Układ osadniczy jako system

• Autorzy: Jedrzejczyk D.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Settlement structure as a system

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

System interpretations study the essence of settlement structure on two ontological planes: on the plane of interactio of elements and on the plane of creating of a separate category of integrity. The ontological substance of interaction consists in the fact that it constitutes the basic mechanism joining elements of the class into a whole. However, freedom of interpretation of the interaction notion results in recognizing the system either as an analogue of an organic system whose purposedly organized elements are kept in dynamic balance, or in treating it as a sui generis convention understood as a useful tool of study. However, with the use of only the interpretation of the substance of interaction mechanisms it is impossible to prove existence of settlement system as a separate category of entity. Between all elements of the class of settlements always there are some interactions, and they can be of mechanical, field or thermodynamic character. However, it is impossible to determine which of the internations have system-creative properties and which are devoid of these properties. These diffilculties cause that settlement theories look for the essence of the system in a class of settlements, constituted into a specific wholeness. This means that a settlement system cannot be constructed by adding elements one by one, thait is it cannot be analysed through application of theories concerning its parts and their interrelations. In other words, an interpretation of a settlement system in system categories resolves itself into recognizing it as an organic whole which requires during in analysis appliiation of irreducible principles of such systems. This is determined by the system's structure which excludes the possibility to analyse it from the so-called „summatiive” point of view. To recognize a settlement system as a separate ontological category requires to show how a „summative” analysis differs from analysis of another „non-summative” type. This differentiation seems to be based on a statement that elements of an organic whole do not behave independently of one another, and one may assume that the principles applying to them when they are not elements of an organic whole, are valid for them as elements of such a whole. Therefore it seems that a „summative” analysis is such which explains properties of a system basing on principles concerning its elements and the prtinciples do not refer to features of the elements as components of a system. And „non-summative” analysis seems to be an analysis describing a system basinig on principles on connections between elements as functional elements of the system. But if these are the differences between such aellegedly different methods of analysis, the differenees are not important. This proves that border between systems cannot be determined aceurately - between „organic wholes” and other systems - „non-summative”. If even elements of summative wholes relate casually to one another (e.g. in gravitational systems), summative analysis of such wholes must contain special assumptions describing organization of elements of such wholes so that a basic theory can be applied to them, similairly to systems recognized as „summative”. This means that from the ontological point of view there is no justification to recognize a „non-summative” whole, which is a substratum of settlement system, as a separate real entity.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

systemy osadnicze; koncepcje; obiekty

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Prace i Studia Geograficzne
• Rocznik: 1989
• Tom: 10
• Opis fizyczny: s.13-35,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Jedrzejczyk D.

