PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2013 | 69 | 11 |

Tytuł artykułu

Współczesne metody wczesnej diagnozy ciąży u krów

Warianty tytułu

EN
Contemporary methods of early pregnancy diagnosis in cows

Języki publikacji

PL

Abstrakty

EN
Contemporary methods used in early pregnancy diagnosis (ePD) in cows have been presented. Despite many new diagnostic tests, the choice methods still remain per rectum palpation and ultrasound examinations (US). The clinical examination is performed about 35 days post insemination, US at about 28 days. When compared to per rectum examination, early ultrasound pregnancy diagnosis (eUSPD) in cows enables an earlier diagnosis or exclusion of pregnancy, confirming of viability and/or evaluation of fetus growth. Ultrasound imaging is a relatively simple and safe noninvasive technique. Accuracy (ACC), sensitivity and negative predictive value for pregnancy diagnosis using miniature, portable ultrasounds equipped with sector or linear probes assessed in 30th day after insemination is 83, 83.2 and 79.6% or 89.4, 95.2 and 91.9% respectively. Relatively low accuracy of ultrasound examination depends of both false negative and positive results. Accuracy is also influenced by such factors as: operator’s experience, technical parameters of the apparatus, individual traits of animals, and environmental conditions. Accuracy of eUSPD could be lowered in the case of pregnancy loss. Included in indirect methods of pregnancy diagnosis is examination consisting in qualitative and quantitative detection of specific substances in systemic fluids (blood, plasma and cot) produced during pregnancy. These are: early pregnancy factor ECF detection, progesterone concentration, PAG, IGF-1 and estrogen, test of specific protein B (PBSP) in blood plasma concentration. On the other hand, highly useful in the evaluation of embryo mortality in early pregnancy is the estimation of pregnancy protein DG29. However, due to their low efficiency (time consuming and low accuracy) these tests are not widely applied in practice. All methods of pregnancy diagnosis in cows should be characterized by high accuracy. Most of them have those features, but none of them combine all of them. It would seem that in the future early pregnancy diagnosis should be directed toward diagnosing based on quick, sensitive and inexpensive qualitative tests as well as completing ultrasound examinations.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

69

Numer

11

Opis fizyczny

s.655-661,fot.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor
  • Instytut Weterynarii, Wydział Hodowli i Biologii Zwierząt, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu, ul.Wołyńska 35, 60-637 Poznań
  • Instytut Weterynarii, Wydział Hodowli i Biologii Zwierząt, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu, ul.Wołyńska 35, 60-637 Poznań

