PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
1993 | 38 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

Are biochemical-genetic variation and mating systems related in large mammals?

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
In some families of large mammals (Cervidae, Bovidae, Canidae), we examined relationships between the various mating systems adopted and biochemical-genetic variation measured in terms of the mean proportion of polymorphic loci (P), mean heterozygosity (H) and derived coefficients, such as the ratio Pt:P and FIS. Our hypothesis was that genetic variability decreases as the degree of polygyny of the mating system adopted increases. Most of the data were in accordance with this prediction, but also some ambiguous results could be observed. Methodological and practical difficulties connected with our synoptical approach, such as the lack of comparability among most electrophoretic studies and the general scarcity of quantitative behavioural data are critically discussed.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

38

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.175-185

Twórcy

autor
  • Universita di Pisa, Via Volta 6, 56126 Pisa, Italy
autor

Bibliografia

  • Aeschbacher A. 1975. Das Brunftverhalten des Alpensteinwildes. Eugen Rentsch Verlag, Erlenbach- Zürich: 1 - 88.
  • Apollonio M. 1992. Reproductive success in male fallow deer on two leks. Abstracts of the Behavioural Ecology Congress, Princeton. University of Princeton.
  • Apollonio M., Festa-Bianchet M. and Mari F. 1989. Correlates of copulatory success in a fallow deer lek. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25: 89 - 97.
  • Arnold S. J. and Wade M. J. 1984a. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: Theory. Evolution 38: 709 - 719.
  • Arnold S. J. and Wade M. J. 1984b. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: Applications. Evolution 38: 720 - 734.
  • Baccus R., Ryman N., Smith M. H., Reuterwall C. and Cameron D. 1983. Genetic variability and differentiation of large grazing mammals. J. Mammal. 64: 109 - 120.
  • Bigalke R. C., Hartl G. B., Berry M. P. S. and Hensbergen H. J. van 1993. Population genetics of the springbok Antidorcas marsupialis - a preliminary study. [In: Ecological genetics in mammals. G. B. Hartl and J. Markowski, eds]. Acta theriol. 38, Suppl. 2: 103 - 111.
  • Buechner H. K. and Roth D. H. 1974. The lek system in Uganda kob antelope. Am. Zool. 14: 145 - 162.
  • Chesser R. K. 1983. Genetic variability within and among populations of the black-tailed prairie dog. Evolution 37: 320 - 331.
  • Chesser R. K., Sugg D. W., Rhodes O. E., Jr, Novak J. M. and Smith M. H. 1993. Evolution of mammalian social structure. [In: Ecological genetics in mammals. G. B. Hartl and J. Markowski, eds]. Acta theriol. 38, Suppl. 2: 163- 174.
  • Clutton-Brock T. H. 1987. Sexual selection in the Cervidae. [In: Biology and management of the Cervidae. C. M. Wemmer, ed]. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C., London: 110 - 122.
  • Clutton-Brock T. H. 1988. Reproductive success. [In: Reproductive success. T. H. Clutton-Brock, ed]. Chicago University Press, Chicago: 472 - 486.
  • Clutton-Brock T. H., Albon S. D., Guinness F. E. 1988. Reproductive success in male and female red deer. [In: Reproductive success. T. H. Clutton-Brock, ed]. Chicago University Press, Chicago: 325 - 343.
  • Clutton-Brock T. H., Guinness F. E. and Albon S. D. 1982. Red deer - Behavior and ecology of two sexes. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh: 1 - 378.
  • Dratch P. and Gyllensten U. 1985. Genetic differentiation of red deer and North American elk (wapiti). Biology of Deer Production. The Royal Society of New Zealand Bulletin 22: 37 - 40.
  • Espmark Y. 1964. Rutting behaviour in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L.). Anim. Behav. 12: 159 - 163.
  • Fisher R. A., Putt W. and Hackel E. 1976. An investigation of the products of 53 gene loci in three species of wild Canidae: Canis lupus, Canis latrans, and Canis familiaris. Bioch. Genet. 14: 963 - 974.
  • Fusco G., Lorenzini R., Lucchini V., Francisci F. and Randi E. 1991. Variabilita genetica, analizzata tramite elettroforesi, di un campione delia popolazione Italiana di lupo (Canis lupus). [In: Genetics and Wildlife Conservation, E. Randi and M. Spagnesi, eds]. Suppl. Ric. Biol. Selvaggina 18: 175 - 183.
  • Gavin T. A. and May B. 1988. Taxonomie status and genetic purity of Columbian white-tailed deer. J. Wildl. Manage. 52: 1 - 10.
  • Geist V. 1963. Behaviour of North American moose, Alces alces andersoni Peterson, 1950 in British Columbia. Behaviour 20: 377 - 416.
