Changes of flowering phenology of six herbal species in a beech forest [Central Slovakia]: a decade analysis

• Autorzy: Schieber B
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The variability in flowering phenology of six forest herbaceous species: Pulmonaria officinalis L. (early spring species), Dentaria bulbifera L. (mid spring), Galium odoratum Scop. (late spring), Veronica officinalis L. (early summer), Mycelis muralis (L.) Dumort. (mid summer) and Campanula trachelium L. (mid/late summer) was analysed over the period of the past ten years (1995–2004). Observations were done in a beech forest at the Ecological Experimental Stationary in Kremnické vrchy Mts (Central Slovakia, 48°38´N, 19°04´E, 450–520 m a.s.l.). Two phenological events – the first flowering and full flowering as well as the duration of interphase interval were analysed. The timing of observed phenological events was related to selected climatic factors (temperature and precipitation). The highest variation in the first flowering date was observed in early spring species- standard deviation (SD) was equal to 7.2 days. As for full flowering date, the highest value of standard deviation was detected in late summer species (SD = 8.5 days). In respect to the duration of interphase interval (in days), the highest relative variability (cv > 53%) was ascertained in early spring species. The significant correlations (P <0.001) were detected between dating of full flowering and cumulative temperatures in all phenological types (excepting early spring); the coefficients of correlation (r) moved from – 0.85 (early summer and mid summer species) to – 0.91 (mid spring species). Significant correlations were revealed between precipitation and timing of flowering only for mid summer (r= +0.70) and late summer species (r= +0.75), respectively. Despite of the fact, that no significant trends were detected in timing of flowering in the species, the effect of the global warming is evident. The values of the possitive deviations of the mean air temperatures averaged for the period of the last decade were increased in comparison to the long-term mean. Onset of flowering has been shifted earlier a few days in majority of the species during the past decade. Decade tendency showed a slight increasing of values of cumulative temperatures during the periods crucial for the development of the phenophases.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Galium odoratum; herb; Pulmonaria officinalis; flowering phenology; climatic factor; beech forest; Mycelis muralis; Veronica officinalis; Campanula trachelium; Slovakia; Dentaria bulbifera

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: 55
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.233-244,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Schieber B