Bibliografia

  • 1. Alexander B. M., Johnson M. S., Guardia R. O., Van de Graff W. L., Senger P. L., Sasser R. G.: Embryonic loss from 30 to 60 days post breeding and the effect of papalpationper rectum on pregnancy. Theriogenology 1995, 43, 551-556.
  • 2. Ali A.: Effect of gestational age and fetal position on the possibility and accuracy of ultrasonographic fetal gender determination in dairy cattle. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2004, 39, 190-194.
  • 3. Austin K. J., Ward S. K., Teixeira M. G., Dean V. C., Moore D. W., Hansen T. R.: Ubiquitin cross-reactive protein is released by the bovine uterus in response to interferon during early pregnancy. Biol. Reprod. 1996, 54, 600-606.
  • 4. Badtram G. A., Gaines J. D., Thiomas C. B., Bosu W. T. K.: Factors influencing the accuracy of early pregnancy detection in cattle by real-time ultrasound scanning of the uterus. Theriogenology 1991, 35, 1153-1166.
  • 5. Ball P. J. H.: The relationship of age and stage of gestation to the incidence of embryo death in dairy cattle. Res. Vet. Sci. 1978, 25, 120-122.
  • 6. Baxter S. J., Ward W. R.: Incidence of fetal loss in dairy cattle after pregnancy diagnosis using a ultrasound scanner. Vet. Rec. 1997, 140, 287-288.
  • 7. Berg D. K., Van Leeuwen J., Beaumont S., Berg M., Pfeffer P. L.: Embryo loss in a cattle between Days 7 and 16 of pregnancy. Theriogenology 2010, 73, 250-260.
  • 8. Butler J. E., Hamilton W. C., Sasser R. G., Ruder C. A., Hass G. M., William N.: Detection and partial characterization of two bovine pregnancy specific proteins. Biol. Reprod. 1982, 26, 925-933.
  • 9. Cavanagh A.: Identification of early pregnancy factor as chaperonin 10: implications for understanding its role. Rev. Reprod. 1996, 1, 28-32.
  • 10. Cordoba M., Sartori R., Fricke P. M.: Assessment of a commercially available Early Conception Factor (ECF) test for determining pregnancy status of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84, 1884-1889.
  • 11. Cowie A. T.: Pregnancy diagnosis tests.: A review. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux Joint Publication 1948, 13, 281-283.
  • 12. DesCôteaux L., Carrière P. D., Bigras-Poulin M.: Evaluation of the Early Conception Factor (ECF) dipstick test in dairy cows between days 11 and 15 post-breeding. Bov. Pract. 2000, 34, 87-91.
  • 13. Diskin M. G., Morris D. G.: Embryonic and Early Foetal Losses in Cattle and Other Ruminants. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 2008, 43 (Suppl. 2), 260-267.
  • 14. Dransfield M., Nebel R., Pearson R., Warnick L.: Timing of insemination for dairy cows identified in estrus by a radiotelemetric estrus detection system. J. Dairy Sci. 1998, 81, 1874-1882.
  • 15. Dunne L. D., Diskin M. G., Screenan J. M.: Embryo and foetal loss in beef heifers between day 14 of gestation and full term. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 1999, 28, 39-44.
  • 16. Egli C., Velek K., Michaud S., Hart M., Leathers V.: IDEXX Bovine Pregnancy Test – a new too lfor accurace and early pregnancy diagnosis in cattle. XXVII World Buiatrics Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, 3-8 June 2012, s. 606, 185-186.
  • 17. Faustini M., Battocchio D., Vigo D., Prandi A., Veronesi M. C., Comin A., Cairoli F.: Pregnancy diagnosis in dairy cows by whey progesterone analysis: an ROC approach. Theriogenology 2007, 67, 1386-1392.
  • 18. Franco O. J., Drost M., Thatcher M. J., Shille V. M., Thatcher W. W.: Fetal survival in the cow after pregnancy diagnosis by palpation per rectum. Theriogenology 1987, 27, 631-644.
  • 19. Fricke P. M.: Scanning the future – ultrasonography as a reproductive management tool for dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85, 1918-1926.
  • 20. Gowan E. W., Etches R. J., Bryden C., King G. J.: Factors affecting accuracy of pregnancy diagnosis in cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 1982, 65, 1294-1302.
  • 21. Grygar I., Kudláč E.: Ultrasonografia w położnictwie i ginekologii weterynaryjnej. Platan, Kraków 2004.
  • 22. Gümen A., Guenther J. N., Wiltbank M. C.: Follicular size and response to Ovsynch versus detection of estrus in anovular and ovular lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86, 3184-3194.
  • 23. Han H., Austin K. J., Rempel L. A., Hansen T. R.: Low blood ISG15 mRNA and progesterone levels are predictive of non-pregnant dairy cows. J. Endocrinol. 2006, 191, 505-512.
  • 24. Han R. X., Kim H. R., Diao Y. F., Lee M. G., Jin D. J.: Detection of early pregnancy-specific proteins in Holstein milk. J. Proteomics 2012, 75, 3221-3229.
