Zalety i ograniczenia stosowania wizualnej metody oceny drzew (VTA) jako odpowiedz na problemy związane z zagrożeniami powodowanymi przez drzewa miejskie

• Autorzy: Suchocka M.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Advantages and limitations of Visual Tree Assessment (VTA) method application as a response to the hazard related problems caused by trees

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Visual Tree Assessment method (VTA) is widely used for phytosanitary check of trees growing in EU urban areas. Application of the method allows to eliminate the risk posed by trees but also to control the city forest phytosanitary status. The main task of the evaluator is to identify the degree of tendency to the fall of the tree. In the face of increasing problems of urban trees VTA method allows for responsible evaluation of tree statics and is used as a tool to avoid damage caused by trees. Method was applied also for urban tree management and long-term planning of urban stands maintenance and exchange costs.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

miasta; zielen miejska; drzewa; ocena zagrozenia; zdrowotnosc drzew; metoda oceny wizualnej drzew; zalety; wady; sprzet pomiarowy; studium przypadku

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Człowiek i Środowisko
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 36
• Numer: 1-2
• Opis fizyczny: s.97-110,rys.,fot.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Suchocka M.

• Instytut Gospodarki Przestrzennej i Mieszkalnictwa, ul.Targowa 45, 03-728 Warszawa

Bibliografia

• Bond J. 2006: Foundations of tree risk analysis: Use of the t/R ratio to Evaluate Trunk Failure Potential 31, Arborist News ISA http://www.itreetools.org/academy_ spring2007/AN_Inventory_PartI.pdf, [dostęp: 03.04.12].
• Coder K. D. 1996: Construction Damage Assessment Trees and Sites. University of Georgia
• Dennis C., Jacobi W.R. 2002: Protecting trees during construction, http://www.ext. colostate.edu/pubs/gardens/07429.html [dostęp 11.07.08]
• Dujesiefken Dirk, Rhaesa Andreas, Eckstein Dieter, Stobbe Horst 1999: Tree wound reactions of differently treated boreholes Journal of Arboriculture 25(3): May 113
• Schwarze Francis W.M.R., Engels Julia, Mattheck Claus 1997: Fungal Strategies of Wood Decay in Trees. Springer Verlag, Berlin - Heidelberg
• Hayes E. 2002: Evaluating Tree Defects a Field Guide. 2-nd edition. Safe trees, LLC Rochester, 24-29
• Hayes E. 2002: Tree Risk Assessment & Tree Mechanics, Arborist News, nr 6, vol. 11, str. 33-39
• Johnstone D.M., Ades P. K., Moore M. G. Ian W. 2002: Predicting Wood Decay in Eucalypts Using an Expert System and the IML-Resistograph Drill Smith. Journal of Arboriculture
• Kane B., Ryan D., Bloniarz D.V. 2001: Comparing formula that assess strength loss due to decay In trees. Journal of Arboriculture 27(2)
• Kersten W., Schwarze F.W.M.R. 2008: Development of decay in the sapwood of trees wounded by the use of decaydetecting devices instutut für angewandte baumpathologie, Freiburg, Germany
• Mattheck C., Breioer H. 1994: The Body Language of Trees, a Handbook for Failure Analysis. HMSO, London, UK
• Niklas K. 1992: Plant Biomechanics: An Engineering Approach to Plant Form and Function. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
• Ustawa z dnia 16 kwietnia 2004 r. o ochronie przyrody, Dz.U. 04.92.880
• Schwarze F.W.M.R. 2008: Diagnosis and Prognosis of the Development of Wood Decay in Urban Trees ENSPEC Pty Ltd.
• Shigo A. 1979: Modern arboriculture: a systems approach to the care of trees and their associates. Shigo and Trees Associates LLC., New Hampshire
• Smiley E.T., Freadrich B.R. 1993: Hazardous Tree Evaluation and Management. Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories. Charlotte, NC., 36
• Smiley T., Freadrich B.R. 1992: Determining strength loss from decay. Journal of Arboriculture 18 (4)
• Wang X., Bruce R. 2008: Visual Inspection, Acoustic Testing, and Resistance Micro- drilling Allison Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 34(1): \-A