Most commonly used sequences and clinical protocols for brain and spine magnetic resonance imaging allowing better identification of pathological changes in dogs

• Autorzy: Zhalniarovich Y. , Adamiak Z. , Pomianowski A. , Jaskolska M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Magnetic resonance imaging is the best imaging modality for the brain and spine. Quality of the received images depends on many technical factors. The most significant factors are: positioning the patient, proper coil selection, selection of appropriate sequences and image planes. The present contrast between different tissues provides an opportunity to diagnose various lesions. In many clinics magnetic resonance imaging has replaced myelography because of its noninvasive modality and because it provides excellent anatomic detail. There are many different combinations of sequences possible for spinal and brain MR imaging. Most frequently used are: T2-weighted fast spin echo (FSE), T1- and T2-weighted turbo spin echo, Fluid Attenuation Inversion Recovery (FLAIR), T1-weighted gradient echo (GE) and spin echo (SE), high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) sequences, fat-suppressing short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE). Magnetic resonance imaging reveals neurologic lesions which were previously hard to diagnose antemortem.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 16
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.157-163,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Zhalniarovich Y.

• Department of Surgery and Radiology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 14, 10-957 Olsztyn, Poland

autor

Adamiak Z.

• Department of Surgery and Radiology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 14, 10-957 Olsztyn, Poland

autor

Pomianowski A.

• Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 14, 10-957 Olsztyn, Poland

autor

Jaskolska M.

• Department of Surgery and Radiology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 14, 10-957 Olsztyn, Poland

