Znaczenie wybranych czynników kształtujących powierzchnie terytoriów puszczyka Strix aluco w lasach Lubelszczyzny

• Autorzy: Cios S. , Grzywaczewski G.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Importance of selected factors influencing the size of tawny owl Strix aluco territories in the forests of Lublin region

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Study analysis the influence of selected factors on the size of tawny owl Strix aluco territories in the forests of Lublin region. The survey was held in years 2005 and 2006 using the voice stimulation. The territory area was determined using Minimum Convex Polygon method. 43 territories with the average size of 18.8 ha were set on 26 study sites. The largest territory was found for birds during laying and incubation period (102.6 ha) and during after−breeding period (98.3 ha). Significant differences in territory size was found depending on the breeding density (high density – average territory size of 5.1 ha, low density – 26.9 ha). The average territory area in winter was 1.5 ha (range 1−2.7 ha), in spring 20.8 ha (1−102.6 ha), in summer 10.8 ha (1−65.5 ha) and in autumn 30.9 ha (1−98.3 ha).

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Lubelszczyzna; lasy; ptaki; puszczyk; Strix aluco; zageszczenie populacji; wielkosc terytorium; warunki srodowiska; pory roku; czynniki siedliska; rzezba terenu; fazy ksiezyca; terytorializm

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Sylwan
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 157
• Numer: 05
• Opis fizyczny: s.348-357,rys.,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Cios S.

• Katedra Zoologii, Ekologii Zwierząt i Łowiectwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul.Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin

autor

Grzywaczewski G.

• Katedra Zoologii, Ekologii Zwierząt i Łowiectwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul.Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin

