The influence of temperature on successful reproductions of burbot, Lota lota [L.] under hatchery conditions

• Autorzy: Zarski D , Kucharczyk D. , Sasinowski W. , Targonska K. , Mamcarz A.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wplyw temperatury na sukces rozrodczy mietusa, Lota lota [L.] w warunkach wylegarniczych

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this study was to define an influence of water temperature on successful reproduction of burbot under the hatchery conditions. Research was conducted during four successive spawning seasons where wild spawners were used. In the first three years of study fish were kept in three different (natural) thermal conditions. In the fourth year it was confirmed that the highest efficacy of synchronization of the spawning could be reached only under controlled thermal regimes. That year one group of spawners was kept at 6℃ before spawning and then a sudden decrease of the temperature to 1℃ was applied. Restrictively controlled thermal regime during reproduction of burbot in captivity caused the most synchronous spawning of females (2 days-period) in contrast to control group (17 days-period) and even hormonally stimulated (4 days-period). Eggs survival in thermally manipulated group was very high (over 85% in the eyed-egg-stage). This research proved that manipulation of water temperature is the most important technique which should be applied in controlled reproduction of burbot and it is suggested that the temperature is the major factor during final maturation of burbot females. Also, confirmed the fact that incubation of burbot eggs in temperature over 5℃ causes its high mortality (100% in the eyed-egg-stage).

PL

Celem pracy było określenie wpływu warunków termicznych na sukces rozrodczy miętusa w warunkach wylęgarniczych. Badania prowadzono podczas czterech kolejnych sezonów rozrodczych na dzikiej populacji miętusa. W pierwszych trzech latach badań ryby przetrzymywano w trzech różnych (naturalnych) warunkach termicznych. W czwartym roku potwierdzono w sposób eksperymentalny, że można osiągnąć bardzo wysoką efektywność rozrodczą po zastosowaniu wyłącznie manipulacji termicznych.W tym celu jedną z grup przetrzymywano przed tarłem w wodzie o temperaturze 6℃, a następnie gwałtownie obniżono temperaturę do 1℃. Restrykcyjne manipulacje termiczne w trakcie przetrzymywania tarlaków miętusa wpłynęły na największą synchronizację rozrodu (2 dni) w porównaniu z grupą kontrolną (17 dni) lub nawet stymulowaną hormonalnie (4 dni). Przeżywalność embrionów w „termicznie manipulowanej” grupie była bardzo wysoka (ponad 85% w stadium zaoczkowania). Wyniki wskazują na to, iż najważniejszym elementem procedury rozrodczej miętusa jest manipulacja termiczna, a temperatura jest głównym czynnikiem powodującym finalne dojrzewanie gamet. Potwierdzono także wysoką śmiertelność embrionów (100% w stadium zaoczkowania) w wodzie o temperaturze powyżej 5℃.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Natural Sciences
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 25
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.93-105,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Zarski D

• Warmia and Mazury University in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland

autor

Kucharczyk D.

autor

Sasinowski W.

autor

Targonska K.

autor

Mamcarz A.