Bibliografia

• Adamiak Z, Jaskólska M, Pomianowski A (2012) Low-field magnetic resonance imaging of canine hydrocephalus. Pak Vet J 32: 128-130.
• Adamiak Z, Pomianowski A, Kwiatkowska M, Majchrowski A, Matyjasik H, Holak P (2011) Laparoscopy-assisted ventriculo-peritoneal shunt implantation in a dog: a case report. Vet Med-Czech 56: 577-580.
• Adamiak Z, Pomianowski A, Zhalniarovich Y, Kwiatkowska M, Jaskólska M, Bocheńska A (2011) A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging sequences in evaluating pathological changes in the canine spinal cord. Pol J Vet Sci 14: 481-484.
• Benigni L, Lamb CR (2005) Comparison of fluid-attenuated inversionrecovery and T2-weighted magnetic resonance images in dogs and cats with suspected brain disease. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 46: 287-292.
• Besalti O, Pekcan Z, Sirin YS, Erbas G (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging findings in dogs with thoracolumbar intervertebral disc disease: 69 cases (1997-2005). J Am Vet Med Assoc 228: 902-908.
• Bitar R, Leung G, Perng R, Tadros S, Moody AR, Sarrazin J, McGregor C, Christakis M, Symons S, Nelson A, Roberts TP (2006)MR pulse sequences: what every radiologist wants to know but is afraid to ask. Radiographics 26: 513-537.
• Brekenfeld C, Foert E, Hundt W, Kenn W, Lodeann KP, Gehl HB (2001) Enhancement of cerebral diseases: how much contrast agent is enough? Comparison of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mmol/kg gadoteridol at 0.2 T with 0.1 mmol/kg gadoteridol at 1.5 T. Invest Radiol 36: 266-275.
• Carrera I, Dennis R, Mellor DJ, Penderis J, Sullivan M (2009) Use of magnetic resonance imaging for morphometric analysis of the caudal cranial fossa in Cavalier King Charles Spaniels. Am J Vet Res 70: 340-345.
• Carrera I, Sullivan M, McConnell F, Goncalves R (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging features of discospondylitis in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 52: 125-131.
• Cerda-Gonzalez S, Olby NJ, Broadstone R, McCullough S, Osborne JA (2009) Characteristics of cerebrospinal fluid flow in Cavalier King Charles Spaniels analyzed using phase velocity cine magnetic resonance imaging. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 50: 467-476.
• Cherubini GB, Mantis P, Martinez TA, Lamb CR, Cappello R (2005) Utility of magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic brain lesions in dogs and cats. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 5: 384-387.
• Cherubini GB, Platt SR, Anderson TJ, Rusbridge C, Lorenzo V, Mantis P, Cappello R (2006) Characteristics of magnetic resonance images of granulomatous meningoencephalomyelities in 11 dogs. Vet Rec 159: 110-115.
• Cherubini GB, Platt SR, Howson S, Baines E, Brodbelt DC, Dennis R (2008) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging sequences in dogs with multi-focal intracranial disease. J Small Anim Pract 49: 634-640.
• Colosimo C, Cianfoni A, Di Lell GM, Gaudino S (2006) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the spine: when, why and how? How to optimize contrast protocols in MR imaging of the spine. Neuroradiology 48: 18-33.
• Couturier J, Rault D, Cauzinille L (2008) Chiari-like malformation and syringomyelia in normal Cavalier King Charles spaniels: a multiple diagnostic imaging approach. J Small Anim Pract 49: 438-443.
• Da Costa RC, Parent J, Dobson H, Holmberg D, Partlow G (2006) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and myelography in 18 Doberman pinscher dogs with cervical spondylomyelopathy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 47: 523-531.
• Dagirmanjian A, Schils J, McHenry MC (1999) MR imaging of spinal infections. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 7: 525-538.
• D’Anjou MA, Carmel EN, Tidwell AS (2011) Value of fat suppression in gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 52: S85-90.
• De Decker S, Gielen IM, Duchateau L, Polis I, van Bree HJ, van Ham LM (2010) Agreement and repeatability of linear vertebral body and canal measurements using computed tomography (CT) and low field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Vet Surg 39: 28-34.
• Delfaut EM, Beltran J, Johnson G, Rousseau J, Marchandise X, Cotten A (1999) Fat suppression in MR imaging: techniques and pitfalls. Radiographics 19: 373-382.
• Dennis R (2011) Optimal magnetic resonance imaging of the spine. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 52: S72-80.
• Desai NK, Runge VM (2003) Contrast use at low field: a review. Top Magn Reson Imaging 14: 360-364.
• Dixon WT (1984) Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 153: 189-194.
• Forrester DM (2004) Infectious spondylitis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 25: 461-473.
• Garosi L, McConnell JF, Platt SR, Barone G, Baron JC, de Lahunta A, Schatzberg SJ (2006) Clinical and topographic magnetic resonance characteristics of suspected brain infarction in 40 dogs. J Vet Intern Med 20: 311-321.
• Gavin PR (2011) Growth of clinical veterinary magnetic resonance imaging. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 52: S2-4.