Bibliografia

• Agyris C., 1959, Understanding human behaviour in organization, w: M. Haire (ed.), Modern organization theory, New York, Wiley, 113-173.
• Ashby W.R., 1958a, An introduction to cybernetics, London, Chapman and Hall (W.R. Ashby; 1963, Wstęp do cybernetyki. Warszawa, PWN).
• Ashby W.R., 1958b, General systems theory as a new discipline, „General Systems”, 3, 1-6.
• Ashby W.R., 1960, Desilgn for a brain; the origin of adaptive behaviour, London, Chapman and Hall.
• Baranow C.N., 1970, Problemy pierspiektiwnogo razwitija sowietskogo gradostroitielstwa, „Architiektura SSSR”, 4, 11-22.
• Beer S., 1966, Decision and control, Chichester, Wiley.
• Berry B.J.L., 1964a, Approach to regional analysis : a synthesis, Annales of the Association of Americain Geographers, 54, 2-11.
• Berry B.J .L., 1964b, Cities as systems within Systems of cities, „Papers of the Regional Science Association”, 13, 147-163.
• Berry B.J.L., 1973, Growth centers in the American urban system, vol. 1: Communing development aind regional growth in the sixtres and seventies, Cambridge, Mass., Ballinger.
• Berry B.J.L., Conkling E.C., Ray D.M., 1976, The geography of economic systems, Englewood Cliffs, N. J ., Prentice-Hall.
• Bertalanffy L. von, 1933, Modern theories of development in introduction to the theoretical biology, London, Oxford University Press and Milford.
• Bertalanffy L. van, 1952, Problems of Lilfe: and evolution of modern biological thought, London, Watts.
• Bertalanffy L. von. 1956, General system theory, „General Systems”, 1, 1-10.
• Bertalanffy L. von, 1962, General system theory; a critical view, „General Systems:, 7, 1-20.
• Bertalanffy L. von, 1968, General system theory; for fundations, development, applications, New York, Braziller.
• Bertalanffy L. von, 1978, Perspectives on general system theory, New York, Braziller.
• Blanberg I.W., W.N. Sadowski, E.G. Judin, 1973, Koncepcje systemowe we wspólczesnej nauce, w: Problemy metodologii badań systemowych, Warszawa: WNT, 9-41.
• Błażko N.I., 1967, Koliczestwiennyje mietody izuczenija sistiemy gorodskich posielenij, Moskwa, Izdatielstwo „Nauka”.
• Bourne L.S., 1.974, Forecasting urban systems: research desigin, alternative, methodologies and urbanization trends with Canadian examples, „Regional Studies”, 8, 197-210.
• Bourne L.S., R.D. MacKinnon (eds), 1972, Urban systems development in central Canada, Toronto: University of Toronto, Department of Geography, Research Publication No 9.
• Bourne L.S., J .W. Simmons, 1979, Canadian settlement trends: an examination of the spatial pattern of growth, 1971-1976, Toronto: The Centre for Urban and Community Studies, University of Toronto, Major Rapport No 15.
• Böventner E. von, 1973, City size systems: theoretical issues, empirical regularities and planning guides, „Urban Studies”, 10, 145-167.
• Carter H., 1972, The study of urban geography, London, Arnold.
• Chadwick G., 1971, A systems view of planning, Oxford, Pergamon Press.
• Chodżajew D.G., Choriew B.S., 1975, The concept of a united settlement system and the planned control of growth of towns in USSR, w: A.R. Kukliński (ed.), Regional development and planning: international perspectives, Leyden, Sijthoff.
• Chojnicki Z., 1974, Podstawowe założenila modeli systemu przestrzennego miast, „Miasto”, 9: 1-5.
• Claval P., 1973, Le systeme urbain et les réseaux d'information, „Revue Geographique”, 27, 5-15.
• Conroy M.E., 1975, The challenge of urban economic development, Lexington, Lexilngton Books.
• Dawidowicz W. G., 1966, Rassielenije w promyszlennych uzłach (inżinierno-ekonomiczeskije osnowy), Moskwa, Gosstrojizdat.
• Davies J.B., L.S. Bourne, 1963, Behaviour of Ontario-Quebec urban system city size regularities, Toronto: Department of Geography University of Toronto, Component Study No 3, Urban Development Study.
• Dickey J.W., T.M. Watts, 1978, Analytic techniques in urban and reginal planning, New York, Mc Graw-Hill.
• Dziewoński K., B. Malisz, 1978, Przekształcenia przestrzenno-gospodarcze struktury przestrzeno-gospodarczej kraju, Warszawa, Studia KPZK PAN, 62.
• Ferguson F., 1975, Architecture, cities and system approach, New York, Braziller.
• Gibson .R.E., 1966, The recognition of systems engeneeiring, Baltimore, Hopkins.
• Galant S., L.S. Bourne, 1968, Growth characteristics of the Ontario-Quebec urban systems, Toronto, Department of Geography University of Toconto, Research Repport No 4.
• Haggett P., 1965, Locational analysis in human geography, London, Arnold.
• Hall AD., 1968, A methodology for systems engeneering, Princeton, D. van Nostrana Company.
• Hall AD., R.E. Fagen, 1956, Definition of system, „General Systems”, 1, 18-28.
• Hall P., D. Hay, 1980, Growth centers in European urban systems, London, Heinemann Educational Books.
• Hall P., N. Hansen, H. Swain, 1975, Urban system: a comparative analysis of structure, change and public policy, Laxenburg International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Memorandum RM-75-35.
• Hancock T. (ed.), 1976, Growth and change in future city region, London, Leonard Hill.
• Handler A.B., 1970, Systems approach to architecture, New York, American Publishing Co.
• Hartley H.J., 1969, Limitations of systems analysis, „Phi Delta Kappa”, 5, 515-519.
