Current issues connected with usage of genetically modified crops in production of feed and livestock feeding

• Autorzy: Kwiatek K. , Mazur M. , Sieradzki Z.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Progress, which is brought by new advances in modern molecular biology, allowed interference in the genome of live organisms and gene manipulation. Introducing new genes to the recipient organism enables to give them new features, absent before. Continuous increase in the area of the biotech crops triggers continuous discussion about safety of genetically modified (GM) crops, including food and feed derived from them. Important issue connected with cultivation of genetically modified crops is a horizontal gene transfer and a bacterial antibiotic resistance. Discussion about safety of GM crops concerns also food allergies caused by eating genetically modified food. The problem of genetic modifications of GM crops used for livestock feeding is widely discussed, taking into account Polish feed law.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

genetically modified organism; animal feeding; feedstuff; feed; soybean; livestock feed; food safety

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: 11
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.411-414,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Kwiatek K.

• National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy, Al.Partyzantow 57, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland

autor

Mazur M.

autor

Sieradzki Z.

Bibliografia

• Ann Clark E (2006) Enviromental risks of genetic engineer­ing. Euphytica 148: 47-60.
• Aulrich K, Bohme H, Daenicke R, Halle I, Flachowsky G (2002) Novel feeds - a reviev of experiments at our Institute. Anim Nutr 54: 183-195.
• Aumaitre A, Ulrich K, Chesson A, Flachowsky G, Piva G (2002) New Leeds from genetically modified plants: substantial, nutritrional equivalence, digestibility and safety for animals and the food chain. Livesock Prod Sci 74: 223-238.
• Bernstein IL, Bernstein JA, Miller M, Tierzieva S, Bernstein DI, Lummus Z, Selgrade MK, Doerfler DL, Seligy VL (1999) Immune responses in farm workers after exposure to Bacillus thuringiensis pesticides. Environ. Health Per- spect 107: 575-582.
• Bertoni G, Marsan PA (2005) Safety risks for animal fed genetic modified (GM) plants. Vet Res Commun 29: 13-18.
• Brake J, Valchos D (1998) Evaluation of transgenic event 176 “Bt” corn in broiler chickens. Poultry Sci 77: 648-653. Brzoska F, Koreleski J, Korol W (2007) Consequences of the prohibition of using GMO feed, including soybean. Polish Poultry 12: 6-9.
• Conner AJ, Jacobs JME (1999) Genetic engineering of crops as a potential source of genetic hazars in the human diet. Mutat Res 443: 223-234.
• Damgaard Ch, Kjellsson G (2005) Gene flow of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) according to isolation distance and buf­fer zone. Agric Ecosyst Environ 108: 291-301.
• De Vries J, Meier P, Wackernagel W (2001) The natural transformation of the soil bacteria Pseudomonas stutzeri and Acinetobacter sp. by transgenic plant DNA strictly depends on homologous sequences in the recipient cells. FEMS Microbiol Lett 195: 211-215.
• Eede G, Aarts H, Buhk HJ, Corthier G, Flint HJ, Hammer W, Jacobson B, Midtvedt T, Vossen J, Wright A, Wackernagel W, Wilcks A (2004) The relevance of gene transfer of the safety of food and feed derived from gen­etically modified (GM) plants. Food and Chemical Toxi­cology 42: 1127-1156.
• Ewen SWB, Pusztai A (1999) Effects of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine. Lancet 354: 1353- -1354.
• Fares NH, El-Sayed AK (1998) Fine structural changes in the ileum of mice fed on endotoxin-treated potatoes and transgenic potatoes. Nat Toxins 6: 219-233.
• Funk T, Wenzel G, Schwarz G (2006) Outcrossing frequen­cies and distribution of transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) in the nearest neighbourhood. Eur J Agron 24: 26-34.
• Gay PB, Gillespie SH (2005) Antibiotic resistance markers in genetically modified plants: a risk to human health? Lancet Infect Dis 5: 637-646.
