PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2016 | 08 | 3 |

Tytuł artykułu

Relationship between age and handgrip strength indexes in elderly women with low bone mass. Preliminary study

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Background: The aim of this preliminary study was to characterize handgrip strength indexes in elderly women with low bone mass and determine their relationship with age. Material/Methods: The study sample consisted of 63 postmenopausal women with osteopenia and ostoporosis, aged 60-74. The subjects were divided into three age groups: 60-64 years, 65-69 years and 70-74 years. To perform this study two handgrip strength indexes were used: handgrip strength on body weight (HS/weight) and handgrip strength on body mass index (HS/BMI). Handgrip strength was measured with Jamar hand dynamometer. Results: These studies revealed a significant decrease in handgrip strength indexes between age groups: 60-64 years and 70-74 years. As for the average HS/weight, it was registered: 0.38 ±0.07 kg for the group 60-64 years, 0.33 ±0.06 kg for the group 65-69 years and 0.32 ±0.05 kg for group 70-44 years. The results of the average HS/BMI in three groups were as follows: 0.99 ±0.24 kg/kg/m2, 0.86 ±0.19 kg/kg/m2 and 0.8 ±0.16 kg/kg/m2, respectively. Conclusions: Handgrip strength indexes in elderly women with low bone mass are gradually decreasing with age. Thus, handgrip strength indexes could provide a convenient tool for clinicians to set goals and to monitor the training progress in women with osteopenia and osteoporosis.

Słowa kluczowe

Twórcy

autor
  • Faculty of Tourism and Recreation, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdansk, Poland
autor
  • Faculty of Tourism and Recreation, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdansk, Poland
autor
  • Faculty of Tourism and Recreation, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdansk, Poland
autor
  • Faculty of Tourism and Recreation, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdansk, Poland
autor
  • Faculty of Tourism and Recreation, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdansk, Poland
autor
  • Faculty of Tourism and Recreation, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdansk, Poland

Bibliografia

  • [1] Goldspink G. Age-related loss of muscle mass and strength. J Aging Res. 2012;2012:158279, doi:10.1155/2012/158279.
  • [2] Delmonico MJ, Harris TB, Visser M, et al. Health, Aging, and Body. Longitudinal study of muscle strength, quality, and adipose tissue infiltration. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(6):1579-85. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28047.
  • [3] Kim YH, Kim KI, Paik NJ, Kim KW, Jang HC, Lim JY. Muscle strength: A better index of low physical performance than muscle mass in older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015; doi: 10.1111/ggi.12514. [Epub ahead of print].
  • [4] Newman AB, Kupelian V, Visser M, et al. Strength, but not muscle mass, is associated with mortality in the health, aging and body composition study cohort. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(1):72-7.
  • [5] Kilgour RD, Vigano A, Trutschnigg B, Lucar E, Borod M, Morais JA. Handgrip strength predicts survival and is associated with markers of clinical and functional outcomes in advanced cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(12):3261-70. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1894-4.
  • [6] Di Monaco M, Di Monaco R, Manca M, Cavanna A. Handgrip strength is an independent predictor of distal radius bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Clin Rheumatol. 2000;19(6):473-476. doi: 10.1007/s100670070009.
  • [7] Cesarec G, Martinec S, Basić I, Jakopić D. Effect of exercises on quality of life in women with osteoporosis and osteopenia. Coll Antropol. 2014;38(1):247-54.
  • [8] Tarantino U, Baldi J, Celi M, et al. Osteoporosis and sarcopenia: the connections. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2013;25 Suppl 1:S93-5. doi: 10.1007/s40520-013-0097-7.
  • [9] Kanis JA, on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group. Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level. Technical Report. University of Sheffield, UK: World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases; Printed by the University of Sheffield; 2007, 1-339.
  • [10] Dong R, Wang X, Guo Q, et al. Clinical relevance of different handgrip strength indexes and mobility limitation in the elderly adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016;71(1):96-102. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glv168.
  • [11] Choquette S, Bouchard DR, Doyon CY, Sénéchal M, Brochu M, Dionne IJ. Relative strength as a determinant of mobility in elders 67-84 years of age. a NuAge study: nutrition as a determinant of successful aging. J Nutr Health Aging. 2010;14(3):190-5.
  • [12] Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66:69-72.
  • [13] Aoyagi K, Ross PD, Nevitt MC, et al. Comparison of performance-based measures among native Japanese, Japanese-Americans in Hawaii and Caucasian women in the United States, ages 65 years and over: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatrics. 2001;1:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-1-3.
  • [14] Czerwinski E, Badurski JE, Marcinowska-Suchowierska E, Osieleniec J. Current understanding of osteoporosis according to the position of the World Health Organization (WHO) and International Osteoporosis Foundation. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2007;9(4):337-56.
  • [15] Bohannon RW. Hand-grip dynamometry predicts future outcomes in aging adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2008;31(1):3-10.
  • [16] Rikkonen T, Sirola J, Salovaara K, et al. Muscle strength and body composition are clinical indicators of osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2012;91:131-138. doi: 10.1007/s00223-012-9618-1.
  • [17] Pasco JA, Holloway KL, Brennan-Olsen SL, Moloney DJ, Kotowicz MA. Muscle strength and areal bone mineral density at the hip in women: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:124. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0586-2.
  • [18] Bayramoglu M, Sozay S, Karatas M, Kilinc S. Relationships between muscle strength and bone mineral density of three body regions in sedentary postmenopausal women. Rheumatol Int. 2005;25:513-517. doi: 10.1007/s00296-004-0475-8.
  • [19] Peolsson A, Hedlund R, Öberg B. Intra- and inter-tester reliability and reference values for hand strength. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33(1):36-41. doi: 10.1080/165019701300006524.
  • [20] Chilima DM, Ismail SJ. Nutrition and handgrip strength of older adults in rural Malawi. Public Health Nutr. 2001;4:11-17. doi: 10.1079/PHN200050.
  • [21] Massy-Westropp NM, Gill TK, Taylor AW, Bohannon RW, Hill CL. Hand Grip Strength: age and gender stratified normative data in a population-based study BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:127. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-127.
  • [22] Charlier R, Mertens E, Lefevre J, Thomis M. Muscle mass and muscle function over the adult life span: A cross-sectional study in Flemish adults. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015;61(2):161-7. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2015.06.009.
  • [23] Patel HP, Syddall HE, Jameson K, et al. Prevalence of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older people in the UK using the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) definition: findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study (HCS). Age Ageing. 2013;42(3):378-84. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs197.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-474e1fc1-2663-49ab-b7b2-ace210df61d3
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.