  • 25. Herzog K., Bollwein H.: Application of doppler ultrasonography in cattle reproduction. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 2007, 42, 51-58.
  • 26. Humblot P., Camous S., Martal J., Charley J., Jeanguyot N., Thibier M., Sasser G.: Diagnosis of pregnancy by radioimmunoassay of a pregnancy-specific protein in the plasma of dairy cows. Theriogenology 1988, 30, 257-267.
  • 27. Hunnam J. C., Parkinson T. J., Lopez-Villalobos N., McDougall S.: Comparison of transcutaneous ultrasound over the right flank with transrectal ultrasound for pregnancy diagnosis in the dairy cow. Aust. Vet. J. 2009, 87, 318-322.
  • 28. Isobe N., Akita M., Nakao T., Yamashiro H., Kubota H.: Pregnancy diagnosis based on the fecal progesterone concentration in beef and dairy heifers and beef cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2005, 90, 211-218.
  • 29. Jaśkowski J., Racewicz P., Włodarek J., Antosik P.: The usefulness of different ultrasound scanners for early pregnancy diagnosis in cattle. XXVII World Buiatrics Congress. Lisbon, Portugal, 3-8 June 2012, s. 591, 81.
  • 30. Kastelič J. P., Curran S., Ginther O. J.: Accuracy of ultrasonography for pregnancy diagnosis on days 10 to 22 in heifers. Theriogenology 1989, 31, 813-820.
  • 31. Kawarsky S. J., Basrur P. K., Stubbings R. B., Hansen P. J., King W. A.: Chromosomal abnormalities inbovine embryo and their influence on development. Biol. Reprod. 1996, 43, 53-59.
  • 32. Kizaki K., Shichijo-Kizaki A., Furusawa T., Takahashi T., Hosoe M., Hashizume K.: Differential neutrophil gene expression in early bovine pregnancy. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2013, 11, 6.
  • 33. Kolour A. K., Batavani R. A., Ardabili F. F.: Preliminary observations on the effect of parity on first day ultrasonic detection of embryo and its organs in bovine. J. Vet. Med. 2005, 52, 74-77.
  • 34. Kornmatitsuk B., Thitaram C., Kornmatitsuk S.: Measurement of faecal progesterone metabolites and its application for early screening of open cows post-insemination. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2007, 42, 238-428.
  • 35. Loo H. Van, Callens J., Miry C., Ribbens S., De Bleecker K., Stoop S.: Two years of diagnosing bovine abortion in Flandres: lessons learned. XXVII World Buiatrics Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, 3-8 June 2012, s. 64.
  • 36. Mann G. E., Lamming G. E.: Relationship between maternal endocrine environment, early embryo development and inhibition of the luteolytic mechanism in cows. Reproduction 2001, 121, 175-180.
  • 37. Mayer J., Soller J., Beck J., Purvins V., Wemheuer W., Schutz E., Brenig B.: Early pregnancy diagnosis in dairy cows using circulating nucleic acids. Theriogenology 2013, 79, 173-179.
  • 38. Mee F. J.: A comparison of veterinary practitioner dairy herd fertility service provision in Portugal, the Netherlands and in Ireland. XXVII World Buiatrics Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, 3-8 June 2012, s. 621, 191.
  • 39. Momont H.: Rectal palpation. Safety Issues The Bovine Practitioner 1990, 25, 122-123.
  • 40. Morton H., Cavanagh A. C., Athanasas-Platsis S., Quinn K. A., Rolfe B. E.: Early pregnancy factor has immunosuppressive and growth factor properties. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 1992, 4, 411-422.
  • 41. Mufeed A., Wadie F., Lubbadeh Z.: Effect of progesterone (P4) intravaginal device (CIDR) to reduce embryonic loss and to synchronize return to oestrus of previously timed inseminated lactating dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2008, 107, 36-47.
  • 42. Nation D. P., Malmo J., Davis G. M., Macmillan K. L.: Accuracy of bovine pregnancy detection using transrectal ultrasonography at 28 to 35 days after insemination. Aust. Vet. J. 2003, 81, 63-65.
  • 43. Paisley L. G., Mickelson W. D., Trost O. L.: A survey of the incidence of prenatal mortality in cattle following pregnancy diagnosis by rectal palpation. Theriogenology 1978, 9, 481-491.
  • 44. Paré J., Audet-Grenier M., Rouillier P., Sirard M.: Evaluation of the DG29 test for early detection of pregnancy in cattle. Can. Vet. J. 2008, 49, 1119-1121.
  • 45. Piechotta M., Bollwein J., Friedrich M., Heilkenbrinker T., Passavant C., Brenen J., Bollwein H.: Comparison of commercial ELISA blood tests for early pregnancy detection in dairy cows. J. Reprod. Dev. 2011, 57, 72-75.
