Spatial behaviour of European mink Mustela lutreola and polecat Mustela putorius in southwestern France

• Autorzy: Fournier P. , Maizeret C. , Fournier-Chambrillon C. , Ilbert N. , Aulagnier S. , Spitz F.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The European minkMustela lutreola Linnaeus, 1761 and the European polecatMustela putorius Linnaeus, 1758 are sympatric in southwestern France. They are related species but the former is highly threatened whereas the latter maintains good populations. Nine European mink and 14 polecats were radiotracked in the Landes de Gascogne region to compare their space use and to identify appropriate conservation measures for the European mink. Resting animals were located once a day and active animals were tracked by continuous monitoring. European mink had linear home ranges whose sizes were larger than predicted by Johnson’s model (mean±SD=2971±1888 ha in males and 257±113 ha in females). They travelled long inter-day distances (1.4±1.9 km in males and 0.4±0.6 km in females). Polecats had home ranges of various shapes (linear, circular or combined) and their sizes were consistent with Johnson’s model (707±779 ha in males and 51±58 ha in females). They also had shorter inter-day distances than mink (0.7±0.9 km in males and 0.2±0.4 km in females). However male polecats had longer activity bouts than male mink. Thus European mink exhibit large movements between small and distant activity areas while polecats compensate for their smaller range by a higher activity in restricted areas. The behaviour of the European mink appears to be an adaptation to habitats scattered over linear ranges. This extensive use of space suggests that conservation of this endangered species cannot be achieved in the confinement of Europe’s natural reserves. Conservation plans should aim at maintaining high quality habitats along entire river networks and ensuring safe movements for the animals, preventing particularly the risk of collisions with vehicles.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

home range; Mustela putorius; adaptation; Mustela lutreola; habitat; spatial behaviour; polecat; France; movement; European mink

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: 53
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.343-354,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Fournier P.

• Groupe de Recherche et d'Etudes pour la Gestion de l'Environnement, Route de Prechac, F-33730 Villandraut, France

autor

Maizeret C.

autor

Fournier-Chambrillon C.

autor

Ilbert N.

autor

Aulagnier S.

autor

Spitz F.

