How the three arches of the foot intercorrelate

• Autorzy: Gwani A.S. , Asari M.A. , Mohd Ismail Z.I.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: The foot is composed of medial, lateral and transverse arches which, particularly the medial arch, provide it with the ability to function both as a flexible and rigid structure for proper locomotion. Arches of the foot, as well as their effect on lower extremity function, have been studied. However, quantitative data on the relationship between these arches still remain scanty. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to examine how the three arches of the foot intercorrelate. Materials and methods: Seventy-six participants (58 males, 18 females) were recruited to participate in the study. Bilateral weight-bearing lateral radiographs of the right foot were taken from each participant. Navicular heights (NH), medial cuneiform height (MCH), calcaneal inclination angle (CIA) and calcaneal-first metatarsal angle (C1MA) were measured to represent the medial arch. The lateral arch was represented by cuboid height (CH) and calcaneal-fifth metatarsal angle (C5MA) whereas; MCH and CH represented the transverse arch. Mean difference of variables between males and females was compared using independent t-test while the correlation between the variables was determined using Pearson correlation. Results: All the variables were not significantly related to gender. Significant moderate to excellent linear correlations were observed between the variables. CIA showed the strongest correlation with C1MA (r = –0.90) and C5MA (r = –0.84) whereas, CH had the least correlation with other variables. Conclusions: The moderate to excellent correlations between the variables indicate that deformation or elevation of the medial arch may consequently result in similar movements of the lateral and transverse arches and vice versa. (Folia Morphol 2017; 76, 4: 682–688)

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Folia Morphologica
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 76
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.682-688,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Gwani A.S.

• Department of Anatomy, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kampus Kesihatan, Kelantan, Malaysia
• Department of Human Anatomy, College of Medical Sciences, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi State, Nigeria

autor

Asari M.A.

• Department of Anatomy, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kampus Kesihatan, Kelantan, Malaysia

autor

Mohd Ismail Z.I.

• Department of Anatomy, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kampus Kesihatan, Kelantan, Malaysia

