PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2016 | 08 | 2 |
Tytuł artykułu

Reliability and validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in Lithuania

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Background: Purpose of the study was to examine: (1) the criterion validity and test-retest reliability of the IPAQ-LT short-form (SF) and long-form (LF) and (2) its potential over-reporting and energy expenditure over-estimation. Material and methods: 130 participants, aged 18 - 69 years, wore the Actigraph GT3X accelerometer (ACC) on all waking hours over 7 consecutive days. One day before and after they completed both versions of the back-translated IPAQ-LT. 92 participants were included for the reliability and 81 for the validity tests. Spearman’s rho correlation coefficients were calculated as the measurement of agreement. Results: Only the walking category significantly (p <.05) correlated with the ACC, SF (.22), LF (.20). Compared with ACC data IPAQ-LT averaged 997% (SF) and 1512% (LF) more weekly minutes of PA and 864% (SF) and 1477% (LF) more MET-min/week. The classification of participants as sufficiently active was 87.6% (SF), 90.1% (LF), and 8.7% (ACC). Conclusions: The validity for total PA scored relatively low compared with other studies. Substantial PA over-reporting and EE over-estimation were observed. As such, the evidence is very weak to support the use of IPAQ- LT as a relative or an absolute measure of PA and further work in this regard is amended.
Słowa kluczowe
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Health, Physical and Social Education, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania
autor
  • Institute of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich Alexander University, Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany
autor
  • Institute of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich Alexander University, Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany
Bibliografia
  • [1] Bauman A, Phongsavan P, Schoeppe S, et al. Physical activity measurement – a primer for health promotion. Promot Educ. 2006;13:92-103.
  • [2] Rütten A, Vuillemin A, Ooijendijk WTM, et al. Physical activity monitoring in Europe. The European Physical Activity Surveillance System (EUPASS) approach and indicator testing. Public Health Nutr. 2003;6:377-384.
  • [3] World Health Organization. Global Strategy on diet, physical activity, and health. Geneva: WHO, 2004. Available at http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/strategy/eb11344/strategy_english_web.pdf
  • [4] Rütten A, Rzewnicki R, Ziemainz H, et al. Towards a European Health Monitoring System. Results of a pilot study on physical activity. In: McQueen D and Puska P, eds. Global Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance. New York: Kuwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers; 2003, 73-92.
  • [5] Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, et al. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381-1395.
  • [6] Boon RM, Hamlin MJ, Steel GD, et al. Validation of the New Zealand Physical Activity Questionnaire (NZPAQ-LF) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-LF) with accelerometry. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44:741-746.
  • [7] Macfarlane DJ, Chan A, Cerin E. Examining the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, long form (IPAQ-LC). Public Health Nutr. 2011;4:443-450.
  • [8] Lee PH, Macfarlane DJ, Lam TH, et al. Validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic review. Int J BehavNutr Phys Act. 2011;8:115-126.
  • [9] Bullinger M. International comparability of health interview surveys: An overview of methods and approaches. In: Nosikov A, Gudex C, eds. EUROHIS: Developing common instruments for health surveys. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2003, 1-12.
  • [10] World Health Organization. Review of physical activity surveillance. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2010. Available at http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/148784/e95584.pdf
  • [11] Puska P, Helasoja V, Prättälä R. Health behaviour in Estonia, Finland and Lithuania 1994–1998 standardized comparison. Eur J Public Health. 2003;13:11-17.
  • [12] Rzewnicki R, Auweele YV, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Addressing overreporting on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) telephone survey with a population sample. Public Health Nutr. 2003;6:299-305.
  • [13] International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Guidelines for Data Processing and Analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) – Short and Long Forms, 2005. http://www.ipaq.ki.se/scoring.pdf [accessed 15 February 2014].
  • [14] International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Cultural Adaptation, 2005. http://www.ipaq.ki.se/cultural.htm [accessed 15 February 2014].
  • [15] Santos-Lozano A, Santín-Medeiros F, Cardon G, et al. Actigraph GT3X: Validation and determination of physical activity intensity cut points. Int J Sport Nutr. 2013;34:975-982.
  • [16] Masse LC, Fuemmeler BF, Anderson CB, et al. Accelerometer data reduction: a comparison of four reduction algorithms on select outcome variables. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:S544-S554.
  • [17] Matthews CE, Chen KY, Freedson PS, et al. Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003–2004. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167:875-881.
  • [18] Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007;116:1081-1093.
  • [19] World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva: WHO, 2010. Available at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/ 9789241599979_eng.pdf.
  • [20] Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:777-781.
  • [21] Macfarlane DJ, Lee CC, Ho EY. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of IPAQ (short, last 7 days). J Sci Med Sport. 2007;10:45-51.
  • [22] Razali NM, Wah YB. Power Comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling Tests. J Stat Model Anal. 2011;2:21-33.
  • [23] Mukaka MM. A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012;24(3):69-71.
  • [24] Hallal PC, Victora CG. Reliability and validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:556-556.
  • [25] Kolbe-Alexander TL, Lambert EV, Harkins JB, et al. Comparison of two methods of measuring physical activity in South African older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2004;14:99-114.
  • [26] Dinger MK, Behrens TK, Han JL. Validity and reliability of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in college students. Am J Health Edu. 2006;37:337-343.
  • [27] Crouter SE, Churilla JR, Bassett Jr, DR. Estimating energy expenditure using accelerometers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;98:601-612.
  • [28] Leenders NY, Sherman WM, Nagaraja HN. Energy expenditure estimated by accelerometry and doubly labeled water: do they agree? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:2165-2172.
  • [29] EkelundU, Sepp H, Brage S. Criterion-related validity of the last 7-day, short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in Swedish adults. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9:258-265.
  • [30] Bauman A, Bull F, Chey T, et al. The international prevalence study on physical activity: results from 20 countries. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:21.
  • [31] Guthold R, Ono T, Strong KL, et al. Worldwide variability in physical inactivity: a 51-country survey. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34:486-494.
  • [32] Freedson P, Pober D, Janz KF. Calibration of accelerometer output for children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:S523-530.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-a5355a9e-f59e-4ca3-8d57-cb6622ef514a
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.