Qualitative performance and consumer acceptability of starch films for the blueberry modifi ed atmosphere packaging storage

• Autorzy: Giuggioli N.R. , Girgenti V. , Peano C.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The sustainability of packaging is an important part of food system innovation and it can influence the purchase decision for the fresh produce. In this work, we evaluated the qualitative performance and the consumer acceptability of three starch fi lms for the blueberry modifi ed atmosphere packaging (MAP) storage under fl uctuating temperatures. Fruits cv. Duke were monitored for up to 18 days (15 days at 1±1°C and 3 days at 20±1°C). The respiration rate of the blueberries and the permeability of the fi lms affect the initial atmospheric composition (0.2 kPa CO2 and 21.2 kPa O2 ) inside each package infl uencing the headspace gas composition and the quality parameters of the fruits. The F3 fi lm has better controlled O2 values inside the packages up until the end of storage (5.7 kPa) and it maintained the highest anthocyanin content (156.21 mg C3 G/100 g FW) and antioxidant capacity (22.18 Fe2+/kg) of fruits at 20±1°C.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 67
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: P.129-136,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Giuggioli N.R.

• DISAFA, Universita degli Studi di Torino, Largo Braccini 2, Grugliasco (TO) 10095, Italy

autor

Girgenti V.

• DISAFA, Universita degli Studi di Torino, Largo Braccini 2, Grugliasco (TO) 10095, Italy

autor

Peano C.

• DISAFA, Universita degli Studi di Torino, Largo Braccini 2, Grugliasco (TO) 10095, Italy