• Georgy BA, Hesselink JR (1994) Evaluation of fat suppression in contrast-enhanced MR of neoplastic and inflammatory spine disease. Am J Neuroradiol 15: 409-417.
• Gonzalo-Orden JM, Altonaga JR, Orden MA, Gonzalo JM (2000) Magnetic resonance, computed tomographic and radiologic findings in a dog with discospondylities. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 41: 142-144.
• Govender S (2005) Spinal infections. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87: 1454-1458.
• Kimotsuki T, Nagaoka T, Yasuda M, Tamahara S, Matsuki N, Ono K (2005) Changes of magnetic resonance imaging on the brain in beagle dogs with aging. J Vet Med Sci 67: 961-967.
• Konar M, Lang J (2011) Pros and cons of low-field magnetic resonance imaging in veterinary practice. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 52: S5-14.
• Kwiatkowska M, Pomianowski A (2011) Comparison of diagnostic values of advanced imaging techniques and electrodiagnostic procedures in the assessement of cervical spinal cord disorders in dogs. A preliminary study. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 55: 339-345.
• Marti-Bonmati L, KormanoM (1997)MR equipment acquisition strategies: low-field or high-field scanners. Eur Radiol 7 (Suppl 5): 263-268.
• Matiasek LA, Platt SR, Shaw S, Dennis R (2007) Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of quadrigeminal cysts in dogs. J Vet Intern Med 21: 1021-1026.
• McRobbie D, Moore E, Graves M, Prince M (2003) Raring to go: spin-echo-based techniques. In: McRobbie D, Moore E, Graves M, Prince M (eds) MRI from picture to proton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 225-228.
• McRobbie D, Moore E, Graves M, Prince M (2007) MRI from picture to proton. 2nd ed, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
• Okada M, Koie H, Kitagawa M, Kanayama K, Sato T, Yamamura H, Sakai T (2006) MRI findings of haematomyelia in a dog with spontaneous systemic haemorrhage. Aust Vet J 84: 332-335.
• Parry AT, Harris A, Upjohn MM, Chandler K, Lamb CR (2010) Does choice of imaging modality affect outcome in dogs with thoracolumbar spinal conditions? J Small Anim Pract 51: 312-317.
• Pease A, Sullivan S, Olby N, Galano H, Cerda-Gonzalez S, Robertson ID, Gavin P, Thrall D (2006) Value of single-shot turbo spin-echo pulse sequence for assessing the architecture of the subarachnoid space and the constitutive nature of cerebrospinal fluid. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 47: 254-259.
• Penderis J, Dennis R (2004) Use of traction during magnetic resonance imaging of caudal cervical spondylomyelopathy (“wobbler syndrome”) in the dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 45: 216-219.
• Robertson I (2011) Optimal magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 52: S15-22.
• Sage JE, Samii VF, Abramson CJ, Green EM, Smith M, Dingus C (2006) Comparison of conventional spin-echo and fast spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging in the canine brain. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 47: 249-253.
• Stabler A, Reiser MF (2001) Imaging of spinal infection. Radiol Clin N Am 39: 115-135.
• Sturges BK, Dickinson PJ, Bollen AW, Koblik PD, Kass PH, Kortz GD, Vernau KM, Knipe MF, LeCouteur RA, Higgins RJ (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging and histological classification of intracranial meningiomas in 112 dogs. J Vet Intern Med 22: 586-595.
• Suran JN, Durham A, Mai W, Seiler GS (2011) Contrast enhancement of extradural compressive material on magnetic resonance imaging. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 52: 10-16.
• Tali ET (2004) Spinal infections. Eur J Radiol 50: 120-133.
• Tidwell AS, Robertson ID (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging of normal and abnormal brain perfusion. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 52: S62-71.
• Tien RD (1992) Fat-suppression MR imaging in neuroradiology: techniques and clinical application. Am J Roentgenol 158: 369-379.
• Tien RD, Olson EM, Zee CS (1992) Diseases of the lumbar spine: findings on fat-suppression MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 159: 95-99.
• Vullo T, Korenman E, Manzo RP, Gomez DG, Deck MD, Cahill PT (1997) Diagnosis of cerebral ventriculomegaly in normal adult beagles using quantitative MRI. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 38: 277-281.
• Wessmann A, Lu D, Lamb CR, Smyth B, Mantis P, Chandler K, Boag A, Cherubini GB, Cappello R (2006) Brain and spinal cord haemorrhages associated with Angiostrongylus vasorum infection in four dogs. Vet Rec 158: 858-863.
• Westbrook C, Kaut C, Talbot J (2005) MRI in practice. 3rd ed., Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford. Young BD, Levine JM, Fosgate GT, Lahunta A, Flegel T, Matiasek K, Miller A, Silver G, Sharp N, Greer K, Schatzberg SJ (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of necrotizing meningoencephalitis in Pug dogs. J Vet Intern Med 23: 527-535.
• Zhang W, Goldhaber DM, Kramer DM (1996) Separation of water and fat MR images in a single scan at .35T using “sandwich” echoes. J Magn Reson Imaging 6: 909-917.

Uwagi

PL

Rekord w opracowaniu