Bibliografia

• Andersen T. 1961. A population of tawny owls in Northern Zealand, studied in the breeding season. Dansk Orn. Foren. 55: 1−55.
• Boldreghini P., Casini L., Santolini R. 1987. The population of tawny owl Strix aluco L. in the Mesola Great Wood (Po River Delta, Northern Adriatic). Suppl. Ric. Biol. Selvaggina 12: 37−44.
• Cesaris C. 1988. Tawny owl Strix aluco and little owl Athene noctua populations in an area of the Park of the River Ticino (northern Italy). Avocetta 12: 115−118.
• Cramp S. [red.]. 1985. Handbook of the Birds of Europe the Middle East and North Africa. Vol. 4., Oxford University Press, New York.
• Dambiermont J. L., Francotte J. P., Collette P. 1967. Notes sur la nidification des Hulottes (Strix aluco) en nichoirs. Aves 4: 31−47.
• Delmče E., Dachy P., Simon P. 1978. Quinze annees d’observations sur la reproduction d’une population forestiere de Chouettes hulottes. Gerfaut 69: 45−77.
• Drozd L., Florek M. 1997. Leśnictwo. Wydawnictwo Akademii Rolniczej w Lublinie, Lublin.
• Enoksson B., Nilsson S. G. 1983. Territory size and population density in relation to food supply in the Nuthatch Sitta europaea (Aves). Journal of Animal Ecology 52 (3): 927−935.
• Exo K. M. 1988. Annual cycle and ecological adaptations in the little owl (Athene noctua). Journal Fuer Ornithologie 129: 393−416.
• European bird populations: estimates and trends. 2004. BirdLife International Conservation Series 10.
• Finck P. 1990. Seasonal variation of territory size with the little owl (Athene noctua). Oecologia, 83: 68−75.
• Galeotti P. 1990. Territorial behaviour and habitat selection in an urban population of the tawny owl Strix aluco L. Boll. i Zool., 57: 59−66.
• Galeotti P. 1994. Patterns of territory size and defence level in rural and urban tawny owl (Strix aluco) populations. J. Zool. Lond. 234: 641−658.
• Galeotti P. 1998. Correlates of hoot rate and structure in male tawny owls Strix aluco: implications for male rivalry and female mate choice. Journal of Avian Biology 29: 25−32, Copenhagen.
• Galeotti P. 2001. Strix aluco tawny owl. BWP Update 3 (1): 43−77.
• Galeotti P., Pavan G. 1993. Differential responses of territorial tawny owl Strix aluco to the hooting of neighbours and strangers. Ibis 135: 300−304.
• Galeotti P., Sacchi R. 1996. Owl census project in the Lombardy Region (northern Italy): preliminary data on the tawny owl (Strix aluco), little owl (Athene noctua) and long– eared owl (Asio otus) populations. Abstr. 2nd Internat. Conf. on raptors. Raptor Research Foundation and University of Urbino.
• Glutz von Blotzheim U. N., Bauer K. 1980. Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Vol. 9. Colubiformes−Piciformes. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Wiesbaden.
• González A. S., Lage Y. M. A., Simal L. J. 2002. Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from buzzards (Buteo buteo) and tawny owl (Strix aluco) by liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. J AOAC Int. 85 (1): 141−145.
• Goszczyński J. 1977. Connections between predatory birds and mammals and their prey. Acta Theriol. 22: 399−430.
• Grzywaczewski G. 2009. Home range size and habitat use of the Little Owl Athene noctua (Scopoli 1769) in Lublin Region (East Poland). Ardea 97 (4): 541−545.
• Hagemeijer E. J. M., Blair M. J. [red.]. 1997. The EBCC Atlas of European Birds: Their Distribution and Abundance. P&AD Poyser, London.
• Hirons G. J. M. 1976. A population study of the tawny owl (Strix aluco) and its main prey species in woodland. D. Phil. Thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford.
• Hirons G. J. M. 1985. The effects of territorial behaviour on the stability and dispersion of tawny owl (Strix aluco) populations. J. Zool. Lond. 1: 21−48.
• Jędrzejewska B., Jędrzejewski W. 2001. Ekologia zwierząt drapieżnych Puszczy Białowieskiej. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
• Kasprzyk K., Kitowski I., Czochra K., Krawczyk R. 2004. Bats in the diet of owls from the southern part of the Lublin region (SE Poland). Myotis 41/42: 75–80.
• Kenward R. 1987. Wildlife Radio Tagging. Academic Press, London.
• Kitowski I., Pitucha G. 2007. Diet of the Eurasian tawny owl in farmland of east Poland. Berkut 16: 225–231.
• König C., Weick F., Beckimg J−H. 1999. Owls. A Guide to the Owls of the World. Pica Press, Susseix.
• Lesiński G., Gryz J., Kowalski M. 2008. Does the diet of an opportunistic raptor, the tawny owl Strix aluco, reflect long−term changes in bat abundance? Folia Zool. 57 (3): 258−263.
• López−Sepulcre, A., Kokko, H. 2005. Territorial defense, territory size and population regulation. American Naturalist 166: 317−329.