Bibliografia

• Arambarri R., Rodriguez A. F. and Belamendia G. 1997. Habitat selection, mortality and new contribution to the distribution of the European Mink (Mustela lutreola) in Alava. Estudios del Museo de Ciencias Naturales de Alava 12: 217–225.
• Arthur S. M., Krohn W. B. and Gilbert J. A. 1989. Home range characteristics of adult fishers. The Journal of Wildlife Management 53: 674–679.
• Baghli A. and Verhagen A. 2003. The distribution and status of the polecatMustela putorius in Luxembourg. Mammal Review 33: 57–68.
• Baghli A. and Verhagen A. 2004. Home ranges and movement patterns in a vulnerable poleacatMustela putorius population. Acta Theriologica 49: 247–258.
• Baghli A. and Verhagen A. 2005. Activity patterns and use of resting sites by polecats in an endangered population. Mammalia 69: 211–222.
• Birks J. D. S. 1989. What regulates the numbers of feral mink? Nature in Devon 10: 45–61.
• Birks J. D. S. 2000. The recovery of the polecat,Mustela putorius, in Britain. [In: Mustelids in a modern world. Management and conservation aspects of small carnivore: human interactions. H. I. Griffiths, ed]. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden: 141–152.
• Birks J. D. S. and Kitchener A. C. 1999. The distribution and status of the polecatMustela putorius in Britain in the 1990s. The Vincent Wildlife Trust, London: 1–152.
• Blandford P. R. S. 1987. Biology of the polecatMustela putorius: A literature review. Mammal Review 17: 155–198.
• Brzeziński M., Jędrzejewski W. and Jędrzejewska B. 1992. Winter home ranges and movements of polecatsMustela putorius in Białowieża Primaveral Forest, Poland. Acta Theriologica 37: 181–191.
• Buskirk S. W. and MacDonald D. W. 1989. Analysis of variability in home-range size of the American marten. The Journal of Wildlife Management 53: 997–1004.
• Ceña J. C. 2003. Aspectos de la ecología y composición de la poplación de Visón europeoMustela lutreola (Linnaeus, 1761) en la cuenca alta del río Ebro. [In: Proceedings book of the International Conference on the Conservation of European Mink (Mustela lutreola), 5–8 November 2003, Logroño, Spain. G. de La Rioja, ed]. Gobierno de La Rioja, Logroño: 63–84.
• Davison A., Griffiths H. I., Brookes R., Maran T., Macdonald D. W., Sidorovich V. E., Kitchener A. C., Irizar I., Villate I., González-Esteban J., Ceña J. C., Ceña A., Moya I. and Palazón S. 2000. Mitochondrial DNA and paleontological evidence for the origins of endangered European Mink,Mustela lutreola. Animal Conservation 4: 345–355.
• Fournier P., Maizeret C., Jimenez D., Chusseau J. P., Aulagnier S. and Spitz F. 2007. Habitat utilization by sympatric European minkMustela lutreola and polecatsMustela putorius in south-western France. Acta Theriologica 52: 1–12.
• Fournier-Chambrillon C., Chusseau J. P., Dupuch J., Maizeret C. and Fournier P. 2003a. Immobilization of free-ranging European mink (Mustela lutreola) an polecat (Mustela putorius) with medetomidine-ketamine and reversal with atipamezole. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 39: 393–399.
• Fournier-Chambrillon C., Dassé B., Delas G., Lanièce S., Letellier Y., Millet P., Pouzenc P. and Fournier P. 2003b. Causes of mortality in free-ranging European mink (Mustela lutreola) from France. [In: Proceedings book of the International Conference on the Conservation of European Mink (Mustela lutreola), 5–8 November 2003, Logroño, Spain. G. de La Rioja, ed]. Gobierno de La Rioja, Logroño: 325.
• Garin I., Zuberogoitia I., Zabala J., Aihartza J., Clevenger A. P. and Rallo A. 2002. Home ranges of European minkMustela lutreola in southwestern Europe. Acta Theriologica 47: 55–62.
• Garland T. 1983. Scaling the ecological cost of transport to body mass in terrestrial mammals. The American Naturalist 121: 571–587.
• Gerell R. 1970. Home ranges and movements of the minkMustela vison Schreber in southern Sweden. Oikos 21: 160–173.
• Gittleman J. L. and Harvey P. H. 1982. Carnivore home-range size, metabolic needs and ecology. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 10: 57–63.
• Goeta V. and Kranz A. 1999. The European mink (Mustela lutreola) in the Danube delta. Small Carnivore Conservation 21: 23–25.
• Goszczyński J. 1986. Locomotory activity of terrestrial predators and its consequences. Acta Theriologica 31: 79–85.
• Harestad A. S. and Bunnell F. L. 1979. Home range and body weight — a reevaluation. Ecology 60: 389–404.
• Herrmann M. 1994. Habitat use and spatial organization by the Stone marten. [In: Habitat use and spatial organization by the Stone marten. R. A. Powell, ed]. Cornell University Press, Ithaca: 122–136.
• Iman R. L. 1974. A power study of rank transform for the two-way classification model when interaction may be present. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 2: 227–229.
• Janeau G. 1998. Localisation de balises radio-émettrices VHF portées par des mammifères terrestres: principes, précision, limites et contraintes. Arvicola 97: 11–18.
• Johnson D. D. P., Macdonald D. W. and Dickman A. J. 2000. An analysis and review of models of the sociobiology of the Mustelidae. Mammal Review 30: 171–196.
• Kelt D. A. and Van Vuren D. 1999. Energetic constraints and the relationship between body size and home range area in mammals. Ecology 80: 337–340.
• Kenward R. E. 1987. Wildlife radio tagging: equipment, field techniques and data analysis. Academic Press, London: 1–192.
• Kenward R. E. and Hodder K. H. 1996. Ranges V. An analysis system for biological location data. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Dorset: 1–66.
• Lindstedt E. R., Miller B. J. and Buskirk S. W. 1986. Home range, time and body size in mammals. Ecology 67: 413–418.
