Morphological reactions of wistar rat tissues exposed to acetal resin implants

• Autorzy: Sobolewska E. , Fraczak B. , Piotrowski P. , Kosierkiewicz A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Morphological changes developed in rat bucal mucosa, parotid glands, and lymphoid nodes following 6 weeks exposure to dental acetal resin implants were compared to metal/titanium, acrylic implants, and sham-operated rats. Morphological evaluation of bucal mucosa of rats exposed to acetal resin showed an increased accumulation of lymphoid and macrophage-like cells compared to sham-operated rats. Eosinophils were found in bucal mucosa and in parotid glands of rats exposed to acetal resin, although this change did not differ significantly from sham-operated rats. Morphological findings with respect to granular reaction and proliferation were similar in acetal resin exposed and sham-operated rats. Acetal resin implants may induce inflammatory and potentially allergic reactions at the site of implantation.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Puławy
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 56
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.681-684,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Sobolewska E.

• hair and Department of Dental Prosthetics, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland

autor

Fraczak B.

• hair and Department of Dental Prosthetics, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland

autor

Piotrowski P.

• Department of Oral Rehabilitation, University of Medical Sciences, 60-812 Poznan, Poland

autor

Kosierkiewicz A.

• Department of Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Blanco-Fuente H., Angulano-Igea S., Otero-Espinar F.J., Blanco-Mendez J.: Kinetics of anhydride formation in xerogels of acrylic acid. Biomaterials 1996, 17, 1667- 1675.
• 2. Ebadian B., Razavi M., Soleimanpour S., Mosharraf R.: Evaluation of tissue reaction to some denture-base materials: an animal study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008, 9, 67-74.
• 3. Edgerton M., Levine M.J.: Biocompatibility is the future in prosthodontic research. J Prost Dent 1993, 69, 4-6.
• 4. Hensten-Pettersen A., Jacobsen N.: Perceived side effects of biomaterials in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1991, 65, 138-144.
• 5. Jorge J.H., Giampaolo E.T., Machado A.L., Vergani C.E.: Cytotoxicity of denture base acrylic resins: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2003, 90, 190-193.
• 6. Lewandowska-Szumiel M., Komender J.: Interaction between tissues and implantable materials. Front Med Biol Eng 2000, 10, 79-82.
• 7. Peláková V., Klézl Z., Balík K., Adam M.: Biomechanical and biological properties of the implant material carbon-carbon composite covered with pyrolytic carbon. J Mat Sci 2000, 11, 793-798.
• 8. Pihut M., Wicniewska G., Wicniewski W.: Problems of biocompatibility and osteointegration in contemporary prosthetic dentistry. Protet Stomatol 1996, 46, 28.
• 9. Sobolewska E.: A comparative analysis of tissue reaction to acrylic resin materials in studies carried out on Wistar strain. Ann Acad Med Stetin 1999, 45, 253-264.
• 10. Weaver R.E., Goebel W.M.: Reaction to acrylic resin dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1980, 43, 138-142.