PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2013 | 35 | 02 |

Tytuł artykułu

The relations between drought susceptibility index based on grain yield (DSIGY) and key physiological seedling traits in maize and triticale genotypes

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The physiological reasons for the differences in sensitivity of C3 and C4 plant species to environmental stresses have not been thoroughly explained. In this study the effects of drought stress on the growth and selected physiological traits were examined in the seedlings of 13 single cross maize (C4 plant) hybrids and 11 spring triticale (C3 plant) breeding lines and varieties differing in drought sensitivity. For plants in the seedling stage the results demonstrated a genetic variation in dry matter accumulation of shoots and roots (DWS, DWR), number (N) and length (L) of particular components (seminal, seminal adventitious, nodal) of the root system, membrane injury by soil drought (LID), osmotic and high temperature stress (LIOS, LIHT), water potential (w), water loss (WL), grain germination in osmotic stress (FG, PI), and seedling survival (SS). Seedlings grown under moderate soil drought showed a decrease in dry matter of the top parts and roots and a decrease in the length of seminal, seminal adventitious and nodal roots in comparison to seedlings grown in control conditions. The observed harmful effects of drought stress were more distinct in drought sensitive genotypes. Used in this paper drought susceptibility indexes (DSIGY) were calculated in other experiment by determining the changes in grain yield (GY) under two soil moisture levels (irrigated and drought). The variation of DSIGY for maize ranges from 0.381 to 0.650 and for triticale from 0.354 to 0.578. The correlations between DSIGY and laboratory tests (LI, FG, SS) confirmed that they are good indicators of drought tolerance in plants. The highest values of genetic variation were observed in LI, DWS, SS and WL and the lowest in the measurements of w FG, PI, LS, LSA and LN. The correlation coefficients between LIOS and LIHT tests were, in most of the considered cases, statistically significant, which indicates that in maize and triticale the mechanisms of membrane injury caused by simulated drought or high temperature are physiologically similar. It can be concluded that an approach to the breeding of maize and triticale for drought tolerance using these tests can be implemented on the basis of separate selection for each trait or for all of them simultaneously. In that case, it would be necessary to determine the importance of the trait in relation to growth phase, drought timing and level, as well as its associations with morphological traits contributing to drought tolerance. The obtained values of the correlation coefficient between laboratory tests suggest that the same physiological traits may be applied as selection criteria in drought tolerance of maize and triticale genotypes.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

35

Numer

02

Opis fizyczny

p.549-565,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • The F. Go´rski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Niezapominajek 21, 30-239 Krako´w, Poland
  • The F. Go´rski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Niezapominajek 21, 30-239 Krako´w, Poland
autor
  • The F. Go´rski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Niezapominajek 21, 30-239 Krako´w, Poland
autor
  • The F. Go´rski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Niezapominajek 21, 30-239 Krako´w, Poland
autor
  • Department of Plant Physiology, Agricultural University, Podluzna 3, 30-239 Krako´w, Poland
autor
  • Institute of Biology, Pedagogical University, Podbrzezie 2, 30-054 Krako´w, Poland
autor
  • Institute of Machinery Exploitation, Agricultural University, Balicka 116 B, 31-149 Krako´w, Poland

