Genetic structure of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] provenances tested in IPTNS-IUFRO 1964/68 experiment in Krynica

• Autorzy: Sabor J. , Kempf M. , Masternak K.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The results of previous studies have shown high breeding values of Beskidian spruce. The aim of the study was to assess the genetic structure of seventeen Norway spruce provenances from the Beskidy Mts. tested in IPTNSIUFRO 1964/68 experiment in Krynica, which survived after massive wind damage on the plots. Polymorphism of five isozyme systems encoded in five loci was determined. The highest value of genetic diversity parameters: mean number of alleles per locus and observed heterozygosity was noted for progeny of spruce from the Eastern Beskidy Mts. (Na = 1.47, Ho = 0.15), and the lowest – for the provenance from the Western Beskidy Mts., Babia Góra massif and the Beskid Sądecki Mts. (Na = 1.27, Ho = 0.12). Mean genetic distance between analyzed spruce provenances was equal to 0.027.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

genetic structure; Norway spruce; Picea abies; isoenzyme; polymorphism; seed source; genetic distance; experiment; Krynica-Zdroj town

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Folia Forestalia Polonica. Series A . Forestry
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 55
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.10-17,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Sabor J.

autor

Kempf M.

• Department of Forest Tree Breeding, Faculty of Forestry, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al.29 Listopada 46, 31-425 Krakow, Poland

autor

Masternak K.

• Insitute of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agrobioengineering, University of Life Science in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