Bibliografia

• 1. Almenar E., Samsudin H., Auras R., Harte B., Rubino M., Postharvest shelf life extension of blueberries using a biodegradable package. Food Chem., 2008, 110, 120–127.
• 2. Almenar E., Samsudin H., Auras R., Harte B., Consumer acceptance of fresh blueberries in bio-based packages. J. Sci. Food Agric., 2010, 90, 1121–1128.
• 3. Alsmairat N., Contreras C., Hancock J., Callow P., Beaudry R., Use of combinations of commercially relevant O2 and CO2 partial pressures to evaluate the sensitivity of nine highbush blueberry fruit cultivars to controlled atmospheres. HortScience, 2011, 46, 74–79.
• 4. Beaudry R.M., Cameron A.C., Shirazi A., Dostallange D.L., Modifi ed atmosphere packaging of blueberry fruit – Effect of temperature on package O2 and CO2 . J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 1992, 117, 436–441.
• 5. Bertuzzi M.A., Castro Vidaurre E.F., Armada M., Gottifredi J.C., Water vapor permeability of edible starch based films. J. Food Eng., 2007, 80, 972–978.
• 6. Bower C., Postharvest handling, storage, and treatment of fresh market berries. 2007, in: Berry Fruits Value Added Products for Health Promotion (ed. Y. Zhao). Taylor & Francis Group, New York, pp. 262–284.
• 7. Briano R., Giuggioli N., Girgenti V., Peano C., Biodegradable and compostable fi lm and modifi ed atmosphere packaging in postharvest supply chain of raspberry fruits (cv. Grandeur®). J. Food Process. Pres., 2015, 39, 2061–2073.
• 8. Briassoulis D., Mistriotis A., Giannoulis A., Giannopoulos D., Optimized PLA-based EMAP systems for horticultural produce designed to regulate the targeted in-package atmosphere. Ind. Crops Prod., 2013, 48, 68–80.
• 9. Cheng G.W., Breen P.J., Activity of phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL) and concentrations of anthocyanins and phenolics in developing strawberry fruit. J. Am. Soc. Hortisci., 1991, 116, 865–869.
• 10. Díaz P., Henríquez O., Enrione J., Matiacevich S., Thermal transitions of pulp and cuticle of blueberries. Thermochim. Acta, 2011, 525, 56–61.
• 11. Duarte C., Guerra M., Daniel P., Camelo A.L., Yommi A., Quality changes of highbush blueberries fruit stored in CA with different CO2 levels. J. Food Sci., 2009, 74, S154-S159.
• 12. Faostat. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United nations: Agricultural Statistical Database, 2012.
• 13. Girgenti V., Peano C., Bounous M., Baudino C., A life cycle assessment of non-renewable energy use and greenhouse gas emissions associated with blueberry and raspberry production in northern Italy. Sci. Total Environ., 2013, 458–460, 414–418.
• 14. Harb J.Y., Streif J., Controlled atmosphere storage of highbush blueberries cv. “Duke”. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci., 2004, 69, 66–72.
• 15. Howard L.R., Hager TJ., Berry fruit phytochemicals 2007, in: Berry Fruits Value Added Products for Health Promotion (ed. Y. Zhao). Taylor & Francis Group, New York, pp. 73–104.
• 16. Joo M.J., Lewandowski N., Auras R., Harte J., Almenar E., Comparative shelf life study of blackberry fruit in bio-based and petroleum-based containers under retail storage conditions. Food Chem., 2011, 126, 1734–1740.
• 17. Junqueira-Gonçalves M.P., Alarcón E., Niranjan K., Development of antifungal packaging for berries extruded from recycled PET. Food Contr., 2013, 33, 455–460.
• 18. Kader A.A., Fruit maturity, ripening, and quality relationships. Acta Hort., 1999, 485, 203–208.
• 19. Kalt W., Forney C.F., Martin A., Prior R.L., Antioxidant capacity, vitamin C, phenolics, and anthocyanins after fresh storage of small fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem., 1999, 47, 4638–4644.
• 20. Katul G.B., Oren R., Manzoni S., Higgins C., Parlange M.B., Evapotranspiration: a process driving mass transport and energy exchange in the soil–plant–atmosphere–climate system. Rev. Geophys. 2012, 50, RG3002.
• 21. Krupa T., Tomala K., Antioxidant capacity, anthocyanin content profile in ‘Bluecrop’ blueberry fruit. Veg. Crops Res. Bull., 2007, 66, 129–141.
• 22. Lim J., Hedonic scaling: a review of methods and theory. Food Qual. Prefer., 2011, 22,733–747.
• 23. Paniagua A.C., East A.R., Heyes J.A., Interaction of temperature control deficiencies and atmosphere conditions during blueberry storage on quality outcomes. Postharv. Biol. Technol., 2014, 95, 50–59.
• 24. Peano C., Girgenti V., Palma A., Fontanella E., Giuggioli N., Film type and MAP on cv. Himbo Top raspberry fruit quality, composition and volatiles. Ital. J. Food Sci., 2013, 25, 1421–1432.
• 25. Peelman N., Ragaert P., De Meulenaer B., Adons D., Peeters R., Cardon L., Van Impe F., Devlieghere F., Application of bioplastics for food packaging. Trends Food Sci. Technol., 2013, 32, 128–141.
• 26. Pellegrini N., Serafini M., Colombi B., Del Rio D., Salvatora S., Bianchi M., Total antioxidant capacity of plant foods, beverages and oils consumed in Italy by three different in vitro assays. J. Nutr., 2003, 133, 2812–2819.
• 27. Perkins-Veazie P., Blueberry 2004, in: The Commercial Storage of Fruits, Vegetables, and Florist and Nursery Stocks (eds. K.C. Gross, C.Y. Wang, M. Saltveit). USDA, ARS, Beltsville.
• 28. Prange R.K., Asiedu S.K., DeEll J.R., Westgarth A.R., Quality of fundy and blomidon lowbush blueberries: effects of storage atmosphere, duration and fungal inoculation. Can. J. Plant Sci., 1995, 75, 479–483.
• 29. Prior R.L., Hoang H., Gu L., Wu X., Bacchiocca M., Assays for hydrophilic and antioxidant capacity (oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC FL) of plasma and other biological and food samples. J. Agric. Food Chem., 2003, 51, 3273–3279.
• 30. Remberg S., Haffner K., Blomhoff R., Total antioxidant capacity and other quality criteria in blueberries cvs. ‘Bluecrop, ‘Hardyblue’, ‘Patriot’, ‘Putte’ and ‘Aron’ after storage in cold store and controlled atmosphere. Acta Hort., 2003, 600, 595–598.
• 31. Rosenfeld H.J., Meberg K.R., Haffner K., Sundell H.A., MAP of highbush blueberries: sensory quality in relation to storage temperature, film type and initial high oxygen atmosphere. Postharv. Biol. Technol., 1999, 16, 27–36.
• 32. Routray W., Orsat V., Blueberries and their anthocyanins: factors affecting biosynthesis and properties. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Safety, 2011, 11, 303–320. 33. Slinkard K., Singleton V.L., Total phenol analysis: Automation and comparison with manual methods. Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 1977, 28, 49–55.
• 34. Vrhovsek U., Masuero D., Palmieri L., Mattivi F., Identifi cation and quantifi cation of flavonol glycosides in cultivated blueberry cultivars. J. Food Compos. Anal., 2012, 25, 9–16.
• 35. Wang S.Y., Antioxidant capacity and phenolic content of berry fruits as affected by genotype, preharvest conditions, maturity, and postharvest handling. 2007, in: Berry Fruits Value Added Products for Health Promotion (ed. Y. Zhao). Taylor & Francis Group, New York, pp. 147–178.
• 36. Wikström F., Williams H., Verghese K., Clune S., The infl uence of packaging attributes on consumer behaviour in food-packaging life cycle assessment studies – a neglected topic. J. Clean Prod., 2014, 73, 100–108.
• 37. Wu X., Beecher G.R., Holden J.M., Haytowitz D.B., Gebhardt S.E., Prior R.L., Concentrations of anthocyanins in common foods in the United States and estimation of normal consumption. J. Agric. Food Chem., 2006, 54, 4069–4075.
• 38. Yam K.L., Lee D.S., Design of modifi ed atmosphere packaging for fresh produce. 1995, in: Active Food Packaging (ed. M.L. Rooney). Blackie Academic, London, pp. 55–73.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/pjfns-2016-0023