Bibliografia

• ANGUIS V., CAÑAVATE J.P. 2005. Spawning of captive Senegal sole (Solea senegalensis) under a naturally fluctuating temperature regime. Aquaculture, 243: 133–145.
• BABIAK I., GLOGOWSKI J., KUJAWA R., KUCHARCZYK D., MAMCARZ A. 1998. Cryopreservation of sperm from asp Aspius aspius. Progr. Fish-Cult., 60: 146–148.
• BAILEY M. 1972. Age, Growth, Reproduction and Food of the Burbot, Lota lota (L.), in Southwestern Lake Superior. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc., 4: 667–674.
• BINNER M., KLOAS W., HERDEWIG I. 2008. Energy allocation in juvenile roach and burbot under different temperature and feeding regimes. Fish Physiol. Biochem., 34: 103–116.
• BROMAGE N., PORTER M., RANDALL C. 2001. The environmental regulation of maturation in farmed finfish with special reference to the role of photoperiod and melatonin. Aquaculture, 197: 63– 98.
• BYE V. 1984. The role of environmental factors in the timing of reproductive cycles. [In:] Fish Reproduction. Strategies and tactics. Eds. G.W. Potts, R.J. Wootton. Academic Press, London, U.K, pp. 187–205.
• DAVIES B., BROMAGE N. 2002. The effects of fluctuating seasonal and constant water temperatures on the photoperiodic advancement of reproduction in female rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture, 205: 183–200.
• GOMAZKOV O.A. 1961. Siezonnyje izmienienija intiensivnosti pishhevaritielnykh prociesov u nalima. Vopr. Ikhtiol., 17: 75–82.
• HARDY R., PARAGAMIAN V.L., NEUFELD M.D. 2008. Zooplankton communities and burbot relative abundance of some oligotrophic lakes of Idaho, USA and British Columbia, Canada. Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp., 59: 79–89.
• HEYRATI F.P.,MOSTAFAVI H., TOLOEE H., DORAFSHAN S. 2007. Induced spawning of kutum, Rutilus frisii kutum (Kamenskii, 1901) using (D-Ala⁶, Pro⁹-NEt) GnRHa combined with domperidone. Aquaculture, 265: 288–293.
• HONG W., ZHANG Q. 2003. Review of captive bred species and fry production of marine fish in China. Aquaculture, 227: 305–318.
• HORVATH L., SZABO T., BURKE J. 1997. Hatchery testing of GnRH analogue-containing pellets on ovulation in four cyprinid species. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol., 44: 221–226.
• JAKOBSON S., JÄRVI T. 1976. Antipredator-behaviour of 2-year old hatchery reared Atlantic salmon Salmo salar and a description of the predatory behaviour of burbot Lota lota. Zool. Revy, 38: 57–70.
• KIRILLOV A. 1988. Burbot of Vilyusk Resevoir. Journal of Ichthyology 28 (2): 49–55.
• KJELLMAN J., ELORANTA A. 2002. Field estimations of temperature-dependent processes: case growth of young burbot. Hydrobiologia, 481: 187–192.
• KLESZCZ M., WITKOWSKI A., WOLNICKI J. 2001. Miętus Lota lota (L.) w Ośrodku Zarybieniowym PZW Szczodre. I. Podsumowanie wyników rozrodu z lat 1997–2000. Komun. Ryb., 6: 16–19.
• KOUŘIL J., LINHART O., DUBSKÝ K., KVASNIČKA P. 1985. The fecundity of female and male burbot (Lota lota L.) reproduced by stripping. Práce VÚRH Vodnany 14: 75–79.
• KOUŘIL J., SVOBODA M., HAMAČKOVA J., KALÁB P., KOLÁŘOVÁ J., LEPIČOVÁ A., SEDOVA M., SAVINA L., MORENO RENDÓN P., SVOBODOVÁ Z., BARTH T., VYKUSOVÁ B. 2007. Repeated administration of different hormonal preparations for artificial propagation and their effects on reproduction, survival and blood biochemistry profiles of female tench (Tinca tinca L.). Czech J. Anim. Sci., 52(6): 183–188.
• KREJSZEFF S., KUCHARCZYK D., KUPREN K., TARGOŃSKA K., MAMCARZ A., KUJAWA R., KACZKOWSKI Z., RATAJSKI S. 2008. Reproduction of chub, Leuciscus cephalus L., under controlled conditions. Aquacult. Res., 39: 907–912.
• KREJSZEFF S., TARGOŃSKA K., ŻARSKI D., KUCHARCZYK D. 2009. Domestication affects spawning of the ide (Leuciscus idus) – preliminary study. Aquaculture, 295: 145–147.
• KUCHARCZYK D., KUJAWA R., MAMCARZ A., SKRZYPCZAK A., WYSZOMIRSKA E. 1996. Induced spawning in perch, Perca fluviatilis L. using carp pituitary extract and HCG. Aquacult. Res., 27: 847–852.
• KUCHARCZYK D., KUJAWA R., ŁUCZYŃSKI M., GLOGOWSKI J., BABIAK I., WYSZOMIRSKA E. 1997a. Induced spawning in bream, Abramis brama (L.), using carp and bream pituitary extract and hCG. Aquacult. Res., 28: 139–144.
