PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2020 | 79 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

Morphology and morphometry of the semitendinosus distal tendon in adults and foetuses

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Background: The distal tendon of the semitendinosus is often used as a graft in orthopedic reconstructive surgery. Knowledge of the exact morphology of this tendon, and also the ability to predict its morphometric data are certainly helpful when planning the procedure of surgery. Comparison of the semitendinosus distal tendon anatomy in adults and foetuses may be scientifically relevant. There are no scientific reports on this tendon anatomy in foetuses. Materials and methods: Seventy semitendinosus muscles from cadavers were obtained using standard dissection techniques (50 muscles were obtained from adults and 20 from foetuses). Moreover, ultrasound examinations of 20 muscles were performed in living individuals. Results: Two main parts of the distal tendon were distinguished — the external part not covered with muscle fibres and the internal part, which is partially or entirely hidden within the muscle belly (venter). The average length of the distal tendon was 32.34 cm, while the average lengths of the external and internal parts were 9.65 cm and 12.59 cm, respectively. The external part was solid and cylindrical. The internal part was flat and rolled like a trough, thus making the tendon a poor transplant material. Similarly, the distal tendon in foetuses consisted of two parts, including the external and internal part. Conclusions: The proportions between the lengths of different muscle parts were very similar in adults and foetuses. (Folia Morphol 2020; 79, 2: 339–349)

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

79

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.339-349,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

  • Department of Descriptive and Clinical Anatomy, Centre of Biostructure Research, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
autor
  • Department of Descriptive and Clinical Anatomy, Centre of Biostructure Research, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
  • Department of Descriptive and Clinical Anatomy, Centre of Biostructure Research, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
autor
  • Department of Descriptive and Clinical Anatomy, Centre of Biostructure Research, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

