Genetic differentiation of the sand lizard populations, Lacerta agilis Linnaeus, 1758 (Reptilia, Lacertidae) in Central Europe

• Autorzy: Maslak R. , Pasko L. , Kusznierz J. , Moska M. , Heulin B. , Surget-Groba Y.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Zróżnicowanie genetyczne jaszczurki zwinki, Lacerta agilis Linnaeus, 1758 (Reptilia, Lacertidae) w Europie Środkowej

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

PL

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego we Wrocławiu. Biologia i Hodowla Zwierząt
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 60
• Opis fizyczny: p.107-123,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Maslak R.

• Institute of Zoology, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Pasko L.

autor

Kusznierz J.

autor

Moska M.

autor

Heulin B.

autor

Surget-Groba Y.

Bibliografia

• Adest G.A., 1977. Genetic Relationships in the Genus Uma (Iguanidae). Copeia, 1: 47-52.
• Andrén C., Berglind S.Á., Nilson G., 1988. Distribution and conservation of the northernmost populations of the sand lizard Lacerta agilis, [in]: Glandt D., Bischoff W., (eds), Biologie und Schutz der Zauneidechse (Lacerta agilis). Mertensiella, 1: 84-85.
• Arribas O.J., 2001. Morphology and taxonomic revalidation of Lacerta agilis garzoni Palacios and Castroviejo, 1975, [in:] Vincente L., Crespo E.G. (eds), Mediterranean Basin Lacertid Lizards. A Biological Approach. ICN Lisboa, 39-49.
• Berglind S.Á., 1996. Ecology and management of relict populations of sand lizard (Lacerta agilis) in South-Central Sweden. Memoranda, Soc. Fauna Flora Fennica 71.
• Bezy R.L., Gorman G.C., Kim Y.J., Wright J.W., 1977. Chromosomal and genetic divergence in the fossorial lizards of the family Anniellidae. Syst. Zool. 26: 57-71.
• Bischoff W., 1970. Zur innerartlischen Stellung der masurischen Zauneidechsen. Aquarien und Terrarien, 17: 305-309.
• Bischoff W., 1981. Verspreiding, oecologie en systematiek van de zandhagedis, Lacerta agilis. Lacerta, Den Haag, 39: 85-93.
• Bischoff W., 1984. Lacerta agilis Linnaeus, 1758 - Zauneidechse, 23-68, [in:] Böhme W. (eds), Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas. Band 2/1, Echsen 2 (Lacerta). Aula Verlag, Wiesbaden.
• Bischoff W., 1988. Zur Verbreitung und Systematik der Zauneidechse, Lacerta agilis Linnaeus, 1758. Mertensiella, 1: 11-30.
• Bischoff W., 1991. Übersicht der Arten und Unterarten der Familie Lacertidae, Die Gattung Lacerta. Die Eidechse, 3: 5-16.
• Crochet P.A., Chaline O., Surget-Groba Y., Debain C., Cheylan M., 2004. Speciation in moun¬tains: phylogeography and phylogeny of the rock lizards genus Iberolacerta (Reptilia: La- certidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 30: 860-866.
• Estoup A., Largiader C.R., Perrot E., Chourrout D., 1996. Rapid one tube extraction for reliable PCR detection of fish polymorphic marker and transgenes. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 20: 295-298.
• Gartside D.F., Rogers J.S., Dessauer H.D., 1977. Speciation with little genic and morphological differentiation in the ribbon snakes Thamnophis proximus and T. sauritus (Colubridae). Copeia, 697-705.
• Gorman G.C., Soulé M., Yang S.Y., Nevo E., 1975. Evolutionary genetics of insular Adriatic lizards. Evolution, 29: 52-71.
• Gorman G.C., Renzi J., 1979. Genetic Distance and Heterozygosity Estimates in Electroforetic Studies: Effect of Sample Size. Copeia, 2: 242-249.
• Guillaume C.P., Cirer A.M., 1985. Comparición electroforética de diez poblaciones de Podarcis pityusensis Bosca, 1882 (Lacertidae) de Ibiza, Formentera e islotes circunvecinos. Bull. Inst. Cat. Hist. Nat. (Sec. Zool.), 52: 197-208.
• Gullberg A., Olsson M., Tegelström H., 1999. Evolution in Swedish sand lizards: genetic diffe¬rentiation and loss of variability revealed by multilocus DNA fingerprinting. J. Evol. Biol., 12: 17-26.
• Hall W.P., Selander R.K., 1973. Hybridization of karyotypically differentiated populations in the Sceloporus grammicus complex (Iguanidae). Evolution, 27: 226-242.
• Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F., 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinforma- tics, 17: 754-755.
• Huelsenbeck J.P.H., Larget B., Miller R.E., Ronquist F., 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Systematic Biology, 51: 673-688.
• Huson D.H., Bryant D., 2006. Application of Phylogenetic Networks in Evolutionary Studies. Mol. Biol. Evol., 23: 254-267.
• Juszczyk W., 1987. Płazy i gady krajowe. Tom 3 (Gady), PWN, Warszawa, 213 pp.
• Kalyabina S.A., Milto K.D., Ananjeva N.B., Joger U., Wink M., 2001. Phylogeography of Lacerta agilis based on the Mitochondrial cytochrome b Gene Sequences: First Results. Russ. J. Herpetology, 8: 151-160.
