Subsydia a efektywność ekonomiczno-finansowa gospodarstw rolnych osób fizycznych

• Autorzy: Kulawik J. , Plonka R.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Subsidies vs. economic and financial effectiveness of farms belonging to natural persons

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The research on the panel of 6,173 farms keeping accounts compliant with the Polish FADN methodology focused on the correlations between subsidies and economic and financial effectiveness in 2005-2010. The traditional ratio analysis showed that the significance of budgetary support in the shaping of the aforementioned effectiveness decreases along with an increase in the extent of conducted activity. The difference in the level od subsidies is, however, considerable between individual production types of farms. Moreover, it turned out that the farms receiving the highest support (farms with field crops, mixed crops and farms keeping ruminants) did not have a directly proportional advantage as regards effectiveness as compared to the farms the least dependent on budgetary support (horticulture and farms keeping granivores). Further on, the regressive calculations showed that the three examined levels of subsidies were most often negatively correlated with effectiveness. There are no, however, clear, in statistical terms, relations between effectiveness and decoupling of budgetary support from agricultural production.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej
• Rocznik: 2013
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: s.25-43,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Kulawik J.

• Instytut Ekonomiki Rolnictwa i Gospodarki Żywnościowej - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Warszawa

autor

Plonka R.

• Instytut Ekonomiki Rolnictwa i Gospodarki Żywnościowej - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Warszawa

Bibliografia

• 1. Agricultural support, farm land values and sectoral adjustment. The implications for policy reform. OECD, 2008.
• 2. Amir D. Aczel: Statystyka w zarządzaniu. PWN, Warszawa 2000.
• 3. Barry P., Ellinger P.N.: Financial management in agriculture. Seventh edition. Pearson Prentice Hall, New York 2012.
• 4. Borkowski B., Dudek H., Szczęsny W.: Ekonometria. Wybrane zagadnienia. PWN, Warszawa 2004.
• 5. Breen P.J. et al.: The effect of decoupling on the decision to produce: an Irish case study. Food Policy, vol. 30, 2005.
• 6. Britz W.: EU-wide (regional and farm level) effects of premium decoupling and harmon­isation following the health check reform. German Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 61, no. 1, 2012.
• 7. Brümer B., Glauben T., Thijssen G.: Decomposition of productivity growth using distance functions: the case of dairy farms in three European countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 84, no. 3, 2002.
• 8. Carroll J., Thorne F., Newman C.: An examination of the productivity of Irish agriculture in a decoupled policy environment. End of Project Report RMIS: 5507, September 2008.
• 9. Coelli T., Perelman S., Van Lierde D.: CAP reforms and total factor productivity growth in Belgian agriculture: a Malmquist index approach. Contributed paper for presentation at the 26th Conference of the International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) held on August 12-18, 2006, at the Gold Coast, Australia.
• 10. Davidova S., Latruffe L.: Relationships between technical efficiency and financial management for Czech Republic farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 58, 2007.
• 11. EU-Agrarpolitik nach 2013. Berichte über Landwirtschaft, Band 88, Nr 2, 2010.
• 12. Goraj L., Mańko S.: Model szacowania pełnych kosztów działalności gospodarstw rolnych. Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej, nr3,2011.
• 13. Kay R.D., Edwards W.M., Duffy P.A.: Farm management. Seventh edition. McGraw Hill International Edition, New York 2012.
• 14. Kropp D.J., Katchowa L.A.: The effects of direct payments on liquidity and repayment capacity ofbeginning farmers. Agricultural Finance Review, vol. 71,no.3,2011.
• 15. Kropp D.J., Whitaker B.J.: The impact of decoupled payments on the cost operating capital. Agricultural Finance Review, vol. 71, no. 1, 2011.
• 16. Malina A.: Statystyczne metody oceny ryzyka działalności gospodarczej. Praca pod red. A. Zeliasia. Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Krakowie, Kraków 1998.
• 17. Mary S.: Assessing the impacts of pillar 1 and 2 subsidies on TFP in French crop farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 64, no. 1, January 2013.
• 18. Mußhoff O., Hirschauer N., Herink M.: Bei welchen Problemstrukturen sind Data­-Envelopment Analysen sinnvoll? Eine kritische Würdung, Agrarwirtschat, vol. 58, heft 2, 2009.
• 19. Nowak E.: Metody taksonomiczne w klasyfikacji obiektów społeczno-gospodarczych. PWE, Warszawa 1990.
• 20. Zhengfei G., Lansink O.A.: The source of productivity growth in Dutch agriculture: a perspective from finance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 88, no. 3, August 2006.
• 21. Zhu X., Oude Lansink.: Impact of CAP subsidies on technical efficiency of crop farms in Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden. Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 61, no. 3, September 2010.

Uwagi

PL

Rekord w opracowaniu