  • 1. Abdou YE. Reconstruction of a chronic patellar tendon rupture with semitendinosus autograft. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014; 134(12): 1717–1721, doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2080-y, indexed in Pubmed: 25179895.
  • 2. Åhlén M, Lidén M, Bovaller Å, et al. Bilateral magnetic resonance imaging and functional assessment of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons a minimum of 6 years after ipsilateral harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40(8): 1735–1741, doi: 10.1177/0363546512449611, indexed in Pubmed: 22711582.
  • 3. Arnold EM, Delp SL. Fibre operating lengths of human lower limb muscles during walking. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011; 366(1570): 1530–1539, doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0345, indexed in Pubmed: 21502124.
  • 4. Arnold EM, Ward SR, Lieber RL, et al. A model of the lower limb for analysis of human movement. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010; 38(2): 269–279, doi: 10.1007/s10439-009-9852-5, indexed in Pubmed: 19957039.
  • 5. Battermann N, Appell HJ, Dargel J, et al. An anatomical study of the proximal hamstring muscle complex to elucidate muscle strains in this region. Int J Sports Med. 2011; 32(3): 211–215, doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1268011, indexed in Pubmed: 21072742.
  • 6. Borton ZM, Yasen SK, Britton EM, et al. Combined all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and minimally invasive posterolateral corner reconstruction using ipsilateral semitendinosus and gracilis autograft. Arthrosc Tech. 2017; 6(2): e331–e339, doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2016.10.007, indexed in Pubmed: 28580250.
  • 7. Buzzi R, Aglietti P, Vena LM, et al. Lateral collateral ligament reconstruction using a semitendinosus graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004; 12(1): 36–42, doi: 10.1007/s00167-003-0456-6, indexed in Pubmed: 14615886.
  • 8. Candal-Couto JJ, Deehan DJ. The accessory bands of Gracilis and Semitendinosus: an anatomical study. The Knee. 2003; 10(4): 325–328, doi: 10.1016/s0968-0160(02)00154-0.
  • 9. Chiang ER, Ma HL, Wang ST, et al. Hamstring graft sizes differ between Chinese and Caucasians. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20(5): 916–921, doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1653-3, indexed in Pubmed: 21866349.
  • 10. Duda GN, Brand D, Freitag S, et al. Variability of femoral muscle attachments. J Biomech. 1996; 29(9): 1185–1190, doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(96)00025-5, indexed in Pubmed: 8872275.
  • 11. Dziedzic D, Bogacka U, Ciszek B. Anatomy of sartorius muscle. Folia Morphol. 2014; 73(3): 359–362, doi: 10.5603/FM.2014.0037, indexed in Pubmed: 25242250.
  • 12. Dziedzic DW, Bogacka U, Komarniţki I, et al. Anatomy and morphometry of the distal gracilis muscle tendon in adults and foetuses. Folia Morphol. 2018; 77(1): 138–143, doi: 10.5603/FM.a2017.0069, indexed in Pubmed: 28703851.
  • 13. Eriksson K, Kindblom LG, Hamberg P, et al. The semitendinosus tendon regenerates after resection: a morphologic and MRI analysis in 6 patients after resection for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001; 72(4): 379–384, doi: 10.1080/000164701753542041, indexed in Pubmed: 11580127.
  • 14. Feucht MJ, Plath JE, Seppel G, et al. Gross anatomical and dimensional characteristics of the proximal hamstring origin. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015; 23(9): 2576–2582, doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3124-0, indexed in Pubmed: 24929658.
  • 15. Franz W, Baumann A. Minimally invasive semitendinosus tendon harvesting from the popliteal fossa versus conventional hamstring tendon harvesting for ACL reconstruction: A prospective, randomised controlled trial in 100 patients. Knee. 2016; 23(1): 106–110, doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.09.001, indexed in Pubmed: 26753501.
  • 16. Garofalo R, Ceccarelli E, Castagna A, et al. Open capsular and ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus hamstring autograft successfully controls superior and posterior translation for type V acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 25(7): 1989–1994, doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4509-7, indexed in Pubmed: 28434037.
  • 17. Gigante A, Bottegoni C, Milano G, et al. Semitendinosus and gracilis free muscle-tendon graft for repair of massive rotator cuff tears: surgical technique. Joints. 2016; 4(3): 189–192, doi: 10.11138/jts/2016.4.3.189, indexed in Pubmed: 27900313.
  • 18. Haberfehlner H, Maas H, Harlaar J, et al. Freehand three-dimensional ultrasound to assess semitendinosus muscle morphology. J Anat. 2016; 229(4): 591–599, doi: 10.1111/joa.12501.
  • 19. Hioki S, Fukubayashi T, Ikeda K, et al. Effect of harvesting the hamstrings tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the morphology and movement of the hamstrings muscle: a novel MRI technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003; 11(4): 223–227, doi: 10.1007/s00167-003-0361-z, indexed in Pubmed: 12695879.