Bibliografia

  • Ahmad S, Ahmad R, Ashraf MY, Ashraf M, Waraich EA (2009) Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) response to drought stress at germination and seedling growth stages. Pak J Bot 41:647–654
  • Asharaf M (2010) Inducing drought tolerance in plants: recent advances. Biotech Adv 28:199–238
  • Ashraf M, Mehmood S (1990) Response of four Brassica species to drought stress. Environ Exp Bot 30:93–100
  • Bandurska H, Stroin´ski A (2003) ABA and proline accumulation in leaves and roots of wild (Hordeum spontaneum) and cultivated (Hordeum vulgare Maresi) barley genotypes under water deficyt conditions. Acta Physiol Plant 25:55–61
  • Bennett JM (1990) Problems associated with the measuring plant water status. HortScience 25:1551–1554
  • Berkowitz GA, Chen C, Gibbs M (1983) Stromal acidification mediates in vivo water stress inhibition of nonstomatal controlled photosynthesis. Plant Physiol 72:1123–1126
  • Blum A (1988) Plant breeding for stress environments. CRC Press, Boca Raton
  • Blum A, Ebercon A (1981) Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci 21:43–47
  • Blum A, Sinmena B, Ziv O (1980) An evaluation of seed and seedling drought tolerance screening tests in wheat. Euphytica 29:727–736
  • Bouslama M, Schapauch WT (1984) Stress tolerance in soybean. I. Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Sci 24:933–937
  • Boyer JS (1982) Plant productivity and environment. Science 218:443–448
  • Bukhov NG, Sabat SC, Mohanty P (1990) Analysis of chorophyll a fluorescence changes in weak light in heat-treated Amaranthus chloroplasts. Photosyn Res 23:81–87
  • Chaves MM, Pereira JS, Maroco J, Rodrigues ML, Ricardo CPP, Osorio LM, Carvalho I, Faria T, Pinheiro C (2002) How plants cope with water stress in the field. Photosynthesis and growth. Ann Bot 89:907–916
  • Clarke JM, McCaig TN (1982) Evaluation of techniques for screening for drought resistance in wheat. Crop Sci 22:503–506
  • Cornic G, Masacci A (1996) Leaf photosynthesis under drought stress. In: Baker NR (ed) Photosynthesis and the environment. Kluwer Academic Publication, Dordrecht, pp 347–366
  • Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (1986) Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome
  • Doorenbos J, Pruit WO (1977) Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome Dubey RS (1997) Photosynthesis in plants under stressful conditions. In: Pessarakli M (ed) Handbook of Photosynthesis, University of Arizona, Tuscon. Arizona. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 859–875
  • Edwards GE, Ku MSB (1987) Biochemistry of C3–C4 intermediates. In: Hatch MD, Boardman NK (eds) The Biochemistry of plants, a comprehensive treatise, vol 10. Photosynthesis. Academic Press, New York, pp 275–324
  • Evans RO, Skagss RW, Sneed RE (1990) Normalized crop susceptibility factors for corn and soybean to excess water stress. Trans ASAE 33:1153–1161
  • Evans RO, Skagss RW, Sneed RE (1991) Stress day index models to predict corn and soybean relative yield under high water table conditions. Trans ASAE 5:1997–2005
  • Fageria NK, Balingar VC, Clark RB (2006) Physiology of crop production. The Haworth Press Inc., New York, pp 23–60
  • Farquhar GD, Wong SC, Evans JR, Hubiek KT (1993) Photosynthesis and gas exchange. In: Jones HG, Flowers TJ, Jones MB (eds) Plants under stress. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 47–70
  • Fischer RA, Maurer R (1978) Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I Grain yield responses. Aus J Agric Res 29:897–912
  • Flexas J, Bota J, Galme0s J, Medrano H, Ribas-Carbo0 M (2006) Keeping a positive carbon balance under adverse conditions: responses of photosynthesis and respiration to water stress. Physiol Plant 127:343–352
  • Gerik TJ, Eastin JD (1985) Temperature effects on dark respiration among diverse sorghum genotypes. Crop Sci 25:957–961
  • Gomez F, Oliva MA, Mielke MS, de Almeida AAF, Leita HG, Aquino LA (2008) Photosynthetic limitations in leaves of young Brazilian Green Dwarf coconut (Cocos macifera L.) ‘‘nana’’ palm under well-watered conditions or recovering from drought stress. Environ Exp Bot 62:195–204
