Seasonal variation in group size of Cantabrian chamois in relation to escape terrain and food

• Autorzy: Perez-Barberia F. J. , Nores C.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The herd size of Cantabrian chamois Rupicapra pyrenaica parva (Cabrera, 1910) varied seasonally in relation to escape terrain and food availability in our study area (Asturias, north of Spain). The median group size of females without kids was 1 (mean ± SD = 1.62 ± 1.00), females with kids was 4 (5.59 ± 5.42), males was 1 (1.73 ± 1.78), and mixed group size was 7 (8.91 ± 7.91). The female-kid group size depended more on escape terrain availability than on food quality. Throughout the early weeks of the life of kids, the mothers remained in difficult access areas (cliffs and steep slopes), and showed a weak tendency to aggregate. These areas provided a wide visual range and hiding places for offspring and their use may be an anti-predation strategy. When the kids were able to run quickly, the mothers used subalpine meadows. These areas were very open and exposed kids to predation and human disturbance, however the forage has high nutritive value, and may compensate for the cost of breeding and suckling by the mothers. Aggregation may be selected as an anti-predation strategy in subalpine meadows, allowing a reduction in time spent vigilant by each individual in the group, and increased time available for other activities. The largest male groups were located in pastures with abundant but poor quality forage. Our results suggest that group size in Cantabrian chamois is very flexible, changing seasonally and in response to resource availability.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

diet; Cantabrian chamois; food; seasonal variation; group size; escape terrain; chamois; Rupicapra pyrenaica parva

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 1994
• Tom: 39
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.295-305

Twórcy

autor

Perez-Barberia F. J.

• Universidad de Oviedo, 33071 Oviedo, Spain

autor

Nores C.

