PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2015 | 45 | 2 |
Tytuł artykułu

Risks to stocks of native trout of the genus Salmo (Actinopterygii: Salmoniformes: Salmonidae) of Serbia and management for their recovery

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Background. Insufficiently controlled stocking compromises the high diversity of wild trout stocks of Serbia. Native brown trout, Salmo cf. trutta Linnaeus, 1758, and Macedonian trout, Salmo macedonicus (Karaman, 1924), reveal remarkable diversity assessed using the mtDNA molecular markers, with the eight exclusive and several more widely spread haplotypes found in them. Four alien trout species and strains and one strain of Macedonian trout were introduced into the home areas of the native wild trout stocks in Serbia. In addition to them, wild trout stocks were also affected by farmed rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum, 1792), and brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis (Mitchill, 1815), that regularly escape to streams, and from Ohrid trout, Salmo letnica (Karaman, 1924), and Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus (Linnaeus, 1758), stocked into streams and reservoirs. Risk of invasiveness that wild trout stocks are exposed to and their restoration were driving forces for this study. Materials and Methods. Trout specimens from the Jerma River sampled in 2013 were additionally analysed for their mtDNA haplotype. The invasiveness potential of eleven alien trout species and strains introduced by stocking into wild brown- and Macedonian trout stocks in Serbia were assessed with the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK). Results. Five of introduced trout species and strains were classified as having a high risk (sensu lato) and two of them as having a high risk (sensu stricto) of being (or becoming) invasive. Conclusion. Progressively rising and insufficiently controlled fishing and management with stocking of non-indigenous trout in wild brown trout stocks are the main current threats to the original diversity. Alien brown trout strains cross breed with native brown trout and incorporate into their stocks. Currently, feral rainbow-, brook-, and Ohrid trout reveal great invasive potential by naturalization in waters heavily stocked with them. The fisheries measures aiming to control and/or to eradicate alien strains of brown trout involve the restriction of stocking, landing of trout suspected as of alien strain or species, as well as the stringent control of stocking material used for the restorative stocking. They are mandatory, regarding the conservational dependence of wild brown trout stocks.
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
-
Rocznik
Tom
45
Numer
2
Opis fizyczny
p.161-173,fig.,ref.
Twórcy
autor
  • Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
autor
  • Teacher Education Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
autor
  • Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
autor
  • Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
autor
  • Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Bibliografia
  • Anonymous 2003. National trout and grayling fisheries strategy. UK Environment Agency, Bristol.
  • Anonymous 2013. Yellowstone fishing regulations. Yellowstone National Park, USA.
  • Anonymous 2014a. Zakon o ribarstvu. [Fishery Act.] Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije 128: 6–18. [In Serbian.]
  • Anonymous 2014b. The IUCN red list of threatened species.Version 2014.1. Downloaded on 26 June 2014.http://www.iucnredlist.org
  • Bernatchez L. 2001. The evolutionary history of Brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) inferred from phylogeographic,nested clade, and mismatch analyses of mitochondria DNA variation. Evolution 55 (2): 351–379.DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01300.x
  • Bernatchez L., Guyomard R., Bonhomme F. 1992. DNA sequence variation of the mitochondrial control region among geographically and morphologically remote European brown trout Salmo trutta populations. Molecular Ecology 1 (3): 161–173.
  • Bewick V., Cheek L., Ball J. 2004. Statistics review 13: Receiver operating characteristic curves. Critical Care 8 (6): 508–512.DOI: 10.1186/cc3000
  • Britton J.R., Cucherousset J., Davies G.D., Godard M., Copp G.H. 2010. Non-native fishes and climate change: Predicting species responses to warming temperatures in a temperate region. Freshwater Biology 55 (5): 1130–1141.DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02396.x
  • Copp G.H., Garthwaite R., Gozlan R.E. 2005. Risk identifi cation and assessment of non-native freshwater fishes: Concepts and perspectives on protocols for the UK. Science Series Technical Reports No. 129.Cefas, Lowestoft, UK.
  • Copp G.H., Vilizzi L., Mumford J., Fenwick G.V., Godard M.J., Gozlan R.E. 2009. Calibration of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for nonnative freshwater fishes. Risk Analysis 29 (3): 457–467.DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01159.x
  • Coutant C.C. 1977. Compilation of temperature preferencje data. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 34 (5): 739–745.DOI: 10.1139/f77-115
  • Crandal K.A., Bininda-Edmonds O.R.P., Mace G.M.,Wayne R.K. 2000. Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15 (7): 290–295.DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01876-0
  • DeLong E.R., DeLong D.M., Clarke-Pearson D.L. 1988. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44 (3): 837–845.DOI: 10.2307/2531595
  • Duftner N., Weiss S., Medgyesy N., Sturmbauer C. 2003.Enhanced phylogeographic information about Austrian brown trout populations derived from complete mitochondria control region sequences. Journal of Fish Biology 62 (2): 427–435.DOI: 10.1046/j.1095-8649.2003.00038.x
  • Fausch K.D. 2007. Introduction, establishment and effects of non-native salmonids: Considering the risk of rainbow trout invasion in the United Kingdom. Journal of Fish Biology 71 (Suppl. D): 1–32.DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01682.x
  • Ferguson A. 2006. Genetic impacts of stocking on indigenous brown trout populations. Science Report SC040071/SR. UK Environmental Agency, Bristol.
