Enzymatic activity of forest luvisols

• Autorzy: Blonska E. , Lasota J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Słowa kluczowe

EN

enzyme activity; Luvisol; Haplic Luvisol; forest; dehydrogenase; urea; forest soil; biological activity; chemical property; physical property; soil quality

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities. Series: Forestry
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 16
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume16/issue1/art-01.html

Twórcy

autor

Blonska E.

• Department of Forest Soils, Krakow Agriculture University, Al. 29 Listopada 46, 31-425 Krakow, Poland

autor

Lasota J.

Bibliografia

• 1. Acosta–Martínez V., Cruz L., Sotomayor–Ramírez D., Pérez–Alegría L.. 2007. Enzyme activities as affected by soil properties and land use in a tropical watershed. Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 35–45.
• 2. Alef K., Nannipieri P.. 1995. Enzyme activities, [W:] Alef K., Nannipieri P. Eds., Methods in applied Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry, Academic Press, London, New York, San Francisco.
• 3. Amador J.A., Glucksman A.M., Lyons J.B., Görres J.H.. 1997. Spatial distribution of soil phosphatase activity within a riparian forest. Soil Science, vol. 162, no. 11, pp. 808–825.
• 4. Bergstrom D. W., Monreal C. M., King D. J.. 1998. Sensitivity of soil enzyme activities to conservation practices. Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 1286–129.
• 5. Błońska E., Januszek K.. 2010. Wpływ składu gatunkowego drzewostanów na właœciwoœci gleb leœnych [The influence of tree species on the properties of forest soils]. Roczniki Gleboznawcze.LXI,2: 5–14.
• 6. Burns R.G.. 1985. The rhizosphere: microbial and enzymatic gradient and prospects for manipulation. Pedologie XXXV, 3, 283–295.
• 7. Dahm H.. 1984. Generic composition and physiological and cultural properties of heterotrophic bacteria isolated from soil, rhizosphere and mycorrihizosphere of pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Acta Microbiologica Polonica 33, 2, 147–156.
• 8. Garcia C., Hernandez T.. 1997. Biological and biochemical indicators in derelict soils subject to erosion. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 29, 171–177.
• 9. Gonet S., Dębska B., Dziamski A., Banach–Szott M., Zaujec A., Szombathowa N.. 2009. Properties of organic matter in haplic luvisol under arable, meadow and forest management. Polish Journal of Soil Science. Vol. XL II/2.
• 10. Januszek K., Błońska E.. 2006. Aktywnoœć kwaœnej fosfomonoesterazy zewnętrznej powierzchni korzeni mikoryzowych sadzonek sosny zwyczajnej oraz fosfataz w glebie strefy ryzosferowej i pozaryzosferowej w uprawach na rekultywowanym wyrobisku piasku i w terenie silnie skażonym imisjami przemysłowymi. W: Nowe biotechnologie w polskim szkółkarstwie leœnym [The activity of acid fosfomonoesterazy the outer surface of of mycorrhizal roots of Scots pine seedlings and phosphatases in the soil rhizosphere and extra–rhizosphere zone in the reclamation of the heading sand and on the highly contaminated area]. Ektomikoryzy. Kowalski S. (Red.). CILP Warszawa.
• 11. Kourtev P. S., Ehrenfeld J. G., Haggblom M.. 2002.Exotic plant species alter the microbial community structure and function in the soil. Ecology, vol. 83, no. 11, pp. 3152–3166.
• 12. Polish forest soils classification [2000]. CILP. Warszawa.
• 13. Reich P.B., Tilman D., Naeem S.. Species and functional group diversity independently influence biomass accumulation and its response to CO2 and N. 2004. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 27, pp. 10101–10106.
• 14. Pei S., Fu H., Wan C.G.. 2008. Changes in soil properties and vegetation following exclosure and grazing in degraded Alxa desert steppe of Inner Mongolia, China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 124, no. 1–2, pp. 33–39.
• 15. Wang C., Wang G., Liu W., Wu P.. 2011. The Effects of Plant–Soil–Enzyme Interactions on Plant Composition, Biomass and Diversity of Alpine Meadows in the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. International Journal of Ecology. Volume 2011, Article ID 180926.
• 16. Waldrop M.P., Balser T.C., Firestone M.K.. 2000. Linking microbial community composition to function in a tropical soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 32, no. 13, pp. 1837–1846.
• 17. WRB (World Reference Base For Soil Resource). 2006. FAO, ISRIC and ISSS.
• 18. Zak D.R., Holmes W.E., White D.C., Peacock A.D., Tilman D.. 2003. Plant diversity, soil microbial communities, and ecosystem function: are there any links. Ecology, vol. 84, no. 8, pp. 2042–2050.