• KUCHARCZYK D., ŁUCZYŃSKI M., KUJAWA R., CZERKIES P. 1997b. Effect of temperature on embryonic and larval development of bream (Abramis brama L.). Aquat. Sci., 59: 214–224.
• KUCHARCZYK D., KUJAWA R., MAMCARZ A., WYSZOMIRSKA E. 1997c. Artificial spawning in bream (Abramis brama (L.)). Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol., 44: 203–207.
• KUCHARCZYK D., KUJAWA R., MAMCARZ A., WYSZOMIRSKA E. 1997d. Induced spawning in rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus L.). Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol., 44: 209–213.
• KUCHARCZYK D., KUJAWA R., MAMCARZ A., SKRZYPCZAK A., WYSZOMIRSKA E. 1998a. Induced spawning in perch, Perca fluviatilis L., FSH + LH with pimozide or metoclopramide. Aquacult. Res., 29: 131–136.
• KUCHARCZYK D., MAMCARZ A., SKRZYPCZAK A., KUJAWA R., BABIAK I. 1998b. Artificial spawning of burbot (Lota lota L.) under controlled conditions. Europ. Aquacult. Soc. Spec. Publ., 26, 149–150.
• KUCHARCZYK D., ŁUCZYŃSKI M., KUJAWA R., KAMIŃSKI R., ULIKOWSKI D., BRZUZAN P. 1998c. Influences of temperature and food on early development of bream (Abramis Brama L.). Arch. Hydrobiol., 141: 243–256.
• KUCHARCZYK D.,MAMCARZ A., KUJAWA R., BABIAK I., GLOGOWSKI J., SAROSIEK B., KOWALSKI R., SKRZYPCZAK A.,
• TARGONSKA-DIETRICH K., CHWALUCZYK R. 2004. Burbot (Lota lota L.) reproduction in captivity: comparison of different methods. [In:] Elevage de la lotte (Lota lota) Recherche et perspectives. Ed. J. Yannick. F.L.A.C., Nancy, pp. 12–16.
• KUCHARCZYK D., KUJAWA R., MAMCARZ A., TARGOŃSKA-DIETRICH K., WYSZOMIRSKA E., GLOGOWSKI J., BABIAK I., SZABO T. 2005. Induced spawning in bream (Abramis brama L.) using pellets containing GnRH. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 50: 89–95.
• KUCHARCZYK D., TARGOŃSKA K., HLIWA P., GOMUŁKA P., KWIATKOWSKI M., KREJSZEFF S., PERKOWSKI J. 2008. Reproductive parameters of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L) spawners during natural season and out-of-season spawning. Reprod. Biol., 8(3): 285–289.
• KUCHARCZYK D., TARGOŃSKA K., ŻARSKI D., KREJSZEFF S., KUPREN K., ŁUCZYŃSKI M.J., SZCZERBOWSKI A. 2010. The reproduction of neon tetra, Paracheirodon innesi (Myers, 1936), under controlled conditions. Pol. J. Nat. Sc. 25(1): 81–92.
• KUJAWA R., KUCHARCZYK D., MAMCARZ A. 2002. Miętus. IRS, Olsztyn.
• KUJAWA R., KUCHARCZYK D., MAMCARZ A. 1997. Effect of temperature on embryonic development of asp (Aspius aspius L.). Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol., 44: 139–143.
• KUJAWA R., KUCHARCZYK D., MAMCARZ A. 1999a. A model system for keeping spawners of wild and domestic fish before artificial spawning. Aquacult. Eng., 20: 85–89.
• KUJAWA R., KUCHARCZYK D., MAMCARZ A. 1999b. The influence of temperature on embryonic development of burbot (Lota lota L.). Europ. Aquacult. Soc. Spec. Publ., 27: 133–134.
• KUJAWA R., KUCHARCZYK D., MAMCARZ A. 1999c. The rearing methods of burbot (Lota lota L.) fry under controlled conditions. Europ. Aquacult. Soc. Spec. Publ., 27: 135–136.
• LAHNSTEINER F., MANSOUR N., BERGER B. 2004. The effect of inorganic and organic pollutants on sperm motility of some freshwater teleosts. J. Fish Biol., 65: 1283–1297.
• LAM T.J. 1983. Environmental influences on gonadal activity in fish. [In:] Fish Physiology, Eds. W.S. Hoar, C. Randall, E.M. Donaldson. Academic Press, New York, IX: 65–116.
• LEHTONEN H. 1998. Winter biology of burbot (Lota lota L.). Memor. Soc. pro fauna et flora Fennica, 74: 45–52.
• MANN R.H.K. 1996. Environmental requirements of European non – salmonid fish in rivers. Hydrobiologia, 323: 223–235.
• MCPHAIL J.D., PARAGAMIAN V.L. 2000. Burbot biology and life history. [In:] Burbot. Biology, Ecology, and management. Eds. V.L. Paragamian, D.W. Willis. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, pp. 11–23.
• NELSON J.S. 1994. Fishes of the World. Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, pp. 227–238.
• NIKOLSKIJ G.V. 1950. Chastnaja ikhtiologija. Gos Izdat „Sovetskaja nauka”, Moskva pp. 283–297.
• PÄÄKKÖNEN J.P.J., MARJOMÄKI T.J. 2000. Feeding of burbot, Lota lota, at different temperatures. Env. Biol. Fish., 58: 109–112.