  • 20. Inagaki Y, Kondo E, Kitamura N, et al. Prospective clinical comparisons of semitendinosus versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sci. 2013; 18(5): 754–761, doi: 10.1007/s00776-013-0427-9, indexed in Pubmed: 23793303.
  • 21. Innes J. A short description of the human muscles. Collins & Co, New York 1818.
  • 22. Janssen RPA, van der Velden MJF, Pasmans HLM, et al. Regeneration of hamstring tendons after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 21(4): 898–905, doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2125-0, indexed in Pubmed: 22763570.
  • 23. Kellis E, Galanis N, Natsis K, et al. Muscle architecture variations along the human semitendinosus and biceps femoris (long head) length. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010; 20(6): 1237–1243, doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.07.012, indexed in Pubmed: 20727788.
  • 24. Kellis E, Galanis N, Natsis K, et al. Validity of architectural properties of the hamstring muscles: correlation of ultrasound findings with cadaveric dissection. J Biomech. 2009; 42(15): 2549–2554, doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.07.011, indexed in Pubmed: 19646698.
  • 25. Kitamura N, Ogawa M, Kondo E, et al. A novel medial collateral ligament reconstruction procedure using semitendinosus tendon autograft in patients with multiligamentous knee injuries: clinical outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41(6): 1274–1281, doi: 10.1177/0363546513485716, indexed in Pubmed: 23625060.
  • 26. Konrath J, Vertullo C, Kennedy B, et al. Hamstring morphology and strength remain altered 2 years following a hamstring graft in acl reconstruction. AP-SMART. 2016; 6: 52, doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2016.07.141.
  • 27. Kwapisz S, Szałaj T, Boszczyk A, et al. Reconstruction of subcutaneous chronic rupture of extensor hallucis longus tendon with semitendinosus autograft. Fuß & Sprunggelenk. 2017; 15(2): 120–125, doi: 10.1016/j.fuspru.2017.01.004.
  • 28. Lee JH, Kim KJ, Jeong YG, et al. Pes anserinus and anserine bursa: anatomical study. Anat Cell Biol. 2014; 47(2): 127–131, doi: 10.5115/acb.2014.47.2.127, indexed in Pubmed: 24987549.
  • 29. Limitlaohaphan C, Kijkunasatian C, Saitongdee P. Length of semitendinosus and gracilis tendons and the relationship of graft length and leg length. J Med Assoc Thai. 2009; 92 Suppl 6: S200–S203, indexed in Pubmed: 20120686.
  • 30. Mascarenhas R, Mcrae S, MacDonald PB. Semitendinosus allograft reconstruction of chronic biceps femoris rupture at the knee. J Knee Surg. 2009; 22(4): 381–384, doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247783, indexed in Pubmed: 19902741.
  • 31. Mikashima Y, Kimura M, Kobayashi Y, et al. Clinical results of isolated reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament for recurrent dislocation and subluxation of the patella, Acta Orthop Belg. 2006; 72: 65–71.
  • 32. Mochizuki T, Akita K, Muneta T, et al. Pes anserinus: Layered supportive structure on the medial side of the knee. Clin Anat. 2003; 17(1): 50–54, doi: 10.1002/ca.10142.
  • 33. Muellner T, Kumar S, Singla A. Proximal hamstring reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis autograft: a novel technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 25(1): 112–114, doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4366-9, indexed in Pubmed: 27826636.
  • 34. Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T, et al. A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double-bundle techniques. Arthroscopy. 2007; 23(6): 618–628, doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.04.010, indexed in Pubmed: 17560476.
  • 35. Murakami H, Soejima T, Inoue T, et al. Inducement of semitendinosus tendon regeneration to the pes anserinus after its harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a new inducer grafting technique. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2012; 4(1): 17, doi: 10.1186/1758-2555-4-17, indexed in Pubmed: 22607724.
  • 36. Nakamae A, Ochi M, Deie M, et al. Unsuccessful regeneration of the semitendinosus tendon harvested for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: report of two cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012; 98(8): 932–935, doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.07.011, indexed in Pubmed: 23123037.
  • 37. Nomura Y, Kuramochi R, Fukubayashi T. Evaluation of hamstring muscle strength and morphology after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015; 25(3): 301–307, doi: 10.1111/sms.12205, indexed in Pubmed: 24646218.
  • 38. Ostermeier S, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Wirth CJ, et al. [Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament by tunnel transfer of the semitendinosus tendon]. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2007; 19(5-6): 489–501, doi: 10.1007/s00064-007-1022-0, indexed in Pubmed: 18071933.
