Wplyw niektorych czynnikow na wyniki zacielen u jalowic biorczyn swiezych zarodkow

• Autorzy: Znaniecki R , Jaskowski J.M. , Znaniecka E.
• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this study was determining influence of some factors on pregnancy results in recipient heifers of fresh embryos. The analysis was carried out on 1641 animals (1847 embryo transfer interventions of an average age of 16-26 months. The mean pregnancy rate in heifers was 46.4% and was dependent (p<0.001) on which the quality of embryos, kind of medium used to embryo collection, herds from recipients descended, number of interventions on one recipient, stage of embryo development, kind of medium to embryo culture and conservation, horn of uterus and the month. The best results were noted in recipients which received very good than poor quality embryos (60 resp. 26.1%). There was a big difference in pregnancy results between recipients coming from different herds (23 resp. 60%). When heifers were used as recipients two or more times the pregnancy results were lower than in heifers used only once (47.1 resp. 43.6% and 19.2%). A significant influence on pregnancy results was also the kind of medium used for the cultivation of embryos (Dulbeco (Menezo) or Dulbeco (Sigma) - 50.2 or 56.6% resp. OCM (Imperial - 26.8%). Likewise results of pregnecies were highest in October (62.2%) and lower in summer months (July 33.3%).

Słowa kluczowe

PL

wyniki zacielen; bydlo; synchronizacja rui; uwarunkowania; zarodki swieze; przeszczepianie zarodkow; stadium rozwoju; krowy biorczynie; jakosc; rozrod zwierzat; pozywki

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medycyna Weterynaryjna
• Rocznik: 1998
• Tom: 54
• Numer: 08
• Opis fizyczny: s.550-553,rys.,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Znaniecki R

• Prywatna Praktyka Weterynaryjna, ul. Wejhera 13, 82-200 Malbork

autor

Jaskowski J.M.

autor

Znaniecka E.

Bibliografia

• 1. Bach S., Muller F.: Tierzucht 40, 209, 1986.
• 2. Bielański A., Tischner M.: Biotechnologia rozrodu zwierząt gospodarskich. Drukrol, Kraków, 1997.
• 3. Donaldson L. E.: Vet. Rec. 118, 661, 1986.
• 4. Jaśkowski J. M., Zbylut J., Urbaniak K.: Mat. Konf. Aktualne osiągnięcia w immunoprofilaktyce i terapii chorób gruczołu mlekowego i narządu rozrodczego zwierząt domowych. 1, 26, 1997.
• 5. Lindner G. M., Wright W. Jr.: Theriogenology 20, 407, 1983.
• 6. Mapletoft R. J., Lindsell C. E., Pawlyshyn V.: Theriogenology 25, 172, 1986.
• 7. Munar C. J., Nigro M. A.: Theriogenology 25, 1975, 1986.
• 8. Schneider U. I. J., Castelberry R. S., Griffin G. L.: Theriogenology 13, 73, 1980.
• 9. Shea В. F., Janzen R. E., McEemand D. P.: Theriogenology 31, 186, 1984.
• 10. Wierzbowski S., Smorąg Z., Wierzchoś E.: Przenoszenie zarodków u bydła. Balice Przysiek 1995.
• 11. Wiese M., Wallenburg J.: Byd. Biul. wet. 2, 9, 1992.
• 12. Wright J. M.: Theriogenology 15, 43, 1996.