PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2000 | 38 |

Tytuł artykułu

Ocena patogenicznosci izolatu FvYM wirusa mozaiki ogorka w stosunku do pomidora uprawnego [Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.]

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

PL

Abstrakty

EN
Experiments were carried out to evaluate the reaction of three tomato cultivare to mechanical inoculation with selected isolate of cucumber mosaic virus (CMV-FvYM), in order to the further comparison with the susceptibility of the regenerants obtained from leaf explants excised from investigated plants. All tomato cultivars tested, that is: Moneymaker, Potentat and Rutgers, proved to be infected in 100%, their reaction was similar, although not homologous. The course of symptom expression and some morphological changes induced are documented. Pollen viability of infected plants was significantly lower than that of the control healthy plants.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

38

Opis fizyczny

s.53-62,fot.,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

  • Akademia Rolnicza, al.29 Listopada 54, 31-425 Krakow
autor

Bibliografia

  • Alexander M.P. 1969. Differential staining of aborded and non aborded pollen. Stain. Technol. 44:117.
  • Badami R.S. 1959. Some effects of changing temperature and of virus inhibitors on infection by cucumber mosaic virus. Ann. Appl. Biol. 47 (1): 78-89.
  • Bowles D. 1999. Rapid responses of tomato leaves to injury. [w:] Molecular Biology of Tomato Conference, York: 18.
  • Devic M., Jaegle M., Baulcombe D. 1989. Symptom production on tobbaco and tomato is determined by two distinct domains of the satellite RNA of cucumber mosaic virus (strain Y). J. Gen. Virol. 70: 2765-2774.
  • Dempsey M.A., Silva H., Klessig D.F. 1998. Engineering disease and pest resistance in plants. Microbiol. 6: 54-61.
  • Ducreux G., Rossignol L., Sihachakr D. 1991. Exploitation of genetic and physiological variability in Solanacceae; the exampes of potato and eggplant. Acta Hort. 289: 65-75.
  • Fraile A., Alonso-Prados J.L., Aranda M.A., Bernal J.J., Malpica J.M., Garcia-Arenal F. 1997. Genetic exchange by recombination or reassortment is infrequent in natural populations of a tri­partite RNA plant virus. Jour, of Vir. 71/2: 934-940.
  • Fraser R.S.S., Whenham R.J. 1982, Plant growth regulators and virus infection: a critical reviev. Plant Growth Reg. 1: 37-59.
  • Gajewski Z, 1998. Badania nad wpływem wybranych fungicydów na efektywność mechanicznego zakażenia tytoniu wirusem mozaiki pomidora. Acta Agr. Silv. ser. Agr., 36: 3-7.
  • Gibbs A.J., Harrison B.D. 1970. Cucumber mosaic virus. C.M.I./A.A.B. Descriptions of Plant Viruses No. 1.
  • Glaser T., Pudelski T. 1979, Wirozy odmian pomidora odpornych na wirus mozaiki tytoniu. Ochrona Roślin 10: 12-15.
  • Hałasowska-Kukułka B. 1985. Wpływ zakażeń wirusami mozaiki tytoniu (TMV), mozaiki ogórka (CMV) i aspermii pomidora (TAV) na żywotność pyłku u pomidora. Praca magisterska AR Kraków.
  • Kaper J.M., Geletka L.M., Wu G.S., Tousignant M.E. 1995. Effect of temperature on cucumber mosaic virus satellite — induced lethal tomato necrosis is helper virus strain dependent. Arch. Virol. 140: 65-74.
  • Kaper J.M., Tousignant M.E., Geletka L.M. 1990. Cucumber mosaic virus-associated RNA-5, XII — Symptom modulating effect is codetermined by the helper virus satelite replication support function. Res. Virol. 141: 487-503.
  • Kaper J.M., Waterworth H.E. 1981. Cucumoviruses. [w:] Handbook of Plant Virus Infections and Comparative Diagnosis. E. Kerstak red. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press: 258-295.
  • Kirlay Z., Barna B. 1998. Physiological aspects of pathogenic stress to plants, [w;] Ekofizjologiczne aspekty reakcji roślin na działanie abiotycznych czynników stresowych. F. Dubert i A. Skoczowski red. „Drukorol”, Kraków: 54.
  • Kobyłko T. 1996. Choroby wirusowe funkii (Hosta Tratt.). Zesz. Nauk. AR w Krakowie. Rozpr. 207.
  • Malepszy S. 1992. Pomidor — „użyteczna Drosophila" nowoczesnej biologii. Biotechnol. 2/17:44-55.
  • Matthews R.E.F. 1991. Economic importance and control. [w:] Plant virology. Academic Press, London: 591-634.
  • Marchoux G., Gebre Selassie K. 1992. Nouveaux et anciens virus affectant la tomate. P. H.M. Revue Hort. 323: 57-65.
  • Mirkowa V., Stoimenova E., Bechava V., Stamova L. 1993. Cytological investigations on tomato plants infected by cucumber mosaic. Proc. XII Eucarpia Met. Tomato Genet. and Bredding. Plovdiv: 209-213.
  • Palukaitis P., Roossinck M.J. 1996, Spontaneous change of satelitę RNA of cucumber mosaic virus to a pathogenic variant. Nature Biotechnol. 14: 1264—1268.
  • Schiller-Smith S., Murakishi H.H. 1993. Restricted virus multiplication and movement of tomato mosaic virus in resistant tomato somaclones. Plant Science 89: 113-122.
  • Sleat D.E., Zhang L., Palukaitis P. 1994. Mapping determinants within cucumber mosaic virus and its satelit RNA for the induction of necrosis in tomato plants. Mol. Plant Micr. Inter. 7/2: 189- -195.
  • Waterworth H.E., Tousignant M.E., Kaper J.M. 1978. A lethal disease of tomato experimentally induced by RNA-5 associated with cucumber mosaic virus isolated from Commelina from El Salvador, Phytopathol. 68: 561-566.
  • Waterworth H.E., Tousignant M.E., Kaper J.M. 1979. CARNA 5, the small cucumber mosaic virus — dependent replicating RNA, regulates disease expression. Science 204: 845-847.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-0802bdc6-d14f-4df1-8672-db2e77d810fb
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.