PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2007 | 55 | 4 |

Tytuł artykułu

Enchytraeids [Enchytraeidae, Oligochaeta] in midfield shelterbelts of different age and in adjoining croplands

Autorzy

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The objective of this paper was to recognize the influence of forest strips planted (as the shelterbelts) in agricultural area, on adjoining cereal fields basing on the distribution and composition of enchytraeid community. Species composition, density and individual size of enchytraeids were estimated in October and April 2003–2005 along two transects: 6 and 11 years old shelterbelts > ecotones > fields (at a distance of 15 and 50 m. from the wood strip) and in two reference sites: large (about 100 ha) forest stand and the field (“control” field) located in deforested area. The results have been compared with the published results of the previous studies made in the same area four years before (1999–2000). Samples were collected with soil corer 10 cm2 in area and 15 cm deep. Ten samples in each site were taken twice a year. Sixteen species were found in total. The range of density and biomass of enchytraeids for all study sites accounted for 1.6 to 15.3 ind.m⁻² and 55 to 956 mg f.wt. m⁻² (i.e.15– 308 mg d.w.) respectively. The lowest density was obserwed in the control field located in the deforested area. However, density and biomass of enchytraeids in the fields accounted for 67% and 47% respectively of those in shelterbelts. Species composition of enchytraeids in the young (2–11 yrs old) forest strips and in the adjacent fields was similar, however different from those in the forest stand and in old (150 yrs) shelterbelt. The response of enchytraeids to grass litter introduced on the soil surface was assessed in the experiment performed in a control field and in the transect of wood strip > field. The 7–10 portions of dried grass Dactylis glomerata (L.), (10 g each) were exposed in each plot for 12 and 18 months. More animals was found in the upper soil layer taken below the exposed litter as well as the density of all enchytraeids and percent share of the dominant genus Enchytraeus increased in the soil after 18 months of litter exposure.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

55

Numer

4

Opis fizyczny

p.681-690,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Polish Academy of Sciences, Dziekanow Lesny, 05-092 Lomianki, Poland

Bibliografia

  • Bartoszewicz A., Ryszkowski L. 1996 – Influence of the shelterbelts and meadows on the chemistry of ground water. (In: Dynamics of Agricultural Landscape. Eds: L. Ryszkowski, N.R. French, A. Kędziora) – PWRiL, Poznań, 98–109.
  • Bernacki Z. 2004 – Secondary succession of the vegetation in the young shelterbelt (Turew area, Western Poland) – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 391–404.
  • Briones M.J.J., Ineson P. 2002 – Use of C₁₄ carbon dating to determine feeding behaviour of enchytraeids – Soil Biol. Biochem. 34: 881–884.
  • Kajak A. 2007 – Effects of forested strips on spider assemblages in adjacent cereal fields: dispersal activity of spiders – Pol. J. Ecol. 55: 691–704.
  • Kajak A., Karg J., Ryszkowski L. (eds). 2003 – Impact of midfield shelterbelts on agricultural landscape: soil processes and litter decomposition – Pol. J. Ecol 51: 269–322.
  • Kajak A., Oleszczuk M. 2004 – Effect of shelterbelts on adjoining cultivated fields: patrolling intensity of carabeid beetles (Carabidae) and spiders (Araneae) – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 155–172.
  • Karg J., Ryszkowski L. 1996 – Animals in arable land. (In: Dynamics of an agricultural landscape. Eds: Ryszkowski L., French N.R., Kędziora A.) – PWRiL: 138–172. (in Polish, English summary)
  • Kasprzak K. 1982 – Review of enchytraeid (Oligochaeta, Enchytraeidae) community structure and function in agricultural ecosystems – Pedobiologia 23: 217–232.
  • Kostro-Chomać A. 2003 – Substancja organiczna gleby i jej właściwości w agroekosystemie z zadrzewieniem śródpolnym [Impact of midfield shelterbelts on organic matter content in soil] – Ph. Doctors Thesis, Agricultural University, Warsaw (in Polish)
  • Kristoufek V., Hallmann M., Westheide W., Schrempf H. 1995 – Selection of various streptomyces species by Enchytraeus crypticus (Oligocheta) – Pedobiologia 39: 547–554.
  • Kristoufek V., Novakova A., Pizl V. 2001 – Coprophilous streptomycetes and fungi – food sources for enchytraeid worms – Folia Microbiol. 46: 555–558.
  • Makulec G. 1983 – Enchytraeidae (Oligocheta) of forest ecosystems. I. Density, biomass and production – Ekol. pol. 31: 9–36.
  • Makulec G. 2004 – Lumbricidae communities in several years old midfield shelterbelts – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 173–179.
  • Marcinek J. 1996 – Soils of the Turew agricultural landscapes. (In: Dynamics of an agricultural landscape. Eds: Ryszkowski L., French N.R., Kędziora A.) – PWRiL: 19–20 (in Polish, English summary)
  • Moszyński A. 1932 – Skąposzczety (Oligocheta) miasta Poznania [Oligocheata of the Poznań city] – Kosmos A. 1–4: 235–255. (in Polish)
  • Nowak E. 2004 – Enchytraeids (Oligochaeta) in the agricultural landscape – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 115–122.
  • Olechowicz E. 2004 – Soil-litter macrofauna in the midfield shelterbelts of different age – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 135–153.
  • Olechowicz E. 2007 – Soil and litter macrofauna in shelterbelts and in adjacent croplands: changes in community structure after tree planting – Pol. J. Ecol. 55: 647–664.
  • Pilipiuk I. 2003 – Enchytraeid fauna (Oligochaeta, Enchytraeidae) in the Białowieża Primeval Forest – Fragm. faun. 46: 1–17.
  • Ryl B. 1977 – Enchytraeids (Oligocheta, Enchytraeidae) on rye and potato fields in Turew – Ekol. pol. 25: 519–529.
  • Ryl B. 1980 – Enchytraeid (Enchytraeidae, Oligocheta) populations of chosen crop-fields in the vicinity of Turew (Poznań region) – Pol. ecol. Stud. 6: 277–291.
  • Ryszkowski L. 1996 – The agricultural landscape near Turew (In: Dynamics of an agricultural landscape Eds: Ryszkowski L., French N.R., Kędziora A.) – PWRiL: 13–18 (in Polish, English summary)
  • Ryszkowski L., Karg J., Bernacki Z. 2003 – Biocenotic function of the mid-field woodlots in west Poland: study area and research assumptions – Pol. J. Ecol. 51: 269–281.
  • Szanser M. 2000 – Decomposition of grass (Dactylis glomerata) litter in a field experiment – biomanipulation of epigean predators’ number – Pol. J. Ecol. 48: 283–297.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-3d0504a1-3cdf-4ff6-ae56-65217dbd591c
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.