  • 39. Pham MH, Tuchman A, Smith L, et al. Semitendinosus Graft for Interspinous Ligament Reinforcement in Adult Spinal Deformity. Orthopedics. 2017; 40(1): e206–e210, doi: 10.3928/01477447-20161006-05, indexed in Pubmed: 27735976.
  • 40. Phillips BB, Cain EL, Dlabach JA, et al. Correlation of interference screw insertion torque with depth of placement in the tibial tunnel using a quadrupled semitendinosus-gracilis graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2004; 20(10): 1026–1029, doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.08.015, indexed in Pubmed: 15592230.
  • 41. Reboonlap N, Nakornchai C, Charakorn K. Correlation between the length of gracilis and semitendinosus tendon and physical parameters in Thai males. J Med Assoc Thai. 2012; 95 Suppl 10: S142–S146, indexed in Pubmed: 23451453.
  • 42. Reina N, Abbo O, Gomez-Brouchet A, et al. Anatomy of the bands of the hamstring tendon: how can we improve harvest quality? Knee. 2013; 20(2): 90–95, doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.06.003, indexed in Pubmed: 22766187.
  • 43. Sarzaeem MM, Lemraski MM, Safdari F. Chronic Achilles tendon rupture reconstruction using a free semitendinosus tendon graft transfer. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20(7): 1386–1391, doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1703-x, indexed in Pubmed: 22037808.
  • 44. Selim NM. Combined anterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner reconstruction by hamstring tendon autografts through a single femoral tunnel by graft-to-graft suspension and fixation. Arthrosc Tech. 2018; 7(5): e557–e567, doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2018.01.010, indexed in Pubmed: 29868435.
  • 45. Song B, Li C, Chen Na, et al. All-arthroscopic anatomical reconstruction of anterior talofibular ligament using semitendinosus autografts. Int Orthop. 2017; 41(5): 975–982, doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3410-9, indexed in Pubmed: 28233114.
  • 46. Stergios P, Georgios K, Konstantinos N, et al. Adequacy of semitendinosus tendon alone for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft and prediction of hamstring graft size by evaluating simple anthropometric parameters. Anat Res Int. 2012; 2012: 1–8, doi: 10.1155/2012/424158.
  • 47. Suydam SM, Cortes DH, Axe MJ, et al. Semitendinosus tendon for ACL reconstruction: regrowth and mechanical property recovery. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017; 5(6): 2325967117712944, doi: 10.1177/2325967117712944, indexed in Pubmed: 28680900.
  • 48. Tohyama H, Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, et al. Morphometry of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons with application to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993; 1(3-4): 143–147, doi: 10.1007/bf01560195, indexed in Pubmed: 8536018.
  • 49. Tuncay I, Kucuker H, Uzun I, et al. The fascial band from semitendinosus to gastrocnemius: the critical point of hamstring harvesting: an anatomical study of 23 cadavers. Acta Orthop. 2007; 78(3): 361–363, doi: 10.1080/17453670710013933, indexed in Pubmed: 17611850.
  • 50. van der Made AD, Wieldraaijer T, Kerkhoffs GM, et al. The hamstring muscle complex. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015; 23(7): 2115–2122, doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2744-0, indexed in Pubmed: 24190369.
  • 51. Vertullo C, Cadman J, Dabirrahmani D, et al. Biomechanical Comparison of Two ACL Reconstruction Methods: Semitendinosus and Gracilis Construct versus Quadrupled Semitendinosus and Tape Construct. AP-SMART. 2016; 6: 51–52, doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2016.07.140.
  • 52. Vesling J. Syntagma Anatomicum, Typis Pauli Frambotti bibliopolae, Padwa 1647.
  • 53. Wiley WB, Noble JS, Dulaney TD, et al. Late reconstruction of chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures with a semitendinosus autograft technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006; 15(4): 440–444, doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.08.018, indexed in Pubmed: 16831648.
  • 54. Woodley SJ, Mercer SR. Hamstring muscles: architecture and innervation. Cells Tissues Organs. 2005; 179(3): 125–141, doi: 10.1159/000085004, indexed in Pubmed: 15947463.
  • 55. Yasin MN, Charalambous CP, Mills SP, et al. Accessory bands of the hamstring tendons: A clinical anatomical study. Clin Anat. 2010; 23(7): 862–865, doi: 10.1002/ca.21020, indexed in Pubmed: 20607820.
  • 56. Yazdi H, Jahansouz A, Sanaie A, et al. Does triple semitendinosus autograft tendon have the same thickness as quadrupled semitendinosus and gracilis autograft tendons in ACL reconstruction? AP-SMART. 2016; 6: 41, doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2016.07.105.
  • 57. Zantop T, Strobel M. Rekonstruktion des hinteren Kreuzbands. Arthroskopie. 2017; 30(1): 14–19, doi: 10.1007/s00142-016-0116-8.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-3e966601-1964-4793-ba80-1a6d0817051c
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.