• Bałut S., Sabor J. 2001. Inventory provenance test of Norway Spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] IPTNSIUFRO 1964/68 in Krynica. Part I. Description of the experimental area. Wydawnictwo Akademii Rolniczej, Kraków.
• Barszcz J., Małek S. 2006. The quality and viability of Picea abies (L.) Karst. seedlings in young crops laid out after a decay of stands at high mountain elevations in the Śląski Beskid Mountains and the western part of the Beskid Żywiecki Mountains. In: Current problems of forest protection in spruce stands under conversion (eds.: W. Grodzki, T. Oszako). IBL (FRI), Warsaw, 21–35.
• Bergmann F., Gregorious H.R. 1979. Comparison of the genetic diversities of various populations of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Proceedings of the Conference on Biochemical Genetics of Forest Trees (ed.: F. Rudin). Umeå, 99–107.
• Bruchwald A., Dmyterko E. 2010. Lasy Beskidu Śląskiego i Żywieckiego – zagrożenia, nadzieja. Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa, Sękocin Stary, pp. 80.
• Burczyk J. 1998. Systemy kojarzenia drzew leśnych. Wyd. Uczelniane WSP, Bydgoszcz, pp. 105.
• Chałupka W., Mejnartowicz L., Lewandowski A. 2008. Reconstitution of a lost forest tree population: A case study of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 2103–2108.
• Conkle M.T., Paul D.H., Nunnaly L.B., Hunter S.C. 1982. Starch Gel Electrophoresis of Conifer Seeds: a Laboratory Manual. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSWGTR- 64. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
• Forest Condition in Europe. 2004. Technical Report of ICP Forests. Federal Research Centre for Forestry and Forest Products (BFH), Hamburg.
• Giannini R., Morgante M., Vendramin G.G. 1991. Allozyme variation in Italian populations of Picea abies (L.) Karst. Silvae Genetica, 40 (3/4), 160–166.
• Giertych M. 1984. Świerk istebniański w świetle międzynarodowych doświadczeń proweniencyjnych. Sylwan, 128 (12), 27–42.
• Giertych M. 1997. Świerk pospolity Picea abies (L.) Karst. Nasze Drzewa Leśne. Warszawa–Poznań, PWN.
• Giertych M. 2002. Troska o bioróżnorodność. Sesja naukowa: Zagospodarowanie oraz wartość genetyczna populacji drzew gatunków domieszkowych i introdukowanych w aspekcie stabilizacji ekosystemów leśnych Karpat. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Rolniczej im. H. Kołłątaja w Krakowie, 394, 289–301.
• Konnert M., Maurer W. 1995. Isozymic Investigations on Norway Spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] and European Silver Fir (Abies alba M ill.). A P ractical Guide to Separation Methods and Zymogram Evaluation. Bayerische Landesanstalt für forstliche Saat- und Pflanzenzucht, Teisendorf, pp. 79.
• Konnert M. 2009. Genetic variation of Picea abies in southern Germany as determined using isozyme and STS markers. Dendrobiology, 61 (Supplement), 131–136.
• Kraj W. 2002. The estimation of genetic variation within and between polish provenances of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) on the basis of RAPD polymorphism, EJPAU 5 (2). Available online: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume5/issue2/forestry/abs-02.html
• Krutovskii K.V., Bergmann F. 1995. Introgressive hybridization and phylogenetic relationship between Norway, Picea abies (L.) Karst., and Siberian, P. obovata L edeb., s pruce s pecies studied b y i sozyme loci. Heredity, 74 (5), 464–480.
• Krutzsch P. 1968. Die Pflanzschulenergebnisse eines inventierenden Fichtenherkunftsversuches (Picea abies Karst. und Picea obovata Ledeb.). Königliche Forstliche Hochschule, Stockholm.
• Langercrantz U., Ryman N. 1990. Genetic structure of Norway spruce (Picea abies): concordance of morphological and allozymic variation. Evolution, 44, 38–53.
• Ledig F.T. 1986. Heterozygosity, heterosis, and fitness in outbreeding plants. In: Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity (ed.: M.E. Soule). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass. (USA), 77– 104.
• Lewandowki A., Burczyk J., Chałupka W. 1997. Preliminary results on allozyme diversity and differentiation on Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] in Poland based on plus tree investigations. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, 66 (2), 197–200.
• Lewandowski A., Burczyk J. 2002. Allozyme variation of Picea abies in Poland. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 17, 478–494.
• Longauer R., Gömöry D., Paule L., Blada I., Popescu F., Maňkovská B. 2004. Genetic effects of air pollution on forest tree species of the Carpathian Mountains. Environmental Pollution, 130, 85–92.
• Masternak K., Sabor J., Majerczyk K. 2009. Effect of provenance on the survival of Norway spruce (Piceas abies (L.) Karst.) trees on the IPTNS-IUFRO 1964/68 site in Krynica (Poland). Dendrobiology, 61, 53–61.
• Masternak K., Zielińska M., Sabor J. 2011. Polimorfizm izoenzymów i wzrost wybranych pochodzeń świerka pospolitego [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] doświadczenia IPTNS-IUFRO 1964/68 w Krynicy. Leśne Prace Badawcze, 72 (1), 65–75.
• Modrzyński J., Prus-Głowacki W. 1998. Isoenzymatic variability in some of the polish populations of Norway spruce (Picea abies) in the IUFRO 1972 provenance trial. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, 67 (1), 75–85.
• Nei M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist, 106, 283–292.
• Nei M., Roychoudhury A.K. 1974. Sampling variances of heterozygosity and genetic distance. Genetics, 76, 379–390.
• Nowakowska J.A. 2009. Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA differentiation of Picea abies populations in Poland. Dendrobiology, 61 (Supplement), 119–129.
• Paule L., Szmidt A.E., Yazdani R. 1990. Isozyme polymorphism of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) in Slovakia. I. Genetic structure of adjacent populations. Acta Facultatis Zvolen, 32, 57–70.
• Polak-Berecka M., Perchlicka I. 2007. Polimorfizm izoenzymowy i zmienność genetyczna wybranych pochodzeń cząstkowych świerka rasy istebniańskiej. Sylwan, 151 (10), 47–53.
• Sabor J. 1996. Możliwości zachowania i metody selekcji drzewostanów świerkowych rasy istebniańskiej. Sylwan, 140 (3), 61–81.
• Sabor J. 2010. Genetic basis of conversion and conservation of forest gene resources of spruce stands in Silesian and Zywiec Beskid Mountains. Beskydy, 3 (2), 175–186.
• Skroppa T. 1994. Impact of tree improvement on genetic structure and diversity of planted forests. Silva Fennica, 28 (4), 265–274.
• Sneath P.H.A., Sokal R.R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy: the Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.
• Wright S. 1978. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol. 4. Variability within and among natural populations. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
• Yeh F.C., Yang R., Boyle T. 1999. Popgene Version 1,31. Microsoft Window – Based Freeware for Population Genetic Analysis. University of Alberta and Centre for International Forestry Research, Edmonton, Canada.