  • Frazer D.J., Bernatchez L. 2001. Adaptive evolutionary conservation: Towards a unifi ed concept for defi ning conservation units. Molecular Ecology 10 (12): 2741–2752.DOI: 10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01411.x
  • Froese R., Pauly D. (eds.) 2014. FishBase. [version 06/2014] http://www.fi shbase.org
  • Frost W.E. 1974. A survey of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri)in Britain and Ireland. The Salmon and Trout Association, London, UK.
  • Giles N., Westgarth J., Hewlett N. 2004. Management advice for trout, grayling and Arctic char fi sheries. Fisheries Technical Manual No. 7. UK Environmental Agency,Bristol, UK.
  • Gowan C., Fausch K.D. 1996. Mobile brook trout in two high-elevation Colorado streams: Revaluating the concept of restricted movement. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53 (6): 1370–1381.DOI: 10.1139/f96-058
  • Hansen M.M. 2002. Estimating the long-term effects of stocking domesticated trout into wild brown trout (Salmo trutta) populations: An approach to using microsatellite DNA analysis of historical and contemporary samples. Molecular Ecology 11 (6): 1003–1015.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01495.x
  • Janković D., Raspopović M. 1960. Ohridska pastrmka (Salmo letnica typicus K.) pod promenjenim uslovima u Vlasinskom baražnom jezeru. [Lake Ohrid trout (Salmoletnica typicus K.) under the altered conditions In the Vlasina reservoir.] Arhiv bioloških nauka 12 (3–4): 117–122. [In Serbian.]
  • Kennedy B.M., Peterson D.P., Fausch K.D. 2003. Different life histories of brook trout populations invading mid-elevation and high-elevation cutthroat trout streams in Colorado. Western North American Naturalist 63 (2): 215–223.DOI: 10.3398/064.069.0116
  • Laikre L., Antunes A., Apostolidis A., Berrebi P., Duguid A., Ferguson A., Garcia-Marin H.L., Guyomard R., Hansen M.M., Hindar K., Koljonen M.-L.,Largiarder C., Martinez P., Nielsen E.E., Palm S.,Ruzzant D., Ryman N., Tryantaphyllidis C. 1999.Conservation genetic management of brown trout (Salmo trutta) in Europe. Report by the Concerted action on identifi cation, management and exploitation of genetic resources in the brown trout (Salmo trutta). (TROUTCONCERTEU FAIR CT97-3882).
  • Laikre L., Ryman N. 1996. Effects on intraspecifi c biodiversity from harvesting and enhancing natural populations.Ambio 25 (8): 504–509.
  • Lowe S., Browne M., Boudjelas S., Poorter M.D. 2004.100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species: A selection from the Global Invasive Species Database. Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) a specialist group of the Species Survival Commission (SSC) of the World Conservation Union (IUCN), World Conservation Union, Auckland, New Zealand .
  • Marić S., Hegediš A., Nikolić V., Simonović P. 2004. Conservation status of two eastern Balkan endemic fish species in Serbia and a proposal for their protection. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 56 (2): 213–222 .
  • Marić S., Nikolić V., Tošić A., Simonović P. 2012. Rekord of the brown trout Salmo trutta L., 1758 in the main riverbed of the Serbian part of the Danube River. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 28 (1): 135–137.DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2011.01881.x
  • Marić S., Snoj A., Nikolić V., Simonović P. 2006a. Genetic differentiation of trout (Salmo spp.) populations in Serbia ascertained using RFLP technique on PCR amplifi ed control region of mitochondrial DNA. Acta Veterinaria 56 (5–6): 423–430.DOI: 10.2298/AVB0606423 M
  • Marić S., Sušnik S., Simonović P., Snoj A. 2006b. Phylogeographic study of brown trout from Serbia, based on mitochondrial DNA control region analysis. Genetics,Selection, Evolution 38 (6): 411–430.DOI: 10.1051/gse:2006012
  • McMillan B. 2014. To save wild steelhead, get rid of hatcheries.Osprey 79 (1): 1–7.
