Sperm morphometry of six Polish duck conservative flocks

• Autorzy: Zawadzka J. , Lukaszewicz E.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Morfometria plemników kaczorów sześciu polskich stad zachowawczych

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

PL

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego we Wrocławiu. Biologia i Hodowla Zwierząt
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 67
• Opis fizyczny: p.41-47,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Zawadzka J.

• Division of Poultry Breeding, Institute of Animal Breeding, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Lukaszewicz E.

• Division of Poultry Breeding, Institute of Animal Breeding, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• Adler M., 2009. Sexual conflict in waterfowl: why do females resist extrapair copulations? Behav. Ecol., 21: 182-192.
• Bireskie J.V., Montgomerie R., Birkhead T.R., 1997. The evolution of sperm size in birds. Evolu¬tion, 51(3): 937-945.
• Birkhead T.R., Martinez J.G., Burke T., Froman D.P., 1999. Sperm mobility determines the out¬come of sperm competition in the domestic fowl. Proc. R. Soc. B., 266: 1759-1764.
• Birkhead T.R., Pellatt E.J., Brekke P., Yeates R., Castillo-Juarez H., 2005. Genetic effects on sperm design in the zebra finch. Nature, 434: 383-387.
• Birkhead, T.R., 1998. Sperm competition in birds. Rev. Reprod., 3: 123-129.
• Brennan L.R., Christopher J.C., Richard O.P., 2009. Explosive eversion and functional morphol¬ogy of the duck penis supports sexual conflict in waterfowl genitalia. Proc. Biol. Sci., 277: 1309-1314.
• Brennan P.L., Prum R.O., McCracken K.G., Sorenson M.D., Wilson R.E., Birkhead T.R., 2007. Coevolution of Male and Female Genital Morphology in Waterfowl. PLoS ONE 2(5): e418.
• Burrows W.H., Quinn J.P., 1937. The collection of spermatozoa from domestic fowl and turkey. Poult. Sci., 16: 19-24.
• Calhim S., Double M.C., Margraf N., Birkhead T.R., Cockburn A., 2011. Maintenance of Sperm Variation in a Highly Promiscuous Wild Bird. PLoS ONE 6(12): e28809.
• Calhim S., Lampe H.M., Slagsvold T., Birkhead T.R., 2009. Selection on sperm morphology under relaxed sperm competition in a wild passerine bird. Biol. Lett., 5: 58-61.
• Ciereszko A., Kowalczyk A., Łukaszewicz E., Krzywiński A., Kobus A., Dietrich G.J., 2009. Sperm- characteristics of male hybrid from across between male Black Grouse Tetrao tetrix and female Capercaillie T. urogallus. Ornis Fenn., 86: 149-152.
• Coker C.R., McKinney f., Hays H., Briggs S., Cheng K., 2002. Intromittent organ morphology and testis size in relation to mating system in waterfowl. Auk, 119: 403-413.
• Cunninghan E.J.A., 2003. Female mate preferences and subsequent resistance to copulation in the mallard.Behav. Ecol., 14: 326-333.
• Denk A.G., Holzmann A., Peters A., Vermeirssen E.L.M.. Kempenaers B., 2005. Paternity in mal-lards: effects of sperm quality and female sperm selection for inbreeding avoidance. Behav. Ecol., 16: 825-833.
• Fujihara N., 1990. Characteristics of Ejaculated Avian Semen, in: Advances in Reproductive Biol¬ogy Selected Lectures of Beijing International Symposium on Reproductive Biology, October 23-26, 1990. Cao Yongging and Zhu Cheng (eds): 132-155.
• Humphries S., Evans J.P., Simmons L.W., 2008. Sperm competition: linking form to function. BMC Evol. Biol., 8: 319.
• Immler S., Birkhead T.R., 2007. Sperm competition and sperm midpiece size: no consistent pattern in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 274: 561-568.
• Immler S., Pryke S.R., Birkhead T.R., Griffith S.C., 2010. Pronounced within-individual plasticity in sperm morphometry across social environments. Evolution, 64: 1634-1643.
• Immler S., Saint-Jalme M., Lesobre L., Sorci G., Roman Y., Birkhead T.R., 2007. The evolution of sperm morphometry in pheasants. J. Evol. Biol., 20: 1008-1014.
• Johnson D.D.P., Birskie J.V., 1999. Sperm competition and sperm length in shorebirds. The Condor, 101: 848-854.
• Kleven O., Laskemoen T., Foss0y F., Robertson R.J., Lifjjeld J.T., 2007. Intraspecific variation in sperm length is negatively related to sperm competition in passerine birds. Evolution, 62: 494-499.
• Korn N., Thurston R.J., Pooser B.P., Scott T.R., 2000. Ultrastructure of spermatozoa from Japanese Quail. Poult. Sci., 79: 407-414.
• Lake P. E., Smith W., Young D., 1968. The ultrastructure of the ejaculated fowl spermatozoon. Q. J. Exp. Physiol., 53: 356-366.
• Lupold S., Calhim S., Immler S., Birkhead T.R., 2009. Sperm morphology and sperm velocity in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 1175-1181.
• Malo A.M., Gomendio M., Garde J., Lang-Lenton B., Soler A.J., Roldan E.R.S., 2006. Sperm de¬sign and sperm function. Biol. Lett., 2: 246-249.
• Surai P.F., Wishart G.J., 1996. Poultry artificial insemination technology in the countries of the former USSR. World's Poult. Sci. J., 52 (1): 28-43.
• Vladic T.V., Afzelius B.A., Bronnikov G.E., 2002. Sperm quality as reflected through morphology in salmon alternative life histories. Biol. Reprod., 66: 98-105.
• Woolley D.M., 1995. The structure of the spermatozoon of the Japanese Quail, Coturnix coturnix L. var. japonica. Acta Zoologica (Stockholm), 76: 45-50.