Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | 79 | 2 |
Tytuł artykułu

N1‑P2: neural markers of temporal expectation and response discrimination in interval timing

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Humans use temporal regularities in their daily life to act in accordance with future events in the most efficient way. To achieve this, humans build temporal expectations and determine a template action that is in line with those expectations. In this temporal trisection study, we aimed to study the neurophysiological counterparts of temporal expectation and response discrimination. We investigated amplitude variations of early event-related potentials (ERPs) while manipulating time intervals. We measured temporal expectation-related attenuation of neural activity and response discrimination processes in N1 and P2 ERP components. Results showed that the amplitude of the N1 component was attenuated for the predicted task-relevant temporal location of a response decision. The P2 amplitude, in contrast, was enhanced for a discriminated response in comparison to a template response. The present study supports a link between the different functional associations of the N1 and P2 components within the requirements of a timing task. N1-related amplitude modulation can determine a change in expectation level during timing. The amplitude regulation of the P2 component, in contrast, explains temporal discrimination in both expected and unexpected temporal locations. In addition to expectation-related modulation, our results suggest an additional regulation of the N1 amplitude that is linked to attention. The effect was observed in instances that included a prediction error of a task-relevant temporal location for a response decision. In conclusion, our study contributes to the growing neurocognitive literature on interval timing by capturing different aspects of a timing task; namely, N1-related expectation and P2-related response discrimination processes.
Słowa kluczowe
Opis fizyczny
  • Department of Cognitive Science, Graduate School of Informatics, METU, Ankara, Turkey
  • Department of Psychology, İstanbul Arel University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Department of Health Informatics, Graduate School of Informatics, METU, Ankara, Turkey
  • Department of Health Informatics, Graduate School of Informatics, METU, Ankara, Turkey
  • Department of Cognitive Science, Graduate School of Informatics, METU, Ankara, Turkey
  • Institute of Cognitive Science, Osnabrück University, Osnabruck, Germany
  • Allan LG (1999) Understanding the bisection psychometric function. In: W. Uttal and P. Killeen (Eds.), Fechner Day 99: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics. Tempe: Arizona State University.
  • Allan LG (2002) Are the referents remembered in temporal bisection? Learn Motiv 33: 10–31.
  • Allan LG, Gerhardt K (2001) Temporal bisection with trial referents. Percept Psychophys 63: 524–540.
  • Annic A, Bocquillon P, Bourriez JL, Derambure P, Dujardin K (2014) Effects of stimulus-driven and goal-directed attention on prepulse inhibition of the cortical responses to an auditory pulse. Clin Neurophysiol 125: 1576–1588.
  • Arnal LH, Giraud, AL (2012) Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions. Trends Cogn Sci 16: 390–398.
  • Barron HC, Garvert MM, Behrens TE (2016) Repetition suppression: a means to index neural representation using BOLD? Phil Trans R Soc B 371: pii: 20150355.
  • Chennu S, Finoia P, Kamau E, Monti MM, Allanson J, Pickard JD, Bekinschtein TA (2013) Dissociable endogenous and exogenous attention in disorders of consciousness. Neuroimage Clin 3: 450–461.
  • Church RM (1984) Properties of the internal clock. Ann N Y Acad Sci 423: 566–582.
  • Correa A, Lupiáñez J, Milliken B, Tudela P (2004) Endogenous temporal orienting of attention in detection and discrimination tasks. Percept Psychophys 66: 264–278.
  • Correa A, Nobre AC (2008) Neural modulation by regularity and passage of time. J Neurophysiol 100: 1649–1655.
  • Coull JT (2009) Neural substrates of mounting temporal expectation. PLOS Biology 7: e1000166.
  • Coull JT, Nobre AC (1998) Where and when to pay attention: the neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI. J Neurosci 18: 7426–7435.
  • Crowley KE, Colrain IM (2004) A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: age, sleep and modality. Clin Neurophysiol 115: 732–744.
