [22] Jezierski T., Koziorowski M., Goszczyński J., Sieradzka I. 1989. Homosexual and social behaviours of young bulls of different geno- and phenotypes and plasma concentration of some hormones. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 24: 101-113.
• [23] Jezierski T., Podłużny M. 1984/5. A quantitative analysis of social behaviour of different cross breds of clairy cattle kept in loose housing and its relationship to productivity. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 13: 31-40.
• [24] Jezierski T., Przybylska H. 1992. Nasilenie behawioru rujowego u krów ncb i nczb i jego związek z wydajnościa mleczną. Prace i Mat. Zoot. 42: 49-55.
• [25] Jones B. R., Hughes B. O. 1986. Fearfulness ancl abnormalities in the chicken's egg shell - is there a link. Proc. of the Internat. Symposium on Applied Ethology in Farm Animals. Balotonfûred Węgry, 171-175.
• [26] Kenny F. J., Tarrant P. V. 1987a. The reaction or young bulls to short haul road transport. Appl. Anim. Beh. Sci. 17: 209-227.
• [27] Kenny F. J., Tarrant P. V. 1987b. The behaviour of young Friesian bulls during socjal re-grouping at an abbatoir. Influence of an overhead electrified wire grid. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 18: 233-246.
• [28] Kenny F, J., Tarrant P. V. 1987c. The physiological and behavioural responses of crossbred Friesian steers to short-haul transport by road. Livest. Prod. Sci. 17: 63-75.
• [29] Kovalcik K., Kovalcikova M. 1974. Vplyv skupinoveho presumu prvostok cernostrahateho plemena na prebeh ich laktacnej krivky. Żivocisna Vyroba 19: 945-952.
• [30] Krohn C. C. 1978. The effect of group change on behaviour and production performance in large dairy herds. First World Comgr. on Ethology Applied to Zootechnics, Madrid, E-1-26, 40.
• [31] Maciejowski J. 1994. Racjonalne i emocjonalne motywy ochrony zwierząt. Medycyna Weterynaryjna, 50, l: 4-7.
• [32] Madec F. 1984. Urinary disorders in intensive pig herds. Pig News and Information, 5, 2: 89-93.
• [33] McGlone J. J., Stansbury W. F., Tribble L. F. 1986. Areosolized 5α androst-16 N-3-one reduced agonistic behavior and temporarily improved performance of growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 63: 679-684.
• [34] Metz J.H.M., Groenstein C. M. (Editors): New trends in veal calf production. Proc. of the Internat. Symposium on Veal Calf Prod. Wageningen, EAAP Publication 52.
• [35] Pasierbski Z., Winnicki S., Mazurkiewicz W. l 979. Erfahrungen bei der Spaltenbodenhatung von Mastbullen in grösseren Gruppen. Landbauforschung Völkenrode, Sonderheft 48: 95-99.
• [36] Pearce G. P., Hughes P. E. 1987. An investigation of the roles of boar-component stimuli in the expression of proceptivity in the female pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 18: 287-299.
• [37] Rooijen van J. 1984. Possibilities and limitalions of choice tests in relation to animal welfare. Proc. of the Congress on Applied Ethology in Farm Animals, Kiel, 353-357.
• [38] Rushen J. 1987. A difference in weight reduces fighting when unacquainted newly weaned pigs first meet. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 67: 951-960.
• [39] Schaefer A. L., Salomons M. O., Tong A. K. W., Sather A. P., Lepage P. 1990. The effect of environmental enrichment on aggression in newly weaned pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 27: 41-52.
• [40] Seabrook M. F. 1984. The personality of the dairy stockman and its intluence on the interaction process. Proc. of the Int. Congr. on Appl. Ethol. in Farm Anim. Kiel. 245-250.
• [41] Tan S. S. L., Shackleton D. M. 1990. Effects of mixing unfamiliar individuals and of azaperone on the social behaviour of finishing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 26: 157-168.
• [42] Tarrant P. V. 1980. The problem of dark cutting in beef. (Editors: D. E. Hood and P. V. Tarrant) Martinus Nijhoff The Hague, 3-34.
• [43] Vestergaard K. 1988. Deprivation choice tests - a new method to access the relative strength of two motivational systems. Proc. of the International Congress on Applied Ethology, Skara, 65-73.
• [44] Walton J. S. 1986. Effect of boar presence beforeand after weaning on estrus and ovulation in sows. J. Anim. Sci. 62: 9-15.
• [45] Warnock J. P., Caple I. W., Halpin C. G., McQueen R. 1978. Metabolie changes associated with the "downer" condition in dairy cows at abbatoirs. Aust. Vet. J. 54: 566-569.
• [46] Warris P. D. 1990. The handling of cattle pre-slaughter and its effects on carcass and meat quality. Appl. Anim. Beh. Sci. 29: 171-186.
• [47] Warris P. D., Kestin S. C., Brown S. N., Wilkins L. J. 1984. The time required for recovery from mixing stress in young bulls and the prevention of dark cutting beef. Meat Sci. 10: 53-68.
• [48] Webster A. B., Hurnik J. F. 1990. Behavior, production and well-being of the laying hen. 1. Effects of movable roosts, relationship of cage mates and genetic stock. Poultry Sci. 69: 2118-2127.
• [49] Webster A. B., Hurnik J. F. 1991. Behavior, production and well-being of the laying hen. 2. Individual variation and relationships of behavior to production and physical condition: Poultry Sci. 70: 421-428.
• [50] Wiepkema P. R., Hellemond K. K., Roessingh P., Romberg H. 1987. Behaviour and abomasal damage in individual weal calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 18: 257-268.
• [51] Winnicki S. 1992. Etologiczna ocena systemów utrzymania krów w Polsce. Prace i Mat. Zootechn. Zeszyt spec. 1: 65-79.