Wydajność aparatu asymilacyjnego sosny zwyczajnej (Pinus sylvestris L.) różnych klas wieku

• Autorzy: Turski M. , Beker C. , Jaszczak R.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Productivity of the assimilation apparatus of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in various age classes

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Productivity of the assimilating apparatus is commonly defined as an increment in volume, most typically of the stem or trunk, per unit of crown size. In this paper the productivity of the assimilating organ (CPtwn1) is calculated as a quotient of the average annual increment in stem volume from a 5−year period (i v1) and the volume of twigs with needles (twnv), determined by xylometry methods (fluid displacement method). The experimental material comprised measure− ments taken on 200 Scots pines (Pinus sylvestris L.) in 8 pure pine stands growing in western Poland (tab. 1). Using the calculated sizes of assimilating apparatus, their arithmetic means and coefficients of variation were calculated for each stand (tab. 2, 3). Additionally, mean crown productivity within each Kraft's class comprising the dominant trees (classes 1, 2 and 3) as well as in the dominated trees (classes 4 and 5) were determined. The strength of the relationship between CPtwn1 and diameter at breast height (d1.3), height (h) and volume of leaved twigs (twnv) was calculated (tab. 4). Moreover, a two−way analysis of variance was conducted to assess the statistical significance of the effect of age of the stand and biosocial class of tree position in the stand (within the dominant trees and the dominated trees) on productivity of the assimilating apparatus. Mean productivity of analysed Scots pine crowns takes the highest values in the youngest stand (0.60 m3), while the lowest – in the oldest stand (0.34 m3). In the youngest, 25−year old pine stand, mean productivity of the assimilating apparatus in trees forming the dominated trees is by 124% greater than that of trees forming the dominant trees. An opposite situation is found in the oldest, 93−year−old stand, where mean productivity of the dominant trees is over 1.5 greater than that recorded in the dominated trees. Statistically significant effect of the stand age on productivity of the assimilating apparatus was observed (tab. 5). However, affiliation of a tree to the dominant or dominated trees does not result in such an effect. On the other hand, there is an interaction between age of the stand and its affiliation to the Kraft's classes. This means that the affiliation of trees to the dominant trees or the dominated trees and its effect on mean productivity of the assimilating apparatus depend on the age of stand.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

lesnictwo; drzewostany sosnowe; klasy wieku; klasy Krafta; drzewa lesne; sosna zwyczajna; Pinus sylvestris; aparat asymilacyjny; wydajnosc aparatu asymilacyjnego

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Sylwan
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 159
• Numer: 01
• Opis fizyczny: s.36-44,rys.,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Turski M.

• Katedra Urządzania Lasu, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu, ul.Wojska Polskiego 71c, 60-625 Poznań

autor

Beker C.

• Katedra Urządzania Lasu, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu, ul.Wojska Polskiego 71c, 60-625 Poznań

autor

Jaszczak R.

• Katedra Urządzania Lasu, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu, ul.Wojska Polskiego 71c, 60-625 Poznań

Bibliografia

• Borowski M. 1966. Über den Zuwachs der sozialen Baumklassen in Kiefernbeständen. Archiv für Forstwesen 3: 233−241.
• Borowski M. 1974. Przyrost drzew i drzewostanów. PWRiL, Warszawa.
• Bronisz K., Bronisz A., Zasada M., Bijak S., Wojtan R., Tomusiak R., Dudek A., Michalak K., Wróblewski L.
• 2009. Biomasa aparatu asymilacyjnego w drzewostanach sosnowych zachodniej Polski. Sylwan 153 (11): 758−767.
• Burger H. 1939. Baumkrone und Zuwachs in zwei hiebsreifen Fichtenbeständen. Mitt. Schw. Anst. f.d. Forst. Versuchswesen 21: 147−176.
• Cohen J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
• Dengler A. 1937. Kronengröße, Nadelmenge und Zuwachsleistung von Altkiefern. Z. f. Forst− u. Jagdwesen 69: 321−336. Ladefoged K. 1946. DfFDanm 16: 365.
• Lemke J. 1968. Związek pomiędzy wielkością korony a przyrostem drzew w drzewostanach sosnowych. Pr. Kom. Nauk Roln. Kom. Nauk Leśn. PTPN 25: 1−48.
• Lemke J. 1974a. Ciężar igliwia, ulistnionych gałązek a przyrost miąższości strzały w drzewostanach sosnowych. Sylwan 118 (5): 10−20.
• Lemke J. 1974b. Wydajność igliwia sosny zwyczajnej w produkcji drewna strzały. Sylwan 118 (9): 33−38.
• Lemke J. 1979. Wielkość i wydajność aparatu asymilacyjnego sosny wejmutki w produkcji drewna strzały. Sylwan 123 (2): 21−31.
• Long J. N., Smith F. W. 1992. Volume increment in Pinus contorta var. latifolia: the influence of stand development and crown dynamics. Forest Ecology and Management 53: 53−64.
• Mayer R. 1958. Kronengröße und Zuwachsleistung der Traubeneiche auf süddeutschen Standorten. Allgemeine Forst− und Jagdzeitung 129: 105−114, 151−163, 191−201.
• Roberts S. D., Long J. N., Smith F. W. 1993. Canopy stratification and leaf area efficiency: a conceptualization. Forest Ecology and Management 60: 143−156.
• Rosenthal R. 1990. How are we doing in soft psychology? American Psychologist 45: 775−777.
• Schmidt H. 1953. Kronen− und Zuwachsuntersuchungen an Fichten des bayerischen Alpenvorlandes. Forstwissenschaftliches Zentralblatt Volume 72 (9/10): 276−286.
• Smith F. W., Long J. N. 1989. The influence of canopy structure on stemwood production and growth efficiency of Pinus contorta var. latifolia. Journal of Applied Ecology 26: 681−691.
• Smith F. W., Long J. N. 1992. Determinants of stemwood production in coniferous forests: a comparison of Pinus contorta var. latifolia and Abies lasiocarpa. W: Cannell M. G. R., Malcolm D. C., Robertson P. A. [red.]. The Ecology of Mixed−Species Stands of Trees. Special Publication Series of the British Ecological Society. Blackwell Science Publishing, Edinburgh. 87−98.
• Sterba H., Amateis R. L. 1998. Crown efficiency in a loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) spacing experiment. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28: 1344−1351.