  • Nehring R.B. 1993. Stream fi sheries investigations: Wild trout introductions. Federal Aid Final Report F-51-R.Colorado Division of Wildlife, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
  • Nehring R.B., Thompson K.G., Hebein S. 1998. Impacts of whirling disease on wild trout populations in Colorado. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 63: 82–94.
  • Perkins N.J., Schisterman E.F. 2006. The inconsistency of “optimal” cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve. American Journal of Epidemiology 163 (7): 670–675. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwj063
  • Peterson D.P., Fausch K.D. 2003. Upstream movement by nonnative brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) promotes invasion of native cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki) habitat. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 60 (12): 1502–1516. DOI: 10.1139/f03-128
  • Povž M., Gregori A. 2014. Tujerodne sladkovodne ribe v Sloveniji. [Alien freshwater fi shes in Slovenia.] Zavod Umbra, Ljubljana. [In Slovenian. ]
  • Razpet A., Marić S., Parapot T., Nikolić V., Simonović P.2007. Re-evaluation of Salmo data by Gridelli (1936)—description of stocking, hybridization and repopulation in the River Soča basin. Italian Journal of Zoology 74 (1): 63–70. DOI: 10.1080/11250000601090081
  • Richardson D.M., Pyšek P., Rejmánek M., Barbour M.G., Panetta F.D., West C.J. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: Concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distribution 6 (2): 93–107. DOI: 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00083. x
  • Ryman N., Utter F., Laikre L. 1995. Protection of intraspecific biodiversity of exploited fishes. Reviews In Fish Biology and Fisheries 5 (4): 417–446.DOI: 10.1007/BF01103814
  • Schisterman E., Perkins N.J., Liu A., Bondell H. 2005.Optimal cut-point and its corresponding Youden Index to discriminate individuals using pooled blood samples.Epidemiology 16 (1): 73–81.DOI: 10.1097/01.ede.0000147512.81966.ba
  • Simonović P., Marić S., Nikolić V. 2005. Morphological differentiation of salmonines (subfamily Salmoninae) with emphasis on trout Salmo spp. stocks in Serbia and adjacent regions. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 57: 341–362 .
  • Simonović P., Marić S., Nikolić V. 2007. Trout Salmo spp.complex in Serbia and adjacent regions of western Balkans: Reconstruction of evolutionary history from external morphology. Journal of Fish Biology 70 (Suppl.C): 359–380.DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01516.x
  • Simonović P., Mrdak D., Tošić A., Škraba D., Grujić S.,Nikolić V. 2014. Effects of stocking with brood fish to manage resident stream dwelling brown trout Salmo cf. trutta L. stock. Journal of Fisheries Sciences 8 (2): 139–152.DOI: 10.3153/jfscom.201418
  • Simonović P.D., Nikolić V.P. 2007. Density-dependence of growth characteristics and maturation in stream-dwelling resident brown trout, Salmo trutta, in Serbia. Fisheries Management and Ecology 14 (1): 1–6.DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2006.00517.x
  • Simonović P., Tošić A., Vassilev M., Apostolou A., Mrdak D., Ristovska M., Kostov V., Nikolić V., Škraba D., Vilizzi L., Copp G.H. 2013. Risk assessment of non-native fi shes in the Balkans region using FISK, the invasiveness screening tool for non-native freshwater fishes. Mediterranean Marine Science 14 (2): 369–376.DOI: 10.12681/mms.337
  • Taylor J., Lightfoot G. 2003. National trout and grayling fisheries strategy. Brown trout rearing and stocking In Europe and North America-policies and practices. Environmental Agency, HO-08/03-5K-BHMC-SP-WM094.
  • Templeton A.R. 1986. Coadaptation and outbreeding depression.Pp. 105–116. In: Soulé M.E. (ed). Conservation biology. The science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
  • Tošić A., Škraba D., Nikolić V., Mrdak D., Simonović P. 2014. New mitochondrial DNA haplotype of Brown trout Salmo trutta L. from Crni Timok drainage area In Serbia. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 14 (1): 37–42.DOI: 10.4194/1303-2712-v14_1_05
  • Vincent D. 1979. Madison River, the: What does the future hold? Montan a Outdoors 10 (4): 31–33.
  • Welcomme R.L. 1992. A history of international introductions of inland aquatic species. ICES Marine Science Symposium 194 (1): 3–14.
  • White R.J. 1989. We’re going wild: a 30-year transition from hatcheries to habitat. Trout Special Anniversary Series: 15–49.
  • Youden W.J. 1950. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 3 (1): 32–35.
  • DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32:: AID-CNCR2820030106>3.0.CO;2-3
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-35d6209e-51d9-4344-aa59-ddc149821967
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.