Polish adaptation of Interpersonal Support Evaluation List, a version for students (Isel-48v.Coll.: Interpersonal Support Evaluation List, College Version)

• Autorzy: Zarzycka D. , Slusarska B. , Dyk D. , Bednarek A. , Trojanowska A.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Polska adaptacja Interpersonalnej Skali Wsparcia Społecznego, wersja dla studentów (Isel-48v.Coll.: Interpersonal Support Evaluation List, Version College)

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background. The objective of the study was the adaptation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Interpersonal Social Support Scale version for students (ISEL-48v.Coll.: Interpersonal Support Evaluation List College Version). Material and methods. The validation of the instrument was performed according to methodological standards, and statistical validation covered the assessment of criterion and construct validity, and reliability of the scale. The study was conducted with the use of the test-retest method, and a package of research instruments was applied, including, apart from the ISEL-48v.Coll., the PSS-14, HADS and SOC-29. The validation sample covered a group of 167 nursing students for the test and 115 for the retest. Results. Reliability of the ISEL-48 v. Coll. as evaluated by Cronbach’s alpha was 0.88, and for the subscales, it ranged from 0.82 to 0.69. The stability of results determined by the correlation in test-retest analysis ranged within 0.76 – 0.61 (p<0.001 and p<0.01). Conclusions. The analysis of results shows that the adopted ISEL-48v.Coll. is an instrument possessing satisfying psychometric properties.

PL

Wprowadzenie. Celem badań było przeprowadzenie procedury adaptacji i oceny właściwości psychometrycznych Interpersonalnej Skali Wsparcia Społecznego w wersji dla studentów (ISEL-48v.Coll.: Interpersonal Support Evaluation List College version). Materiał i metody. Adaptacja lingwistyczna skali została przeprowadzona zgodnie z obowiązującymi standardami metodologicznymi, a walidacja statystyczna poprzez określenie trafności kryterialnej, teoretycznej i rzetelności. W badaniu wykorzystano metodę test-retest i zastosowano pakiet narzędzi badawczych oprócz ISEL-48v.Coll. również PSS-14, HADS, SOC-29. Próba walidacyjna obejmowała grupę 167 studentów dla testu i 115 dla retestu. Wyniki. Rzetelność ISEL-48 v.Coll. oceniana współczynnikiem alfa Cronbacha wynosiła 0.88 a dla podskal waha się od 0.82 do 0.69. Stałość wyników określona współczynnikiem korelacji w badaniu test-retest przyjmowała wartości od 0.76 do 0.61 (p<0.001 and p<0.01). Wnioski. Analiza wyników wskazuje iż zaadaptowana ISEL-48v.Coll jest narzędziem o zadowalających właściwościach psychometrycznych.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Health Problems of Civilization
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 11
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.280-286,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Zarzycka D.

• Department of Paediatric Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland

autor

Slusarska B.

• Chair of Oncology and Environmental Health, Department of Family Medicine and Community Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland

autor

Dyk D.

• Chair of Nursing, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Nursing, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

autor

Bednarek A.

• Department of Paediatric Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland

autor

Trojanowska A.

• Department of Paediatric Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. De Girolamo G, Dagani J, Signorini G. Youth mental health from continuity of psychopathology to continuity of care. Word Child & Adolescent. Psychiatry 2014; 6: 6-8.
• 2. Mikolajczyk RT, Maxwell AE, Naydenova V, Meier S, Ansari WE. Depressive symptoms and perceived burdens related to being a students: Survey in three European countries. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2008; 19: doi:10.1186/1745-0179-4-19.
• 3. Jané-Llopis E, Anderson P. Mental Health Promotion and Mental Disorder Prevention. A Policy for Europe. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen, 2005.
• 4. Wardle J, Steptoe A, Gulis G, Sartory G, Sęk H, Todorova I, Vogele C, Ziarko M. Depression, perceived control, and life satisfaction in university students from Central Eastern and Western Europe. Int J Behav Med 2004; 11: 27-36.
• 5. Steptoe A, Wardle J. Health behavior, risk awareness and emotional well-being in students from Eastern Europe and Western Europe. Soc Sci Med 2001; 53: 1621-1630.
• 6. Wilks SE, Spivey CA. Resilience in undergraduate social work students: Social support and adjustment to academic stress. Soc Work Educ 2010; 29:276-288.
• 7. Sęk H. Chosen issues of social support. In: Sęk H., editor. Clinical psychology. [Polish]. Warsaw: PWN; 2005. p. 252-255.
• 8. Cohen S. Mermelstein R, Kamarck T, Hoberman HM. Measuring the Functional Components of Social Support. In: Social Support: Theory, Research and Applications. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster: 1985. p. 73-94.
• 9. Cohen S. Pressman S. Stress – buffering hypothesis. In: Anderson NB., editor. Encyclopedia of Health &Behavior. Sage Publications. APA. 2004; pp. 780-782.
• 10. Cohen S, McKay G. Social Support, Stress and the Buffering Hypothesis: A Theoretical Analysis. In: Baum A, Taylor SE, Singer JE., editors. Handbook of Psychology and Health. Hillsdale. NJ. 1984. p. 255-260.
• 11. Cobb S. Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosom Med. 1976; 38: 300-314.
• 12. Cohen S, Hoberman HM. Positive events and social support as buffers of life change stress. J Appl Sociol Psychol. 1983; 13: 99-125.
• 13. Cohen`s Scales. [cited 2016 Jul 01]. Available from: http://www.psy.cmu.edu/~scohen/&ei
• 14. Zarzycka D, Śpila B, Wrońska I, Makara-Studzińska M. Validation analysis of chosen aspects of Interpersonal Support Evaluation List - 40 v. General Population (ISEL-40 v.GP). [Polish] Psychiatry 2010; 7: 83-94.
• 15. Szlachta E. The attempt of adaptation and validation of Polish version of The Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL). [Polish] Psychol Rev 2009; 52: 433-451.
• 16. Brzeziński Z. Validity and Reliability of Psychological Tests. Selection of Texts. Psychology Publishing, Gdańsk 2005.
• 17. Dalistamati E, Samacouri M, Davis E. Vorvolacos T, Xenitidis K, Livaditis M. Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL) – College Version: validation and application in Greek sample. Int J Soc Psychol 2006; 52: 552-560.
• 18. Brookings JB, Bolton B. Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List. Am J Commun Psychol 1988; 16: 137-147.
• 19. Bauman EM, Haaga DAF, Kaltman S, Dutton MA. Measuring social support in battered women: Factor structure of the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL). Violence Against Wom. 2012; 18 (1): 30-43.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5114/hpc.2017.71889.