• Slovak Academy of Sciences, Sturova 2, 960 53 Zvolen, Slovakia

Bibliografia

• Ahas R., Jaagus J., Aasa A. 2000 – The phenological calendar of Estonia and its correlation with mean air temperature – Int. J. Biometeorol. 44: 159–166.
• Barna M. 2004 – Adaptation of european beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) to different ecological conditions: Leaf size variation – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 35–45.
• Battey N.H. 2000 – Aspects of seasonality – J.Exp.Bot. 51: 1769–1780.
• Blionis G.J., Halley J.M., Vokou D. 2001 – Flowering phenology of Campanula on Mt Olympos, Greece – Ecography, 24: 696–706.
• Bottlíková A. 1975 – Phenological characterization of selected phytocoenoses in the kettlehole of Liptov – Biologické práce, 81pp. (in Slovak with English summary).
• Braslavská O., Borsányi P. 1996 – Quality control of long series of phenological data with sum of cumulated average monthly air temperatures – International Symposium on Applied Agrometeorology and Agroclimatology. Proceedings Volos, Greece, 24 to 26 April: 305–310.
• Bergant K., Kajfež-Bogataj L., Črepinšek Z. 2002 – Statistical downscaling of generalcirculation-model – simulated average monthly air temperature to the beginning of flowering of the dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) in Slovenia – Int. J. Biometeorol. 46: 22–32.
• Cenci C.A., Ceschia M. 2000 – Forecasting of the flowering time for wild species observed at Guidonia, central Italy – Int. J. Biometeorol. 44: 88–96.
• Chmielewski F.M., Rötzer T. 2001 – Response of tree phenology to climate change across Europe – Agr. For. Meteorol. 108: 101–112.
• Debussche M., Garnier E., Thompson J.D. 2004 – Exploring the causes of variation in phenology and morphology in mediterranean geophytes: a genus-wide study of Cyclamen – Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 145: 469–484.
• Defila C., Clot B. 2001 – Phytophenological trends in Switzerland – Int. J. Biometeorol. 45: 203–207.
• Diekmann M. 1996 – Relationship between flowering phenology of perennial herbs and meteorological data in deciduous forests of Sweden – Can. J. Bot. 74: 528–537.
• Diekmann M., Eilertsen O., Fremstad E., Lawesson J.E., Aude E. 1999 – Beech forest communities in the Nordic countriesa multivariate analysis – Plant Ecol. 140: 203–220.
• Dunne J., Harte J., Taylor K.J. 2003 – Subalpine meadow flowering phenology responses to climate change: integrating experimental and gradient methods – Ecol. Monog. 73: 69–86.
• Dunnett N.P., Willis A.J., Hunt R., Grime J.P. 1998 – A 38-year study of relations between weather and vegetation dynamics in road verges near Bibury, Gloucestershire – J. Ecol. 86: 610–623.
• Fitter A.H., Fitter R.S.R., Harris I.T.B., Williamson M.H. 1995 – Relationships between first flowering date and temperature in the flora of a locality in central England – Fun. Ecol. 9: 55–60.
• Fitter A.H., Fitter R.S.R. 2002 – Rapid changes in flowering time in British plants – Science, 296: 1689–1691.
• Kattenberg A., Giorgi F., Grassl H., Meehl G.A., Mitchell J.F.B., Stoufer R.J., Tokioka T., Weaver A.J., Wigley T.M.L. 1996 – Climate models-projections of future climate. (In: Climate change 1995: the science of climate change, Eds: J.T. Houghton, L.G. Meira-Filho, B.A. Callander, N. Harris, A. Kattenberg, K. Maskell) – Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 285–358.
• Kawarasaki S., Hori Y. 2001 – Flowering phenology of understory herbaceous species in a cool temperate deciduous forest in Ogawa Forest Reserve, central Japan – J. Plant Res. 114: 19–23.
• Kittel T. 1998 – Effect of climatic variability on herbaceous phenology and observed species richness in temperate montane habitats, Lake Tahoe Basin, Nevada – Madrono, 45: 75–84.
• Kodrík M. 1993 – Tree layer below-ground biomass of fir-beech forest in the Middle Slovakia – Ekológia (Bratislava), 16: 17–22.
• Kontriš J., Kontrišová O., Gregor J. 1993 – Dynamics of the phytocenoses development of the submountain beech forest stands. I. Phytocoenoses – Ekológia (Bratislava), 12: 417–428.
• Kożuchowski K., Degirmendžić J. 2005 – Contemporary changes of climate in Poland: Trends and variation in thermal and solar conditions related to plant vegetation – Pol. J. Ecol. 53: 283–297.
• Kukla J., Kontriš J., Kontrišová O., Gregor J., Mihálik A. 1998 – Causes of floristical differentiation of Dentario bulbiferae-Fagetum (Zlatník 1935) Hartmann 1953 and Carici pilosae-Fagetum Oberd.1957 associations – Ekológia (Bratislava), 17: 177–186.
• Lapin M., Faško P., Melo M., Šťastný P., Tomlain J. 2002 – Climatic regions (In: Atlas of landscape of the Slovak republic, Ed. L. Miklos) – MŽP, Bratislava,344 pp. (in Slovak).
• Maak K., Storch H. 1997 – Statistical downscaling of monthly mean air temperature to the begining of flowering of Galanthus nivalis L. in northern Germany – Int. J. Biom. 41: 5–12.
• Marhold K., Hindák F. 1998 – Checklist of non-vascular and vascular plants of Slovakia –VEDA, Bratislava, 687 pp.
• Menzel A. 2000 – Trends in phenological phases in Europe between 1951 and 1996– Int. J. Biometeorol. 44: 76–80.
• Oger R., Glibert L. 1989 – A biometeorological time scale to describe phenological development of vegetation – Agr. For.Meteorol. 46: 245–258. (in French with English abstract).
• Parmesan C., Yohe G. 2003 – A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems – Nature, 42: 37–42.
• Peñuelas J., Filella I., Comas P. 2002 – Changed plant and animal life cycles from 1952 to 2000 in the Mediterranean region – Glob. Chan. Biol. 8: 1–14.
• Rötzer T., Wittenzeller M., Haeckel H., Nekovar J. 2000 – Phenology in central Europe – differences and trends of spring phenophases in urban and rural areas – Int. J. Biometeorol. 44: 60–66.
• Routier M.C., Lapointe L. 2002 – Impact of tree leaf phenology on growth rates and reproduction in the spring flowering species Trilium erectum (Liliaceae) – Am. J. Bot. 89: 500–505.
• Sauer R.H. 1976 – The relationship of cumulative sums and moving averages of temperature to reproductive phenology in Clarkia – Am. Mid. Nat. 95: 144–158.
• Sierra G.G., Merino A.P., Herrero E.A. 1996 – Phenology of Hyacinthoides nonscripta (L) Chouard, Melittis melissophyllum and Symphytum tuberosum L. in 2 deciduous forests in the Cantabrian Mts., northwest Spain – Vegetatio, 122: 69–82.
• Schieber B. 2000 – Life reactions of perennial herbs in submountain beech forest in winter period (In: Plant Population Biology VI., Ed. Eliáš) – SEKOS Nitra, p. 76–79. (in Slovak with English abstract).
• Sparks T.H., Jeffree E.P., Jefree C.E. 2000 – An examination of the relationship between flowering times and temperature at the international scale using long-term phenological records from the UK – Int. J. Biometeorol. 44: 82–87.
• Střelec J. 1992 – Influence of cutting operation in a beech stand on changes in illumination – Lesnícky časopis-Forestry Journal, 38: 551–558. (in Slovak with English summary)
• Šuľc G.E. 1981 – General phenology – Nauka, Leningrad, 186 pp. (in Russian).
• Tyler G. 2001 – Relationships between climate and flowering of eight herbs in a Swedish deciduous forest – Annals Bot. 87: 623–630.
• Thórhallsdóttir T.E. 1998 – Flowering phenology in the central highland of Iceland and implications for climatic warming in the Arctic – Oecologia, 114: 43–49.
• Vasseur L., Guscott R.L., Mudie P.J. 2001 – Monitoring of spring flower phenology in Nova Scotia – Northeastern Nat. 8: 393–402.
• Walther G.R. 2002 – Weakening of climatic constraints with global warming and its consequences for evergreen broad-leaved species – Folia Geob. 37: 129–139.
• WMO 2005 – WMO statement on the status of the global climate in 2005 – WMO-No. 743, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.