  • Grzesiak S (1990) Reaction to drought of inbreds and hybrids of maize (Zea mays L.) as evaluated in field and greenhouse experiments. Maydica 35:303–331
  • Grzesiak MT, Grzesiak S, Skoczowski A (2006) Changes of leaf water potential and gas exchange during and after drought in triticale and maize genotypes differing in drought tolerance. Photosyntetica 44:561–568
  • Grzesiak MT, Marcin´ska I, Janowiak F, Rzepka A, Hura T (2012) The relationship between seedling growth and grain yield under drought conditions in maize and triticale genotypes. Acta Physiol Plantarum. doi:10.1007/s11738-012-0973-3
  • Hanson AD, Nelson ChE (1985) Water adaptation of crop to drought. In: Carlson PS (ed) The biology of crop productivity. Academic Press, New York, pp 79–149
  • Haupt-Herting S, Fock HP (2002) Oxygen exchange in relation to carbon assimilation in water-stressed leaves during photosynthesis. Ann Bot 89:851–859
  • Hillel D, Van Bavel CHM (1976) Simulation of profile water storage as related to soil hydraulic properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 40:s807–s815
  • Hura T, Hura K, Grzesiak MT, Rzepka A (2007) Effect of long-term drought stress on leaf gas exchange and fluorescence parameters in C3 and C4 plants. Acta Physiol Plantarum 29:103–113
  • Iijima M, Kono Y (1991) Interspecific differences of the root system structures of four cereal species as affected by soil compaction. Jpn J Crop Sci 60:130–138
  • Jajarmini V (2009) Effects of water stresson germination indices in seven wheat cultivar. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 45:105–106
  • Johnson DA, Brown RW (1977) Psychrometric analysis of turgor pressure response; a possible technique for evaluating plant water stress resistance. Crop Sci 17:507–510
  • Jones HG (1993) Drought tolerance and water-use efficiency. In: Smith JAC, Griffiths H (eds) Water deficits plant responses from cell to community. Bios Scientific Publishers Limited, Oxford, pp 193–204
  • King J (2011) Reaching for the sun. How plant work. Part IV Stress, defense, and decline, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 185–244
  • Kono Y, Yamauchi A, Nonoyama T, Tatsumi T, Kawamura N (1987) A revised system of root-soil interaction for laboratory work. Environ Conltrol Biol 25:141–151
  • Kpoghomou BK, Sapra VT, Beyl CA (1990) Screening for drought tolerance: soybean germination and its relationship to seedling response. J Agron Crop Sci 164:153–159
  • Larsson S, Go´rny AG (1988) Grain yield and drought resistance indices of oat cultivars in field rain shelter and laboratory experiments. J Agron Crop Sci 161:277–286
  • Lawlor DW, Cornic G (2002) Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plant Cell Environ 25:275–294
  • Levitt J (1980) Response of plants to environmental stresses. Academic Press, New York
  • Lipiec J, Ishioka T, Szustak A, Pietrusiewicz J, Ste˛pniewski W (1996) Effects of soil compaction and transient oxygen deficiency on growth, water use and stomatal resistance in maize. Acta Agric Scand Sect Soil Plant Sci 46:186–191
  • Lopes MS, Araus JL, van Heerden PDR, Foyer CH (2011) Enhancing drought tolerance in C4 crops. J Exp Bot 62:3135–3153
  • Lorens GF, Bennett JM, Loggale LB (1987) Differences in drought resistance between two corn hybrids. I. Water relations and root length density. Agron J 79:802–807
  • Martinielio P, Lorenzoni C (1985) Response of maize genotypes to drought tolerance tests. Maydica 30:361–370
  • Medrano H, Escalona JM, Bota J, Gulias J, Flexas J (2002) Regulation of photosynthesis of C3 plants in response to progressive drought: stomatal conductance as a reference parameter. Ann Bot 89: 895–905
  • Michel BE, Wiggins KO, Outlow WHJ (1983) A guide to establishing water potential for aqueous two-phase solutions (Polyethylene glycol plus dextran) by amendment with mannitol. Plant Physiol 72:60–65
  • Morgan JM (1992) Osmotic components and properties associated with genotypic differences in osmoregulation in wheat. Aust J Plant Physiol 19:67–76
  • Muller JE, Whitsitt MS (1996) Plant cellular response to water deficit. Plant Growth Regul 20:41–46