  • Dowman R (2004) The pain-evoked P2 is not a P3a event-related potential. Brain Topogr 17: 3–12.
  • Eagleman DM, Pariyadath V (2009) Is subjective duration a signature of coding efficiency? Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol Sci 364: 1841–1851.
  • Finnigan S, O’Connell RG, Cummins TD, Broughton M, Robertson IH (2011) ERP measures indicate both attention and working memory encoding decrements in aging. Psychophysiology 48: 601–611.
  • Garcia-Larrea L, Lukaszewicz AC, Mauguiere F (1992) Revisiting the oddball paradigm. Non-target vs. neutral stimuli and the evaluation of ERP attentional effects. Neuropsychologia 30: 723–741.
  • Getzmann S, Wascher E, Schneider D (2017) The role of inhibition for working memory processes: ERP evidence from a short-term storage task. Psychophysiology 55: e13026.
  • Gold JI, Ding L (2013) How mechanisms of perceptual decision-making affect the psychometric function. Prog Neurobiol 103: 98–114.
  • Gratton G, Coles MG, Donchin E (1983) A new method for off-line removal ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 39: 526–530.
  • Griffin IC, Miniussi C, Nobre AC (2002) Multiple mechanisms of selective attention: differential modulation of stimulus processing by attention to space or time. Neuropsychologica 40: 2325–2340.
  • Hansen JC, Hillyard SA (1988) Temporal dynamics of human auditory selective attention. Psychophysiology 25: 316–329.
  • Kingdom FAA, Prins N (2009) Psychophysics. A Practical Introduction. San Diego, CA, US: Elsevier Academic Press.
  • Kononowicz, TW, Van Rijn, H (2011) Slow potentials in time estimation: the role of temporal accumulation and habituation. Front Integr Neurosci 5: 48.
  • Kononowicz TW, Van Rijn H (2014) Decoupling interval timing and climbing neural activity: a dissociation between CNV and N1P2 amplitudes. J Neurosci 34: 2931–2939.
  • Kononowicz TW, Van Rijn H, Meck WHM (2017) Timing and time perception: A critical review of neural timing signatures before, during, and after the to-be-timed interval. In: J. Wixted (Editor-in-Chief) and J. Serences (Editor, Vol. II): Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience (4th ed.), Volume II: Sensation, Perception and Attention, New York: Wiley.
  • Kornilov SA, Landi N, Rakhlin N, Fang SY, Grigorenko EL, Magnuson JS (2014) Attentional but not pre-attentive neural measures of auditory discrimination are atypical in children with developmental language disorder. Develop Neuropsychol 39: 543–567.
  • Lefebvre CD, Marchand Y, Eskes GA, Connolly JF (2005) Assessment of working memory abilities using an event-related brain potential (ERP)-compatible digit span backward task. Clin Neurophysiol 116: 1665–1680.
  • Lijffijt M, Lane SD, Meier SL, Boutros NN, Burroughs S, Steinberg JL, Swann AC (2009) P50, N100, and P200 sensory gating: Relationships with behavioral inhibition, attention, and working memory. Psychophysiology 46: 1059–1068.
  • Linares D, Lopez-Moliner J (2015) quickpsy: Fits Psychometric Functions for Multiple Groups (Version 0.1.2). Retrieved from package=quickpsy.
  • Luck SJ, Woodman GF, Vogel EK (2000) Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends Cogn Sci 4: 432–440.
  • Lu ZL, Dosher B (2013) Visual Psychophysics. From Laboratory to Theory. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  • Macar F, Vidal F, Casini L (1999) The supplementary motor area in motor and sensory timing: Evidence from slow brain potential changes. Experimental Brain Research 135: 271–280.
  • Macar F, Vidal F (2002) Time processing reflected by EEG surface Laplacians. Experimental Brain Research 145: 403–406.