• Hoos LR., 1968, A critical review of systems anialysis, Berkeley, University of Catifornia, The California Experience, Paper No 89, Space Sciences Laboratory.
• Jerczyński M., 1977, Struktura i współczesne przemiany systemu osadniczego, w: K. Dziewoński, A. Gawryszewski, E. Iwanicka-Lyrowa, A. Jelonek, Rozmieszczenie i migracje ludności a system osadniczy Polski Ludowej, Prace Geograficzne IG i PZK PAN, 117, 285-324.
• Kennett S., 1978, Exploding the myth of rapidly expanding urban systems in Britain: implications for adoption of functional areas the 1981 census, London, London School of Economics, Graduate School of Geography, Discussion Paper No 70.
• Knobelsdorf E.W., 1957, K woprosu o tipach sowietskich gorodow, Gieograficzeskij Sbornik, 11, 75-90.
• Koestler A., 1967, The ghost in the machine, New York, Macmillan.
• Krueckeberg D.A., A.L. Silvers, 1974, Urban planning analysis: methods and models, New York, Wiley.
• Lange O., 1962, Całość i rozwój w świetle cybernetyki, Warszawa, PWN.
• Laszló E., 1978, Systemowy obraz świata, Warszawa, PIW.
• La Patra J.W., 1973, Applying the systems approach to urban development, Stroudsburg, Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.
• Lubański M., 1980, Informacja-system, w: M. Heller, M. Lubański, S.W. Ślaga, Zagadnienia filozoficzne współczesnej nauki. Wstęp do filozofii przyrody, Warszawa Akademia Teologii Katolickiej, 14-164.
• Mc Laughlin J .B., 1969, Urban and regional planning-a systems approach, New York, Praeger.
• Nagel E., 1961, The structure of science, problems in the logic of scientific explanation, New York, Harcourt, Brace and World (E. Nagel, Struktura nauki, Warszawa 1979, PWN).
• Northam R.M., 1975, Urban geography, New York, Wiley.
• Ottensmann, J .R., 1975, The changing spatial structure of American cities, Lexington, Lexington Books and Heath.
• Pedersen P.O., 1970, Information diffusion within and between national urban systems „Geographical Analysis”, 2, 203-254.
• Piturenko E.I., 1977, Tierritorialnyje sistiemy gorodskich posielenij Ukrainskoj SSR, Kijew, Naukowa Dymka.
• Pred AR., 1973a, The growth and development of systems of cities in advanced economics, w: A.R., Pred, G.E. Törnqvist, Systems of cities and information flows. Two essays, Lund, Lund Studies in Geography, Ser. B., Human Geography, 38, 9-82.
• Pred A.R., 1973b, Urban growth and circulation of information: the United States Systems of cities, 1790-1840, Cambridge, Mass., Harward University Press.
• Pred A.R., 1977, City-systems in advanced economics. Past growth, present processes and future development opinions, New York, A Halsted Press Book.
• Rapoport A., 1970, Modern systems theory-an outlook for coping with change, „General Systems”, 15, 15-25.
• Ray D.M., 1972:, Dimension of Canadian regionalism, Ottawa, Information Canada, Geographical Paper No 49.
• Reif B., 1973, Models in urban and regional planning, London, Leonard Hill Books and Intertext Publisher.
• Richardson H.W., 1971, Optimality in city size, systems of cities and urban policy: a sceptic's view, w: Economic research relevant to the formulation of national urban development strategies, Glasgow, University of Glasgow Press.
• Sadowski W.N;, 1973, Analiza logiczno-metodiologic:zma ogólnej teorii systemów L. vo111 Bea:talanffy, w: Problemy metodologii badań systemowych, Warszawa, WNT, 237-357.
• Sadowski W.N., 1978, Problemy ogólnej teorii systemów. Analiza logiczno-metodologiczna, Warszawa, PWN.
• Siegel J., M. Woodyard, 1971, Urban growth and its relation to the urban hierarchy in central Canada, Toronto, The Centre for Urban and Community Studies University of Toronto, Research Paper No 52.
• Simmons J.W., 1979, Mysteries of urban growth: a cross sectional analysis of the Canadian urban system, Toronto, The Centre for Urban and Community Studies University of Toronto, Research Paper No 114.
• Steiss A.W., 1974a, Models for the analysis and planning of urban systems, Lexington, Heath.
• Steiss A.W., 1974b, Urban systems dynamics, Lexington, Heath.
• Stuart D.G., 1970, The systems approach in urban planning, Planning Advisory Service, Repport No 213.
• Tatarkiewlicz W., 1978, Układ pojęć w filozofii Arystotelesa, Warszawa, PWN.
• Taylor J.L., 1971, Institutional planning systems. A gravity-simulation approach to urban problems, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Törnqvist G.E., 1975, Spatial organization of activity spheres, w: H. Swain, R.D. MacKinnon (eds), Issues in the management of urban systems. Schloss, Laxenburg, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 226-265.
• Wärneryd O., 1968, Interdependence in urban systems, Göteborg, Regionkonsult Aktiebolag.
• Westway J., 1974, Contact potential and the occupational structure of British urban system 1961-1966: an empirical study, „Regional Studies”, 8, 57-73.
• Wertheimer M., 1970, Gestalt theory, New York, Wisdom Library.
• Wilmoth D., 1974, Communications in the urban systems, „Journial of the Proceedings of the Ecological Soctiety of Australia”, 8, 211-230.
• Whebell C.F.J., 1969, Corridors: a theory of urban systems, Annales of the Association of American Geographers, 58, 1-26.
• Wilson A.G., (ed.), 1972, Patterns and processes in urban and regional systems, London, Pion.