• Flammond BG, Vicini JL, Hartnell GF, Naylor MW, Knight CD, Robinson EH, Fuchs RL, Padgette SR (1996) The feeding value of soybeans fed to rats, chickens, catfish and dairy cattle is not altered by genetic incorporation of glyphosate tolerance. J Nutr 126: 717-727.
• James C (2007) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops. Executive Summary. ISAAA Briefs 35: 1-2.
• Jamróz D, Podkówka W, Chachutowa J (2001) Aniamal nu­trition and feed science. PWN, Warsaw.
• Kappeli O, Auberson L (1998) How safe is safe enough in plant genetic engineering? Trends Plant Sci 7: 276-281.
• Kwiatek K, Sieradzki Z, Mazur M (2007) Prevalence of gen­etically modified crops in animal feedingstuffs in Poland - Three year studies. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 51: 609-613.
• Lambucki P (2007) Effect of feeding on the occurrence of “fish” flavour of eggs. Polish Poultry 7: 40-41.
• Messeguer J (2003) Gene flow assessment in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Tiss Org 73: 201-212.
• Moreno-Fierros L, Garcia N, Gutierrez R, Lopez-Revilla R, Vazquez-Pedron RI (2000) Intranasal, rectal and in- traperitoneal immunization with protoxin CrylAc from Bacillus thuringiensis induces compartmentalized serum, intestinal, vaginal and pulmonary immune responses in Balb/c mice. Microbes Infect 2: 885-890.
• Munkvold GP, Hellmich RL, Rice LG (1999) Comparison of fumonisin concentration in kernels of transgenic Bt maize hybrids and non-transgenic hybrids. Plant Dis 83: 130-138.
• Paterson BA, Hyun Y, Stanisiewski EP, Hartnell GF, Ellis M (2003) A comparison of swine performance when fed diets containing Roundup Ready® wheat (event MON 71800) and conventional wheat varieties. J Anim Sci 81: 207-208.
• Phips RH, Jones AK, Tingey AP, Abeyasekera S (2005) Ef­fect of corn silage from an herbicide-tolerant genetically modified variety on milk production and absence of transgenic DNA in milk. J Dairy Sci 88: 2870-2878.
• Purchase IFH (2005) What determines the acceptability of genetically modified food that can improve human nutri­tion? Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 207: 19-27.
• Pusztai A (2002) Can science give us the tools for recogniz­ing possible health risks of GM food? Nutr Health 16: 73-84.
• Pusztai A, Grant G, Bardocz S, Alonso R, Chrispeels MJ, Schroeder HE, Tabe LM, Higgins TJV (1999) Express­ion of the insecticidal bean a-amylase inhibitor transgene has minimal detrimental effect on the nutritional value of peas fed to rats at 30% of the diet. J Nutr 129: 1567-1603.
• Rasmussen MA, Cutler SA, Wilhelms K, Scanes CG (2007) Effects of Bt (Bacillus thuringensis) corn on reproductive performance in adult laying hens. Internat J Poultry Sci 6: 169-171.
• Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed (OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, pp 1-23).
• Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Councilof 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organ­isms and the traceability of food and feed products pro­duced from genetically modified organisms and amend­ing Directive 2001/18/EC (OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, pp 24-28).
• Schluter K, Futterer J, Potrykus I (1995) Horizontal gene-transfer from a transgenic potato line to a bacterial pathogen (Erwinia chiysanthem) occurs, if at all, at an extremely low-frequency. Bio/Technol 13: 1094-1098.
• Seralini GE, Cellier D, Spiroux de Vendomois J (2007) New analysis- of a rat feeding study with a genetically modified maize reveals signs of hepatorenal toxicity. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 52: 596-602.
• Taylor ML, Stanisiewski EP, Riordan G, Nemeth MA, George B, Hartnell GF (2004) Comparison of broiler performance when fed diets containing Roundup Ready (Event RT73) nontransgenic control, or commercial canola meal. Poultry Sci 83: 456-461.
• Feed Law of 22 July 2006 (2006), Law Gazette 144: 1045.
• Vazquez-Padron RI, Moreno-Fierros L, Neri-Bazan L, de la Riva G, Lopez-Revilla R (1999) Inragastric and in- traperitoneal administration of CrylAc protoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis induces systemic and mucosal anti­body responses in mice. Life Sci 21: 1897-1912.
• Wu F (2006) Mycotoxin reduction in Bt corn: potential economic, health, and regulatory impacts. Transgenic Res 15: 277-289.