  • Geist V. 1971. Mountain sheep. A study in behavior and evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 1 - 383.
  • Georgiadis N. J., Kat P. W., Oketch H. and Patton J. 1990. Allozyme divergence within the Bovidae. Evolution 44: 2135 - 2149.
  • Gyllensten U., Ryman N., Reuterwall C. and Dratch P. 1983. Genetic differentiation in four European subspecies of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Heredity 51: 561 - 580.
  • Hamilton M. J. and Kennedy M. L. 1986. Genie variation in the coyote, Canis latrans, in Tennessee, USA. Genetica 71: 167 - 173.
  • Hartl D. L. 1988. A primer of population genetics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts: 1 - 305.
  • Hartl G. B. 1986. Steinbock und Gemse im Alpenraum - Genetische Variabilität und biochemische Differenzierung zwischen den Arten. Z. zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch. 24: 315 - 320.
  • Hartl G. B., Burger H., Willing R. and Suchentrunk F. 1990a. On the biochemical systematics of the Caprini and the Rupicaprini. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 18: 175 - 182.
  • Hartl G. B., Markov G., Rubin A., Findo S., Lang G. and Willing R. 1993. Allozyme diversity within and among populations of three ungulate species (Cervus elaphus, Capreolus capreolus, Sus scrofa) of Southeastern and Central Europe. Z. Säugetierk. (in press).
  • Hartl G. B. and Pucek Z. Genetic depletion in the European bison {Bison bonasus) and the significance of electrophoretic heterozygosity for conservation. Conserv. Biol, (in press).
  • Hartl G. B. and Reimoser F. 1988. Biochemical variation in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.): are r-strategists among deer genetically less variable than K-strategists? Heredity 60: 221 - 227.
  • Hartl G. B., Reimoser F., Willing R. and Köller J. 1991. Genetic variability and differentiation in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) of Central Europe. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 23: 281 - 299.
  • Hartl G. B., Schleger A. and Slowak M. 1986. Genetic variability in fallow deer, Dama dama L. Animal Genetics 17: 335-341.
  • Hartl G. B., Willing R., Grillitsch M. and Klansek E. 1988. Biochemical variation in Mustelidae: Are carnivores genetically less variable than other mammals. Zool. Anz. 221: 81 - 90.
  • Hartl G. B., Willing R., Lang G., Klein F. and Köller J. 1990b. Genetic variability and differentiation in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) of Central Europe. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 22: 289 - 306.
  • Hartl G. B., Willing R. and Suchentrunk F. 1990c. On the biochemical systematics of selected mammalian taxa: empirical comparison of qualitative and quantitative approaches in the evaluation of protein electrophoretic data. Z. zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch. 28: 191 - 216.
  • Hawkins R. E. and Klimstra W. D. 1970. A preliminary study of the social organization of white-tailed deer. J. Wildl. Manage. 34: 407 - 419.
  • Kennedy P. K., Kennedy M. L., Clarkson P. L. and Liepins I. S. 1991. Genetic variability in natural populations of the gray wolf, Canis lupus. Can. J. Zool. 69: 1183 - 1188.
  • Krämer A. 1969. Soziale Organisation und Sozialverhalten einer Gemspopulation (Rupicapra rupicapra L.) der Alpen. Z. Tierpsychol. 26: 889 - 964.
  • Kurt F. 1991. Das Reh in der Kulturlandschaft. Sozialverhalten und Ökologie eines Anpassers. Paul Parey, Hamburg und Berlin: 1 - 284.
  • Kurt F., Hartl G. B. and Völk F. 1993. Breeding strategies and genetic variation in European roe deer Capreolus capreolus populations. [In: Ecological genetics in mammals. G. B. Hartl and J. Markowski, eds]. Acta theriol. 38, Suppl. 2: 187 - 194.
  • Lent P. C. 1965. Rutting behaviour in a Barren Ground caribou population. Anim. Behav. 13: 259 - 264.
  • Leuthold W. 1977. African ungulates. Springer Verlag, Berlin and New York: 1 - 307.
  • Lorenzini R., Patalano M., Apollonio M. and Mazzarone V. 1993. Genetic variability of roe deer Capreolus capreolus in Italy: electrophoretic survey on populations of different origin. [In: Ecological genetics in mammals. G. B. Hartl and J. Markowski, eds]. Acta theriol. 38, Suppl. 2: 141 - 151.
  • Macnamara M. and Eldridge W. 1987. Behavior and reproduction in captive pudu {Pudu pudu) and red brocket (Mazama americana), a descriptive and comparative analysis. [In: Biology and management of the Cervidae. C. M. Wemmer, ed]. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C., London: 371 - 387.