  • Matthews WJ (2011) Can we use verbal estimation to dissect the internal clock? Differentiating the effects of pacemaker rate, switch latencies, and judgment processes. Behav Process 86: 68–74.
  • Matthews WJ, Gheorghiu AI (2016) Repetition, expectation, and the perception of time. Curr Opin Behav Sci 8: 110–116.
  • Mento G, Tarantino GA, Sarlo VA, Bisiacchi MA, Silvia P (2013) Automatic temporal expectancy: a high-density event-related potential study. PLOS ONE 8: e62896.
  • Miller EK, Desimone R (1994) Parallel neuronal mechanisms for short-term memory Science 263: 520–522.
  • Näätänen R, Picton T (1987) The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24: 375–425.
  • Ng KK, Tobin S, Penney TB (2011) Temporal accumulation and decision processes in the duration bisection task revealed by contingent negative variation. Front Integr Neurosci 5: 77.
  • Nobre A, Correa A, Coull J (2007) The hazards of time. Curr Opin Neurobiol 17: 465–470. Oades RD, Dittmann-Balcar A, Schepker R, Eggers C, Zerbin D (1996) Auditory eventrelated potentials (ERPs) and mismatch negativity (MMN) in healthy children and those with attention-deficit or Tourette/tic symptoms. Biol Psychol 43: 163–185.
  • O’Donnell BF, Hokama H, McCarley RW, Smith RS, Salisbury DF, Mondrow E, Shenton ME (1994) Auditory ERPs to non-target stimuli in schizophrenia: relationship to probability, task-demands, and target ERPs. Int J Psychophysiol 17: 219–231.
  • Paris T, Kim J, Davis C (2016) The processing of attended and predicted sounds in time. J Cogn Neurosci 28: 158–165.
  • Pariyadath V, Eagleman DM (2008) Brief subjective durations contract with repetition. J Vis 8 : 1–9.
  • Potts GF, Liotti M, Tucker DM, Posner MI (1996) Frontal and inferior temporal cortical activity in visual target detection: Evidence from high spatially sampled event-related potentials. Brain Topography 9: 3–14.
  • Potts GF, Tucker DM (2001) Frontal evaluation and posterior representation in target detection. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 11: 147–156.
  • Rif J, Hari R, Hamalainen MS, Sams M (1991) Auditory attention affects two different areas in the human supratemporal cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 79: 464–472.
  • Rossion B, Jacques C (2012) The N170: Understanding the time course of face perception in the human brain. In: Luck SJ, Kappenman ES, editors. The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components. Oxford: Oxford University Press; pp. 115–141.
  • Senderecka M, Grabowska A, Gerc K, Szewczyk J, Chmylak R (2012) Event-related potentials in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: an investigation using an auditory oddball task. Int J Psychophysiol 85: 106–115.
  • Seppänen M, Hämäläinen J, Pesonen AK, Tervaniemi M (2012) Music training enhances rapid neural plasticity of N1 and P2 source activation for unattended sounds. Front Hum Neurosci 6: 1–13.
  • Van Wassenhove V, Lecoutre L (2015) Duration estimation entails predicting when. Neuroimage 106: 272–283.
  • Wickham H, Chang W, Henry L, Pedersen TL, Takahashi K, Wilke C and Woo K (2018) Create elegant data visualizations using the grammar of graphics. Retrieved from
  • Woods DL, Knight RT, Scabini D (1993) Anatomical substrates of auditory selective attention: behavioral and electrophysiological effects of posterior association cortex lesions. Cogn Brain Res 1: 227–240.
  • Zhang F, Deshpande A, Benson C, Smith M, Eliassen J, Fu QJ (2011) The adaptive pattern of the auditory N1 peak revealed by standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography. Brain Res 1400: 42–52.
  • Zhang J, Nombela C, Wolpe N, Barker RA, Rowe JB (2016) Time on timing: Dissociating premature responding from interval sensitivity in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 31: 1163–1172.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.