Bibliografia

• Atbon S. D. and Clutton-Brock T. H. 1988. Climate and the population dynamics of red deer in Scotland. (In: Ecological Changes in the Uplands. M. B. Usher and D. B. A. Thompson, eds]. Blackwell Scientific Publication, Oxford.
• Alados C. 1985. Group size and composition of the Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica Schinz) in the Sierras of Cazorla and Segura. [In; The biology and management of mountain ungulates. S. Lovari, ed]. Croom-Helm, London: 134-147.
• Berducou C. and Bousses P. 1985. Social grouping patterns of a dense population of chamois in the Western Pyrenees National Park, France. [In: The biology and management of mountain ungu­lates. S. Lovari, ed], Croom-Helm, London: 166-175.
• Bousses P. and Cornaire S. 1982. L'ontogenese du comportement de jeune isard. Doc. Sei. Parc National des Pyrénées 10: 1-125.
• Caraco T. 1979a. Time budgeting and group size: a theory. Ecology 60: 611-627.
• Caraco T. 1979b. Time budgeting and group size: a test of theory. Ecology 60: 618-627.
• Caraco T. 1980. Stochastic dynamics of avian foraging flock. Am. Nat. 115: 262-275.
• Caraco T. 1981. Risk-sensitivity and foraging groups. Ecology 62: 527-531.
• Caraco T., Martindale S. and Pulliam H. R. 1980. Avian flocking in the presence of a predator. Nature 285: 400-401.
• Cederna A. and Lovari S. 1985. The impact of tourism on chamois feeding activities in an area of the Abruzzo National Park, Italy. [In: The biology and management of mountain ungulates. S. Lovari, ed). Croom-Helm, London: 216-225,
• Clarke C. M. H. and Frampton C. M. 1991. Structural changes in an apparently stable chamois population in Basin Creek, Canterbury, New Zealand. N. Zeal. J. Zool. 18: 233-241.
• Clutton-Brock T. H., Guinness F. E. and Albon S. D. 1982. Red deer. Behaviour and ecology of two sexes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 1-378.
• Cushing D. H. and Harden F. R. 1968. Why do fish school? Nature 218: 918-920.
• Elsner-Schack I. von. 1985. Seasonal changes in the size of chamois groups in the Ammergauer Mountains, Bavaria. [In: The biology and management of mountain ungulates. S. Lovari, edj. Croom-Helm, London: 148-153.
• Focardi S. and Paveri-Fontana S. L. 1992. A theoretical study of the socioecology of ungulates. Theor. Popul. Biol. 41: 121-134.
• Fryxell J. M. 1991. Forage quality and aggregation by large herbivores. Am. Nat. 138: 478-498.
• Hirth D. H. 1977. Social behavior of white-tailed deer in relation to habitat. Wildl. Monogr. 53: 1-55.
• Jeppesen J. L. 1987. Seasonal variation in group size, and sex and age composition in a Danish Red deer (Ceruus elaphus) population under heavy hunting pressure. Dan. Rev. Game Biol. 13: 4-18,
• Jodra P. J. 1981. Parámetros de gregarismo del Gamo (Dama dama) en el coto de Doñana, Doñana Acta Vertebrata 8: 237-289.
• Krämer A. 1969. Soziale Organisation und Sozialverhalten einer Gemspopulation (Rupicapra rupi­capra L.) den Alpen. Z. Tierpsych. 26: 889-964.
• Krausman P. R., Leopold B. D., Seegmiller R. F. and Torres S. G. 1989. Relationships between desert bighorn sheep and habitat in western Arizona. Wildl. Monogr. 102: 1-66.
• Krebs J. R. and Davies N. B. 1987. An introduction to behavioural ecology (2nd edn). Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford: 1-389.
• Lagory K. E. 1986. Habitat, group size, and the behaviour of white-tailed deer. Behaviour 98: 168^179.
• Lovari S. and Cosentino R. 1986. Seasonal habitat selection and group size of the Abruzzo chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica ornata). Boll. Zool. 53: 73-78.
• McNaughton S. J. 1988. Mineral nutrition and spatial concentrations of African ungulates. Nature 334: 343-345.
• Mitchell B., McCowan D. and Nicholson I. A. 1976, Annual cycles of body weight and condition in Scottish red deer (Ceruus elaphus). J. Zool., Lond. 180: 107-127.
• Mueller-Dombois D. and Ellenberg H. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York: 1-547.
• Norusis M. J. 1986. SPSS/PC+: SPSS for the IBM PC/XT/AT. Chicago.
• Patterson I. J. 1988. Responses of Apennine chamois to human disturbance. Z. Sàugetierk. 53: 245-252.
• Pulliam H. R. and Caraco T. 1984. Living in groups: is there an optimal group size?. [In: Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, eds], Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford: 122-147.
• Pulliam H. R. and Mills G. S. 1977. The use of space by wintering sparrows. Ecology 58: 1393-1399.
• Quenette, P.-Y. 1990. Functions of vigilance behaviour in mammals: a review. Acta Oecologica 11: 801-818.
• Reimers E. and Ringberg T. 1983. Seasonal changes in body weights of Svalbard reindeer from birth to maturity. Acta zool. fenn. 175: 69-72.
• Richard C. and Pépin D. 1990. Seasonal variation in intragroup-spacing behavior of foraging isards {Rupicapra pyrenaica). J. Mammal. 71: 145-150.
• Richard-Hansen C., Gonzalez G. and Gerard J.-F. 1992, Structure sociale de l'isard (Rupicapra pyrenaica) dans trois sites pyrénéens. Gibier Faune Sauvage 9: 137-149.
• San José C, and Braza F, 1992, Antipredator aspects of fallow deer behaviour during calving season at Dofiana National Park (Spain). Ethol. Ecol, Evol. 4: 139-149.
• Sokal R. R. and Rohlf F. J. 1981. Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. (2nd edn). W. H. Freeman and Company, New York: 1-859.
• Staines B. W., Crisp J. M. and Parish T. 1982. Differences in the quality of food eaten by red deer (Ceruus elaphus) stags and hinds in winter. J. Appl. Ecol. 19: 65-77.
• Zar J. H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis (2nd edn). Prentice-Hall, New Jersey: 1-718.