• Kalyabina-Hauf S.A., Ananjeva N.B., 2004. Filogeografiya i vnutrividovaya struktura shirokoa- real'nogo vida yashcherits Lacerta agilis L., 1758 (Lacertidae, Sauria, Reptilia) (Phylo- geography and intraspecies structure of wide distributed sand lizard, Lacerta agilis L. 1758). Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences. Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 105 pp.
• Keane T.M., Naughton T.J., McInerney J.O., 2007. MultiPhyl: a high-throughput phylogenomics webserver using distributed computing. Nucleic Acids Research, 2007: 1-5.
• Maślak R., 1996. Zróżnicowanie morfologiczne jaszczurki zwinki (Lacerta agilis Linnaeus, 1758) w północno-wschodniej Polsce, p. 57. Materiały konferencyjne IV Ogólnopolskiej Konferencji Herpetologicznej „Biologia płazów i gadów", Kraków 26-27 września 1996, Wydawnictwo Naukowe WSP w Krakowie.
• Miller M.P., 1997. Tools for population genetic analyses (TFPGA) 1.3. A Windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data. Computer software distri¬buted by author.
• Müller K., 2005. SeqState - primer design and sequence ststistics for phylogenetic DNA data sets. Applied Bioinformatics, 4: 65-69.
• Murphy R.W., McCollum F.C., Gorm G.C., Thomas R., 1984. Genetics of Hybridizing Popula¬tions of Puerto Rican Sphaerodactylus. Journal of Herpetology 18: 93-105.
• Najbar B., 1995. Płazy i gady Polski. Wyższa Szkoła Inżynierska w Zielonej Górze: 119 pp.
• Nei M., 1972. Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist, 106: 283-292.
• Nei M., 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics, 89: 583-590.
• Nei M., 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, 512 pp.
• Nei M., Graur D., 1984. Extent of protein polymorphism and the neutral mutation theory. Evol. Biol., 17: 73-118.
• Obst F.J., 1980. Spezielle Gesichtspunkte bei der Erfassung unserer Zauneidechsen-Vorkommen (Lacerta agilis L.). Feldherpetol. Mitt., 3: 8-9.
• Page R.D.M., Holmes E.C., 1998. Molecular Evolution. A Phylogenetical Approach. Blackwell Science, 346 pp.
• Pasteur N., Pasteur G., Bonhomme F., Catalan F. & Britton-Davidian J. 1988. Practical Isozyme Genetics. Ellis Horwood Limited. John Wiley & Sons, 215.
• Peters G., 1958. Die Zauneidechse des Kleinen Kaukasus als besonderer Unterart Lacerta agilis brevicauda. Zool. Jahrb., 86: 127-138.
• Rahmel U., 1988. Untersuchungen zum Unterart Charakter von Lacerta agilis agilis Linnaeus, 1758 und Lacerta agilis argus (1768). Mertensiella, 1: 31-40.
• Rambaut A., Drummond A.J., 2007. Tracer v1.4, Available from http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.
• Rogers J.S., 1972. Measures of genetic similarity and genetic distance, [in:] Studies in Genetics VII. University of Texas Publication no. 7213.
• Rohlf J., 1998. NTSYSpc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate statistics for phylogenetic DNA data sets. Applied Bioinformatics, 4: 65-69.
• Sa-Sousa P., Almeida A.P., Rosa H., Vicente L., Crespo E.G., 1999. Genetic and morphological relationships of the Berlenga wall lizard (Podarcis bocagei berlengensis: Lacertidae). J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Research, 38: 95-102.
• Shaklee J.B., Allendorf F.W., Morizot D.C., Whit G.S., 1990. Gene nomenclature for protein¬-coding loci in fish. Transactions of American Fisheries Society, 119: 2-15.
• Smith M.F., Patton J.L., 1991. Variation in mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences in natural populations of South American akodontine rodents (Muridae: Sigmodontidae). Molecular Biology and Evolution, 8: 85-103.
• Sneath P.H.A., Sokal R.R., 1973. Principles of Numerical Taxonomy, Freeman, 359 pp.
• Soliman M., Schneider H., Zahran W., Gabri M., Shakin A.B., 1994. Protein variation and taxo¬nomy in some genera of family Scincidae (Reptilia) in Egypt. An electrophoretic study of genetic variation in natural populations of the ocellated skink (Chalcides ocellatus). Jour¬nal of the Egyptian German Society of Zoology, Vertebrate Anatomy and Embriology (B), 14: 187-225.
• Swofford D.L., 2003. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland,Massachusetts.
• Utter F.M., Seeb J.E., 1990. Genetic Marking of Fishes: Overwiev Focusing on Protein Variation. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 7: 426-438.
• Weir B.S., Cockerham C.C., 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38: 1358-1370.
• Wright S., 1978. Evolution and the genetics of populations. Vol. IV. Variability Within and Among Natural Populations. University of Chicago Press, 590 pp.
• Yablokov A.W., 1976. Prytkaya yashscheritsa. Nauka. Moskwa 376 pp.
• Yablokov A.W., Baranov A.S., Rozanov A.S., 1980. Population structure, geographic variation, and microphylogenesis of the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis), [in:] Hecht, M. K., Steere, W. C., Walles, B. (eds), Evolutionary Biology. Plenum Publishing Corp., New York - London, 12: 91-127.