Evolutionary aesthetics as a meeting point of philosophy and biology

• Autorzy: Chmielewski A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Metaphysics, or the knowledge of what there is, has been traditionally placed at the pinnacle of philosophical hierarchy. It was followed by theory of knowledge, or epistemology. Practical knowledge of proper modes of conduct, ethics, came third, followed by aesthetics, treated usually in a marginal way as having to do only with the perception of the beautiful. The hierarchy of philosophical disciplines has recently undergone a substantial transformation. As a result, ethics has assumed a central role. The aim of this paper is to suggest that the hierarchy of philosophical disciplines is not yet complete and that one further step needs to be taken. According to the claim advocated here, it is not metaphysics, epistemology or ethics, but aesthetics that is the first and foremost of all philosophical disciplines. This claim is argued for by references to findings of evolutionary aesthetics, especially to Charles Darwin's idea of sexual selection as elaborated in The Descent of Man. I also argue that Darwinian approach to morality is, and should be, derivable from an Darwinian aesthetics which lies at the core of his conception of sexual selection.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

evolutionary aesthetics; philosophy; biology; beauty; morality; sexual selection

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 81
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.67-73,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Chmielewski A.

• Institute of Philosophy, University of Wroclaw, Koszarowa 3/20, 51-149 Wrocław, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1.Darwin C. On the origin of the species by means of natural selection: or, The preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray; 1859.
• 2.Five questions for Francisco Ayala on Charles Darwin and his legacy [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2009 May 11]; Avail­able from: http://www.britannica.com/blogs/20 09/02/ an-interview-with-francisco-ayala-evolutionary-biologist-britannica-contributor-on-charles-darwin-his-legacy
• 3.Lovelock J. Gaia: the practical science of planetary medi­cine. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
• 4.Lovelock J. The revenge of Gaia Earth's climate in crisis and the fate of humanity. New York: Basic Books; 2006.
• 5.MacIntyre AC. Dependent rational animals: why human beings need the virtues. Chicago IL: Open Court; 1999.
• 6.Rorty R. Hilary Putnam and the relativist menace. In: Rorty R, editor. Truth and moral progress: philosophical papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. p. 48. (vol 3).
• 7.Chmielewski A. The gaze and touch in the public space. toward the political aesthetics. In: Wrocław Non Stop: Urban Space. Wrocław: Galeria Design; 2008. p. 84-92.
• 8.More J, Desmond A. Introduction. In: Darwin C, editor. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Lon­don: Penguin Books; 2004. p. xlvii-xlviii.
• 9.Darwin C. The descent of man. London: Penguin Books; 2004.
• 10.Desmond AJ, Moore JR. Darwin. New York: Warner Books; 1991.
• 11.Huxley T. Evolution and ethics [Internet]. London: Mac­millan; 1894 [cited 2009 May 10]. Available from: http:// manybooks.net/titles/huxleythetext01thx2010.html
• 12.Ridley M. The origins of virtue. London: Viking; 1996.
• 13.Ridley M. The red queen: sex and the evolution of human nature. London: Viking; 1993.
• 14.Baker R. Sperm wars. London: Fourth Estate; 1996.
• 15.Flack JC, de Waal FBM. “Any animal whatever”: Darwin­ian building blocks of morality in monkeys and apes. In: Katz LD, editor. Evolutionary origins of morality. Imprint Academic; 2000. p. 1-29.
• 16.Michod RE. Eros and evolution. Reading MA: Addison- Wesley; 1995.
• 17.Knight C. The bloodiest revolution. Tikkun. 1992;7(3):45.
• 18.Knight C. Blood relations: menstruation and the origins of culture. Yale: Yale University Press; 1991.
• 19.Aristotle. Metaphysics. p. 980a.
• 20.Freud S. Writings on art and literature. Stanford CA: Stan­ford University Press; 1997.
• 21.Fromm E. The heart of man, its genius for good and evil. New York: Harper & Row; 1964. (Religious perspectives; vol 12).
• 22.Wilson EO. Biophilia. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press; 1984.
• 23.Kellert SR, Wilson EO, editors. The biophilia hypothesis. Washington: Island Press; 1995.
• 24.Smets G. Aesthetic judgment and arousal an experimental contribution to psycho-aesthetics. Leuven: University Press; 1973.
• 25.Wilson EO. Consilience: the unity of knowledge. New York: Knopf; 1998.
• 26.Voland E, Grammer K, editors. Evolutionary aesthetics. Berlin: Springer; 2003.
• 27.Dutton D. The art instinct. New York: Bloomsbury Press; 2009.
• 28.MacIntyre AC. After virtue a study in moral theory. Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press; 1984.
• 29.Hrdy S. The woman that never evolved. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press; 1981.
• 30.Schönborn C. Finding design in nature. The New York Times. 2005;
• 31.Coyne JA. Seeing and believing. The never-ending attempt to reconcile science and religion, and why it is doomed to fail. The New Republic. 2009;
• 32.Popper KR. Unended quest: an intellectual autobiography. London: Routledge; 2002.
• 33.Popper KR. Objective knowledge: an evolutionary ap­proach. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1979.
• 34.Darwin C. The origin of species by means of natural selec­tion: or, The preservation of favored races in the struggle for life. New York: Gramercy Books; 1979.