Towards a holistic approach to the sustainable development of industry

• Autorzy: Wisniewska-Paluszak J. , Paluszak G.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper attempts to analyse the motivations of industrial actors to network for sustainable development. In order to answer this question two sets of modern industrial approaches have been considered i.e. industrial ecology and industrial network approach. Both of them understand industry as a systematic network of interrelated nodes and flows. Their contributions to the sustainable industrial network have been analysed. The review of the theories led to the assumption that the incentives for business to network for sustainable development are exogenous. But networking for sustainable development depends finally on long term relationships which are negotiated as independent business deals. Those relationships are established only if they are expected to be mutually beneficial for business partners considering sustainable outcomes.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Intercathedra
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 32
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.116-126,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Wisniewska-Paluszak J.

• Department of Economics, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland

autor

Paluszak G.

Bibliografia

• 1. Ayres R.U. and Ayres L.W. (Ed.) (2002), A handbook of industrial ecology. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
• 2. Brundtland Commission (1987), Our Common Future. United Nation World Comission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• 3. Freeman R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman Publishing, Boston, MA.
• 4. Iivonen K. and Moisander J. (2014), Rhetorical construction of narcissistic CSR orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(3), 649-664.
• 5. Kakabadse N.K., Rozuel C., and Lee-Davies L. (2005), Corporate Social Responsibility and stakeholder approach: a conceptual review, International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(4), pp. 277-302.
• 6. Lee S. Y. and Carroll C. E. (2011), The emergence, variation, and evolution of corporate social responsibility in the public sphere, 1980-2004: the exposure of firms to public debate. Journal of Business Ethics, 104 (1), pp. 115—131.
• 7. Porter T., Derry R. (2012), Sustainability and business in a complex world, Business and Society Review, 117(1), pp. 33-53.
• 8. Baraldi E., Gregori G.L. and Perna A. (2010), Developing and embedding eco-sustainable solutions: the evolution of the Leaf House network. 26th IMP-conference in Budapest, Hungary.
• 9. Ehrenfeld J. (2004), Industrial ecology: a new field or only a metaphor? Journal of Cleaner Production, 12 (8-10), pp.825-831.
• 10. Garner A. and Keoleian G. A. (1995), Industrial Ecology: An Introduction. National Pollution Prevention Center for Higher Education, University of Michigan, Michigan.
• 11. Frosch R.A. and Gallopoulos N.E. (1989), Strategies for Manufacturing, Scientific American, 261(3), pp.144-152.
• 12. Chertow M. R. (2000), Industrial symbiosis: Literature and taxonomy. Annual Review of Energy and Environment, 25, pp. 313–337.
• 13. Li Y. and Shi L. (2015), The Resilience of Interdependent Industrial Symbiosis Networks. A Case of Yixing Economic and Technological Development Zone. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19 (2), pp. 264-273.
• 14. Schiller F., Penn A. S., Basson L. (2014), Analyzing networks in industrial ecology - a review of Social-Material Network Analyses. Journal of Cleaner Production, 76, pp. 1-11.
• 15. Posch A. (2010), Industrial Recycling Networks as Starting Points for Broader Sustainability-Oriented Cooperation? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14(2), pp. 242-257.
• 16. Ford D. and Håkansson H. (2006), The Idea of Business Interaction. The IMP Journal, 1(1), pp. 4-20.
• 17. Håkansson H. and Snehota I. (Ed.) (1995), Developing Relationships in Business Networks. Routledge, London and New York.
• 18. Lehni M. (2000). Eco-efficiency creating more value with less impact, WBCSD, Geneva.
• 19. Håkansson H. and Waluszewski A. (2002), Managing Technological Development, IKEA, the Environment and Technology. Routlege, London.
• 20. Goduscheit R. C. (2007), Networks and Networks – Social network theory vs. the IMP tradition. Paper presented at New Directions for Marketing: Interactions and Partnerships, Moscow, Russian Federation.
• 21. Velenturf A.P.M. and Jensen P.D. (2015), Promoting Industrial Symbiosis. Using the Concept of Proximity to Explore Social Network Development. Journal of Industrial Ecology, online version, pp. 1-10.
• 22. Dornfeld D.A. (Ed.) (2012), Green Manufacturing, Fundamentals and Applications. Springer, New York.