Adamczewski K., Skrzypczak G., Lisowicz F., Bubniewicz P., 1997. Aktualne problemy ochrony kukurydzy w Polsce. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln. 450: 63-78.
Domaradzki K., 2001. Metodyka doświadczeń biologicznej oceny herbicydów, bioreguła torów i adiuwantów. Cz. I. Doświadczenia polowe. Wyd. IUNG, Puławy.
Grey T.L., Bridges D.C., Raymer P., Day D., NeSmith D.S., 2000. Differential tolerance of fresh market sweet corn cultivars to the herbicides nicosulfuron and primisulfuron. Hortic Sci. (Calcuta) 35, 6: 1070-1073.
Kunjo E.M., Manuel J.S., 1989. Mechanical and chemical methods of weed control and their combinations on the yield and yield components of sweet corn (Zea mays). Pest Contr. 2: 368-373.
O’Sullivan J., Bouw W.J., 1993. Reduced rates of post-emergence herbicides for weed control in sweet corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 7: 995-1000.
O’Sullivan J., Brammall R.A., Bouw W.J., 1995. Response of sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivars to nicosulfuron plus rimsulfuron. Weed Technol. 9: 58-62.
O’Sullivan J., Sikkema P.H., 2002. Sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivar tolerance to primisulfuron. Can. J. Plant Sci. 82: 261-264.
O’Sullivan J., Sikkema P.H., Thomas R.J., 2000. Sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivar tolerance to nicosulfuron. Can. J. Plant Sci. 80: 419-423.
O’Sullivan J., Thomas R.J., Bouw W.J., 1998. Tolerance of sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivars to rimsulfuron. Weed Technol. 12: 258-261.
Stall W.M., Bewick T.A., 1992. Sweet corn to cultivars respond differentially to the herbicide nicosulfuron. Hortic. Sci. (Calcuta) 27, 2: 131-133.
Waligóra H., Skrzypczak W., Duhr E., Sulewska H., 2005. Wrażliwość odmian kukurydzy cukrowej na Milagro 040 SC, Mikado 300 SC i Titus Plus DF. Progr. Plant Prot. / Post. Ochr. Rośl. 45, 2: 1187-1189.
Williams B.J., Harvey R.G., 2000. Effect of nicosulfuron timing on wild millet (Panicum miliaceum) control in sweet corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 14: 377-382.