• PÄÄKKÖNEN J.P. J., TIKKANEN O., KARJALAINEN J. 2003. Development and validation of a bioenergetics model for juvenile and adult burbot. J. Fish Biol., 63: 956–969.
• PARAGAMIAN V.L. 2000. The effects of variable flows on burbot spawning migrations in the Kootenai River, Idaho, USA, and Kootenai Lake, British Columbia, Canada, after construction of the Libby Dam. [In:] Burbot. Biology, Ecology, and management. Eds. V.L. Paragamian, D.W. Willis. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, pp. 111–123.
• PARAGAMIAN V.L., HARDY R., GUNDERMAN B. 2005. Effects of regulated discharge on burbot migration. J. Fish Biol., 66: 1199–1213.
• PARAGAMIAN V.L., PYPER B.J., DAIGNEAULT J., BEAMESDERFER R.C.P., IRELAND S.C. 2008. Population Dynamics and Extinction Risk of Burbot in the Kootenai River, Idaho, USA and British Columbia, Canada. Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp., 59: 213–234.
• PULLIAINEN E., KORHONEN K., KANKAANRANTA L., MAKI K. 1992. Non-spawning burbot on the northern coast of the Bothnian Bay. Ambio, 2: 170–175.
• PULLIAINEN E., KORHONEN K. 1993. Does the burbot, Lota lota, have rest years between normal spawning seasons? J. Fish Biol., 43(3): 355–362.
• RASS T.S. 1983. Zhizn zhivotnykh. Tom chetvertyjj. Lancetniki, kruglorotye, khrjashhevye ryby, kostnye ryby. Prosveshhenie, Moskva, pp. 310–321.
• SCHRAM S.T. 2000. Seasonal movement and mortality estimates of burbot in Wisconsin waters of western Lake Superior. [In:] Burbot. Biology, Ecology, and management. Eds. V.L. Paragamian, D.W. Willis. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, pp. 81–89.
• SCOTT W.B., CROSSMAN E.J. 1973. Freshwater Fishes of Canada. Fish. Res. Board Can., Bull., 184: 1–966.
• SHIRI HARZEVILI A., CHARLEROY D. DE, AUWERX J., VUGHT I., SLYCKEN J. VAN, DHERT P., SORGELOOS P. 2003. Larval rearing of burbot (Lota lota L.) using Brachionus calyciflorus rotifer as starter food. J. Appl. Ichthyol., 19: 84–87.
• SHIRI HARZEVILI A., DOOREMONT I., VUGHT I., AUWERX J., QUATAERT P., CHARLEROY D. DE. 2004. First feeding of burbot, Lota lota (Gadidae, Teleostei) larvae under different temperature and light conditions. Aquacult. Res., 35: 49–55.
• SLAVIK O., BARTOS L. 2002. Factors affecting migrations of burbot. J. Fish Biol., 60: 989–998.
• STACEY N.E. 1984. Control of the timing of ovulation by exogenous and endogenous factors. [In:] Fish Reproduction. strategies and tactics. Ed. R.J. Wootton. Academic Press, London, pp. 207–222.
• STEINER V., SCHOTZKO N., KLETZL M., KAINZ E. 1996. A contribution to the economical raising of small, sensitive fish larvae by the example burbot (Lota lota L.). Öesterr. Fisch., 49: 160–172.
• SZCZERBOWSKI A., KUCHARCZYK D., MAMCARZ A., ŁUCZYŃSKI M.J., TARGOŃSKA K., KUJAWA R. 2009. Artificial off-season spawning of Eurasian perch Perca fluviatilis L. Arch. Pol. Fish. 17, 95–98.
• TIITU V., VORNANEN M. 2002. Morphology and fine structure of the heart of the burbot, a cold stenothermal fish. J. Fish Biol., 61: 106–121.
• VOSTRADOVSKA M. 1963. K biologii mnika jednovouseho (Lota lota L.) v Lipenske Udolni Nadrźi. I. Zmeny vahy jater, gonad a koeficientu vykrmenosti v pfedvyterovem obdobi. Bul VURH Vodńany, 3: 53–78.
• WOLNICKI J., MYSZKOWSKI L., KAMIŃSKI R. 2001. The influence of water temperature on the growth, survival, condition and biological quality of juvenile burbot, Lota lota (L.). Arch. Pol. Fish., 9(1): 79–86.
• WOLNICKI J., KAMIŃSKI R., MYSZKOWSKI L. 2002. Temperature-influenced growth and survival of burbot Lota lota (L.) larvae fed live food under controlled conditions. Arch. Pol. Fish., 10(1): 109–113.
• ZAKĘŚ Z., SZKUDLAREK M. 1998. Breeding of wild European pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca (L.)) in controlled conditions. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 43: 439.
• ŻARSKI D., SASINOWSKI W., KUCHARCZYK D., KWIATKOWSKI M., KREJSZEFF S., TARGOŃSKA K. 2009a. Mass initial rearing of burbot Lota Lota (L.) larvae under controlled conditions. Pol. J. Nat. Sci., 24(1): 76–84.
• ŻARSKI D., KUCHARCZYK D., TARGOŃSKA K., JAMRÓZ M., KREJSZEFF S., MAMCARZ A. 2009b. Application of ovopel and ovaprim and their combinations in controlled reproduction of two reophilic cyprinid fish species. Pol. J. Nat. Sc., 24(4): 235–244.