Neuroimaging and clinical anatomy in veterinary medicine

• Autorzy: Purzyc H. , Walecki J. , Komosa M.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Neuroobrazowanie i anatomia kliniczna w medycynie weterynaryjnej

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Modern imaging techniques, such as computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MRI) are among the basic diagnostic methods for various afflictions in human medicine. Recently, these methods have become of great interest in veterinary medicine. Despite the high cost associated with the purchase of such diagnostic equipment, their pres­ence is increasingly visible in veterinary clinics, and this is particularly true for computer tomography. Magnetic resonance is a more sensitive diagnostic method, although its pur­chase is associated with higher expenditure than in the case of CT. At present, veterinary practitioners are increasingly more frequently entering into cooperation with centres of medical science or private clinics, for the benefit of the patient, which possess MRI. The basis for correct reading of the image and interpretation of results is faultless knowl­edge of clinical anatomy and topography of individual structures in the central nervous system. Furthermore, thanks to this knowledge, it is possible to investigate anatomical vari­ance.

PL

Nowoczesne techniki obrazowania, takie jak tomografia komputerowa (TK) lub rezonans magnetyczny (MRI) są jednymi z podstawowych metod diagnostyc­znych w różnych dolegliwościach w medycynie. Współcześnie metody te cieszą się dużym zainteresowaniem w medycynie weterynaryjnej. Mimo wysokich kosztów związanych z zakupem tego typu urządzeń diagnostycznych, są coraz częściej obecne w lecznicach zwierząt, zwłaszcza tomografia komputerowa. Rezonans magnetyczny jest czulszą metodą diagnostyczną, choć jego zakup wiąże się z wyższymi wydatkami niż w przypadku CT. Obecnie lekarze weterynarii, z korzyścią dla pacjenta, coraz częściej nawiązują współpracę z ośrodkami nauk medycznych oraz prywatnymi klinikami, które posiadają MRI. Podstawą prawidłowego odczytu obrazu i interpretacji wyników jest bezbłędna znajomość anatomii klinicznej i topografii poszczególnych struktur centralnego układu nerwowego. Ponadto, dzięki tej wiedzy, możliwe jest badanie anatomicznych zmienności.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Medicina Veterinaria
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 10
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.23-27,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Purzyc H.

• Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Walecki J.

• Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

autor

Komosa M.

• Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland

Bibliografia

• Arencibia A., Vazquez J.M., Ramirez J.A., Ramirez G., Villar J.M., Rivero M.A., Alayon S., Gil F., 2001. Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal equine brain. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound, 5, 405-408.
• Couturier L., Degueurce C., Ruel Y., Dennis R., Begon D., 2005. Anatomical study of cranial nerve emergence and skull foramina in the dog using magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound, 46, 375-383.
• D'Arceuil H., de Crespigny A., 2007. The effects of brain tissue decomposition on diffusion tensor imaging and tractography. Neuroimage, 36, 64-68.
• D'Arceuil H., Liu C., Levitt P., Thompson B., Kosofsky B., de Crespigny A., 2008. Threedimen- sional high-resolution diffusion tensor imaging and tractography of the developing rabbit brain. Dev. Neurosci., 30, 262-275.
• Dvir E., Kirberger M., Terblanche A.G., 2000. Magnetic resonance imaging of otitis media in a dog. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound, 41, 46-49.
• Hermier M., Leal P.R., Salaris S.F., Froment J.C., Sindou M., 2009. Imaging anatomy of cranial nerves. Neurochirurgie, 55, 162-173.
• Forrest L.J., 1999. The head: Excluding the brain and orbit. Clin. Tech. Small. An. P., 14, 170-176.
• Grahn B.H., Stewart W.A., Towner R.A., Noseworthy M.D., 1993. Magnetic resonance imaging of the canine and feline eye, orbit, and optic nerves and its clinical application. Can. Vet. J., 34, 148-424.
• Gross B., Garcia-Tapia D., Riedesel E., Ellinwood N.M., Jens J.K., 2010. Normal canine brain maturation at magnetic resonance imaging. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound, 51, 361-373.
• Guilfoyle D.N., Helpern J.A., Lim K.O., 2003. Diffusion tensor imaging in fixed brain tissue at 7.0 T. NMR Biomed., 16, 77-81.
• Hudson L.C., Cauzinille L., Kornegay J.N., 1995. Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal feline brain. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound, 37, 267-275.
• Kraft S.L., Gavin P.R., Wendling L.R., Reddy V.K., 1989. Canine brain anatomy on magnetic reso­nance images. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound, 30, 147-158.
• Mafee M.F., Inoue Y., Mafee R.F., 1996. Ocular and orbital imaging. Neuroimag. Clin. N. Am., 6, 291-318.
• Marino L., Sudheimer K.D., Murphy T.L., Davis K.K., Pabst D.A., McLellan W.A., Rilling J.K., Johnson J.I., 2001. Anatomy and three-dimensional reconstructions of the brain of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) from magnetic resonance images. Anat. Rec., 264, 397-414.
• Mori S., Itoh R., Zhang J., Kaufmann W.E., van Zijl P.C., Solaiyappan M., Yarowsky P., 2001. Dif­fusion tensor imaging of the developingmouse brain. Magn. Reson. Med., 46, 18-23.
• Munasinghe J.P., Gresham G.A., Carpenter T.A., Hall L.D., 1995. Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal mouse brain: Comparison with histologic sections. Lab. Anim. Sci. 45, 674-679.
• Leigh E., Mackillop E., Robertson I.D., Hudson L.C., 2008. Clinical anatomy of the canine brain using magnetic resonance imaging. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound, 49, 113-121.
• Oelschlager H.A., Haas-Rioth M., Fung C., Ridgway S.H., Knauth M., 2008. Morphology and evolutionary biology of the dolphin (Delphinus sp.) brain-MR imaging and conventional histology. Brain Behav. Evol., 71, 68-86.
• Sager M., Assheuer J., Trümmler H., Moormann K., 2009. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of intra- and extracrnial vessels in dogs. Vet. J., 179, 92-100.
• Schores A., 1993. Magnetic resonance imaging. Vet. Clin. North. Am. Small Anim. Pract., 23, 437-459.
• Shimony J.S., McKinstry R.C., Akbudak E., Aronovitz J.A., Snyder A.Z., Lori N.F., Cull T.S., Con­turo T.E. 1999. Quantitative diffusion-tensor anisotropy brain MR imaging: normative human data and anatomic analysis. Radiology, 212, 770-784.
• Schmidth M.J., Langen N., Klumpp S., Nasirimanesh F., Shirvanchi P., Ondreka N., Kramer M., 2011. A study of the comparative anatomy of brain of domestic ruminants using magnetic reso­nance imaging. Vet. J. Article in Press. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.12.026.
• Schmidth M., Pilatus U., Wigger A., Kramer M., Oelschlager H.A., 2009. Neuroanatomy of the calf brain as revealed by high-resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J. Morphol., 270, 745-758.
• Stewart W.A., Parent J.M-L., Towner R.A., Dobson H., 1992. The use of magnetic resonance imag­ing in the diagnosis of neurological disease. Can. Vet., 33, 585-590.
• Su M-Y., Head E., Brooks W.M., Wang Z., Muggenburg B.A., Adam G.E., Stutherland R., Cotman C.W., Nalcioglu O., 1998. Magnetic resonance imaging of anatomic and vascular characteris­tics in canine model of human aging. Neurobiol. Aging. 19, 479-485.
• Su M-Y., Tapp P.D., Vu L., Chen Y-F., Chu Y., Muggenburg B., Chiou J-Y., Chen C., Wang J., Bracco C., Head E., 2005. A longitudinal study of brain morphometrics using serial magnetic resonance imaging analysis in a canine model of aging. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry, 29, 389-397.
• Tucker R.L., Gavin P.R., 1996. Brain imaging. Vet. Clin. North. Am. Small Anim. Pract., 26, 735-58.
• Verma R., Mori S., Shen D., Yarowsky P., Zhang J., Davatzikos C., 2005. Spatiotemporal matura­tion patterns of murine brain quantified by diffusion tensor MRI and deformation-based morphometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 102, 6978-6983.
• Widjaja E., Wei X., Vidarsson L., Moineddin R., Macgowan C.K., Nilsson D., 2009. Alterations of diffusion tensor parameters in postmortem brain. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 27, 865-870.
• Wilms G., Bosmans H., Demaerel Ph., Marchal G., 2001. Magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial vessels. Eur. J. Radiol., 38, 10-18.

Uwagi

PL