• Mietelski, J. W., Kitowski I, Gaca P., Frankowska P., Tomankiewicz E., Blazej S., Kierepko R. 2008. Radionuclides in bones of diurnal birds of prey and owls from the eastern Poland. Chemia Analityczna 53 (6): 821−824.
• Morimando F., Pezzo F., Draghi A. 1995. Owl census in the Siena town: preliminary data. Avocetta 19: 117.
• Neufeld H. S., Young D. R. 2003. Ecophysiology of the herbaceous layer in temperate deciduous forests. W: Gilliam F., Roberts M. [red.]. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America, Oxford University Press. 38−90.
• Nowak M., Nowak J. 1996. Lubelszczyzna. Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne, Warszawa.
• Ranazzi L., Manganaro A., Salvati L. 2000. The breeding success of tawny owls (Strix aluco) in a Mediterranean area: a long−term study in urban Rome (central Italy). J. Raptor Res. 34: 322−326.
• Rawlik M., Jagodziński A. M., Janyszek S. 2012. Sezonowe zmiany stanu biomasy w runie lasu grądowego Stellario holosteae−Carpinetum betuli. Leśne Prace Badawcze 73 (3): 221−235.
• Redpath S. M. 1994. Censusing tawny owls Strix aluco by the use of imitation calls. Bird Study 41: 192−198.
• Redpath S. M. 1995a. Habitat fragmentation and the individual: tawny owls Strix aluco in woodland patches. J. Anim. Ecol. 64: 652−661.
• Redpath S. M. 1995b. Impact of habitat fragmentation on activity and hunting behaviour in the tawny owl Strix aluco. Behav Ecol. 6: 410−415.
• Redpath S. M., Appleby B. M., Petty, S. J. 2000. Honest signalling in tawny owls – Do male hoots betray parasite loads. J. Avian Biol. 31: 457−462.
• Rhim S−J., Lee W−S. 2004. Seasonal changes in territorial behaviour of hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia) in a temperate forest of South Korea. J Ornithol. 145: 31−34.
• Ryszkowski L., Wagner C. K., Goszczyński J., Truszkowski J. 1971. Operation of predators in a forest and cultivated fields. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 8: 160−168.
• Salvati L., Ranazzi L. 2002. Changes in density and territory size of the tawny owl Strix aluco along an altitude gradient: the effect of forest types and wood cover. Acta zoological cracoviensia 45 (2): 237−243.
• Sara M. 1987. Preliminary data on tawny owl Strix aluco density in Sicily. Suppl. Ric. Biol. Selvaggina 12: 207−216.
• Schoener T. W. 1968. Sizes of Feeding Territories among Birds. Ecology 49: 123–141.
• Skłodowski J., Gryz J. 2012. Owady w pokarmie puszczyka (Strix aluco) na terenach leśnych w środkowej i północno−wschodniej Polsce. Sylwan 156 (1): 36−46.
• Soderstrom B. 2001. Seasonal change in red−backed Shrike Lanius collurio territory quality – the role of nest predation. lbis 143: 561−571.
• Solonen T. 2005. Breeding of the tawny owl Strix aluco in Finland: responses of a southern colonist to the highly variable environment of the North. Ornis Fennica 82: 97−106.
• Southern H. N. 1954. Tawny owls and their prey. Ibis 96: 384−410.
• Southern H. N. 1970. The natural control of a population of tawny owls. J. Zool. Lond. 162: 197−285.
• Stubbe A., Stubbe M., Herrmann St. 2000. Populationsökologie Greifvogel und Eulenarten 4: 491−504.
• Sunde P., Bölstad M. S. 2004. A telemetry study of the social organization of a tawny owl (Strix aluco) population. J. Zool. 263: 65−76.
• Sunde P., Overskaug K., Bolstad J. P., Oien I. J. 2001. Living at the limit: Ecology and behaviour of tawny owls Strix aluco in a northern edge population in central Norway. Ardea 89 (3): 495−508.
• Sunde P., Redpath S. M. 2006. Combining information from range use and habitat selection: sex – specific spatial responses to habitat fragmentation in tawny owls Strix aluco. Ecography 29: 152−158.
• Szmal A., Jermaczek A., Nawrocki P., Szwagrzak A., Winiecki A. 1991. Liczebność, rozmieszczenie i terytorializm puszczyka Strix aluco w Wielkopolskim Parku Narodowym. Acta orn. 26: 15−22.
• Tomiałojć L., Stawarczyk T. 2003. Awifauna Polski – rozmieszczenie, liczebność i zmiany. PTPP „proNatura”, Wrocław.
• Vlasman K. L., Fryxell J. M. 2002. Seasonal changes in territory use by red squirrels, Tamiasciurus hudsonicus, and responses to food augmentation. Can. J. Zool. 80 (11): 1957−1965.
• Vrezec A., Tome D. 2004. Habitat selection and patterns of distribution in a hierarchic forest owl guild. Ornis Fennica 81: 109−118.
• Wendland V. 1972. Vierzehnjahrige Beobachtungen zur vermwhrung des Waldkauzes. J. fur Ornithol. 113: 276−86.
• Wiącek J., Polak M., Grzywaczewski G. 2010. The Role of Forest Age, Habitat Quality, Food Resources and Weather Conditions for the Tawny Owl Strix aluco Populations. Polish J. of Environ. Stud. 19 (5): 1039−1043.
• Zuberogoitia I., Martínez J. A. 2000. Methods for surveying tawny owl Strix aluco populations in large areas. Biota 1: 137−146.