  • 46. Pursley J. R., Silcox R. W., Wiltbank M. C.: Effect of time of artificial insemination on pregnancy rates, calving rates, pregnancy loss, and gender ratio after synchronization of ovulation in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1998, 81, 2139-2142.
  • 47. Rejamahendran R., Ambrose J., Burton B.: Clinical and research applications of real-time ultrasonography in bovine reproduction: A review. Can. Vet J. 1994, 35, 563-572.
  • 48. Roberts R. M., Cross J. C., Leaman D. W.: Interferons as hormones of pregnancy. Endocrine Rev. 1992, 13, 432-452.
  • 49. Roberts R. M., Xie S., Nagel R. J., Low B., Green J., Beckers J. F.: Glycoproteins of the aspartyl proteinase gene family secreted by the developing placenta. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1995, 362, 231-240.
  • 50. Romano J. E., Fahning L. M.: Effecs of early pregnancy diagnosis by palpation of amniotic sac per rectum on pregnancy loss in dairy cattle. XXVII World Buiatrics Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, 3-8 June 2012, s. 67-68.
  • 51. Romano J. E., Thompson J. A., Kraemer D. C., Westhusin M. E., Forrest D. W., Tomaszewski M. A.: Early pregnancy diagnosis by palpation per rectum: influence on embryo/fetal viability in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2007, 67, 486-493.
  • 52. Sakonju S., Enomoto S., Kaminura S., Amana K.: Monitoring bovine embryo viability with 698 early pregnancy factor. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 1993, 55, 271-274.
  • 53. Sasser R. G., Crock J., Ruder-Montgomery C. A.: Characteristics of pregnancy-specific protein B in cattle. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 1989, 37, 109-113.
  • 54. Silke V., Diskin M. G., Kenny D. A., Boland M. P., Dillon P., Mee J. F., Sreenan J. M.: Extent, pattern and factors associated with late embryonic loss in dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2002, 71, 1-12.
  • 55. Silvio-del-Rio N., Colloton J. D., Fricke P. M.: Factors affecting pregnancy loss for single and twin pregnancies in a high-producing dairy herd. Theriogenology 2009, 71, 1462-1471.
  • 56. Sirkkola H.: Trächtigkeitsdiagnose mit Ultraschallgerät bei Kühen und Sauen. Prakt. Tierarzt 1988, 10, 54-57.
  • 57. Spencer T. E., Bazer F. W.: Biology of progesterone action during pregnancy recognition and maintenance of pregnancy. Front. Biosci. 2000, 7, 1879-1898.
  • 58. Szelényi Z., Bajcsy Árpad C., Brydl N., Nagy K., Répási A., Kulcsár M., Szenci O.: Prediction of twin pregnancies by measuring certain endocrine and metabolic parameters in dairy cows in the peripartal period. XXVII World Buiatrics Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, 3-8 June 2012, 243, s. 69.
  • 59. Szenci O., Beckers J. F., Humblot P., Sulon J., Sasser G., Taverne M. A., Schekk G.: Comparison of ultrasonography, bovine pregnancy-specific protein B, and bovine pregnancy-associated glycoprotein 1 tests for pregnancy detection in dairy cows. Theriogenology 1998, 50, 77-88.
  • 60. Szenci O., Taverne M. A. M., Beckers J. F., Sulon J., Nagy P., Henzen Ch., Racz V.: Evaluation of the determination of bovine pregnancy associated glycoprotein (bPAG) and ultrasonography for the early diagnosis of pregnancy in dairy cattle. 18th World Buiatrics Congress, Bologna, Italy 1994, s. 341-345.
  • 61. Tathcher W., Meyer M., Denet-Desnoyers G.: Maternal recognition of pregnancy. J. Reprod. Fert. 1995, 49, 15-28.
  • 62. Vanroose G. A., Van Soom A.: Embryonic mortality and embryo–pathogen interactions. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 60, 131-143.
  • 63. Wiebold J. L.: Embryonic mortality and the uterine environment in first-service lactating dairy cows. J. Reprod. Fert. 1988, 84, 393-399.
  • 64. Wise M. E., Armstrong D. V., Huber J. T., Hunter R., Wiersma F.: Hormonal alterations in the lactating dairy cow in response to thermal stress. J. Dairy Sci. 1988, 71, 2480-2485.
  • 65. Witkowski M., Max A.: Ultrasonograficzne rozpoznanie ciąży u bydła. Technika Medyczna 1995, 17, 48-55.
  • 66. Zemjanis R.: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques in Animal Reproduction. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore 1970.
  • 67. Zoli A. P., Guilbault L. A., Delahaut P., Ortiz W. B., Beckers J. F.: Radioimmunoassay of a bovine pregnancy-associated glycoprotein in serum: its application for pregnancy diagnosis. Biol. Reprod. 1992, 46, 83-92.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-93cdfe6f-1714-4210-8799-fa0623cb2bff
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.