• Lodé T. 1993. Stratégies d’utilisation de l’espace chez le putois européen Mustela putorius dans l’ouest de la France. Revue d’Ecologie (Terre et Vie) 48: 305–322.
• Lodé T. 1996. Polecat predation on frogs and toads at breeding sites in western France. Ethology Ecology and Evolution 8: 115–124.
• Lodé T. 1999. Comparative measurement of terrestrial and aquatic locomotion in Mustela lutreola and M. putorius. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 64: 1–6.
• Lodé T., Guiral G. and Peltier D. 2005. European mink-polecat hybridization events: hazards from natural process? Journal of Heredity 96: 1–8.
• Macdonald D. W. 1983. The ecology of carnivore social behaviour. Nature 301: 379–384.
• McNab B. K. 1963. Bioenergetics and the determination of home range size. The American Naturalist 97: 133–140.
• Maizeret C., Migot P., Galineau H., Grisser P. and Lodé T. 1998. Répartition et habitats du Vison d’Europe (Mustela lutreola) en France. Arvicola 97: 67–72.
• Maizeret C., Migot P., Rosoux R., Chusseau J. P., Gatelier T., Maurin H. and Fournier-Chambrillon C. 2002. The distribution of the European mink (Mustela lutreola) inFrance: towards a short term extinction? Mammalia 66: 525–532.
• Maran T. 2003a. European mink: setting of goal for conservation and the Estonian case study. Galemys 15: 1–11.
• Maran T. 2003b. Conservation of the European mink,Mustela lutreola, in Estonia: an update 2001–2003. [In: Proceedings book of the International Conference on the Conservation of European Mink (Mustela lutreola), 5-8 November 2003, Logroño, Spain. G. de La Rioja, ed]. Gobierno de La Rioja, Logroño: 131–142.
• Maran T. and Henttonen H. 1995. Why is the European mink disappearing? — A review of the processes and hypotheses. Annales Zoologici Fennici 32: 47–54.
• Maran T., Macdonald D. W., Kruuk H., Sidorovich V. E. and Rozhov V. V. 1998. The continuing decline of the European minkMustela lutreola: evidence for the intraguild aggression hypothesis. [In: Behaviour and ecology of riparian mammals. N. Dunstone and M. Gorman, eds]. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 297–324.
• Niemimaa J. 1995. Activity patterns and home ranges of the American MinkMustela vison in the Finnish outer archipelago. Annales Zoologici Fennici 32: 117–121.
• Palazón S. 1998. [Distribution, morphology and ecology of European mink (Mustela lutreola) in Iberian Peninsula]. PhD thesis, University of Barcelona, Barcelona: 1–278.
• Palazón S., Ceña J. C., Ruiz-Olmo J., Ceña A., Gozálbez J. and Gómez-Gayubo A. 2003. Trends in distribution of the European mink (Mustela lutreola) in Spain: 1950–1999. Mammalia 67: 473–484.
• Palazón S. and Ruiz-Olmo J. 1998. A preliminary study of the behaviour of the European MinkMustela lutreola in Spain, by means of radiotracking. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 71: 93–105.
• Phillips D. M., Harrison D. J. and Payer D. C. 1998. Seasonal changes in home-range area and fidelity of martens. Journal of Mammalogy 79: 180–190.
• Powell R. A. 1994. Structure and spacing ofMartes populations. [In: Structure and spacing of martes populations. R. A. Powell, ed]. Cornell University Press, Ithaca: 101–121.
• Roger M. 1990. Analyse d’un système proies — prédateur: le modle “lapin — petits rongeurs — putois”. These de l’Université Paris VI, Paris: 1–268.
• Sato J. J., Hosoda T., Wolsan M., Tsuchiya K., Yamamoto M. and Susuki H. 2003. Phylogenic relationships and divergence time among Mustelids (Mammalia, Carnivora) based on nucleotide sequences of the nuclear interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein and mitocondrial cytochromosomeb genes. Zoological Science 20: 243–264.
• Sidorovich V. E. 2000. The on-going decline of riparian mustelids (European mink,Mustela lutreola, polecat,Mustela putorius and stoat,Mustela erminea) in Eastern Europe: a review of the results to date and a hypothesis. [In: Mustelids in a modern world. Management and conservation aspects of small carnivore: human interactions. H. I. Griffiths, ed]. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden: 295–317.
• Skillings J. H. and Mack G. A. 1981. On the use of a Friedman-type statistic in balanced and unbalanced block designs. Technometrics 23: 171–177.
• Sokal R. R. and Rohlf F. J. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Third edition. W. H. Frreman and Company, New York: 1–887.
• SPSS® 9.0 1999 SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois 60606, USA.
• Thompson I. D. and Colgan D. W. 1987. Numerical responses of martens to a food shortage in northcentral Ontario. The Journal of Wildlife Management 51: 824–835.
• Tumanov I. L. 1999. The modern state of European mink (Mustela lutreola L.) populations. Small Carnivore Conservation 21: 9–11.
• Virgos E. 2003. Association of the polecatMustela putorius in eastern Spain with montane pine forests. Oryx 37: 484–487.
• Walton K. C. 1970. The polecat in Wales. [In: Welsh wildlife in trust. W. S. Lacey, ed]. North Wales Wildlife Trust, Bangor: 98–108.
• Weber D. 1989a. Beobachtungen zu Aktivität und Raumnutzung beim Iltis (Mustela putorius L.). Revue Suisse Zoologique 96: 841–862.
• Weber D. 1989b. The ecological significance of resting sites and the seasonal habitat change in polecats (Mustela putorius). Journal of Zoology, London 217: 629–638.
• Youngman P. M. 1982. Distribution and systematics of the European minkMustela lutreola. Acta Zoologica Fennica 166: 1–48.
• Zalewski A., Jędrzejewski W. and Jędrzejewska B. 2004. Mobility and home range use by pine martens (Martes martes) in a Polish primerval forest. Ecoscience 11: 113–122.