Orbital size measurement based on computed tomography imaging for surgical safety

• Autorzy: Skorek A. , Szurowska E. , Raczynska D. , Szmuda T. , Stodulski D.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Determining the orbital size makes it possible to manoeuvre safely within the orbit during a surgical procedure. Based on the measurements performed on a multi-layer head computed tomography images, the length was determined of the medial, superior, inferior and lateral orbital walls. Also angles were determined between the superior and inferior walls, between the medial and lateral walls, between the inferior wall and Frankfurt plane and between the anterior and posterior segments of the orbital wall. With these measurements it was possible to establish that the safe space for surgical exploration of the orbit (that is the space between the orbital margin and optic canal) is approximately 40 mm. Moreover, it was determined that the medial wall is parallel to the vertical axis of the body and that the angle between the inferior wall and the Frankfurt plane is 19.7°. The angle between the posterior segment of the inferior wall (posterior to the inferior orbital fissure) and the anterior segment is 130.8°. These data will significantly increase the safety of orbital surgeries. (Folia Morphol 2014; 73, 3: 314–320)

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Folia Morphologica
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 73
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.314-320,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Skorek A.

• Department of Otolaryngology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland

autor

Szurowska E.

• Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland

autor

Raczynska D.

• Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland

autor

Szmuda T.

• Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland

autor

Stodulski D.

• Department of Otolaryngology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Abed SF, Sham P, Shen S, Adds PJ, Uddin JM (2012) A cadaveric study of ethmoidal foramina variation and its surgical significance in Caucasians. Br J Ophthalmol, 96: 118–121.
• 2. Ahmad F, Kirkpatrick WNA, Lyne J, Urdang M, Garey LJ, Waterhouse N (2003) Strain gauge biomechanical evaluation of forces in orbital floor fractures. Br J Plast Surg, 56: 3–9.
• 3. Akdemir G, Tekdemir I, Altm L (2004) Transethmoidal approach to the optic canal: surgical and radiological microanatomy. Surg Neurol, 62: 268–174.
• 4. Al-Sukhun J, Penttilä H, Ashammakhi N (2012) Orbital stress analysis. Part V: systematic approach to validate a finite element model of human orbit. J Craniofac Surg, 23: 669–674.
• 5. Burkat CN, Lemke BN (2005) Anatomy of the orbit and its related structures. Otolaryngol Clin N Am, 38: 825–856.
• 6. Chastain JB, Sindwani R (2006): Anatomy of the orbit, lacrimal apparatus and lateral nasal all. Otolaryngol Clin N Am, 39: 855–864.
• 7. Dortzbach RK ed. (1994) Ophthalmic plastic surgery: prevention and management of complications. Raven Press, New York.
• 8. Fujino T (1974) Experimental “blow-out” fracture of the orbit. Plast Reconstr Surg, 54: 81–82.
• 9. Goldberg RA, Kim AJ, Kerivan KM (1998) The lacrimal keyhole, orbital door jamb and basin of the interior orbital fissure. Three areas of deep bone in the lateral orbit. Arch Ophthalmol, 116: 1618–1624.
• 10. Gönül E, Erdogan E, Düz B, Timurkaynak E (2003) Transmaxillary approach to the orbit: an anatomic study. Neurosurgery, 53: 935–941.
• 11. Hwang K, Baik SH (1999) Surgical anatomy of the orbit of Korean adults. J Craniofac Surg, 10: 129–133.
• 12. Ji Y, Qian Z, Dong Y, Zhou H, Fan X (2010) Quantitative morphometry of the orbit in Chinese adults based on a three-dimensional reconstruction method. J Anat, 217: 501–508.
• 13. Jones DEP, Evans JNG (1967) “Blow-out” fractures of the orbit: an investigation into their anatomical basis. J Laryngol Otol, 81: 1109–1120.
• 14. Karakas P, Bozkir MG, Oguz Ö (2002) Morphometric measurements from various reference points in the orbit of male Caucasians. Surg Radiol Anat, 24: 358–362.
• 15. Lee H, Lee Y, Ha S, Park M, Baek S (2011) Measurement of width and distance of the posterior border of the deep lateral orbital wall using computer tomography. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 39: 606–609.
• 16. Liesegang TJ, Skuta GL, Cantor LB eds. (2005) Basic and clinical science course. Część 7. [Oczodół, powieki i układ łzowy]. Wydawnictwo Medyczne Urban & Partner, Wroclaw.
• 17. McQueen CT, Di Ruggiero DC, Campbell JP, Shockley WW (1995) Orbital osteology: a study of the surgical landmarks. Laryngoscope, 105: 783–788.
• 18. Michel O (2000) Transnasale Chirurgie der Orbita. HNO, 48: 4–17.
• 19. Nagasao T, Miyamoto J, Nagasao M, Ogata H, Kaneko T, Tamaki T, Nikajima T (2006) The effect of striking angle on the buckling mechanizm in blowout fracture. Plast Reconstr Surg, 117: 2373–2380.
• 20. Nitek S (2005) Morfologia i morfometria struktur kostnych oczodołu w aspekcie bezpieczeństwa wybranych dojść operacyjnych. Rozprawa doktorska. Akademia Medyczna w Warszawie.
• 21. Regensburg NI, Wiersinga WM, van Velthoven ME, Berendschot TT, Zonneveld FW, Baldeschi L, Saeed P, Mourits MP (2011) Age and gender-specific reference values of orbital fat and muscle volumes in Caucasians. Br J Ophthalmol, 95: 1660–1663.
• 22. Rene C (2006) Update on orbital anatomy. Eye, 20: 1119–1129.
• 23. Rontal E, Rontal M, Guilford FT (1979) Surgical anatomy of the orbit. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 88: 382–386.
• 24. Wanyura H (1996) Anatomia chirurgiczna oczodołu. Czas Stomat, 49: 567–578.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5603/FM.2014.0036