  • Mitton J. B. and Grant M. C. 1984. Associations among protein heterozygosity, growth rate, and developmental homeostasis. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 479 - 499.
  • Nascetti G., Lanfranchi P., Ratti P., Peracino V., Mattiucci S., Meneguz P. G., Rossi L. and Bullini L. 1987. Studi elettroforetici sulla variabilita e divergenza genetica di Capra ibex ibex e Capra aegagrus hircus delle Alpi. [In: Lo stambecco delle Alpi: Realta attuale e prospettive. T. Balbo, D. De Meneghi, P. G. Meneguz and L. Rossi, edsl: 11 - 15.
  • Nevo E. 1983. Population genetics and ecology: the interface. [In: Evolution from molecules to men. D. S. Bendall, ed]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 287 - 321.
  • Nevo E., Beiles A. and Ben-Shlomo R. 1984. The evolutionary significance of genetic diversity: ecological, demographic and life history correlates. [In: Evolutionary dynamics of genetic diversity. G. S. Mani, ed]. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, Springer Verlag, Berlin: 13 - 213.
  • O'Brien S. J., Gail M. H. and Levin D. L. 1980. Correlative genetic variation in natural populations of cats, mice and men. Nature 288: 580 - 583.
  • Ralls K., Harvey P. H. and Lyles A. M. 1986. Inbreeding in natural populations of birds and mammals. [In: Conservation biology. The science of scarcity and diversity. M. E. Soulé, ed]. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts: 35 - 56.
  • Randi E. and Apollonio M. 1988. Low biochemical variability in European fallow deer (Dama dama L.): natural bottlenecks and the effects of domestication. Heredity 61: 405 - 410.
  • Reuterwall C. 1980. Genetic variation in a large game species, the moose (Alces alces): patterns of differentiation and some management implications. Ph.D. thesis, Sundt Offset, ISBN 91-7146- -106-X, Stockholm 1 - 22.
  • Røed K. H. 1985. Comparison of the genetic variation in Svalbard and Norwegian reindeer. Can. J. Zool. 63: 2038 - 2042.
  • Røed K. H. 1986. Genetic variability in Norwegian wild reindeer {Rangifer tarandus L.). Hereditas 104: 293 - 298.
  • Ryman N., Reuterwall C., Nygren K. and Nygren T. 1980. Genetic variation and differentiation in Scandinavian moose {Alces alces): are large mammals monomorphic? Evolution 34: 1037 - 1050.
  • Sage R. D. and Wolff J. O. 1986. Pleistocene glaciations, fluctuating ranges and low genetic variability in a large mammal {Ovis dalli). Evolution 40: 1092 - 1095.
  • Schaller G. B. 1977. Mountain monarchs. Wild sheep and goats of the Himalaya. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London: 1 - 425.
  • Schnell G. D. and Selander R. K. 1981. Environmental and morphological correlates of genetic variation in mammals. [In: Mammalian population genetics. M. H. Smith and J. Joule, eds]. University of Georgia Press, Athens: 60 - 99.
  • Selander R. K. and Kaufman D. W. 1973. Genie variability and strategies of adaptation in animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70: 1875 - 1877.
  • Sheffield S. R., Morgan R. P. II., Feldhamer G. A. and Harman D. M. 1985. Genetic variation in white-tailed deer {Odocoileus virginianus) populations in Western Maryland. J. Mammal. 66: 243 - 255.
  • Sheldon J. W. 1992. Wild dogs. The natural history of nondomestic Canidae. Academic Press, San Diego.
  • Simonsen V. 1982. Electrophoretic variation in large mammals. II. The red fox, Vulpes vulpes, the stoat, Mustela erminea, the weasel, Mustela nivalis, the pole cat, Mustela putorius, the pine marten, Martes martes, the beech marten, Martes foina, and the badger, Meles meles. Hereditas 96: 299 - 305.
  • Smith M. H., Branan W. V., Marchinton R. L., Johns P. E. and Wooten M. C. 1986. Genetic and morphologic comparisons of red brocket, brown brocket and white-tailed deer. J. Mammal. 67: 103 - 111.
  • Struhsaker T. 1967. Behavior of elk (Cervus canadensis) during the rut. Z. Tierpsychol. 24: 80 - 114.
  • Stüwe M., Scribner K. T. and Alkon P. U. 1992. A comparison of genetic diversity in Nubian ibex {Capra ibex nubiana) and Alpine ibex (Capra i. ibex). Z. Säugetierk. 57: 120 - 123.
  • Thomas W. D. 1975. Observations on captive brockets. Intern. Zoo Ybk 15: 77 - 78.
  • Wallmo O. C. 1981. Mule and black-tailed deer of North America. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln and London.
  • Wooten M. C. and Smith M. H. 1985. Large mammals are genetically less variable? Evolution 39: 210-212.
  • Zouros E. 1979. Mutation rates, population sizes and amounts of electrophoretic variation of enzyme loci in natural populations. Genetics 92: 623 – 646.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-2cabaf7b-f6c4-430f-a28c-ce31dd45395d
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.