Effect of different tillage systems on the macronutrient content and uptake in sugar beets

• Autorzy: Gaj R. , Budka A. , Przybyl J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The study, carried out in 2012-2013, intended to determine effects of different cultivation systems on the uptake and content of macronutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, calcium and sodium) in sugar beets at the technological maturity stage. A conventional tillage system (SO) was compared to simplified technologies of soil cultivation. The following conservation tillage systems were analyzed: (2) tillage to a depth of 35 cm and sowing into stubble mulch (MS35); (3) shallow tillage to a depth of 15 cm and sowing into stubble mulch (MS15); (4) tillage to a depth of 15 cm and sowing into white mustard mulch; (5) strip-till on stubble mulch to a depth of 25 cm and instantaneous beet seed sowing (STS); (6) strip-till to a depth of 25 cm on white mustard mulch and instantaneous beet seed sowing (STG). Mineral nutrient concentrations in beets varied depending on the cultivation system applied and the plant organ analyzed. The experimental factor significantly differentiated the content of P, K, Ca, Mg and Na in both beet leaves and roots, having no effect on the nitrogen content. When compared to the conventional tillage system, a decreasing trend for phosphorus and calcium in beet leaves and a significant increase of sodium both in beet leaves and roots was observed in the simplified cultivation systems. Cultivation simplifications provided some equivocal evidence implicating differences in the nutrient content between the study years. The analysis of correlations between root yields and the total accumulation of nutrients indicated significant relationships for N, P, K, Ca, Mg only in the conventional tillage system and in the treatment with 35 cm deep tillage (soil ripping) along with sowing into stubble mulch (MS35). In the other treatments, strong relationships were observed only for individual nutrients.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

plant cultivation; tillage system; macronutrient content; macronutrient uptake; sugar-beet; conservation tillage; nutrient content; nutrient uptake

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Journal of Elementology
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 20
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.839-853,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Gaj R.

• Chair of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Biogeochemistry, Poznan University Life of Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 71F, 60-625 Poznan, Poland

autor

Budka A.

• Chair of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Biogeochemistry, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland

autor

Przybyl J.

• Chair of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Biogeochemistry, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland

