Examination of fundamental movement patterns and likelihood of injury in amateur runners from Opole region in Poland

• Autorzy: Sobota D. , Kaczorowska A. , Mroczek A. , Polanski A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: The most common risk factors for running-related injuries are mistakes, such as insufficient warm-up and stretching exercises, during training. Good preparation and proper training reduces the risk of sport-related injuries. Aim of the study: To examine fundamental movement patterns and likelihood of injury in amateur runners. Material and methods: Twenty-four amateur long-distance runners from Opole region (Poland) were divided into two groups. The first group comprised 12 runners from the club “Kotwica Brzeg”, who did a proper warmup before training and stretching exercises after training. The second group comprised 12 runners from other clubs who did not undertake any warm-up or stretching exercises (control group). Fundamental movement patterns were tested by the Functional Movement Screen test (FMS). Results: The mean FMS test score was higher in “Kotwica Brzeg” runners (17.08 points) than in the control group (15.50 points), but this was not statistically significant. The “Kotwica Brzeg” runners performed better in five of the FMS tests, but this was only significant for the rotational stability test. Conclusions: Runners who did a proper warm-up and stretching exercises achieved better results in the FMS test, which may reduce the risk of running-related injuries.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Poland; Opole region; sport; amateur; runner; injury risk; risk factor; prevention; Functional Movement Screen test; physical health

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medical Science Pulse
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 12
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.29-33,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Sobota D.

• Physiotherapy Faculty, Opole Medical School,Opole, Poland

autor

Kaczorowska A.

• Physiotherapy Faculty, Opole Medical School, Katowicka 68, 45-060 Opole, Poland

autor

Mroczek A.

• Physiotherapy Faculty, Opole Medical School,Opole, Poland

autor

Polanski A.

• Psychoimmunology Institute, Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Moczyński P. Różnicowanie uszkodzeń kończyny dolnej u biegaczy. Prakt Fizjoter Rehabil 2015; 66: 18–28. (in Polish).
• 2. Dziak A. Uszkodzenia sportowe i ich leczenie. Acta Clin 2002; 2(3): 217–224. (in Polish).
• 3. Złotkowska R, Skiba M, Mroczek A, Bilewicz-Wyrozumska T, Król K, et al. Negatywne skutki aktywności fizycznej oraz uprawiania sportu. Hygeia Public Health 2015, 50(1): 41–46. (in Polish).
• 4. Agresta C, Slobodinsky M, Tucker C. Funktional Movement ScreenTM – normative values in healthy distance runners. Int J Sports Med 2014; 35(14): 1203–1207.
• 5. Sinclair J. The effects of barefoot and barefoot inspired footwear running on tibiofemoral kinetics. Hum Mov 2016; 17(3): 176–180.
• 6. Sinclair J, Dillon S. The influence of energy boost and springblade footwear on the kinetics and kinematics of running. Hum Mov 2016; 17(2): 112–118.
• 7. Sinclair J, Taylor PJ. Sex variation in patellar tendon kinetics during running. Hum Mov 2015; 16(2): 60–63.
• 8. Sinclair J, Shore HF, Taylor PJ, Atkins S. Sex differences in limb and joint stiffness in recreational runners. Hum Mov 2015; 16(3): 137–141.
• 9. Van den Tillaar R, Vatten T, von Heimburg E. Effects of short or long warm-up on intermediate running performance. J Strength Cond Res 2017; 31(1): 37–44.
• 10. Van den Tillaar R, von Heimburg E. Comparison of two types of warm-up upon repeated-sprint performance in experienced soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2016; 30(8): 2258–2265.
• 11. Fletcher IM, Jones B, The effect of different warm-up stretch protocols on 20 meter sprint performance in trained rugby union players. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18(4): 885–888.
• 12. Lemiesz G, Iwańczyk K, Biernat R, Godlewski J, Szymański M, Biernat U et al. Zastosowanie testu funkcjonalnej oceny w praktyce. Prakt Fizjoter Rehabil 2013; 39: 4–11. (in Polish).
• 13. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: The use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function–Part 1. N Am J Sports Phys Ther 2006; 1(2): 62–72
• 14. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function–Part 2. N Am J Sports Phys Ther 2006; 1(3): 132–139
• 15. Kochański B, Plaskiewicz A, Kałużny K, Dylewska M, Płoszaj O, Hagner-Derengowska M, et al. Functional Movement Screen (FMS) – kompleksowy system oceny funkcjonalnej pacjenta. J Educ Health Sport [online] 2015; 5(4): 90–101 [cit.20.03.2017]. Available from URL: http://www.ojs.ukw.edu.pl/index.php/johs/article/view/2015%3B5%284%29%3A90-101/pdf_91. (in Polish).
• 16. Adamczyk J, Pepłowski M, Boguszewski D, Białoszewski D. Ocena funkcjonalna zawodników uprawiających podnoszenie ciężarów z zastosowaniem testu Functional Movement Screen. Med Sport 2012; 28(4): 267–276. (in Polish).
• 17. Kiesel K, Plisky P, Voight M. Can serious injury in professional football be predicted by a preseason functional movement screen? N Am J Sports Phys Ther 2007 Aug; 2(3): 147–158.
• 18. Malliaroupulos N, Mertyri D, Tsaklis P. Prevalence of injury in ultra trial running. Hum Mov 2015; 16(2): 55–59.
• 19. Siedlaczek M, Srokowski G, Łukasiewicz H, Srokowska A, Kowalik T, Piekorz Z, et al. Zgodność pomiędzy wynikami testu FMS a częstością występowania kontuzji u siatkarek na przykładzie drużyny II ligowej. J Educ Health Sport [online] 2015; 5(8): 529–539 [cit.24.03.2017]. Available from URL: http://www.ojs.ukw.edu.pl/index.php/johs/article/view/2015%3B5%288%29%3A529-539/4613. (in Polish).
• 20. Sulowska I, Gattner H, Stosur A, Rembiasz K. Functional movement screen as a tool for functional evaluation and prediction of the risk of injury among floorball athletes. Antropomotoryka 2015; 72(25): 35–42.
• 21. Loudon JK, Parkerson-Mitchell AJ, Hildebrand LD, Teague C. Functional movement screen scores in a group of running athletes. J Strength Condit Res 2014 Apr; 28(4): 909–13.
• 22. Hotta T, Nishiguchi S, Fukutani N. Functional movement screen for predicting running injuries in 18- to 24-year-old competitive male runners. J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29(10): 2808–2815.
• 23. Hibbs A, Thompson K, French D, Wrigley A. Optimizing performance by improving core stability and core strenght. Sports Med 2008; 38(12): 995–1008.
• 24. Kibler W, Press J, Sciascia A. The role of core stability in athletic function. Sports Med 2006; 36(3): 189–198.
• 25. Mandacho C, Garcia-Ruiz J, Cortell-Tormo JR, Tortosa-Martinez J. Effect of core training on male handball players‘ throwing velocity. J Hum Kinet 2017; 56(1): 177–185.
• 26. Dello Iacono A, Padulo J, Ayalon M. Core stability training on lower limb balance strength. J Sports Sci 2016; 34(7): 671–678.
• 27. Okada T, Huxel KC, Nesser TW. Relationship between core stability, functional movement, and performance. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25(1): 252–261.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0012.1161