Bibliografia

• 1. Akdoğan I, Akkaya S, Akkaya N, et al. Comparison of the calcaneal pitch angle and modified projection area per length squared method for medial longitudinal arch evaluation of the foot. Balkan Med J. 2012; 29(4): 406–409, doi: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2012.036, indexed in Pubmed: 25207043.
• 2. Bálint GP, Korda J, Hangody L, et al. Regional musculoskeletal conditions: foot and ankle disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003; 17(1): 87–111, doi: 10.1053/yberh.2003.275, indexed in Pubmed: 12659823.
• 3. Bourdet C, Seringe R, Adamsbaum C, et al. Flatfoot in children and adolescents. Analysis of imaging findings and therapeutic implications. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013; 99(1): 80–87, doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.10.008, indexed in Pubmed: 23260367.
• 4. Buldt AK, Murley GS, Levinger P, et al. Are clinical measures of foot posture and mobility associated with foot kinematics when walking? J Foot Ankle Res. 2015; 8: 63, doi: 10.1186/s13047-015-0122-5, indexed in Pubmed: 26604987.
• 5. Colton T. Statistics in medicine. 1st ed. Little, Brown & Company, Boston 1974.
• 6. Dugan SA, Bhat KP. Biomechanics and analysis of running gait. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2005; 16(3): 603–621, doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2005.02.007, indexed in Pubmed: 16005396.
• 7. Early JS, Bucholz RW. Lisfranc injuries and their management. Current Orthopaedics. 1996; 10(3): 169–173, doi: 10.1016/s0268-0890(96)90005-5.
• 8. Franco AH. Pes cavus and pes planus. Analyses and treatment. Phys Ther. 1987; 67(5): 688–694, indexed in Pubmed: 3575426.
• 9. Fukano M, Fukubayashi T. Motion characteristics of the medial and lateral longitudinal arch during landing. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009; 105(3): 387–392, doi: 10.1007/s00421-008-0915-3, indexed in Pubmed: 18998155.
• 10. Glasoe WM, Yack HJ, Saltzman CL. Anatomy and Biomechanics of the First Ray. Physical Therapy. 1999; 79(9): 854–859, doi: 10.1093/ptj/79.9.854.
• 11. Hillstrom HJ, Song J, Kraszewski AP, et al. Foot type biomechanics part 1: structure and function of the asymptomatic foot. Gait Posture. 2013; 37(3): 445–451, doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.09.007, indexed in Pubmed: 23107625.
• 12. Kapandji I. The physiology of the joints. Longman Group Limited, Churchill Livingstone., London 1970.
• 13. Lautzenheiser SG, Kramer PA. Linear and angular measurements of the foot of modern humans: a test of Morton’s foot types. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2013; 296(10): 1526–1533, doi: 10.1002/ar.22764, indexed in Pubmed: 23963833.
• 14. Lundgren P, Nester C, Liu A, et al. Invasive in vivo measurement of rear-, mid- and forefoot motion during walking. Gait Posture. 2008; 28(1): 93–100, doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.10.009, indexed in Pubmed: 18096389.
• 15. Lung CW, Yang SW, Hsieh LF. Is the Arch Index Meaningful. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics. 2009; 19(2): 187–196, doi: 10.5103/kjsb.2009.19.2.187.
• 16. Menz H, Munteanu S. Validity of 3 Clinical Techniques for the Measurement of Static Foot Posture in Older People. J Orthopaedic Sports Physical Therapy. 2005; 35(8): 479–486, doi: 10.2519/jospt.2005.35.8.479.
• 17. Moore KL, Dalley AF, Agur AMR. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. Wolters Kluwer Health 2013.
• 18. Murley GS, Menz HB, Landorf KB. A protocol for classifying normal- and flat-arched foot posture for research studies using clinical and radiographic measurements. J Foot Ankle Res. 2009; 2: 22, doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-2-22, indexed in Pubmed: 19575811.
• 19. Nester CJ, Jarvis HL, Jones RK, et al. Movement of the human foot in 100 pain free individuals aged 18-45: implications for understanding normal foot function. J Foot Ankle Res. 2014; 7(1): 51, doi: 10.1186/s13047-014-0051-8, indexed in Pubmed: 25493100.
• 20. Nester CJ, Liu AM, Ward E, et al. In vitro study of foot kinematics using a dynamic walking cadaver model. J Biomech. 2007; 40(9): 1927–1937, doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.09.008, indexed in Pubmed: 17081548.
• 21. Oatis CA. Biomechanics of the foot and ankle under static conditions. Phys Ther. 1988; 68(12): 1815–1821, indexed in Pubmed: 3057518.
• 22. Philbin T, Rosenberg G, Sferra JJ. Complications of missed or untreated Lisfranc injuries. Foot Ankle Clin. 2003; 8(1): 61–71, doi: 10.1016/s1083-7515(03)00003-2, indexed in Pubmed: 12760575.
• 23. Pohl MB, Farr L. A comparison of foot arch measurement reliability using both digital photography and calliper methods. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010; 3: 14, doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-3-14, indexed in Pubmed: 20630090.
• 24. Roth S, Roth A, Jotanovic Z, et al. Navicular index for differentiation of flatfoot from normal foot. Int Orthop. 2013; 37(6): 1107–1112, doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1885-6, indexed in Pubmed: 23580031.
• 25. Saltzman CL, Nawoczenski DA, Talbot KD. Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995; 76(1): 45–49, doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80041-7, indexed in Pubmed: 7811174.
• 26. Saltzman CL, Nawoczenski DA. Complexities of foot architecture as a base of support. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995; 21(6): 354–360, doi: 10.2519/jospt.1995.21.6.354, indexed in Pubmed: 7655479.
• 27. Seringe R, Wicart P. The talonavicular and subtalar joints: the „calcaneopedal unit” concept. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013; 99(6 Suppl): S345–S355, doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.07.003, indexed in Pubmed: 23978710.
• 28. Sinacore DR, Gutekunst DJ, Hastings MK, et al. Neuropathic midfoot deformity: associations with ankle and subtalar joint motion. J Foot Ankle Res. 2013; 6(1): 11, doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-6-11, indexed in Pubmed: 23531372.
• 29. Takai S. Structural components of the arch of the foot analyzed by radiogrammetric and multivariate statistical methods. Cells Tissues Organs. 1984; 119(3): 161–164, doi: 10.1159/000145879.
• 30. Viladot A. Biomechanics of the subtalar joint. Foot. 1992; 2(2): 83–88, doi: 10.1016/0958-2592(92)90023-i.
• 31. Wicart P. Cavus foot, from neonates to adolescents. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012; 98(7): 813–828, doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.09.003, indexed in Pubmed: 23098772.
• 32. Yalçin N, Esen E, Kanatli U, et al. Evaluation of the medial longitudinal arch: a comparison between the dynamic plantar pressure measurement system and radiographic analysis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2010; 44(3): 241–245, doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2010.2233, indexed in Pubmed: 21088466.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2017.0049