Bibliografia

• Barłóg P., Grzebisz W. 2001. Effect of magnesium foliar application on the yield and quality of sugar beet roots. Rostl. Vyr., 47(9): 418-422.
• Barłóg P., Szczepaniak W., Grzebisz W. 2013. Response of sugar beet dose and type of sodium fertilizers against the background of manure applications. Part II Content and uptake of nutrients. Fragm. Agron., 30(3): 35-45. (in Polish)
• Barłóg P. 2009. Investigations on sugar beet nutrition by macroelements with special attention to sodium. Fertilizers and Fertilization, 35, 147p. (in Polish)
• Bell Ch., Milord G.F.J., Leigh R-A. 1996. Sugar beet. In: Photoassimilate distribution in plants and crops. Source-sink relationships. Zamski E., Schaff er A.A. (eds.). Marcel Dekker Inc. USA, NY, 691-707 pp.
• Blaziak J., Dechnik I., Wiater J. 1996. Influence of straw and farmyard manure fertilization on microelement content in wheat and barley. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol., 434: 269-273. (in Polish)
• Brown K.F., Biscoe P.V. 1985. Fibrous root growth and water use of sugar beet. J. Agric. Sci., Camb., 105: 679-691.
• Caliński T., Czajka S., Kaczmarek Z. 1987. A model for the analysis of a series of experiments repeated at several place over a period of years. I. Theory. Biul. Oceny Odmian, 12(1): 7-33.
• Gaj R., Budka A., Niewiadomska A., Przybył J., Mioduszewska N. 2015. Effect of different tillage systems on the nutritional status, yield and quality of sugar beets. J. Elem., 20(3): 571-584.
• Gill R.I.S., Singh B., Kaur N. 2009. Productivity and nutrient uptake of newly released wheat varieties at different sowing times under poplar plantation in north-western India. Agroforest Syst., 76: 579-590.
• Grewal H.S., Maheshw ari B., Parks S. 2011. Water and nutrient use efficiency of low-cost hydroponic greenhouse for a cucumber crop: An Australian case study. Agr. Water Manage, 98: 841-846.
• Grzebisz W., Barłóg P., Feć M. 1998. The dynamics of nutrient uptake by sugar beet and its effect on dry matter yield and sugar yield. Fragm. Agron., 3(98): 242-248. (in Polish)
• Hartw ig N., Ammong H.U. 2002. Cover crops and living mulches. Weed Sci., 50: 688-699.
• Hedley M.J., Mortv edt J.J., Bolan N.S., Seyers J.K. 1995. Phosphorus fertility management in agroecosytems. In: Phosphorus in the global environment: Transfers cycles and management. Tiessen H. (ed) New York, John Wiley & Son Ltd, 27-42.
• Hasegawa E., Yoneyama T. 1995. Effect of decrease in supply of potassium an the accumulation of cations in komatsuna and sugar beet plants. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 41: 393-398.
• Ishaq M., Ibrahim M., Lal R. 2001. Tillage effect on nutrient uptake by wheat and cotton as influenced by fertilizer rate. Soil Till. Res., 62:41-53.
• Kala R. 2000. Statistics for naturalists. AR, Poznan. (in Polish)
• Khan B.R., Khan B., Razzaq A., Munir M., Aslam M., Hobb s P.R. 1986. Effect of different tillage implements on the yield of wheat. Pak. J. Agric. Res.,7:141-147.
• Kordas L., Zimny L. 1997. Effect of selected stubble crops on sugar beet yielding in direct sowing technology. Biul. IHAR, 202: 207-211. (in Polish)
• Kuc P, Zimny L. 2005. Yielding and technological quality of sugar beet growing in different cultivation systems. Ann. UMCS, Sect. E, 60:133-143. (in Polish)
• López-Fando C., Pardo M.T. 2009. Changes in soil chemical characteristics with dfferent tillage practices in semi-arid environment. Soil Till. Res., 104: 278-284.
• Marchett i R., Castelli F. 2011. Mineral nitrogen dynamics in soil during sugar beet and winter wheat crop growth. Europ. J. Agron., 35: 13-21.
• Milford G.F.J., Amstrong M.J., Jarvis P.J., Hought on B.J., Bellett -Travers D.M., Jones J., Leight R.A. 2000. Effect of potassium fertilizer on the yield, quality and potassium offtake of sugar beet crops grown on soils of different potassium status. J. Agric. Sci., 135(1): 1-10.
• Rasmussen K.J. 1999. Impact of ploughless soil tillage on yield and soil quality: A Scandinavian review. Soil Till. Res., 53:3-14.
• Selles F., McConkey B.G., Campell C.A. 1999. Distribution and forms of P under cultivatorand zero-tilage for continuous- and fallow-wheat cropping systems in the semi-arid Canadian prairies. Soil Till. Res., 51: 47-59.
• Sip V., Vavera R., Chrpova J., Kusa H., Ruzek P. 2013. Winter wheat yield and quality related to tillage practice, input level and environmental conditions. Soil Till. Res., 132: 77-85.
• Słowiński H., Prośba-Białczyk U., Pytlarz-Kozicka M., Nowak W. 1995. The influence of fertilization on the dynamics of mineral nutrient uptake by sugar beet. Zesz. Nauk. AR Wrocław, Rol., 43(262): 31-43. (in Polish)
• Soane B.D., Ball B.C., Arvidsson J., Moreno F., Roger-Estrade J. 2012. No-till in northern, western and south-western Europe: A review of problems and opportunities for crop production and the environment. Soil Till. Res., 118: 66-87.
• Tiwana U., Narang R. 1997. Micronutrients uptake spectrum in rice (Oryza sativa L.)- wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cropping system under heavy fertilization. J. Res. Punjab Agric. Univ., 34(4): 363-369.
• Van den Putt e A., Govers G., Diels J., Gillijns K., Demuzere M. 2010. Assessing the effect of soil tillage crop growth: a meta-regression analysis on European crop yields under conservation agriculture. Europ. J. Agron., 33: 231-241.
• Van Duivenbooden N., Witt C.T., Van Keulen H. 1996. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium relations in five major cereals reviewed in respect to fertilizer recommendations using simulation modeling. Fert. Res. 44: 37-49.
• Valle S.R., Pinochet D., Calderini D. 2011. Uptake and use efficiency of N, P, K, Ca and Al by Al-sensitive and Al-tolerant cultivars of wheat under a wide range of soil Al concentration. Field Crops Res., 121: 392-400.
• Vandergeten J.P., Van der Linden J.P., Jarvis P., Leveque E., Guiraud de Willot D., Kromer K.H. 2004. Test procedures for measuring the quality in sugar beet production - seed drillability, precision seeders, harvesters, cleaner loaders. I.I.R.B. Brussels.
• Verch G., Kächele H., Hőlti K., Richt er C., Fuchs C. 2009. Comparing the profitabilty of tillage methods in Northest Germany – a field trial from 2002 to 2005. Soil Till. Res., 104(1): 16-21.
• Werker A., Jaggard K.W. 1998. Dependence of sugar beet yield on light interception and evapotranspiration. Agric. Forest Met., 89: 229-240.
• Wiśniewski W. 1994. Dynamics of growth and accumulation of mineral nutrients by sugarand fooder beets with regard to their processing quality. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol., 434:269-273.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5601/jelem.2015.20.1.817