  • Naylor RES, Su J (1998) Plant development of triticale cv. Lasko at different sowing date. J Agric Sci 130:297–306
  • Nayyar H, Gupta D (2006) Differential sensitivity of C3 and C4 plants to water deficit stress: association with oxidative stress and antioxidants. Environ Exp Bot 58:106–113
  • Paknejad F, Nasri M, Moghadam HRT, Zahedi H, Alahmadi MF (2007) Effects of drought stress on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, chlorophyll content and grain yield of wheat cultivars. J Biol Sci 7:841–847
  • Palta JP (1990) Stress interactions at the cellular and membrane level. Hort. Sci. 25:1337–1381
  • Passioura JB, Condon AG, Richards RA (1993) Water deficits, the development of leaf area and crop productivity. In: Smith JAC, Griffiths H (eds) Water deficits plant responses from cell to community. BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd, Oxford, pp 253–264
  • Poljakoff-Mayber A (1981) Ultrastructural consequences of drought. In: Paleg LG, Aspinall D (eds) The physiology and biochemistry of drought resistance in plants. Academic Press, New York, pp 389–403
  • Reynolds MP (2002) Physiological approaches to wheat breeding. In: Curtis BC, Rajaram S, Gomez Macpherson H (Eds) Bread wheat: improvement and production. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. pp118–140
  • Reynolds MP, Singh RP, Ibrahim A, Agech OAA, Larque-Saavedra A, Quick JS (1998) Evaluation physiological traits to complement empirical selection for wheat in warm environments. Euphytica 100:84–95
  • Richards RA (1978) Variation between and within species of rapeseed (Brassica campestris and B. napus) in response to drought stress. III. Physiological and physicochemical characters. Aust J Agric Res 29:495–501
  • Richards RA (1991) Crop improvement for temperate Australia: future opportunities. Field Crop Res 39:141–169
  • Richards RA (1996) Defining selection criteria to improve yield under drought. Plant Grow Regul 20:157–166
  • Richards RA, Thurling N (1978) Variation between and within species of rapeseed (Brasica campestris and B. napus) in response to drought stress. I. Sensitivity at different stages of development. Aust J Agric Res 29:469–477
  • Royo C, Abaza M, Bianco R, del Moral LFG (2000) Triticale grain growth and morphometry as affected by drought stress, late sowing and simulated drought stress. Aust J Physiol 27:1051–1059
  • Smirnoff N, Colombe SV (1988) Drought influences the activity of enzymes of the chloroplast hydrogen peroxide scavenging system. J Exp Bot 39:1097–1108
  • Stanley CD (1990) Proper use and data interpretation for plant- and soil water status measuring instrumentation: introductory remarks. HortScience 25:1534
  • Sullivan ChY, Ross WN (1979) Selecting for drought and heat resistance in grain sorghum. In: Mussel H, Staples R (eds) Stress physiology in crop plant. Wiley, New York, pp 263–281
  • Tang AC, Kawamitsu Y, Kanechi M, Boyer JS (2002) Photosynthetic oxygen evolution at low water potential in leaf discs lacking an epidermis. Ann Bot 89:861–870
  • Tardieu F (1991) Spatial arrangement of maize roots in the field. In: McMichael BL, Person H (eds) Plant roots and their environment. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 506–514
  • Turner NC (1986) Adaptation to water deficits: a changing perspective. Aust J Plant Physiol 13:175–190
  • Vietor DM, Ariyanayagam RP, Musgrave RB (1977) Photosynthetic selection of Zea mays L. I. Plant age and leaf position effects and relationship between leaf and canopy rates. Crop Sci 17:567–573
  • Williams MH, Rosenqvist E, Buchhave M (1999) Response of potted miniature roses (Rosaxhybrida) to reduced water availability during production. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 74:301–308
  • Winter SR, Musick JT, Porter KB (1988) Evaluation of screening techniques for breeding drought resistant winter wheat. Crop Sci 28:512–516
  • Zagdańska B (1992) Physiological criteria for estimation of plant resistance to drought. Biul Inst Hod i Aklimatyzacji Ros´lin 183:11–19 (In Polish)

Uwagi

rekord w opracowaniu

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-3479d5de-195d-48bb-98b0-3c3fee12b2cf
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.